¥éËV1,V2,V3,V4,V5,V7,V8,V9,V10,Project,random,Cond,Browser_1_TEXT,Browser_3_TEXT,Browser_4_TEXT,Browser_5_TEXT,Browser_6_TEXT,Browser_7_TEXT,T.ID_1,T.ID_2,T.ID_3,T.ID_4,TestVid,Elephant,Num,T.DemQ_1,T.DemQ_2,T.DemQ_3,T.DemQ_4,Sex,Age,Hispan,Race,Educ,Income,Q1,Q2_1,Q2_2,Q2_3,Q2_4,Q3,Q4_1,Q4_2,Q4_3,Q4_4,Q5,Q6_1,Q6_2,Q6_3,Q6_4,Q7,Q8_1,Q8_2,Q8_3,Q8_4,Q9,Q10_1,Q10_2,Q10_3,Q10_4,Q11,Q11.5,Q11.6_1,Q11.6_2,Q11.6_3,Q11.6_4,Q11.7,Q11.8_1,Q11.8_2,Q11.8_3,Q11.8_4,Q12,Q13_1,Q13_2,Q13_3,Q13_4,Q14,Q15_1,Q15_2,Q15_3,Q15_4,Q16,Q17_1,Q17_2,Q17_3,Q17_4,Q18_1,Q18_2,Q18_3,Q18_4,Q18_5,Q18_6,Q18_7,Q18_8,Q18_9,Q18_10,Q18_11,Q18_11_TEXT,Q19_1,Q19_2,Q19_3,Q19_4,Q20,Q21_1,Q21_2,Q21_3,Q21_4,Q22_1,Q22_2,Q22_3,Q22_4,Q22_5,Q22_6,Q22_7,Q22_8,Q22_9,Q22_10,Q22_11,Q22_11_TEXT,Q23_1,Q23_2,Q23_3,Q23_4,Q24,Q25_1,Q25_2,Q25_3,Q25_4,Q26,Q27,Q28,Q29,Q30_1,Q30_2,Q30_3,Q30_4,Problems,Comments,T.Deb_1,T.Deb_2,T.Deb_3,T.Deb_4,LocationLatitude,LocationLongitude,LocationAccuracy ResponseID,ResponseSet,Name,ExternalDataReference,EmailAddress,Status,StartDate,EndDate,Finished,Project,random,Cond,Browser Meta Info-Browser,Browser Meta Info-Operating System,Browser Meta Info-Screen Resolution,Browser Meta Info-Flash Version,Browser Meta Info-Java Support,Browser Meta Info-User Agent,Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,"Before you begin the actual study, please watch the following 5-second video and answer the two ques...",What word did you see?,What number did you hear?,Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,What is your sex?,What year were you born?,Are you Spanish/Hispanic/Latino?,Which of the following best describes / your ethnicity?,What is the highest degree or level of school you have completed?,Which of the following best describes your total household income?,Please click to play video,Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,Please click to play video,Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,Please click to play video,Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,Please click to play video,Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,Please respond to the / following questions regarding the trial you just watched.,Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,"Based on the evidence and the instructions provided by the judge, has the prosecutor proved, beyond...","Why did you reach that verdict? (50 character minimum, please). ",Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,"Do you agree or disagree with the following question: ""I understand the Judgeäó»s instructions.""",Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,How many witnesses were called to testify in the present case?,Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,How confident are you in your verdict?,Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,Do you agree or disagree that Barbara Dunnäó»s eyewitness testimony was influential in your verdict de...,Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-There were 8 photos in the lineup.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-Other (please explain),Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-Other (please explain)-TEXT,Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,How fair was the lineup that the officer conducted in the present case?,Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-There were 5 photos in the lineup.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-Other (please explain),Select from below the factors that influenced your final verdict / decision. Indicate all that may app...-Other (please explain)-TEXT,Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,How fair was the lineup that the officer conducted in the present case?,Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,Have you ever served on jury duty?,Have you ever witnessed a crime?,Have you ever been the victim of a crime?,How knowledgeable were you about eyewitness testimony before you participated in this study?,Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,"Did you encounter any computer or other problems while taking this survey? If so, please explain. (O...","If you have any additional thoughts or comments about this survey, please share them here. (Optional...",Timing-First Click,Timing-Last Click,Timing-Page Submit,Timing-Click Count,LocationLatitude,LocationLongitude,LocationAccuracy R_eK91PHQpy7tve7P,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 16:17,3/12/13 16:30,1,Pap,569827,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1050x1680,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/24.0.1312.56 Safari/537.17",1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Male,1924,"Yes, Puerto Rican",American Indian or Alaskan Native,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$50,000 to $59,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cXSF5xixpUtIFhz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:08,3/12/13 18:47,1,Pap,455123,RIweak,Firefox, Ubuntu,1280x800,11.2.202,1,Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Male,1963,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The fact that three weeks had passed before the line up had occured, and the witness could be wrong. I felt that the lineup was coached a little and the witness was encouraged to remember blonde hair , and although the winess was asked if she was certain she was told she had identified the right man. This gave her a false or inflated sence of certainty at trial.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bf73DMK7ZNghGT3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:08,3/12/13 18:56,1,Pap,574014,NJweak,Chrome,Macintosh,1680x1050,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Male,1974,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Doctorate degree (e.g., PhD, EdD)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The line-up procedure was flawed. The main witness was hesitating at some point.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9nMNSiu7KUg86lD,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:07,3/12/13 18:59,1,Pap,850029,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.3.300,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Male,1967,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I didn't need the long speech by the judge...The only evidence shown was one eyewitness testimony. I would shure think there would be a video camera in that store that would have presented better evidence. Also, the witness was led to the identification by the police in that they only gave 5 pics to her when the minimum stated by the judge is 6 minimum...",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,"Juries have to remember that cops and prosecutors are going for a conviction...It is known that sometimes these people will put up unreliable evidence and coerce testimony from people...There was just no enough evidence to convict, and possibly the way the witness was handled that the case could be thrown out!...",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6LjvQ02AJIQBaW9,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:19,3/12/13 19:06,1,Pap,167229,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,2560x1440,11.5.502,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Male,1966,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","1. The sole evidence against the defendant was a single eyewitness. There was no murder weapon recovered, no physical evidence that put the defendant at the scene. / / 2. The eyewitness was not reliable to me. She stated that she was at the back of the store, looking at the murderer's face. I had great difficulty understanding a store layout in which a person facing the clerk can also have his face clearly observed for what the eyewitness said was ""2 minutes"". I believed clearly that she mostly saw the back of his head, perhaps the side of his face here and there. She was also hiding behind a bread rack, which tells me she was not engaged in constant observation, and that likely any time the murderer would move his head, she would likely duck into full cover and not see anything. / / 3. The police officer in taking a description of the murderer suggested hair color as noted by the eyewitness. I felt it possible that other parts of the description could be suggested to the witness. / / 4. The length of time between the crime and the lineup was too long. / / 5. The eyewitness was able to throw one picture out of the lineup automatically, which suggests the police officer was pushing a suspect at her; she may have viewed five photos, but if one is obviously not right (as stated by the eyewitness), then she's really only looking at four people, any one of whom so identified could have been charged in this case apparently. / / 6. The timeline didn't make sense to me. I couldn't see how the defendant could leave his girlfriend's apartment, go to the store on the way, get into an argument, demand money from the register, shoot, leave, and arrive at his apartment by 8:50 or 8:45 pm. / / 7. The irregularity of instruction given to witnesses before and after viewing a lineup to me taints the only piece of evidence the prosecution had to offer.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),"I didn't believe the witness ever got a clear look at the suspect, and certainly not for 2 minutes.",1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,I think I got 'em all earlier!,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cuVWLAU5vwhFUG1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:22,3/12/13 19:12,1,Pap,954648,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.2,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Male,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I do believe there is enough evidence to charge the defendant with the crime he has been associated with. I also believe that if the suspect had left his girlfriends apartment and traveled back to his own, he would not have enough time to decide to commit a robbery, especially so near his own home. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,none,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_aaXIp3psiyh11s1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:43,3/12/13 19:22,1,Pap,361006,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Female,1982,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The only evidence is an eye-witness identification that took place three weeks after the event. That is too much time between the event and the identification to be credible beyond a reasonable doubt.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),Three weeks passed between the crime and the only positive identification of the defendant.,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bBkfP9vZ6cZmhlr,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,1,3/13/13 0:15,3/13/13 0:16,1,Pap,860694,,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,23,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_1GNAT3jTtjcE5cV,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,1,3/13/13 0:17,3/13/13 0:17,1,Pap,584292,,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Orangatang ,47,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_d5rP1qZlAQCiP65,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 0:48,3/13/13 1:29,1,Pap,973775,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1280x1024,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1952,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","This case is solely based on one eye witness's testimony. There is no evidence at all to speak of. I don't see how this eye witness could have even seen the shooter's face. Wouldn't the shooter have his back turned to her, when she was hidden behind the bread rack? Also I thought that the police officer who conducted the police investigation and photo lineup should have provided more photographs to choose from. There were only five total. Also the length of time between when the witness looked at the photo lineup was 3 weeks, suggesting to me that she might not have correctly remembered. I could never convict someone based on only one eyewitness's identification of a suspect, without a weapon being found, without DNA evidence, without fingerprints. There is a lot of reasonable doubt here, so NOT GUILTY.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),"No weapon found, no fingerprints found, no DNA found. Can't trust that this witness remembered correctly. ",1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5z0ZIcK4E87y7zv,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 0:53,3/13/13 1:30,1,Pap,758669,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1440x900,11.3.300,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1978,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I believe that he probably is guilty but I do not feel that it was absolutely proven that no one else besides Peter Brown could have done this. The lack of DNA or fingerprints is confusing to me unless he is the best criminal mastermind ever.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),"lack of evidence, dna, gun, fingerprints, etc... The fact that Officer Lombard was not called lead me to believe the police were not being totally forthcoming with their information.",1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, everything ran smoothly.","It was interesting, I really enjoyed it. If it were a real jury scenario, I would have liked to see more witnesses. (the other officer) ",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_37wVFPMEZlGGZWB,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 0:47,3/13/13 1:40,1,Pap,788830,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1958,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was no physical evidence the defendant committed the crime, only an eye witness. The eye witness could have been mistaken. After witness testimony and the instructions by the judge, I concluded that there was reasonable doubt the defendant committed the crime.",1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_d0ERYrXhs68eNuZ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 0:55,3/13/13 1:44,1,Pap,309608,NJweak,Safari,Macintosh,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/534.57.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.7 Safari/534.57.2",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1992,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$80,000 to $89,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I do not feel that the prosecution provided much evidence of Peter Brown's guilt. All they had was eyewitness testimony and a photo lineup identification. The lineup occurred three weeks after the crime and human memory is not entirely trustworthy. Brown's fingerprints were not found at the scene and there were no other witnesses besides Mrs. Dunn.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,It asked how many witnesses there were in the case and I only said 1. Now I am second-guessing myself. Should I have said 2? Does Mr. Brown's girlfriend count as a witness? I'm not sure if it means witness to the crime or witnesses as in people that testified. And what about the cop? ,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6PdvEDefiZkd63b,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 1:00,3/13/13 1:50,1,Pap,371222,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I feel that without having the murder weapon or fingerprints tying him to the scene of the crime, accusing him was circumstantial. With Mrs. Dunn's 3week old, improperly done line up being the only realy proof- I don't feel the state proved without a reasonable doubt Mr Brown was guilty.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),Mrs Dunn only viewed one set of lineup photos only having to pick him out once,1,2,3,4,Very unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_b8lslu3pohCNpad,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 1:16,3/13/13 1:50,1,Pap,730736,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1366x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1955,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",There wasn't enough evidence for me to find him guilty,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),"The eyewitness seemed to be laughing and it gave me a bad feeling, I do believe he might be guilty but without more evidence I couldn't find him guilty of the crime of murder.",1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,Yes,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,None,"I wanted more evidence, I wanted to see Peter Brown. Seeing someone even if they don't testify gives you a good chance to read how they act and react to things being said.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bECsuJQsHYLvZ7T,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 1:20,3/13/13 1:56,1,Pap,684529,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1252x704,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1949,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","the only evidence was eye witness testimony. Even though I'm sure Ms Dunn is convinced she identified the correct man, eyewitness testimony is notoriously inaccurate. Since the case rests mainly on her testimony, I feel the evidence does not prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_enTqWjDNp78e3JP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 1:05,3/13/13 1:58,1,Pap,727625,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1280x800,11.2.202,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","My verdict was reached based on the witness being straight forward and confident in her assumption. She was there and only fifteen feet away from the scene of the murder and her attention was fully focused on the scene before her. The defendants girlfriend stated that when she called Peter around 8:45, he sounded winded and his excuse was that he had just checked the mail, which made no sense to go inside his apartment and then go back out and check it. The timing for this was too close to the store and his out of breath response to his girlfriend would indicate his running from his actions. He fit the description of the suspect and as Officer Richardson stated when he arrested Peter, Peter couldn't provide specific details about his whereabouts that night.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),Details and specifics from all witness testimonies,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bNNDQFEV298LMa1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 1:25,3/13/13 1:59,1,Pap,530364,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.2,1920x1080,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; Win64; x64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20130309 Firefox/19.0 PaleMoon/19.0.2-x64,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1970,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","It just seems to me that very little evidence was presented that he was guilty. They found no gun, no prints nothing. The only evidence that he was even there is the witness. I think that she may believe that it was him, but the 3 week difference between the crime and the identification leaves room for reasonable doubt. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no problems,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6QLlFvN71qBTRFX,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 1:44,3/13/13 2:18,1,Pap,228236,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1192x670,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; AskTbORJ/5.15.2.23037),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1987,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",American Indian or Alaskan Native,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","It was not proven to me beyond a reasonable doubt that Peter Brown was guilty. Yes he could have had the possibility of being at the location so there is oppotunity to commit the crime, but due to the exact testimony and lack of additional evidence I have doubts that Peter Brown committed the crime.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,None,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_a3LKpKLeuM59EsB,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 1:30,3/13/13 2:19,1,Pap,991771,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Professional degree (e.g., MD, DDS, JD)","$40,000 to $49,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There is not enough evidence to establish that he was the person there, that he robbed the store, or that he killed the clerk. It appears that the clerk dying was glossed over and assumed by both sides, but there was very little evidence to support that. As to identification, neither side established clearly that the photos were definitive or flawed, and in a tie, that pushes to the defense as the burden is on the prosecution. There is enough doubt in the procedure of the photo lineup, picking from 8 people, and instant confirmation of the photo chosen (I believe that it was instantly confirmed for the witness), that I cannot convict based solely on one eyewitness's use of a photo. Additionally, the instructions from the judge about gun focus and time perception both weaken the eyewitness testimony and suggest that there could be a flaw. I don't know that there is a flaw, but the prosecution did not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that her identification was correct.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,"I'm not sure if these are law students or actors, but their presentation felt disjointed at times and disrupted my focus.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eYj82uU2t2fpy1D,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 1:50,3/13/13 2:26,1,Pap,300075,RIstrong,Chrome, CrOS armv7l 3428.193.0,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS armv7l 3428.193.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.126 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$150,000 to $199,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I still have a reasonable doubt. The prosecution only has eyewitness testimony, which is not enough for me to convict a man of murder. They were not able to find the gun, or fingerprints, or any other evidence that this man did in fact commit the crime. While I do believe his alibi is shaky, and I don't fully trust his girlfriend, it's just as shaky as the eyewitness testimony of a scared and traumatized woman, three weeks later.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),"none of the exact statements above were a factor in my final verdict decision of not guilty. I think the process of the photo lineup was fine, I just don't think that you can trust a person's memory of a traumatic event three weeks later.",1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3QRezTZY9z4Rh1r,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 1:53,3/13/13 2:34,1,Pap,693906,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1954,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",Based on eyewitness testimony of Mrs. Barbara Dunn. She was positive of the identification of Mr. Peter Brown that he indeed did commit the crime. The testimony of Mr. Peter Brown's girl friend was also supportive that he committed the crime due to the time factors that she testified to.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,None,None,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_29w8vFMUylXn54N,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 1:29,3/13/13 2:39,1,Pap,311947,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I do not belive there was enough evidence presented by the prosecution to convict David Aimes of murder. The prosecution failed to convince me that he was present at the time of the crime. I was unable to evaluate other factors which were described by the judge in reference to distance, and the point of view of the eye witness. Based on the information that was provided there is no way that I would safely conclude that David Aimes had commited the crime. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,It was a pleasure. Thanks.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_aY5VkyKVWqCRjX7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 2:18,3/13/13 2:56,1,Pap,241442,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.2,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.45 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Even though there was some concern about Peter Brown's guilt, I don't think the prosecution presented sufficient evidence against him. They couldn't present a gun, any fingerprints, dna evidence and it's possible that Mrs. Dunn's memory of the event could be in question.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),"A lack of evidence against Peter Brown. Dna, the gun, fingerprints, etc.",1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No I didn't encounter any computer problems.,Thanks for the survey. Please always provide serious turkers with at least minimum wage or better compensation for their efforts. I am speaking on behalf of other turkers who feel they are under compensated for the length of time the tasks take and believe their work is just as valuable as what you would receive in a lab. Please do honor the request of the turkers and always compensate them accordingly for their time. Thank you. ,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cBlO8SuJmzAhs9v,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 2:05,3/13/13 3:02,1,Pap,380068,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1152x864,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1973,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Since there was no other evidence to show that the defendant was present at the crime (like DNA, surveillance photo, or fingerprints), the Prosecution's case rested entirely on the eye witness's testimony and her identification of the defendant. I ran through the checklist provided by the judge as to the major components to consider when deciding how much weight to give it a witness identification (for example, how much time lapsed between when the crime occurred and when the witness gave the identification to police, stress, distance seen from, weapon focus, any disguises used that may have distracted the witness, the witness's confidence in their identification the composition of line up, etc.). After doing so, I found that although her testimony passed a few of the major guidelines, it failed in a majority of them. Therefore, I had no choice but to find the defendant ""not guilty"".",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),There was no physical evidence or any other evidence other than witness #1's account.,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,Not at all.,None that I can think of at this time.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9Kp5Sw8naFCWF01,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 2:13,3/13/13 3:06,1,Pap,785261,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I came to this verdict because I felt the witnessäó»s identification of the defendant was not credible enough. She did not see identify him until about three weeks after the incident. Too much time had passed for her to identify him with great accuracy. In addition, there was no physical evidence äóñ no gun or fingerprints. This, to me, gives reasonable doubt as to the defendantäó»s guilt.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The witness did not identify the perpetrator until 3 weeks after the robbery occurred. ,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_42djoixYHb7UCXz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 2:10,3/13/13 3:09,1,Pap,372810,NJstrong,Chrome,Macintosh,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1954,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only evidence is the eyewitness testimony of one witness. She said she only observed him for 2 minutes and that during that time she was so frightened that she was shaking and that part of the time she was focusing on the gun instead of his face because she had never seen a gun before. Since she did not view his face for very long it is unlikely she recalled facial details 3 weeks later. I think it was his long hair that may have gotten her attention in the photo line-up. Any male in his 20s with long hair may have struck her as being very similar to the perpetrator. If more photos were included showing long-haired young men, perhaps she would have been able to narrow it down to one.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),The witness stated she was shaking from fear and focused on the gun part of the time.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5sTMyvtLaytjl3f,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 1:26,3/13/13 3:22,1,Pap,768665,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1440x900,11.4.402,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/9.0.1,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1978,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Because of too many iffy statements,as well as careless police work.The witness said ball cap,then later said toboggan.The police didnt arrest him for 3 weeks,the witness saw plenty on tv becore interviewed by police.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"None,but my internet broadband bleeped out,had to reboot during the video,all that did was make the video start over,which was fine.",intersting,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_d3TQEyiy6cYKVbT,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 2:48,3/13/13 3:41,1,Pap,274668,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Based on the evidence and the testimony of the eye witness, along with the testimony of the defendants girlfriend the timeline that went with it, the shady police lineup and the lack of a murder weapon, I could not decide without reasonable doubt that Peter Brown had robbed the convenient store and shot the clerk.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,,,,,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,"For the question when you asked how many witnesses there were, i meant to click 2 witnesses but somehow clicked 3.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3gVcc17oWFaGVz7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 3:37,3/13/13 4:20,1,Pap,243364,RIstrong,Chrome, Linux i686,1920x1200,11.2.202,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/25.0.1364.160 Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1937,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was no weapon found, and no proof that the defendant owned or possessed a firearm. No physical evidence that he was on the scene such as DNA, fingerprints, or security video. Eye witnesses are notoriously inaccurate. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),The eyewitness seemed to find the situation humorous. ,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_b71b4HeKaIg7DYF,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 3:50,3/13/13 4:39,1,Pap,760082,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1333x750,11.5.502,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",based upon the fact of no other evidence beside one whitness there is reasonable doubt,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,:),1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_2679DzxwumM52yV,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 4:00,3/13/13 5:14,1,Pap,496352,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1963,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Eyewitness testimony is notoriously awful. And in this case, the lineup was so poorly conducted it shouldn't have even been allowed to be entered as evidence. In regard solely to the lineup: 1. Only one lineup took place. 2. Only 4 other photos were included with the defendant's 3. The officer conducting the photo lineup knew who the suspect was 4. Prior to the lineup, the witness could only describe the suspect as pretty much average build and height, and quite readily agreed that to the suggested suspect's hair color, even though she repeatedly stated he was wearing a baseball cap. 5. The cop did NOT tell the eyewitness that the suspect may not be present in the photo lineup, making it natural and easy for her to simply assume that the perpetrator was, in fact, one of the 5 men whose pictures she viewed. 6. The cop, KNOWING who the suspect was, told the eyewitness she'd ""done a good job"" after she chose the defendant's picture and 6. WORST of all, the cop readily admitted that his lineup procedures ""vary"" depending on the situation and ""what works best"" - ""works best"", we can safely assume, means ""results in more positive identifications"". In other words, it's okay in the cop's mind to use a very subtle form of manipulation (one that he may not even be aware of) that ""leads"" an eyewitness to make an identification in a manner that pleases the cop. / Aside from this, no actual evidence was presented. Everything was circumstantial. No weapon was found, no fingerprints were found, and the defendant has a reasonable, (though not iron-clad) alibi. There is no way the investigation was fair to the defendant, and the abuse of the photo lineup evidence should give the defendant reason to turn around and sue for false arrest, slander, and the like after I find him not guilty. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),Everything is circumstantial. Not one solid piece of evidence to be found.,1,2,3,4,Very unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,None.,"Yeah. I'm a Baltimorean. We know all about how bad eyewitness testimony is. They even train our cops that when apprehending a suspect, loudly repeat, ""Don't fight me!"", ""Stop Resisting!"", ""I don't wanna hurt ya buddy, stop fighting me!"" even when the suspect is laying on the ground, not moving a muscle. People will stand there, watch as the cops yell ""Stop fighting me!"" as the beat the CRAP out of the suspect, who's balled up on the ground trying to protect himself from the blows, and STILL think they saw the suspect fighting back. / The truth all came out when we started videotaping the cops. It was sickening to watch. And the cops just don't care (although, to be safe, it's best to kinda hide the phone or whatever you're using to record them, because they will occasionally turn on bystanders for videotaping them.)",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6FMTuOGqsrOtpIN,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 4:42,3/13/13 5:31,1,Pap,138493,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1960,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",My decision is based on the partly on the research that indicates eyewitness identification is unreliable. Also given the 3 weeks between the event and the identification her memory probably faded. Then there is the factor that the time involved was brief and the witness was probably focused on the gun and hiding. Also the hat worn by the perpetrator makes identification more difficult. In addition the distance estimated by the witness is far enough away to make identification harder.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),"The gun focus, wearing a hat and general unreliability of eyewitness testimony and the fact that the identification was made 3 weeks after the crime and that no other evidence beyond the eyewitness testimony was presented",1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,"The defense attorney did not look as credible as the prosecutor, which could bias some people.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3QnfBccoz7xjBWt,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 5:04,3/13/13 5:38,1,Pap,437342,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1280x1024,11.5.502,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1972,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Because there was no other evidence other than the 1 lady that was in the store's testimony. The girlfriend testified that her boyfriend had been with her and then that after he left her place, she spoke with him 15 minutes after he left and at that time he was at his house. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The timeframe of the crime.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0NUm7FDeFit5GIt,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 4:52,3/13/13 5:55,1,Pap,574094,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was no evidence beyond an eyewitness identification from a lineup. The photo lineup was done three weeks after the crime, and it was no double blind in regard to the officer in charge. It was a weak case and the state failed to establish proof beyond reasonable doubt.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,"I know only one ACTUAL witness was part of the video trial, but for the question which asked how many witnesses were cross examined I put three for the witness, the cop, and girlfriend. I wondered if there was some ambiguity in the question at the time. I hope I don't get screwed for that.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0STiWozMKE4RxTD,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 5:36,3/13/13 6:22,1,Pap,561000,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,Some college credit,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Although I believe the eyewitness testimony to be true and accurate, the prosecution did not present enough evidence to convince me that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The have no fingerprints, DNA, surveillance, no money that was stolen found in the defendants possession, no getaway car description or direction defendant fled and the police lack of getting the witness to view a lineup right away with out her vantage point being tainted by out side media sources and the town chatter. Unfortunately this leads me to have to say not guilty when this innocent mans life was taken. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain)," The have no fingerprints, DNA, surveillance, no money that was stolen found in the defendants possession, no getaway car description or direction defendant fled .",1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9piKzLGqZ8MfXmd,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 6:33,3/13/13 6:38,1,Pap,308029,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1957,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",American Indian or Alaskan Native,"Doctorate degree (e.g., PhD, EdD)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",because there were no believable criteria to think inversely,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3sHXCffiskDjQwJ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 6:43,3/13/13 6:54,1,Pap,795778,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1958,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$50,000 to $59,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","After completing the demographic questions, I hit the continue button as instructed, however, there was not a video to view regarding a mock trial. So, to be fair, I must select not guilty because there was a failure to produce any evidence to me. Therefore, I can not with good conscious, convict the defendant without seeing the actual trial or evidence against him/her. ",1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),was not able to view the video,1,2,3,4,Very unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"Yes. I followed all of the instructions, however the video was never offered for me to watch. I did see the mini video asking what word was present (elephant) and what number was said, (47), however I was never presented with the mock trial video. Was this a trick?",I really wanted to view the mock trial...:( ,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6FpYlAt3ZqhoZhP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 6:41,3/13/13 7:15,1,Pap,349010,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The girlfriends testamony had some gaps in it. Like the fact that the defendant broke his normal mail picking routine and he was breathless when he spoke to his girlfriend on the phone, He also had time to commit the crime before he got to his apartment. There was an eye witness and she had no interest in seeing the defendant go to jail.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eDHjQvkx5SganNH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:06,3/13/13 7:20,1,Pap,775534,RIweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1680x1050,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; Trident/6.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; SLCC2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; MALN; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1977,"Yes, Mexican/Mexican American/Chicano",Some Other Race,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I was not really convinced . I belive because this is a make belive trial there lacks the emotional fact that other wise might have convinced me to make a different decicion.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,yes at the beganing of the video it skipped and then it restarted automatically,no other thoughts.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3wl52a02JapIsqF,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 6:40,3/13/13 7:23,1,Pap,447195,RIweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.0,1680x1050,11.6.602.171,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C; McAfee),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1973,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$150,000 to $199,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","While there was a positive identification, there was no additional evidence presented to confirm the defendant was present - video or physical evidence. While I didn't not believe the girlfriend's testimony as proof he wasn't there, I felt it was the burden of the prosecution to bring forward more convincing evidence.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,Other (please explain),lack of other evidence,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3t9hYQMC7S212cd,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 6:41,3/13/13 7:33,1,Pap,994845,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.4.402,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1993,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,Some college credit,"$90,000 to $99,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","No one has found that the defendant was responsible for the first degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt, along with the possibility mistaken identification, possible disguise of the perpetrator and a plethora of other factors.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,Nope.,"Consider adding a volume slider and a maximize screen button to the video, as people like myself with bigger monitors have a harder time comfortably viewing a small video and some of the audio sounded muffled at times, even with my headphones on max volume.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6LFnoJxZCv5vk5n,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:06,3/13/13 7:39,1,Pap,822778,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; AskTbORJ/5.14.1.20007; .NET4.0E; BRI/2),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The eyewitness got a good enough look at him, and was able to identify him. The fact that 3 weeks had passed doesn't mean much, in my opinion, considering that she was able to see him for 2 minutes and from only 15 feet away. He lives close to the store, and the fact that he was out of breath when he talked to his girlfriend on the phone means that he was running from somewhere, and would have had time to commit the crime.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, everything technically worked well.","The audio was very quiet during witness examination and cross-examination portions of the video. Even with my speakers turned all the way up, I had to keep my ear close to the speakers to hear what was being said.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_7VBbnDwSGKN98Xz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 6:43,3/13/13 7:42,1,Pap,457136,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1440x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1971,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I have doubts about the identification and there is no other evidence against this guy.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,None,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9Xpyk0mvsnyiLhb,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 6:43,3/13/13 7:43,1,Pap,915292,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1968,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",There is very little evidence in this case and I have a reasonable doubt about the accuracy of the identification.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no problems,no,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_e8xmVMFYBhcD7OR,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 6:45,3/13/13 7:49,1,Pap,821181,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1440x900,11.6.602.171,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET4.0C; InfoPath.3; .NET4.0E),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1959,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I have way to much doubt about the eye witness testimony. Without that the prosecutor presented nothing.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_73cRtUkQMayNvpP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:23,3/13/13 8:01,1,Pap,512230,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1280x1024,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I felt convinced by the defense attorney's argument that the only evidence the police were able to present for their case was this one witness's identification which had a few too many weaknesses. The fact that the witness made an ID after 3 weeks had passed seems a little shaky to me, also the fact the police officer failed to actually describe any standard procedures for line ups and instead stated that every case is unique. Too many uncertainties around this witness and her identification to be beyond reasonable doubt. I also wondered about how easy it is to really see someone's face when they have a ball cap on.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, I did not encounter any computer problems.",Very interesting! Would like to know how the case turned out (if it was based on reality) or how a case like this would turn out.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6QNg1CLHGFwBo45,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:21,3/13/13 8:01,1,Pap,635093,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1680x1050,11.2.202.233,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; InfoPath.3),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1976,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I just don't think eye witness in this case is enough. I think there needs to be more evidence to convict someone, such as video surveillance and other eye witnesses to corroborate the young lady's view. The fact that the line up took place 2 weeks after the crime could also fade her memory. Also, prosecution did not find the gun and other physical evidence to connect the accused to the crime. That is really important, especially for a capital murder case.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),There was only one eye witness and no other physical evidence to connect the crime to the defendent.,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No problem.,Fun survey.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cvVnzzxYr3WtNtP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:05,3/13/13 8:13,1,Pap,582085,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1280x1024,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1968,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","To me, the defendant did not present the case in a manner of confidence. The DA was determined and exhibited more knowledge of the law in question. ",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,Yes,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,NONE,I enjoy survey's where I watch videos.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9RBVCcQX5tmGzyt,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:26,3/13/13 8:15,1,Pap,864537,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,-1,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1983,"Yes, Mexican/Mexican American/Chicano",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$70,000 to $79,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",There is no evidence beyond a witness testimony. The suspect would have had a hard time committing the crime in the time frame they are giving. There is reasonable doubt. ,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,No,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0rocV04z0j2RxsN,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:20,3/13/13 8:17,1,Pap,268796,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.2,1440x900,11.6.602.171,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; Trident/6.0; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; BRI/2),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Because although there is a witness, there is no physical evidence that he was there, no fingerprints, no DNA sample..........so that witness can be mistaken.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),There was no physical evidence.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,No additional comments.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_7VT6x5ViBG2hT6J,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:48,3/13/13 8:21,1,Pap,869963,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.5.502,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"Yes, other Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",I reached that verdict because the prosecuor laid out all the groundwork and facts for the jury to reach. The primary witness also had a large claim in that she saw exactly what happned and also that she is a fewquent shopper in the store. Also the physical evidence that the perpertator left on the scene also was monumental in conviction.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_1FYyIPwaXSVn24Z,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:36,3/13/13 8:22,1,Pap,344545,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,10.3.183,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1963,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",I felt that the eyewitness testimony was believable. She didn't seem to falter when she viewed the photo line-up at the police station. She knew right away who the suspect was when she saw those photos.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, I did not.",No other thoughts or comments.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eo1RUtUQZnNTx7D,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:31,3/13/13 8:23,1,Pap,684976,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1947,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I think the eyewitness is mistaken about Peter Brown being the person who robbed the store and killed the clerk. It had been three weeks when she made the identification of Peter Brown. There is not enough evidence to prove that Peter Brown committed this crime. They had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty and I don't believe this was done in this trial.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,"It is hard in these kind of cases where the eyewitness says a certain person committed a crime. People can look alike and Mrs Dunn admitted she was scard, as anyone would have been in this case. It was also three weeks since the robbery and murder that she picked him out of the line up.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0eVX2b3fObrkNaR,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:54,3/13/13 8:31,1,Pap,750871,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Because everything rests on the witnesses testimony, which just does not seem like enough evidence to me. Add to this, that she waited 3 weeks to identify him in a lineup. Memory can very much fade in that frame of time.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,thanks,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bQKT8iskf60jHkF,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:49,3/13/13 8:38,1,Pap,832254,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",I reached that verdict because the police did do the photo lineup by standards. There is nothing that makes it seem like they were biased. I also believed the witness when she said that she could identify the suspect. She looked sure of herself. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6JexBbG7zDtk0ap,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:57,3/13/13 8:38,1,Pap,432674,RIstrong,Safari,iPad,768x1024,-1,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 6_1_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10B146 Safari/8536.25",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",I felt that the eyewitness testimony was strong and that the police did not act in a deceitful or leading fashion. The testimony of the girlfriend also led me to feel he was guilty,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0iXYfbgLWzqRBkh,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:46,3/13/13 8:39,1,Pap,346751,NJstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1192x670,11.6.602.171,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; BRI/2; MAEM; .NET4.0C),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1967,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$90,000 to $99,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","we are relying on the witnesses memory several weeks later. she states she was hiding behind stacked soda cartons at the back of the store.....how did she get a good look at his face if he was facing the cashier. She states she was approx 15-20 feet from the altercation. The robber didn't see her come out of the bathroom? there is usually mirrors at the front of the store by the cashier. I would think the robber may have noticed some movement. I'm just not 100% convinced the witness really had a good look at the robber from her location. She also stated several times how ""terrified"" and ""scared"" and in ""shock"" she was. She gave a detailed description of his clothing and general features but not anything specific. I also didn't care for the snickering she did while testifying. This isn't a funny matter. In a nutshell, the eyewitness was not very credible.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),I don't see how the witness could have gotten a good look at the defendant. so i have a very very small amount of doubt. No concrete evidence.,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no none,"I just want to say, that i think he did it.....but i can't say that beyond a reasonable doubt. The girlfriend actually, to me, made me think he was guilty more than the eyewitness. I just feel the eyewitness was not convincing and credible.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bIRu4MjDjIhyjFr,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:51,3/13/13 8:41,1,Pap,504344,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1280x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$30,000 to $39,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Mrs. Dunn picked Peter Brown out of a lineup three weeks after the crime occured made me worry because that is a long time to remember. The lack of physical evidence and the the fact that no murder weapon was ever found and the only way to link Mr. Peter Brown to the crime was Mrs. Dunns testimony. There is a window between when the defendant left his girlfriends house and when she called him on the phone and I think it is possible that mr. Brown commited the crime but there is simply not enough evidence to convict him of murder. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),not enough evidence,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,no,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_2t2HQleuj6m17Uh,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:54,3/13/13 8:42,1,Pap,247866,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1024x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1970,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$70,000 to $79,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I didn't think the eyewitness testimony was enough. Although I think there is a good chance that the defendent committed the crime, there was still a shadow of a doubt for me. Finding the gun or fingerprints at the scene would help remove that cloud.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),lack of evidence,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,None,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_1RMG9c6wymI6N01,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:00,3/13/13 8:42,1,Pap,791886,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1976,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","If we dismiss the testimony of the girlfriend (who is biased), we are merely left with Mrs. Dunn's testimony. It isn't good enough. Problematic is the amount of time she claimed to examine the suspect during the robbery; I find it difficult to believe she had a clear vantage, yet stayed out of sight. The baseball cap and the three week space between the crime and her ID raised doubts as well. The lack of material evidence as well as circumstantial evidence pushes me toward feeling reasonably doubtful. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),leading questions by officer,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,None,"You can't win: I'm sure several respondents will report that they enjoyed video as opposed to reading text. I prefer text, generally, and in this case I found the acting quality to be distracting. ",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0Nhs28b9fxQQu7H,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:57,3/13/13 8:42,1,Pap,292811,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1959,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The witness did not see the perpetrator close up. A hat can change the appearance of a persons face. It took 3 weeks to put together a line up. That is a long time to try to remember what a person looked like. No video, no one else saw the perpetrator enter or leave the store. The girlfriend seemed creditable as witness.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The identification was 3 weeks later.,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,No,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0TcGZRkbuK9iRx3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:56,3/13/13 8:46,1,Pap,524563,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1440x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1961,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",There was too much time between the crime and the identification of the witness.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"The video had a hard time loading at first, but after about 15 seconds it was good.",It was very interesting.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_ah2xEUcDiuRHRgF,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:09,3/13/13 8:52,1,Pap,200887,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1280x1024,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1961,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was only one eye witness testimony and it was three weeks from incident to identification. The defendant's girlfriend gave a compelling alibi. There was no additional evidence such as the missing gun, fingerprints or DNA evidence. I believe the defense presented enough reasonable doubt to set him free.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),Identification was three weeks after the crime.,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,"It is very difficult to set a man free who was arrested for murder and identified by an eyewitness, and equally hard to convict a man on very minimal evidence.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bymoOSh4T2dT3H7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:05,3/13/13 8:53,1,Pap,468347,NJweak,Safari,iPad,768x1024,-1,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 6_1_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10B146 Safari/8536.25",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was reasonable doubt in regards to the witness, and for how the officer conducted the interview of the perpratraighter. We must give a not guilty verdict if there is any doubt of the guilt, and there is. So I said not guilty.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,No,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_e39Kkli9e6C2Wrj,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:10,3/13/13 8:56,1,Pap,424227,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",I believe that the eye witness testimonial was the key. The fact that the perpertraitor didnt wear anything to hinder the identification and the fact that she picked him out of one lineup was what made me decide on that. Also the fact that when the girlfriend called him he was out of breath like he had been running.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8IhZ0OwlysqGkJf,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:08,3/13/13 8:59,1,Pap,142280,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There is no other evidence other than the eye witness account, who by her own account was 15-20 feet away, had never seen a gun before, and was terrified. It had been 3 weeks and in that time I have no doubt that her recolection had been tainted. Someone witnessing such a horrible act would no doubt be doing all they could to forget it as wuickly as possible.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),Dunn's eye witness account is worthless without hard evidence that the suspect was even at the store. I feel her fear was the biggest influence. ,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bedJi4w8GIDSGDX,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:29,3/13/13 9:03,1,Pap,376091,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:21.0) Gecko/20130312 Firefox/21.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Becuase of the witness and her statement and to me she thought this was a joke up their smiling I do not feel she was taking this serious. I feel that the defenedent was picked out based on bias and is not the correct person and that as his girlfriend said taht he was home at the time.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly disagree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_7WMPifXQM4nEc4Z,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:05,3/13/13 9:06,1,Pap,228736,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.2.202,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1987,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$70,000 to $79,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The prosecution did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was present at the time of the murder. The eyewitness account is not reliable enough to prove that the defendant was, in fact, the person who committed the crime, especially since the line-up did not occur for so long after the event. In addition, there was no weapon recovered and no evidence tying the defendant to a weapon, nor were there fingerprints tying the defendant to the scene of the crime. Furthermore, the defendant had a plausible alibi.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),The lineup did not occur until long after the crime was witnessed.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0w6M13EwoSkh6Bf,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:33,3/13/13 9:10,1,Pap,554528,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1960,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Even though he's probably guilty I couldn't reach that verdict on just eye witness testimony, and absolutely no other evidence.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),"no gun, fingerprints, money, evidence",1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no problems,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8IlK8Cjj5U99abX,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:37,3/13/13 9:27,1,Pap,999652,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1024x600,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"Less than $10,000",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only real evidence they had was the one eyewitness. I believe she was under a great deal of stress at the time of the crime, and she could have easily made a mistake in the identification. Also,the lack of any hard evidence such as fingerprints, security camera footage etc.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,"This was interesting, Thanks!",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_ebVaLmoFPWZoKSV,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:51,3/13/13 9:29,1,Pap,684775,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 5.1,1680x1050,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; FunWebProducts; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1966,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I felt that there was not enough sufficient evidence when it came to whether he stopped at the store enroute to his house prior to his girlfriend calling him. The police never found a gun nor more importantly to me, fingerprints at the scene. Nothing was said as to whether the robber was wearing gloves that I recalled. It was just not enough to convict someone for murder.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),That is took weeks for Barbara Dunn to see a lineup. Which was brought into question the length of time while being interviewed on the witness stand.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,None.,A written prompt while viewing the video would have been helpful due to the sound quality in the courtroom it was at times hard to understand some words from different witnesses. I had no way to rewind to catch some of the words.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3jEyH20IENYWGeV,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:59,3/13/13 9:36,1,Pap,370595,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1440x900,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1958,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",It bothered me that it was 3 weeks from the time that the crime happened. The other thing that bothered me was that the eye witness said she had 2 minutes to see the defenedent. In a situtation like that I can't imagine that someone would be peeking out behind a bread rack to see what was going on. The girl friend also made a strong case for him not being there. Too many things just didn't add up for me to convict him. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3UGmKhF5TWijnpz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:56,3/13/13 9:40,1,Pap,729660,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1024x768,11.6.602.171,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; MAAR; BRI/2),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1966,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",The length of the eyewitness view of the suspect inidicates a good memmory of who was the robber.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),The defendent being out of reath when his girl friend called him.,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3VmVwiYDIPR0zWd,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:07,3/13/13 9:47,1,Pap,950066,RIstrong,Firefox, Ubuntu,1280x800,11.2.202,1,Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/13.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1961,"Yes, Puerto Rican",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","oh, the guy is guilty, nobody goes back downstairs to get the mail if forgot. That was a lie. But eye witnessess are notorioius for being the most undependable (I.E. My cousin Vinny, Positraction). / / I would have like to see the exact photo line up that the eye witness had. This should have never gone to court until actual evidence was found. Eye witness was trying hard not to luagh, the officer was slouching. Cops always have that puffed ramrod posture.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),I did not see the 8 photos myself,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,Nope.,How did the police from the eyewitness connect the defendent in the first place? That was not demostrated. There has to be a some sort of evidence not shown that would even lead to police to the defendent before even having a photo line up. What was that evidence? How did that get from point A to Point B from the store to the defendent. That was totally missing. Why did they pick him up 3 weeks later. Did I miss something here?,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bwqqfW59kdcj3VP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:51,3/13/13 9:47,1,Pap,541628,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1971,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$30,000 to $39,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty"," All they have is the eye witness identification. There is nothing else to indicate that he was there and committed the crime. The alibi that the defendant had was weak but there wasn't any really compelling evidence to prove that he comitted the crime. / There is a real possibility that someone who merely looked like him committed the crime. There was no mention of any real extraordinary identifyting feature on the suspect, the description of the robbery wasn't all that detailed either nor had the witness shown any kind of exceptional memory for detail. There were no security tapes, cameras or any kind of evidence to prove the suspect was even there other than the witness and it just isn't a strong enough arguement.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),The evidence was justnot sufficient to convict absent a confession or some supporting factor.,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,Just in the part right before starting I had to change a setting on my computer to allow the video to play and had to reload the page.," It is just a really weak case. There wan't any evidence, no real motive or reason, not even any really suspisious circumstance that would really indicate any involvement of the defendant. It is possible he committed the crime but it is not proven in any manner.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8BQvtIbcZ5ERp53,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:14,3/13/13 9:48,1,Pap,287993,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1979,"Yes, Mexican/Mexican American/Chicano",American Indian or Alaskan Native,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Actually the case was about the robbery and murder done by Peter Brown. But the evidence was not enough to prove that, all was done by him.",1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,Interesting,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8As44Kzk2UmdTMx,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:09,3/13/13 9:58,1,Pap,363761,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602.171,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; BRI/2; .NET4.0C),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1965,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I have reached that decision based on the eyewitness testimony and the judge's instruction regarding that testimony. There were many factors that made me question the validity of the identification by the eyewitness. It was 3 weeks before the identification was made, the officer knew who the suspect was, etc..",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no problems.,Very educational and interesting study.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_dhQZvtT6naYVDcp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:54,3/13/13 9:58,1,Pap,856137,NJweak,Chrome,Macintosh,1920x1200,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1982,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","i believe that the prosecutor made a strong case but aside from the witness Barbara and the defendants girlfriend. i felt at least one more strong eyewitness would have been substantial evidence in making their case against the defendant, but the defense brought up a good point when question the police officer about finding no finger prints or murder weapon connecting the defendant to the crime. at this point i dont think the questionable eyewitness testimony is enough to find the defendant guilty of first degree murder. with that said i believe peter brown will have to be cross examined to further help with this particular case at hand. also asking the the witness how many shots where fired and at what distance did she view the suspect would have helped substantially.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,interesting survy ,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6Jd7VoGGPfD9teR,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:24,3/13/13 9:59,1,Pap,972124,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1962,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Other than an ID of the suspect which to me is questionable ther is no othe evidence to say he is guilty. They did not find the gun used when they searched the apartment. When the witenss got on the stand she hesitated when asked a ew questions as if she was a little unsure. The photo line up could have been biased as well as the officer without even knowing it when he presented the lineup.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no and the video ran very ell,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0MNHIZ9v7prLiqF,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:21,3/13/13 10:00,1,Pap,642658,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1991,"Yes, other Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Some Other Race,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","It is very clear that this person is guilty. There are plenty of witnesses who are all saying the same thing. Each witnessing the exchange between the criminal and the clerk. And then later the murder. Each witness seemed very settled in their point of view. None of them seemed like they were lying. They all seemed very honest and certain of what they witnessed, which made me think that the defendant is guilty. ",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,none,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5b9wR3xXdXZWpKJ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:04,3/13/13 10:01,1,Pap,864848,NJstrong,Safari,iPad,768x1024,-1,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 6_1_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10B146 Safari/8536.25",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Although I believe that the witness was in a stable mind and saw the crime, I was not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that it was Mr. Brown. I think there is so much weight placed on that one piece of evidence that I do not feel like I can convict without something else incriminating him.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),The lineup was done 3 weeks after the crime.,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,None,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_24sgbEL2MBsYIpn,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:00,3/13/13 10:03,1,Pap,499228,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Primarily, due to the possibly unreliable nature of the eyewitness testimony. Without any other evidence, it is difficult to be certain beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendent is guilty, even if I do believe that it's possible he is responsible for the crime.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"Yes, the video would not play within the survey and I had to open the video on Vimeo in order to make it play.",,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_56GHx2UTrUt1pM9,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:19,3/13/13 10:09,1,Pap,554859,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Although Barbara Dunn was very confident in her identification of the suspect, it is the only evidence available. There were no fingerprints/dna evidence or weapon found from Peter Brown. It's very difficult because Barbara is very certain and the police officer Rchardson has a lot of experience. But because the evidence relies solely on one testomony and no other supporting evidence it's hard to be certain that it was 100% Peter. His girlfriend Diana Reyes testimony did support Peter slightly, but she did state he was out of breath which was slightly suspicious and he was close to the location of the crime. But because again there was no further evidence to place him there, they really need more evidence to back up Barabara's testimony.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No problems.,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_aVqex4vZYo1y8qF,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:40,3/13/13 10:14,1,Pap,919619,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1366x768,11.4.402,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1991,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Although the police lineup seems fair and in accord with proper protocol, eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable and due to lack of more concrete evidence such as finding the weapon used to perpetrate the crime or even surveillance video, I do not see it as sufficient evidence that the defendant was the perpetrator of the crime. Also, given the amount of time between when the defendant was last seen and spoken to - 15 minutes from when his girlfriend saw him to when she spoke to him when he arrived home, seems like it would be difficult to successfully rob and kill someone in that short time span.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,Yes,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6DsDOl8P9um2XMV,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:21,3/13/13 10:14,1,Pap,665678,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1964,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$70,000 to $79,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Cause they did not find the gun that Peter Brown shot the cashier with. Mrs. Dunn did accused Peter Brown in the line up when 3 weeks already went by. I think that is a long time to remember the person that actually did the crime. The police officer did not find any finger prints in the store of Peter Brown either.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5tYhjdEApVzlmW9,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:32,3/13/13 10:23,1,Pap,652704,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1981,"Yes, Puerto Rican",Some Other Race,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$50,000 to $59,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",There isn't enough evidence to prove that Brown was guilty. The eyewitnesses recount of the crime 3 weeks later is simply not evidence enough to charge him with murder. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9MRkBjkqZNN0zCB,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:11,3/13/13 10:24,1,Pap,373297,RIweak,Safari,Android 4.0.4,540x960,-1,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; en-us; DROID BIONIC 4G Build/6.7.2-223_DBN_M4-23) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The girlfriend seemed to be covering up information with the testimony that she gave. She stated that her boyfriend does not live with her so therefore she could be lying about his whereabouts the night in question. Also, when she called he was out of breath. If he was outside checking the mail does his phone ring loud enough to be heard outside. She was looking down during some of her testimony which indicates that she may have been lying. There was a positive identification made by the eyewitness. In a lineup of:: & men he was positively identified. :",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,I enjoyed taking this survey it was very interesting ,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_01cMwNlM4I307OJ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:57,3/13/13 10:24,1,Pap,513040,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1992,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I reached that verdict because of the cross examinations and all of the evidence that was provided. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8CHirNoB9tWtfsV,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:46,3/13/13 10:24,1,Pap,712182,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The fact that there was no evidence beyond that of the eyewitness, and that she identified the witness three weeks after it had happened makes me think there is at least a reasonable doubt that Peter Dunn did not rob and murder the store clerk. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),The lineup was viewed three weeks after the crime happened.,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"My computer froze up for a few minutes during the video, but then it came back and the video resumed.",None.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_e3bkcCJL78hvd6l,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:24,3/13/13 10:29,1,Pap,354201,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1964,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There is no fingerprints or DNA at the crime scene, the defendent doesn't own a gun and there is no video survellience of the crime. / The only thing is witness testimony of one witness.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,none,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bCbMywPGyjVEKsB,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:35,3/13/13 10:30,1,Pap,482450,NJweak,Chrome,Macintosh,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1975,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","A couple of reasons. First off the officer was familier with the suspect. He told the witness that she correctly identified the suspect. There was only 5 people in the lineup. And it was a full 3 weeks from the time of the incident till the lineup, giving the witness time to forget certain aspects.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,I feel that this was a very good representation of a trial. ,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_7ZDIDxx1MB18k8B,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:01,3/13/13 10:31,1,Pap,345077,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1440x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",I believe the witnesses are telling the truth and there is motive in the defendents,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,no,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_aXzB6fzpDnQmSCp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:59,3/13/13 10:31,1,Pap,278119,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1970,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",there was no evidence other than eye witness account,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),"no fingerprints, no gun, no dna evidence",1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no problems,no comments,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0eTDq09rxnGre97,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:44,3/13/13 10:36,1,Pap,218545,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1952,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The most important thing is that the sole witness didn't get the chance to view a lineup for three weeks. There is no way that I consider that to be reliable testimony. Furthermore, there is no evidence beyond her identification, which is counterbalanced by the girlfriend's testimony. The girlfriend was convincing in that she obviously wasn't trying hard to find excuses. She said what part she was involved in straightforwardly. This alone would have caused me to find the defendent ""not guilty"". / / That said, there is one other factor. Both the witness and the police officer had a great deal of difficulty not smiling. The witness smiled several times in the direction that she later pointed to identify the defendent. She had to rub her mouth before she was able to stop smiling. The police officer also smiled several times. Strange behavior in a murder case. If I were a juror, I would find that off-putting, if not outright suspicious, and it would clinch my verdict of ""not guilty"". / / I really hope that this was not a real trial and the smiling was because those two were lousy actors. Otherwise, this was an attempt to knowingly frame someone.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The 3 week delay before the witness had the opportunity to make an identification.,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no technical problems were encountered,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_56WyCth6DnpkbJP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:07,3/13/13 10:45,1,Pap,620475,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1200,10.3.181.34,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; InfoPath.2),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I felt not guilty because I didn't think the witness was that believeable (or if she was even sure of herself). She seemed to stumble. It might have been nerves but I wouldn't feel comfortable based off her actions on deciding wether or not the defendant robbed the store and killed the clerk on 2-22-12. Also, photos and a police line-up are not the best of evidence, in my opinion. If there was security cameras or something, then perhaps it would be better evidence. Perception of a face changes over time, especially if you are not aware you need to focus on it for future recall. She might have mistakenly identified him as the killer and be wrong.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"The audio seemed to act up a little bit, but my internet connection was fine. Also, I gave this my all and focused completely on the case, but I truly did not remember some of what was talked about during the case because I was getting bored (my personality). I believe in many trials, the jury can go back to the judge for clairifcation on some information. I wish this ability was allowed in this survey (such as after watching, having the ability to somehow go back to a certain spot to watch it again. While this is not the same as what would happen in a court of law, it could have possibly changed my mind if I didn't catch something correctly at first.","The people in the video were not believeable except the judge. No matter, I didn't use that to decide my decision.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_4Pe5Su9OVv0KbNr,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:49,3/13/13 10:47,1,Pap,813598,NJstrong,Chrome, Linux i686,1280x1024,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","Less than $10,000",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I think that the eyewitness account has a chance of not being reliable. I also feel that the lack of weapon connecting the suspect to the murder makes me uncomfortable convicting him without a doubt. The evidence is not strong enough to warrant a conviction despite the seriousness of the crimes.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),lack of murder weapon,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_1YBIgV0ohq46CPj,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:30,3/13/13 10:59,1,Pap,744366,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.2,1366x768,11.6.602.167,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; Trident/6.0; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; MATBJS),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1988,"Yes, Puerto Rican",Some Other Race,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",I believe that he is guilty because of the evidence they had. The lady had identified him as being the one who robbed the store. The police also said that he was nervous when asked about his whereabouts.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,I did not encounter any computer problems while taking the survey.,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5msDQWnH3pJSoD3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:57,3/13/13 11:01,1,Pap,185460,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$200,000 or more",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I just did not believe the case warranted a guilty verdict beyond reasonable doubt.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,No,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bx9HKBZLQXxwQ4t,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:23,3/13/13 11:08,1,Pap,267317,RIweak,Firefox,Macintosh,1440x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The lack of police evidence, specifically dna or prints or a gun or anything coupled with the hesitance of the eye witness and the fact she was hiding behind something with an obstructed view and could not get a clear view means there isnt enough evidence",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),"The eyewitness was slow to respond, had to think which means they were searching for the truth",1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,The video froze up though the audio did play through. It made it hard to read reactions from that.,"WHen you said witnesses I was not sure if it meant eye witnesses or just plain people called to the stand to testify. This may cause a rejection because I picked 1 since there was 1 eye witness, but there were 3 witnesses those being the police officer, defendents girlfriend, and the eye witness in the convenience store at the time. I would hate to be disqualified because I did not understand exactly what kind of person you meant when you said witness.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6hy7JBSZHe64MPX,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:25,3/13/13 11:10,1,Pap,320212,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1990,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$10,000 to 19,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",Times matched up and Witness testimonies too strong,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_802CL9q2Y9zg1qR,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:30,3/13/13 11:11,1,Pap,624186,RIweak,Firefox,Macintosh,1280x800,11.1.102,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","After hearing all of the evidence, it seems highly unlikely that the defendant is guilty. First, there was no physical evidence found at the scene -- no fingerprits, no gun, and no biological links between the defendant and the victim of the crime. Second, the witness was asked in a fairly biased way to identify the defendant a full 3 weeks after the date of the incident. Not only is 3 weeks ample time to forget the subtle differences and details of the suspect's face, but she was also shaken at the time of the incident, and likely was a bit muddled in her identification abilities. Third, I feel that the way in which Ms. Dunn was shown suspect photos was biased in that therewere onl 5 photos. Not 20 photos, some with hats (which the witness said the defendant was wearing at the time of the robbery), just 5 photos. The witness was not even told that the suspect may or may not be in the photo lineup. She simply pointed out a man who matched a vague description, and the officer in charge took her word for it, thanked her, and went after Mr. Brown. Lastly, the fact that he had an alibi, and that his girlfriend, Ms. Reyes, was able to tell the court that he had been at her apartment, then at his own home when she called him on his landline, leaves a reasonable doubt that Mr. Brown committed the murder. Yes, the alibi is not air tight, but it is still strong enough evidence for me to doubt Mr. Brown's guilt. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),"The eewitness seemed visibl shaken, which made me question how well her perception abilties were at the time of the crime. Also, the alibi of Mr. Brown was fairly strong. ",1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,Yes,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, everything worked very well. ","This was interesting, and actually pretty fun, thank you! ",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9XdKYVJ71I0B0gt,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:39,3/13/13 11:12,1,Pap,251374,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1987,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I think the case goes in defendants account on basis of benefit of doubt. The witness Ms Dunn seems to be a bit unreliable and may have made a mistake. I feel there needs to be much more hardcore evidence like poly graphic tests to nail the suspect,1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,the voice was very low,the actors looked scared,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0VcDDRzD4rsiQRv,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:25,3/13/13 11:14,1,Pap,565912,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1138x640,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1950,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Doctorate degree (e.g., PhD, EdD)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",the procedures used to identify the person charged and the 3 weeks period bertween the crime and the viewing of pictures raises serious doubt aobut the possible accruacy of the eye witness. Also the fact that only 5 picutres were shown to the eye witness and the person chargfed was one of them increases the chance of an error on her part. ,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,none,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6mb5pHa2CrFmLm5,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:42,3/13/13 11:19,1,Pap,604208,RIweak,Firefox,Macintosh,1680x1050,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The police departments methods of attaining photo line up participants was reliant on recent events which does not pose a strong enough case. The witness during the robbery was not convincing that she saw clearly the defendent during the time of the robbery. These reasons cause me to have doubts.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),There was no first hand evidence of the robbery,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,My doubts are common and I found it much easier to vote that the defendent was not guilty due to absense of evidence and my disbelief of the eye witnesses pick in the photo line up. I would have to be thoroughly convinced the defendent was guilty to vote him so and I became nervous when considering this.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_efE28mDBmkRvkkl,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:44,3/13/13 11:20,1,Pap,351454,RIstrong,Firefox, Ubuntu,1680x1050,11.2.202,1,Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1978,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Lack of corroborating evidence, plausible alibi, prolonged time between the crime and the lineup, witness who had never seen a gun before (plausible weapon focus).",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),None of the above. I believe adequate precautions were taken in order to avoid biasing the witness.,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"The video stuttered a couple times, but it appears I saw the entire video.",,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_2cmT0tnPOniyGpL,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:33,3/13/13 11:23,1,Pap,405075,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1992,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$100,000 to $149,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only evidence is from a witness's identification which can be unreliable. There is not other evidence. This makes me have doubt. It could be the defendant, but since there isn't a lot of evidence I'm not 100% convinced that the defendant is the one who commited the crime. Therefore, I have to pick not guilty. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The time between witnessing the crime and identifying the suspect was 3 weeks which is way too long to be accurate. ,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_88neg3d78IAYx0N,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:37,3/13/13 11:28,1,Pap,649584,NJstrong,Safari,Macintosh,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/536.26.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.2 Safari/536.26.17",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1987,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",there was no other evidence only the eyewitness account. the gun was also never recovered ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),no other evidence,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,Yes my internet went down,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bw8Bwd3TrTFCb8V,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:55,3/13/13 11:32,1,Pap,354587,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1994,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$80,000 to $89,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","While I personally think it's likely the defendant committed the crime, there simply was not enough evidence presented during the trial. The prosecutor focused on the eyewitness too much, which on top of being not the most accurate source of information leads me to believe they didn't have much else to go off of. There was no gun found, and the way the line up was handled seemed unprofessional. The prosecution did not eschew reasonable doubt.",1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, everything worked properly.",,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_2sPr4Xykyj8ngc5,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:49,3/13/13 11:36,1,Pap,880772,NJstrong,Safari iPhone,iPhone,320x568,-1,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10B143 Safari/8536.25",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$70,000 to $79,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The eyewitness identification was done 3 weeks following the crime, and only one lineup was shown to the eyewitness. Also, there is no other evidence beyond this identification to suggest the defendant is guilty. I don't feel this is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. ",1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bCxD26a9IMA68CN,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:51,3/13/13 11:43,1,Pap,548056,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I didnt think there was enough evidence to prove that he did it. The only main evidence that they have was the witness who identified the person. It was three weeks after that she identified him, and thats a long time. They didnt find a gun or any finger prints at the scence. The basically had no evidence that lead to peter brown that was strong enough.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,Other (please explain),There wasn't any evidence besides the eyewitness.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_byf5gviGJqiyfnT,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:51,3/13/13 11:44,1,Pap,639740,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,9.0.115.0,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; GTB7.4; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; PeoplePal 6.6; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618) w:PACBHO60 w:PACBHO60 w:PACBHO60 w:PACBHO60,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Without having more evidence, I didn't think there was enough strength in the case for prosecuting Peter Brown. They had no weapon or any evidence at the store. The only evidence they had was the witness that didn't identify the suspect for a long time after. There was just too much doubt in the case to say he was guilty.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,Other (please explain),3 weeks that it took to identify.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No problems,None,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3P25Vw2JjXfRZB3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:30,3/13/13 11:44,1,Pap,585761,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1920x1080,10.1.85,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I am not convinced he was completely innocent. The eyewitness account seemed trustworthy. The girlfriend's account did not convince me of his innocence, mainly because she could not recall the time of day she called him, and just because she didn't know of him owning a gun, doesn't mean he doesn't. However, there is too much reasonable doubt (lack of any other evidence) here for me to convict.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6nVxrRRByODAH9H,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:54,3/13/13 11:45,1,Pap,125097,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1969,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$40,000 to $49,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The eye witness waited to until the following morning to speak to police. The police then waited 3 weeks before lineup and the fact the officer knew the identity of the suspect. No gun was found at the scene and no fingerprints. The suspect did not have a gun and none was found at his residence. His girlfriends testimony also is a reliable alibi as she was not under stress at that time which then could not affect her memory. Other than an eye witness which may not be reliable given the circumstances the state has not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the suspect is the offender.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),"no weapon was found, the eyewitness viewed while stressed and hiding and no gun at suspects home and the girlfriends testimony",1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,I was pleased that i was given this opportunity as I believe too many people are improperly punished in this country. I would love to do additional studies if they become available.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_b3mqtU8sSfZvVYN,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:40,3/13/13 11:49,1,Pap,115228,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.4.402,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I listened to both sides of the case and while they had good evidence against him i was not totally convinced to is guilty,1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0rcMFmWkRwpLOZL,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:11,3/13/13 11:51,1,Pap,162868,RIstrong,Opera,X11,1280x1024,11.0.1,1,Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux x86_64) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.13,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",The witness for the defendant was not very reliable and may have had ulterior motives since she was the girlfriend. The witnesses for the prosecution were more reliable in their statements.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bNOUFQQTLvthqBf,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:18,3/13/13 11:54,1,Pap,230949,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1971,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","I reached that verdict because the defendan't fingerprints were found at the scene. Additionally, there was an eyewitness identification.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,"None, I loved doing this, thanks!",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bxPZcijygzfiWSp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:15,3/13/13 12:03,1,Pap,214599,NJweak,Safari,iPad,768x1024,-1,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 6_1_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10B146 Safari/8536.25",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$90,000 to $99,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I don't believe Ms Dunn. Not only is her positive ID questionable at best, she says that she was at the convenience store to get gas. Her words were ""after I filled up my tank."" People in New Jersey don't pump their own gas... So what was she really doing there?",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5hB2SjxNStzkETP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:36,3/13/13 12:09,1,Pap,752417,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1960,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",BECAUSE THERE WERE NO FINGERPRINTS FOUND AT THE SCENE AND THE WITNESS COULD BE WRONG. IT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,NO,SO MUCH FOR FUN. THIS WAS VERY LEGHTHY,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bCrSn7CrYcI26SV,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:23,3/13/13 12:11,1,Pap,569303,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1024x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1991,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",He left the houseof the person who verified he was there and shortly spoek on the home phone along with lack of fingerprints at the scene make me believe the witness was mistaken and the defendant was not guilty ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,The video would not load beyond a certain point in the hit it was around the 12 minute mark i had to open the video on vimeo and finish it it is http://vimeo.com/61227061# i tried watching it from the start twice but when Officer Richardson said he conducted 200 lineups it paused and when i unpause it had restarted the video ,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_dbeRtWvxsX1Rndb,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:28,3/13/13 12:12,1,Pap,187978,RIstrong,Chrome,Macintosh,2560x1440,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_2) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Because the evidence presented by Barbara is based on memory, which is prone to inaccuracies. This is especially considering the interview with the photo lineup occurred three weeks after the robbery. His alibi is also not conclusive since Peter was not present with his girlfriend at the exact time the shooting happened. Regardless of this, without any other conclusive evidence beyond Barbara's testimony, I cannot declare the defendant guilty. ",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),Eyewitness saw the lineup three weeks after the crime.,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9oaoPgshJnJVwMd,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:21,3/13/13 12:13,1,Pap,419928,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1024x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$10,000 to 19,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",1. No mudrer weapon was found. / 2. No evidence of Mr. Brown being at the store was found (other than the eye witness) / 3. The eye witness fingered Mr. Brown weeks after the robery - To much time (for me) had passed to safely assume her memory was 100% accurate. / 4. Just because Mr. Brown passes the store on his way home does not make him guilty. / 5. Just because Mr. Brown was out of breath when answering his phone - does not mean he was running from the murder. / 6 Not enough details in the case to convict Mr. Brown without reasonable doubt.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,I did not.,"It was fun, and well put together.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eQGTRGwNrkaN48Z,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:25,3/13/13 12:14,1,Pap,204943,NJweak,Safari,Macintosh,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/536.26.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.2 Safari/536.26.17",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1992,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",They only had an eye witness view that is weeks old and could have been mistaken. They couldn't find the weapon used to commit this crime. The eye witness had been told by the police that the man she picked was a suspect in the investigation which gave her confidence in her choice. She only had a line up of five and didn't get enough diversity to make sure her decision was accurate.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eh70QGzVi2kfq4J,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:39,3/13/13 12:16,1,Pap,379758,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,Some college credit,"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","because there was no other evidence to convict the suspect. Although alot of the testimony seems to be convincing , after 3 weeks before being questioned, did the victom actually see the suspects face from hiding behind something in the Back of the store, more that likely she only seen the back side of his person",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,No,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,"the first witness seemed to be holding back smiles and laughs during her testimony , which made me to think she was untrustworthy.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_4GHk7tvJC65rowZ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:59,3/13/13 12:16,1,Pap,910399,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; ATT),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1975,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",witness testimony seemed to be very reliable to me,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,none,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5nF63Dkw2HzWoOp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:09,3/13/13 12:17,1,Pap,378550,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$50,000 to $59,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The eye witness positevely identified Mr. Brown as a person who commited the crime. Taking into the consideration the instructions that were given by the judge, I looked at the following: The stress level might have been high, however, the duration of the encounter was significant enough for the witness to take a good look at the deffendant. Also, the lighting in the store was good, which is helpful. The defandant was wearing a cap and had a gun, which could reduce the accuracy of the identifying the assulter. However, when the line up was conducted, the police took all the right measure in conducting the line up. I believe that the officer was not biased and followed the procedures well. The line up was conducted by a highly trained officer. / The defendant's girlfriend failed to provide a good alibi for the defendant. She stated that he left at 8:30, and she called him around 8:45, she also said that the store is 5 minute drive from her apartment, and the store is on the way to the defendant's apartment, which is 7-8 minutes away from her house. Therefore, making it 2-3 minutes away from the defendant's apartment. The witness says, she had about 2 minutes to look at the defendant and when the girlfriend called, Mr. Brown was out of breath. / Taking all of that into consideration, I believe, without reasonable doubt, that the defendant is guilty as charged.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),"The level of confidence of the eyewitness, and her ability to follow the instruction about not discussing the crime with anyone, to avoid getting suggestions. ",1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, everything worked perfectly.","This was a very fun and interesting survey, great job!",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_d58ENnlBTKbODk1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:45,3/13/13 12:18,1,Pap,499697,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I didn't think there was enough evidence against Mr. Brown to find him guilty.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, none.",,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8pqAuaKgP0hSd37,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:24,3/13/13 12:22,1,Pap,354518,NJstrong,Safari,Macintosh,1280x800,10.3.183,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8) AppleWebKit/534.50.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.6 Safari/533.22.3",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1964,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$50,000 to $59,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Reasonable Doubt: The main witness Mrs Dunn was 15' away from the crime, hiding behind a tall bread cart, ""terrified"". This case did not evaluate where the crime was situated in the store in relation to where Mrs Dunn was located. Was the perpetrator facing towards or away from her at the check out. He was wearing a hat, further obscuring a positive ID. Mrs Dunn also said she ""tried"" not to watch news reports about the crime suggesting that she did, this could have easily influenced her recall of the crime. Since there was no further evidence of Mr Brown at the crime scene, I have reasonable doubt that I cannot set aside.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),previously described,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cG7qRlqo6US9Nfn,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:38,3/13/13 12:25,1,Pap,217216,NJstrong,Chrome,Macintosh,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_2) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1990,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","Less than $10,000",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I think that there is reasonable doubt; the witness's identification is unreliable because of too much time passed.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),3 weeks between crime and lineup,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_4INFYZKxI7dvmdv,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:40,3/13/13 12:28,1,Pap,794972,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.2,1702x957,11.6.602.171,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; Trident/6.0; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; HPNTDFJS),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1982,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"Less than $10,000",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I don't feel they have enough evidence to prove definitely he was the murder or robber in either case. Also the witness may or may not accurately remember what the man looked like.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,The video blipped for a few seconds in the last part when the judge was talking to the jury.,no comments thanks for asking though ;),1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3dPDKl6PT7BVOqp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:54,3/13/13 12:31,1,Pap,363417,RIweak,Safari,Windows NT 6.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.57.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.7 Safari/534.57.2",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$80,000 to $89,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","based on the eyewitness testimony, the time of the crime he is guilty . his girlfriend was unable to correctly confirm the time she spoke to him on the phone and when she did speak to him he was out of breath. that goes to prove his guilt of fleeing the scene .",1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6opNVWjCYYSzvwh,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:22,3/13/13 12:33,1,Pap,535687,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1024x600,11.1.102,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty"," They only evidence the prosecution had was the witness, and the witness's testimony could not be considered reliable. Firstly, at the time of the crime the witness was frightened, had a view of the weapon, and the suspect was wearing a hat. The Judge warned that all three of these things can negatively affect identification. The identification was further affected by the three weeks between the crime and the lineup. Secondly, there were problems with how the lineup was conducted. The officer admitted that he adapts what he says for each lineup. In this case, the officer did not tell the witness that the suspect may not be in the lineup. Further, the witness claims that the officer told her that she had choose correctly afterwards. These last two things are contrary to the things the judge suggested for a reliable identification. Lastly, there was no evidence of the suspect being at the crime scene during the crime and he in fact he has an alibi. Regardless of whether or not the witness is telling the truth, there are two many reasons to consider that her identification may not be reliable. Therefore there is reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the suspect.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"When I clicked play the video did not start at first. I right-clicked it and went to 'view at vimeo'. After the video loaded at vimeo it also started playing in the original tab, so i closed vimeo and watched the video here.", The defense's suit was especially shiny.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cGCjNztrdBfB5FH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:43,3/13/13 12:33,1,Pap,415654,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1978,"Yes, Puerto Rican",Some Other Race,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$10,000 to 19,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I do not think that the prosecution was able to prove that the person was guilty. There is no evidence besides a scared woman's identification of the witness 3 weeks after the incident. That to me, is not reliable testimony. There is no murder weapon, no fingerprints, and no money found. Also, if the defendant had any previous record it was not noted, as it would have been. / / It doesn't seem plausible that a man would just randomly stop on his way home from his girlfriend's house, and rob a place 5 blocks from his house where he might be recognized. Criminals can be pretty dumb, but without evidence the circumstances don't even point to this man being guilty. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),"time lapse between line up and crime, no murder weapon, or other evidence",1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no computer problems...everything went smooth,terrible acting.... ,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eRGGMVIqg5VX1oF,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:43,3/13/13 12:35,1,Pap,923719,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1946,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There is no other evidence but one witness's testimony that he was the man who committed the crime. The photo lineup occured three weeks after the crime and was composed of 8 pictures only. The defendent was charged simply because he resembled the description of the perpetrator . He had an aliby from his girlfriend stating that he was at her aptment at the time of the crime. He answered his home phone shortly after arriving home. There was no gun found, nor was Brown known for owning a gun. There were no fingerprints found at the scene that matched Brown.The lack of further evidence to back up the charge means it's all based on one witness and that's not enough to find for murder. There is doubt and any doubt is too much doubt.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),too much time between the crime and the identification,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"The video was slow to load and ran haltingly, especially at first, but I saw and heard it all.",none,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_aaawgjkUmVVzGn3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:08,3/13/13 12:42,1,Pap,308256,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.1.102.55,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1987,"Yes, other Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Some Other Race,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",Even though there wasnt a lot of eveidence I think that the eye witness report was enough to get me to lean that way. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,No,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_a61N7VGv7eT0qUJ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:08,3/13/13 12:43,1,Pap,382125,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The witness was very adament in her disision to choose Peter Brown as the defendant, also Miss Reaz testomonie was shaky at best and had a motive to give a false alibi.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5jTi8a7VwmiZMCF,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:09,3/13/13 12:44,1,Pap,903782,RIweak,Chrome,Macintosh,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",the testimony of the girlfriend was very convincing plus i dont think the eyewitness got a good look at the guy scared for her life behind some shelves in the back and looking at him while he had a ball cap on,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cUDLGemwl6C2DM9,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:08,3/13/13 12:44,1,Pap,271771,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.5.502.146,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB7.4; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1987,"Yes, Mexican/Mexican American/Chicano",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was no other evidence that it was him or at what time he arrived at his house. Also, how could the witness get a clear view if the crime was across the room and she was hiding behind a bread rack. Plus I doubt that the robber was facing her direction and she most likely only got a side profile.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),There was no other evidence given,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,Some parts of the video did not match the audio but the voices were clear so I could still understand everything.,"I really like it, it was interesting.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5yzg7rt6EMuTajH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:47,3/13/13 12:47,1,Pap,564893,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,960x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1978,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I reached that verdict, because judging on the basis of the testimonies of the witness of the crime, the girlfriend of Peter Brown, the police officer and absense of a gun and fingerprints there are reasonable doubts that Peter Brown has committed this crime",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5jNpwUAEK9oOhz7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:00,3/13/13 12:47,1,Pap,969564,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,Some college credit,"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Because memory is not 100% correct and the photo line up did not occur until 3 weeks after the crime committed. ,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_d58GPLcssHcjx7n,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:40,3/13/13 12:49,1,Pap,547723,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,800x600,11.2.202,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1958,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",American Indian or Alaskan Native,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Really not sure, I might have misunderstood. There was an unexpected noise in the background.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Not at all
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"Well, yes, Cat jumped on my keyboard, totally unexpected. He is gone now.",Just wish I was more accurate.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0riCurSFW2oVXE1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:04,3/13/13 12:55,1,Pap,713044,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1920x1200,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1410.28 Safari/537.31",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1949,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",Ms Dunn said that she had a good two minutes looking at the perpetrator. I believe that being able to see someone for two minutes is enough time to be able to distinguish that person in a line up three weeks later.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8lfp4h216LV8XMp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:22,3/13/13 12:56,1,Pap,114620,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1024x600,-1,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Because I believe that most often, the eye witness account/memory is not reliable anymore, they should consider and look for more evidence other than the eye witness account. Further more, the witness had pinpointed the suspect in the line up after three weeks the accident occurred which I would think is too far of a time already. Besides the witness said that the guy was wearing a ball cap, so that would mean that she have not seen the hair of the suspect.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,I have not experienced problems while taking the survey.,"I did enjoy doing the task, I actually find it interesting. Thank you.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_1XiVai34DzYbg4l,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:25,3/13/13 12:57,1,Pap,251963,RIweak,MSIE,Windows NT 5.1,1280x800,11.1.102.62,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB7.4; BRI/1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; BRI/2),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",because of what the girl said sitting on the stand. she was so scared and crying and it looked like she was telling the truth.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eWfT3MupfRfWa8Z,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:08,3/13/13 13:03,1,Pap,442872,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$10,000 to 19,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The eye witness seemed sincere, but there are a lot of factors that make her seem unreliable. First, the duration of time between witnessing the crime and making the identification not only means her memories might have faded, but also means it's really very likely she was aware that Mr. Brown was a suspect via news sources. Though she says she saw no photographs of suspects in the news, it's still possible she's lying, or that she does not consciously recall seeing them, but nonetheless is being subconsciously influenced by them. Second, the visible weapon, the distance, the level of stress, and the fact that the perpetrator was wearing a cap all decrease her reliability. Her claim that she saw the criminal's face for two minutes seems very unlikely, for example, and makes it seem that she probably doesn't remember the event with much clarity. In addition, it seems likely that officer Lombard knew who the suspect was when conducting the interview. Though he was not on the case himself, I imagine he would have known due to the magnitude of the case: police presumably gossip with each other, and with a murder case remaining unsolved for three weeks I imagine they talked about it a lot. Though none of this invalidates the witness's testimony entirely, together it undermines it sufficiently that, with no supporting evidence, I feel there's a reasonable doubt as to Mr. Brown's guilt.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),Passage of time between the crime and the identification,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3VOwK53zyC9ujEV,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:26,3/13/13 13:10,1,Pap,429670,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1360x768,11.5.502,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1959,"Yes, Mexican/Mexican American/Chicano",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The recollection of the defendent's identity by Mrs. Dunn after a three week period is a weak basis upon which to convict him of the crimes. No corroborating evidence like fingerprints or a gun was produced. The testimony of Ms. Reyes also leaves much doubt as to whether or not the defendant had the opportunity to commit the crimes. There is more than a reasonable doubt as to his guilt.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_4UVHM5oNat0oKEd,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:35,3/13/13 13:16,1,Pap,200233,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1969,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$90,000 to $99,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I reached that verdict based on lack of physical evidence:finger prints, DNA, and the gun. Even if the gun could not be located but there were positive finger prints from the defendant at the scene I could have voted guilty. But with no physical evidence I could not, in good conscience vote guilty.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, everything ran smoothly.",I didn't find the actors terribly believable but the information was presented well. The questions and answers were clear and concise.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6RnCUwPs4N3zRhH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:20,3/13/13 13:18,1,Pap,939463,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1976,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","This was hard. I came to a decision that the state did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty. There was no physical evidence. No gun, fingerprints, or DNA. His girlfriend testified to his whereabouts. The witness was 15-20 away in the back of the store, identified two weeks after the incident. She also said she was terrified at the robbery and murder, so she was under distress. Lastly the procedures of the investigating officer's line-up lead me to decide the defendant was not guilty.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),lack of evidence,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No Problems.,None Thank You.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_afxEXitmusd61Pn,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:38,3/13/13 13:21,1,Pap,319153,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1994,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Lack of murder weapon. No surveillance video. No fingerprints. There's nothing that even puts him at the scene of the crime concretely, let alone evidence that has him robbing the store and murdering the clerk. Ms. Dunn is subject to human error as anybody is, so I don't believe that one individual's testimony alone is enough to find somebody guilty of any crime. The prosecution has to provide hard evidence to actually prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),Lack of evidence aside from the single eyewitness testimony.,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,"I found the attention check question asking how many witnesses testified to be a bit confusing, because I was unsure if it meant the number of witnesses testifying who had seen the crime (Just Ms. Dunn) or if it meant the total number of people testifying (three: Dunn, the officer, and the defendant's girlfriend). ",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cuskxv622RUS5OR,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:35,3/13/13 13:21,1,Pap,246831,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$50,000 to $59,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I made up my mind as soon as I knew eye witness testimony was the only evidence they had, it is notoriously unreliable. It didn't help the eye witness didn't seem credible and stumbled on the question about wearing glasses. I would need physical evidence to consider convicting.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,none,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9oV1rmsSQohSDWd,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:49,3/13/13 13:24,1,Pap,314541,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1152x864,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There were no fingerprints or DNA, so I had reasonable doubt.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),The lineup took place 3 weeks later.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,I didn't have any problems.,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5bdDNlmBhjgIJCJ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:30,3/13/13 13:26,1,Pap,833615,NJweak,Chrome,Macintosh,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1958,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The questioning was too superficial. Witnesses were allowed to go beyond the scope of the question - not likely, particularly on cross. Did the accused own similar shorts and sneakers? Phone records to substantiate timeline? 3 week time lapse between initial witness meeting and photo lineup. Witness admitted to be so terrified. Lineup procedure included officer who knew accused. Investigative officer provided her with 'blonde hair' information ON THE STAND! / / Not to mention, the instructions - which lasted about 3 times longer than the questioning - basically made the 'reasonable doubt' for the case. It was far more potent that any of the weak questioning IMHO. / / ",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),"Although the officer said he followed Lakeside's SOP, he didn't. The procedure seemed flawed by design also (including the 5 photos item checked above).",1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,Nope. Went very smoothly on my Mac running 10.7 and Chrome.,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3mTp4ucljEPLWC1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:39,3/13/13 13:29,1,Pap,766399,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.5.502,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",we can check the call logs whether he was at home or not. It sometimes happens that people forget the face of the defendant as it was 3 weeks back,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,nope,nope,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_dgLcI1W4PNQwCrj,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:28,3/13/13 13:29,1,Pap,243937,,Firefox,Android,320x480,11.1.115,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Android; Mobile; rv:19.0) Gecko/19.0 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,78,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_efD8yAYlTIkeRff,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:31,3/13/13 13:33,1,Pap,698120,,Safari,Android 2.3.5,800x823,-1,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5; en-us; Venture Build/GRJ90) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,12,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_eDxICw8i6LqOfWt,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:50,3/13/13 13:37,1,Pap,910290,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,800x600,11.4.402,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",I believed the witness when she said she positively identified the suspect and I did not trust the defense's arguments and felt like he was trying to fool me by placing doubt artificially into my head; I did not like the way he questioned the witnesses,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_aWNl9fcOKirvYtD,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:09,3/13/13 13:45,1,Pap,547277,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1952,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",No hard evidence + Witness three weeks later = doubt. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Not at all
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),Length of time between crime and photo lineup. ,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,Yes,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9WYhnLFPeFe2TLD,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:59,3/13/13 13:46,1,Pap,195200,NJstrong,Safari,Macintosh,1680x1050,11.3.300,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/534.57.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.7 Safari/534.57.2",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1993,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$200,000 or more",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was enough reasonable doubt, that I could not say for sure the defendant was guilty.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),No weapon was found,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bpDT2DOpF7nwQ85,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:56,3/13/13 13:47,1,Pap,540615,NJweak,Safari,iPad,768x1024,-1,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$150,000 to $199,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Insufficient evidence was presented, the one reputable piece, Dunns account was not conducted in an unbiased manner following a standardized protocol to minimize leading the witness. Due to the poor execution of the witness interviewing process, I cannot say wo reasonable doubt that brown was guilty. I will say that having access to view the line up and seeing personally identifiable attributes, ie scars tattoos could alter my decision.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,No,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_07onL6W6RvtzbAp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:14,3/13/13 13:49,1,Pap,316383,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1680x1050,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The fact that the defendent recieved a call on his home phone only 15 minutes after leaving his girlfriend's house. I would imagine the decision to rob and shoot would take some time considering and building up the courage to perform. Then upon arriving home after the act, would be difficult to gain composure,answer the phone and come up with a lie so quickly.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),the line up was conducted 3 weeks after the incident,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,NO,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9S9EosE6pkYPunz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:11,3/13/13 13:49,1,Pap,412917,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Based on the lack of physical evidence and the length of time that the suspect was identified I can not say without a reasonable doubt that he was present at the crime scene. There was no evidence other then the i-witness statement that would incriminate the defendent. There was no gun found, no DNA, and no fingerprints. The witness was at the back of the store hiding behind something and I do not think she would have had a good enough view of his face to be sure 3 weeks later of who she saw. I believe that she is mistaken. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),The distance away from the robber at the time of the crime. And the suggestion that the robber had blond hair.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,I think it was a fun survey. Thanks for oppotunity. I can say that eye witness is not very accurate most of the time. Many cases have been proven years later that the eye witness was wrong due to DNA. ,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_1Ar64QFi8qZsRHD,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:49,3/13/13 13:52,1,Pap,163690,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1280x1024,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1968,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","Less than $10,000",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I am not comfortable with having no evidence except for a single eyewitness who was under a great deal of stress. Eyewitnesses are notoriously inaccurate...strangers can look remarkably similar to one another and so be easily confused. Better had the store invested in a video camera...the camera doesn't have recall problems. While Mrs. Dunn's account seems truthful and reasonable, she feared for her life so stress was very high. Although it may have seemed to her that she had 2 minutes of unobstructed viewing of the perpetrator's face, she likely did not have that much time especially since she also was able to recall details about the gun (so she was distracted by it). Three weeks is a long time to go between the event and the photo array and claim to NOT have any outside influences (television, radio, newspapers) to possibly influence her memory. It is also unlikely that the distance from the back of a convenience store (where she was hiding) is 15 or 20 feet from the counter....more likely, she was twice that distance away and this could have affected her viewing. Her initial description is rather vague: 5 foot 10 inch white male of medium build with long blond hair and a baseball cap could apply to a LOT of people. I would have expected her to report some unique feature or at least remember shape of face, nose, etc. Using 8 photos in the lineup was adequate but it would have been better to use more to really force the witness to think / look. In short, had there been several eyewitnesses that were all pointing toward this defendant, I would be convinced but with no physical evidence or other eyewitnesses, I have reasonable doubt.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),lack of other physical evidence and no other eyewitnesses to corroborate this witness' identification,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No problems.,"Having never served on a jury, I was confused about the definition of ""witness"". When you ask me how many witnesses were called, I selected one -- Mrs. Dunn was the only person to witness the crime. However, I know that a total of 3 people were called to the stand (Mrs. Dunn, Officer Richardson, and Ms. Reyes). If all of these people are considered ""witnesses"" then my answer would have been 3. ",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3NOgRyjcN8aUZ49,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:07,3/13/13 14:00,1,Pap,480319,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The evidence given by the prosecution is not substantial enough to held the accused guilty. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,None,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_byJBqn1f73rIKOh,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:13,3/13/13 14:09,1,Pap,708527,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1957,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The State did not meet their burden of proof in my opinion. The eyewitness described the suspect in terse description that a police or trained observer would use yet thee was no evidence that this was her usual manner. The girlfriend presented reasonable doubt of an alibi and was not refuted by the State. ,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,I believe I saw the end of the judge's instruction but the video just stopped and thee was an option to re-start it. That was confusing.,"Most convenience stores have video inside or out. I may be mistaken about gas being sold there, but in any case there would be a receipt showing the last transaction to show the time. The 911 should have been recorded which would have given a baseline for the witness appearance and perception. I understand the evidence had to be kept to a minimum, but in doing so the circumstantial evidence to support guilty just isn't there.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6V6L9LxDhL6JRPf,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:25,3/13/13 14:14,1,Pap,976849,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1970,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",The eye witness identified the suspect in the line-up as well as in court. The defense testimony seemed weak. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,Yes,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No problems,Was a fun survey.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5szB2w3X4lQFVul,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:18,3/13/13 14:22,1,Pap,416892,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1994,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",There was not enough proof to show that without a doubt he was guilty.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5mvViI7VJD2yn3f,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:45,3/13/13 14:22,1,Pap,473737,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Some Other Race,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There is a lack of evidence. The only evidence is a single eye witness during a frightening and stressful crime. No gun, or any link to a gun can be tied to the defendent. Additionally, there is DNA, or mention of the money stolen during the crime. / / Even though, the defendent alibi is extremely weak, I would be hard pressed to declare him guilty of the crime.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, the video ran very smoothly.",,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9AHggRk5YScR6h7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:09,3/13/13 14:26,1,Pap,728199,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1192x670,11.0.1.152,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; eSobiSubscriber 1.0.0.40; MAAR; .NET4.0C; BRI/2),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1961,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I don't think there is enough proof. The eyewitness waited too long to come in to make a statement and view photo lineup.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The eyewitness delayed too long in viewing the lineup.,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,no,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5ASNXm1MmnNOuah,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:16,3/13/13 14:28,1,Pap,700517,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.2,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",because it just seem like his girlfriend lied for him.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0Cfwm8IabfAPqxD,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:57,3/13/13 14:32,1,Pap,989162,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","i believe the defence's arguement, that there was not sufficient evidence to convict someone of such a serious crime. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),"the only evidence is eyewitness testimony, which is not sufficient in my eyes",1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0GI5IxCD2UWyyJn,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:47,3/13/13 14:33,1,Pap,614507,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1992,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The murder weapon was never found. While his girlfriend was not totally sure which time he left, he still has an alibi. A large amount of time passed between the lineup and the crime. The lineup contained people who looked similar.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, everything worked well.","No additional comments, thank you.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5jcjI3H5TB2ESIl,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:58,3/13/13 14:34,1,Pap,413004,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1441x810,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; BRI/2; AskTbORJ/5.15.14.29495),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1982,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only witness did not identify him for 3 weeks and no other evidence was submitted. She admitted she was horrified at the situation, which could have affected her memory as well.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),lack of evidence,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0rlxJg85qcgOwvz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:48,3/13/13 14:38,1,Pap,846384,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1990,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I reached my verdict based on the lack of other evidence, aside from the eye witness present at the crime. There was nothing provided such as DNA, fingerprints, or the fire arm to prove that the accused had in fact commited the crime. Also the witness who identified the accused was given the line up after three weeks, which seems like a long time afterward so it leads me to believe that her memory of the event and the person who commited the crime were not as accurate had she been given the line up during say sometime during days following the incident.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The eyewitness was given the line up nearly a month after the crime,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"The video stopped and started, like it was buffering/loading, many times throughout the video.",,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6l1toAIz651NqjH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:50,3/13/13 14:39,1,Pap,369851,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1965,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was no mention of finding the weapon, which was a gun. Which means no fingerprints. The Defendant was at home while the store was being robbed. He did not go to the store. The witness that was in the store while it was being robbed was 15 feet away, She just noticed the clothes and the ballcap. She was not able to pick out the Defendant untill 3 weeks later. There is no proof that he robbed and murdered that cashier.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9YtcDMt7juA0d0x,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:11,3/13/13 14:50,1,Pap,830237,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The time it took to get the eye witness to identify the suspect was quite long. It was also a little hard to believe that she would have had such a clear look his face without being exposed to him. There was also no trace of incriminating evidence found at the scene of the crime or the suspects residence.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6Gsr5JE1pX67zRH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:01,3/13/13 14:51,1,Pap,184484,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.97 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1967,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$100,000 to $149,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I believe the evidence that consisted only on an eye witness account was extremely flimsy and certainly does not preclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed this crime. I also believe that 3 weeks is an awful long time for a witness to try to recollect a person even in such a dramatic situation and therefore deem her to be unreliable. I did not have much confidence in the police officer's testimony and I'm troubled by the fact of there not being any fingerprints found or the murder weapon found either by the police.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ disagree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),Lack of other evidence.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No problems.,The judges instructions were exceedingly long and complex. Almost seemed to be more from the judge in terms of instructions versus the actual trial itself.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3DUoXBIqkpUVTrn,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:07,3/13/13 14:57,1,Pap,597517,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I agree in that the witness, Ms. Dunn, may have believed her recollection of the defendant's face was accurate. However, I also think that the fact that she made this connection three weeks later presents a problem. I think there is a good chance that she may think she recognizes him, but doesn't, and unless there is actual proof, it shouldn't be admissible in court.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),"The ""three weeks later"" bit is really important.",1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9uAWMUbHGddZfaB,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:20,3/13/13 15:01,1,Pap,832301,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1440x900,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The eye witness was credible on the stand. She described the suspect in detail, gave precise answers calmly and seemed confident. She looks to have a good recollection becasue she is younger, wore her contacts, noted the store lighting was bright and she was standing 12 ft away from suspect indicating she had a good view of the suspect. The suspect's girlfriend on the other hand did not have concrete time line. The time gap and distance between her place and suspect's could put him at the store. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0CEuN7gcXZJeK7H,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:15,3/13/13 15:01,1,Pap,532676,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1992,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was no other evidence that the suspect was guilty, and eyewitness identification can be inaccurate. She may have been distracted by the gun, he could have hidden himself, or she may have heard something that skewed her memory on the news. It also was three weeks before she identified him, increasing the chance of a false match. ",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_4MhYBvtdhN6uFi5,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:56,3/13/13 15:06,1,Pap,647442,RIstrong,Safari,iPad,768x1024,-1,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 6_1_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10B146 Safari/8536.25",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1991,"Yes, Mexican/Mexican American/Chicano",Some Other Race,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","He only had one person saying that he wasn't guilty. There was no actual evidence proving he wasn't. The people had an actual witness, why would she point him out in the line up if it was not him.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6F5ovarGJWlE5ZH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:33,3/13/13 15:12,1,Pap,847502,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1970,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Not only do I feel doubt about the lineup procedure used, which was completely unresolved by the officer and the prosecutor telling me 'It's always been done this way', but with no other evidence the whole case is circumstantial. Also, there was one thing the witness to the murder said that makes me think it wasn't a robbery at all - 'where's the rest of it?' 'I'll have it for you...' makes it sound like a drug hit.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The accused was the last picture in the lineup,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_abgK3enSvFcHw2h,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:19,3/13/13 15:12,1,Pap,310341,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some high school,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The police brought the suspect in on another charge, due to his physical appearance. They placed him in a line up and he was identified by an eyewitness. The instructions given to her were ""Pick out someone who looks familiar."" Given that this seems to be a relatively small neighborhood, it's possible she saw him in the neighborhood. Upon searching his home, the police did not find any other evidence linking him to the crime. They did not find the gun. His girlfriend testified to him being at her apartment until 8:30 and she spoke with him again at 8:45. I do not believe he had the time to rob the store and then make it home that quickly.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,Audio skipped slightly.,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3xWsdqXQWP8ycm1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:59,3/13/13 15:13,1,Pap,985088,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,-1,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",there is no evidence linking Mr. Peter Brown to the crime other than the eye witness and what an individual witnesses can be subjective and without any hard evidence to collaborate it I have a lot of doubt that is was him.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,Other (please explain),lack of other evidence,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"none, video worked well",nothing really,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3h40ac2ZhPYMPrv,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:39,3/13/13 15:14,1,Pap,148081,RIweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.0,1117x698,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/5.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; AskTbNCH2/5.15.9.30496),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1954,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Eyewitness identification is one of the weakest forms of proof in a trial. This witness did not even view a photo lineup for three full weeks.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),3 week delay in photo lineup,1,2,3,4,Very unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,"if you want an answer with a 50 character maximum, you should include a character counter with the question",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3Rbnj9qR0HxLpZP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:55,3/13/13 15:19,1,Pap,425419,NJstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.0,1440x900,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; GTB7.4; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET4.0C),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1962,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$50,000 to $59,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",Because the witness was very convincing that she was positive that the man who did the crime was the defendent.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,no,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_2tOUbFg0WJyZjzT,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:36,3/13/13 15:23,1,Pap,376077,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.33 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1436.2 Safari/537.33",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$150,000 to $199,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","From all of the information provide and my previous education about the unreliability of eye-witness testimony, coupled with the complete lack of any other evidence, I have reason for reasonable doubt to exist. That there is a witness that contends the accused was with them for most of that night and also received a home phone call, decreases the probability that the accused committed a murder on a whim. The few week delay of the identification also casts doubt on the situation. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),Unreliability of eyewitness testimony,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No problems.,Interesting experiment.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8D09Ez4ZzWgarZP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:35,3/13/13 15:24,1,Pap,972424,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1947,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The testimony of the police was apparently truthful, but the question is whether the eye witness's memory of the incident was reliable. She seemed as though she believed what she said she saw but she could be mistaken. The defendant's girl friend appeared to be telling the truth, but she did have the motivation to lie for her boy friend. I believe the result of the trial leaves you in an impasse because you don't know whom to believe. This is reasonable doubt, so you must aquit the defendant",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"Although I could hear the people who participated in the trial , the volume was a bit low and there didn't seem to be a way t adjust it.",,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_2sozUDL3F2AZHU1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:31,3/13/13 15:27,1,Pap,852573,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1280x800,10.3.183,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0.1,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Deciding on a guilty verdict would be from one eyewitness that might have been distracted by never seeing a gun before.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,Nope,Nope,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eyX5rs1eK1qBsIB,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:52,3/13/13 15:28,1,Pap,256800,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1024x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The fact that Peter Brown was out of breath when his girlfriend called seemed unusual. Especially when he claimed it was from getting the mail, which he usually did as he entered the apartment - not as a seperate action later. It seemed too suspicious to ignore.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cwGuxvwTwZlRMUZ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:57,3/13/13 15:34,1,Pap,546566,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1280x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1957,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Several things stood out to me: 1. Dunn seemed to be smiling as though she had been coached and we pleased that she was answering the prosecuters questions correctly. 2. there is no physical evidence linking Brown to the crime. 3. What happened to the video that all little stores like that generally have? 4. Brown's lineup was three weeks later. No one will recall a face so long after the event. All big omissions for putting a man in jail (or to death).,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),I dont like Dunn she looks shifty to me.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,Everything went ok.,I sure hope Brown got off ok (and is not guilty) The police work in this case was very poor in my opinion.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_00qCHgNZfwbwhZr,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:47,3/13/13 15:35,1,Pap,313845,NJweak,Safari,Macintosh,1280x800,10.3.183,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8) AppleWebKit/534.50.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.6 Safari/533.22.3",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$80,000 to $89,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The evidence was flawed and can not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The police officer brought the witness in 3 weeks after the incident to identify the suspect. The case is built on circumstantial evidence and there is no DNA evidence.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Very unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8k49mMso2CPqOBT,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:57,3/13/13 15:35,1,Pap,173148,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1956,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I reached the verdict because the only evidence against the defendant was the testimony of one eyewitness. The identification came three weeks later and the defendant was arrested solely on an identification that could have fit thousands of people.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_1FAStbrNQjVTThz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:46,3/13/13 15:39,1,Pap,421668,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1600x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I think that the witness being shown pictures of the suspects three weeks later is not enough evidence to prove that the defendant is guilty. The gun was never found and there was no other evidence that the suspect committed the crime. If there was another witness who also pointed out the suspect, then I think it would be enough evidence that he commited the crime, but there was only one witness and no other evidence.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_78ajxLahiAyKkU5,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:41,3/13/13 15:40,1,Pap,935281,RIstrong,,,,,,,,,,,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",I reached that verdict because the evidence of the eye witness is very important in this case and she sounds very confident. Most importantly the accused's girlfriend did notice that he was out of breath when she had called him after he had left her house. There is a very strong likelihood that the accused went to the convenience store right after leaving his girlfriend's house and committed the crime and rushed home when he got her call. So I feel that he is guilty.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No I did not encounter any problem.,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8kVVWFsQn9s9vTL,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:54,3/13/13 15:41,1,Pap,227432,NJstrong,,,,,,,,,,,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$50,000 to $59,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The judge made statements that influenced my decision. Things such as eyewitness accounts and identification can be influenced by stress. I also don't believe the witness could see a clear view of the witness if they were hiding behind a store shelf.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_2r9jxJLDGPU2JCt,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:56,3/13/13 15:45,1,Pap,198318,NJstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.0,1280x960,11.2.202.235,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.2; MS-RTC LM 8; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1982,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$200,000 or more",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Due to the lack of physical evidence and only one witness, I cannot pronounce him guilty.",1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_agEFH4zupwNtBl3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:41,3/13/13 15:45,1,Pap,472589,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.5.502.110,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",American Indian or Alaskan Native,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty", asjdliaweut galgha;lsdg hashjasfasg aksf jgg a as laskgjalkfhg aklfdj lgjaa;lgjalkg agagl;jag jasdflkrtgh artia afsdkjh gae,1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,kg,k,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_7VOADBKgy2lYdSt,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:43,3/13/13 15:45,1,Pap,818274,,Chrome,Macintosh,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.99 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,88,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_4IUZMvfBptgZYNf,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:57,3/13/13 15:47,1,Pap,242448,NJweak,Firefox,Macintosh,1280x800,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The case rests on one witness who identified the defendant after only a single brief photo line up. She was not informed that the defendant may not be in the line up and she provided a description of what the suspect looked like prior to the selection of photographs used in the photo line up. ,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,None,Minor detail: The witness claims she went into the store to pay for her gas after she filled up her car. This is not possible in New Jersey. An attendant fills the gas and collects the money while the customer waits in the car. ,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8l7rDn6oR8WWH9H,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:13,3/13/13 15:50,1,Pap,148649,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x600,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","It does seem very, very, very suspicious, but identifying somebody three weeks after the fact, and it being only one witness, I would have to seriously question how accurate this is, even though the women seems to be in her right mind and everything. There's evidence, but there's definitely still reasonable doubt.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,Other (please explain),Human memory is very faulty.,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_74kmpTW9EBavpK5,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:54,3/13/13 15:52,1,Pap,270988,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1152x864,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","I reached that verdict because I felt the confidence of the eye witness carried a great deal of weight. Although the photo identification of the defendant didn't take place until 3 weeks after the crime, there were only 5 suspects in the line up, the suspect wore a hat, and she was under a fair amount of stress, her description of the suspect never changed at any point. She was pretty detailed when interviewed by the police the next morning following the crime which showed me she was very focused on the suspect despite her stress. She stated that she did not pay much attention to media coverage about the trial (even if she was not able to avoid all). I was also swayed by the fact that the defendant did not truly have an alibi for the time the crime was committed, and also may have had the opportunity (considering the gas station was on the route he would have taken from his girlfriend's house to this own house).",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),the witness identified the defendant in the line up immediately,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,None.,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0UMPw8MebUFxE8Z,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:05,3/13/13 15:57,1,Pap,952563,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1987,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","While the eyewitness feels certain that Peter Brown is the man she saw committing the crime, there is doubt as the whether she is correct. The identification took place three weeks after she witnessed the crime. This both gave time for her memory of the criminal to fade, and also gave time for news reports and discussions about the crime to colour her recollection. In addition, the lineup was conducted by an officer who knew which photo matched the suspect, and he took no measures to hide the photos from himself to account for that knowledge. Thus, he may have, knowingly or unknowingly, signaled to the witness which photo was the suspect. / / At the crime scene, the criminal both held a weapon, which would have drawn some of the witness's attention and memory, and wore a hat, which would have increased the difficulty of identifying him. While she claimed she was somewhat close to the criminal, her account on that front cannot be trusted. / / In addition, no further evidence, including the murder weapon and the suspect's fingerprints, were found. The suspect's girlfriend also claimed that he did not own a gun, and backed up his alibi (though still left a little time for him to commit the murder).",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),There were factors at the crime scene to increase difficulty of recollection.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,None,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8iSS4qlDogamJRr,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:17,3/13/13 15:58,1,Pap,509671,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.1.102,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1982,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I decided that the defendant was not guilty because I did not feel like the prosecution presented a clear case. There was no mention of prior criminal offenses or whether or not the defendant was financially and emotionally stable and in need of money. In addition, they could have asked his girlfriend what clothes the defendant was wearing and compare that to the testimony of the eye witness because there was no time for him to change on his way home from his girlfriends house. Also there was no murder weapon and no fingerprints even though the guy who did rob the store didn't seem like he was smart enough to not leave fingerprints behind. Basically, there were a lot of unanswered questions.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,n/a,n/a,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_1YVVpGd2JcdAoGp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:01,3/13/13 15:59,1,Pap,632488,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1152x864,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1956,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,,,,,"No, not guilty",There was not enough evidence for a convition. I have no idea what the damn prosecuters office was doing bringing such a weak case to a court room. the DA should be demoted to dogcatcher! Maybe then he can get more (dog) convictions right. Also the damn judge talks waaaay the hell tooo much! What the heck was he reading anyway? The police academy handbook?,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),It all just smelled fishy to me. Like a setup or something.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,Yes,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,It ran a little slow at times.,Was this a real trial? I can't believe this POS made it to a courtroom!,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5jMZEiGp2h1qhMh,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:14,3/13/13 16:03,1,Pap,418992,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1280x720,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Some Other Race,Some college credit,"$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Because I can not say without a doubt that the defendant was even present during the robbery. There was no DNA or fingerprint evidence found and the weapon was never found. ,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,I found the study to be quite interesting and engaging as well. ,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eOISUkXmSzupHlr,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:21,3/13/13 16:07,1,Pap,494264,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1972,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$100,000 to $149,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I am not 100% convinced the evidence point to Brown being guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. His girlfriend put that reasonable doubt out there for me.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),girlfriends alibi,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,no,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_1ZjJ31dHMvpUca9,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:31,3/13/13 16:09,1,Pap,958406,RIweak,MSIE,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.1.102.55,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2; .NET4.0C; BRI/2),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1987,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Well, the witnessed said that she saw him but thats all they had to offer. I thought they didnt presetn enough evidence besides her that put him at the scene. No footage?",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),No footage or anything else puttin ghim at the scene,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,No,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bKP46C6VfUx1RB3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:18,3/13/13 16:12,1,Pap,641204,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","As the judge suggested (regarding time, number of line-ups done, and the officer knowing the suspect's identity), there is doubt regarding the time frame in which it took for Ms Dunn to do an initial line-up (3 weeks) and that she did only one. In addition to the fact that the Officer admitted to knowing the real suspects identity.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),Dunn only did 1 line-up and it was 3 weeks after the initial crime,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"The video got laggy and slowed/paused itself several times (as if buffering). / Also, when done the video, it simply started over but there were no instructions on pressing the red >> button at the bottom (this may cause confusion regarding the ""did you enter it twice"" question.",It was very interesting. / It was also a great way for me to get a feel for the judicial system and how an actual trial like this would occur.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8Bw7fGBb6Iyawy9,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:26,3/13/13 16:16,1,Pap,888565,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$30,000 to $39,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only solid evidence is the eye witness identification. I believe the eye witness was honest and not biased by the police, and her level of confidence makes me think she probably did see the man she accused, but she is still one person who identified a person 3 weeks later after a 2-minute crime where she was hiding. / / The fact that he was driving by the store where the crime was committed and was picked up for assault 3 weeks later are somewhat evidence against him, but it doesn't seem solid enough to me to convict him for murder.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The eyewitness was hiding because the perpetrator had a gun. She was very scared at the time.,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"no, everything worked well","What a tough case. I'm glad I'm not on that jury. I have to admit that I would be tempted to go with majority opinion on the jury, because I'm so on the fence. I do believe he committed the crime; the coincidences are too great. However, there just wasn't enough evidence to convict him of murder.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_ba88nMMOuhW5kAR,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:30,3/13/13 16:20,1,Pap,974888,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1440x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1950,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Mrs Dunn unsure of hair color and I didn't think there were enough photos for her to look at. Also no other evidfence.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9AEHLMd1Uj8qfRP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:09,3/13/13 16:23,1,Pap,500782,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1988,"Yes, Mexican/Mexican American/Chicano",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",its about boy who broke shop and lawyer had brought in an action againts to him,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no thanks ,no thanks,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_d07ltpshJu1Y6bz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:49,3/13/13 16:23,1,Pap,143293,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,857x482,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; Media Center PC 6.0; MDDC; BRI/2),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1968,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,Some college credit,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",i reached my verdict because there was no physical evidence and the eye witness didnt get to see a photo line up until 3 weeks after the crime was committed. she coud be wrong.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),the time that passed,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,no,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_ezgejilgWJ1hbal,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:43,3/13/13 16:33,1,Pap,987544,NJstrong,Safari,iPad,768x1024,-1,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 6_1_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10B146 Safari/8536.25",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1960,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$50,000 to $59,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The eye witness was not ask to identify the photos of the suspects for three weeks. It appears she was exposed to several news stories describing the crimes committed and the robber. Also, it appears she may have been led, inadvertently by the police officer conducting the photo lineup.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_80KqhnwxItXnCzH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:55,3/13/13 16:33,1,Pap,427195,RIweak,Safari,Macintosh,1440x900,11.5.502,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_3) AppleWebKit/534.53.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.3 Safari/534.53.10",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1993,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","No real evidence was proven that he was there or committed the crime. Three weeks is a long time to remember someones face especially from a distance while the person has on a ball cap. The description of the man sounded like the average man, so I believe she has a false memory of what the person who committed the crime looked like. ",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8IgwvAfyVLaUizj,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:32,3/13/13 16:33,1,Pap,189907,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; AskTbNCH2/5.15.15.35882; BRI/2),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1960,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was no evidence that identified Mr. Peter Brown as the undisputed perpetrator of the robbery and murder outside of the one eyewitness, Mrs. Barbara Jane Dunn. Mr. Brown's fingerprints were not found at the scene of the crime, nor was the gun found to link him to the murder. Mrs. Dunn admitted to being shakey, nervous, and very upset. She wasn't able to provide an interview until the next morning. Not only could her view of the incident be skewed by such upset, but she viewed a man who was wearing a ballcap and who was holding a gun. There are many eyewitnesses who believe they can identify the guilty, when in fact they cannot. Given this reasonable doubt, I cannot find Mr. Brown Guilty. That said, I think he may well have been the robber/shooter.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),There was no physical evidence.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,None.,"I believe there would be substantially more evidence (even if just circumstantial) before the Defendent would be charged with such serious crimes. I do, however, understand the difficulty in relying upon eyewitness testimony given the frequency of eyewitness mistakes.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_d0GGwGDK1pzJujr,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:48,3/13/13 16:34,1,Pap,684210,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1982,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","i dont think the evidence was conclusive enough to choose guilty. there was only one witness and the suspect had an alibi, which wasnt disproven, and there was no dna or other concrete evidence so i could not guiltlessy chose guilty because of the lack of evidence. that is why i chose not guilty.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"the volume was so low on the video that i had to strain to hear it, even turned all the way up",,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eD2uFOIGpQ9JtMp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:01,3/13/13 16:36,1,Pap,844999,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1680x1050,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1946,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",There was no physical evidence. The only evidence was the eyewitness report. If there had been other evidence along with the eyewitness report I might have chosen a different verdict. I know that sometimes memory isn't what we think it is and three weeks is a long time between the time she saw the crime committed and the date she saw the line up pictures.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bjzSUhZTBybOkWp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:47,3/13/13 16:39,1,Pap,449757,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only evidence seems to be from an eyewitness ID that took place 3 weeks after the crime. There were deviations from best practice in the ID process, apparently. The eyewitness was hiding behind something and could not have had prolonged viewing of the crime as she thought.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),Distance of eyewitness from the crime and her viewing of the gun at the time.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bOe46Ipy1JpqH4h,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:10,3/13/13 16:53,1,Pap,477271,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.5.502,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","the lack of suspects fingerprints at the store, and the time period that past between when the witness was able to identify the witness and the short period of time the witness had to really observe the criminal expecially with the precene of a gun and that she has never seen one up close could have ben a distraction",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),the time frame from crime to lineup,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8AKqut9LXC7wMGV,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:03,3/13/13 16:54,1,Pap,715120,RIstrong,Safari,iPad,768x1024,-1,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 6_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10B141 Safari/8536.25",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1990,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","To be proven guilty in a criminal trial, the burden of proof lies with the prosecution. In this particular case, the prosecution relied on the experience of the officer who took the witness' testimony and the alibi provided by Brown's girlfriend. The most critical element in the prosecutions case however, was the testimony of the witness. While most of the emphasis is placed with her seeing the defendant, the window of time was too long before the incident occurred and the identification in the lineup. In three weeks she could have forgotten what Brown looked like.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,Nope.,These guys should be on Law and Order,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bILMJIxuCrcwu7b,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:06,3/13/13 16:55,1,Pap,656776,NJstrong,Safari iPhone,iPhone,320x480,-1,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10A523 Safari/8536.25",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$10,000 to 19,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I reached the verdict of not guilty because I had reasonable doubt that he did not commit the crime. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),No weapon or fingerprints were found to implicate the suspect ,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, everything ran smoothly and the video quality was excellent",Thank you ,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8CVrmiekR8LBTlr,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:20,3/13/13 16:56,1,Pap,337473,RIweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; BRI/1; BRI/2),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1961,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I believe the eyewitness and I don't believe his girlfriend. I am very suspicious of him as he lives close by, was available to commit the crime during the time period, has commited other violent crimes and was suspcious to the police when questioned about this crime. However, eyewitness testimony is often incorrect and it had been a long time since the crime and the id. I don't think one eyewitness is enough to prevent doubt on sending someone away for life or to their death.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_4Z7od8zudlpWtWR,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:24,3/13/13 17:00,1,Pap,909946,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1952,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The defendant was positively identified by a creditable eye witness in a police line up. She was able to give details immediately following the crime and she witnessed the shooting in person. Witness provided complete description, race, height, weight, hair color and what he was wearing. This was done within minutes of the shooting.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,great HIT more please,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_71yX4IHgEzq7mYJ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:29,3/13/13 17:02,1,Pap,849636,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Doctorate degree (e.g., PhD, EdD)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",-He was positively IDed by a witness who was present during the crime; he did not have a solid alibi for the date and time in question. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no.,"This was interesting, thanks.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cFRjF4pLXIFE2oJ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:16,3/13/13 17:07,1,Pap,156213,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1965,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty"," At first I actually thought guilty but then when I thought there's no gun, no fingerprints, no dna. There's only the lady id'ing him which could be a mistake. / The fact that he left his girlfriends and she called him and he was all out of breath is suspicous but I can't through him in prison for that. I need alot more evidence to convict the man. Does the convenience store have camera's? The cops needed to search his house from top to bottom. From the chimney on down. ",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),"Lack of fingerprints,dna,gun not found, did store have camera's",1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4, None,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_1SpX7YzD6vV3zRr,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:36,3/13/13 17:11,1,Pap,348701,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1953,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","eye witness very very crediable, his girlfriend was not",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,interesting,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_doIQi9h5bOh0Amx,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:29,3/13/13 17:17,1,Pap,538870,NJweak,Safari,Macintosh,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_2) AppleWebKit/536.26.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.2 Safari/536.26.17",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1972,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Besides the testimony of the eye witness, there is no evidence. No gun or fingerprints. Additionally, the judge said that the line up photos should have been six not five. Further, common sense dictates that a person hiding behind a rack in a convenience store as to not be noticed and shot would not have a very good memory. ",1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"no, everything came through loud and clear... ","No, thank you. ",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_79Qk2YCxWx35mZf,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:33,3/13/13 17:25,1,Pap,715392,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","Less than $10,000",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","One witness, who didn't talk to the media, and thus wasn't exposed to any biased accounts of who was guilty. / Lineup procedure was largely unbiased. (Witness wasn't told that the probable suspect was in the lineup, lineup conducted by experienced officers, suspects arresting officer was involved, but wasn't present.) / Possible that suspect could have left the house of the girlfriend, robbed the quickstop, and reached home in the allotted time-frame. / Gunman described as quick to anger, suspect arrested for getting into a fight. / You don't have to buy a gun to own one.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_aWvuSMeKX5l4omh,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:35,3/13/13 17:28,1,Pap,166337,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1970,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Although there was alot of factors indicating guilt, The gun was missing and there weren't any fingure prints to support dna evidence that would remove any doubt. Without any prints or the wepon, there is still resonable doubt dispite much evidence to strongly support guilt and this decission was to be made without any resonable doubt..",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The gun was missing and there weren't any fingure prints to provide DNA evidence,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,Good survey thank you,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_38ah79FJmzWtvtX,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:00,3/13/13 17:32,1,Pap,250990,RIweak,MSIE,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.1.102.55,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2; .NET4.0C),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1990,"Yes, Puerto Rican",Some Other Race,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The fact that the winess identified the man quite easily did it for me. Since they didnt provided concrete evidence to say the he wasnt there, I was satisfied with what the witness said. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,Yes,Yes,No,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,no,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_aXyDaC95a9mjT2l,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:08,3/13/13 17:41,1,Pap,857200,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1991,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I don't believe that is was proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed the crime.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,I have taken a forensic psychology course and am very knowledgeable about the reliability of eyewitness testimony.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8oV6UmQLMJyA7cN,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:09,3/13/13 17:45,1,Pap,361988,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1525x858,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1960,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$90,000 to $99,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",There was an eye-witness account. The girlfriend didn't provide an adequate alibi. She was foggy on the times so Peter could have committed the crime.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,the video didn't keep up with the audio,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0BV6QiePO76XDbD,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:02,3/13/13 17:51,1,Pap,934157,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1959,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$90,000 to $99,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The prosecution did not make their case. The judge made it clear that there were many problems with eye witness testimony. The prosecution had nothing else. No weapon, no finger prints. Nothing. I could not convict on the eye witness testimony alone.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),She was under duress and probably spent the 2 minutes staring at a gun. ,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, everything worked fine.",,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_dgnGFG5lKNhWajP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:04,3/13/13 17:58,1,Pap,529747,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1280x1024,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Some Other Race,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"Less than $10,000",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There is not sufficient evidence.. The only real evidence is that of the eye witness, who's memory may have been compromised.. It had been three weeks after the incident when she made the identification.. And her testimony that the officer indicated that she picked their suspect out of the lineup may have skewed her confidence level in her recollection.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9WTq2zYShtOxsc5,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:27,3/13/13 18:05,1,Pap,506129,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$80,000 to $89,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty"," His only real defense was his girlfriend... who admitted that he was out of breath and took longer to arrive than he usually does. / / Otherwise, he was put in the lineup because of a violent charge and he matched the description of the witness. / / Enough points to guilty that I cant reasonably doubt it. ",1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"Nope, worked well. It would have been nice to go full screen though."," One thing that was odd is that there was very little emotion in the witness. I know they are just actors, but I know tears and emotional responses WOULD influence my decision. As is... I would have hesitated to believe ""Worst day of my life""... but I know judging based on actors would be wrong.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cRU4zsuMlMP0TnT,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:31,3/13/13 18:06,1,Pap,923995,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1280x800,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Not enough evidence showing he had actually committed the crime. Left with reasonable doubt,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),"only had eye witness statement, had no other information stating he had actually been present to commit crime",1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no computer problems,none,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9Fa6zRnFwxnfTwx,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:11,3/13/13 18:09,1,Pap,904613,NJstrong,Safari,iPad,768x1024,-1,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 6_1_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10B146 Safari/8536.25",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",The defendant could have gone to the convenient in the time after he left his girlfriends house. I believe the lineup was accurate.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,No,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8fazHg0QqDvT8tn,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:25,3/13/13 18:15,1,Pap,365454,NJstrong,Firefox, Ubuntu,1680x1050,11.2.202,1,Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1975,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I would lean towards guilty, but since no gun was found, and it was such a long time until an ID was made, I would say that reasonable doubt was established.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),"no gun found, memory becomes unreliable after time",1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No real problems. I had to switch off HD to get the video to play for me, but I doubt that makes a difference.",,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bynAiObb31O4Y8l,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:19,3/13/13 18:19,1,Pap,707529,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1991,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Insufficient number of people in the lineup (5 instead of 6), feedback from officer, officer may have influenced witness, no gun found.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"The volume on the video was very low and I had to concentrate very hard to hear it, and this was with the volume on my computer all the way up.","I wish there had been a status bar on the video so I could see how much of the video had been played and how much there was to go, and so I could skip back to replay parts I didn't hear quite as clearly. / / Also, I am not sure of the judicial procedure during court cases, but I feel it would be more effective and fair for the judge to instruct the jury before all the witnesses were to speak. That way the jury could make decisions about the fairness of the lineup as the witnesses spoke, rather than trying to remember what they had said after the fact.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9z979G75cRqITBz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:12,3/13/13 18:20,1,Pap,285893,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",I apologize the video did not play and I cannot refresh!,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,Yes the second video did not come up. There was no option to play.,I would like so know the purpose of the survey. I did not feel comfortable giving out such personal information without knowing why?,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_4InqtruuuZNwCY5,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:37,3/13/13 18:26,1,Pap,899994,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.2,1242x698,11.6.602.171,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; Trident/6.0; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; HPNTDFJS),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1974,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only evidence present was the eyewitness testimony. To me, this is insufficient. It would be easy to mistake someone's identity, especially if it was three weeks after you witnessed the incident.",1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,Yes,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,None,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6nUX1nCSYk04rSR,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:53,3/13/13 18:26,1,Pap,600655,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1024x600,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","3 weeks after the trial is when the guy was arrested. That's a long time. No gun found, no fingerprints at the scene. The women made him seem guilty but his lawyer made him seem not guilty",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,it was fun,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_d76XZmm4BG2gHZ3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:52,3/13/13 18:41,1,Pap,622156,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1969,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$100,000 to $149,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","While I feel Police procedure was correctly followed, the length of time between the crime and the eyewitness identification was unusually long, and the lack of ANY physical evidence typing the suspect to the scene leaves some level of doubt/",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The length of time between crime and identification,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No issues.,"Very interesting survey and well presented, but the judges instructions were LOOOOOOONG! / / I also feel that the section of the survey that investigated my decision making process did not allow me to adequately explain my reasoning, as it focused exclusively on the eyewitness testimony, which was not the deciding factor for me.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_4H1UeV3b9n6MegZ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:59,3/13/13 18:45,1,Pap,174426,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1994,"Yes, other Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I felt that the procedure was unfairly conducted, and the State did not provide absolute evidence that the defendant was guilty.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6V9OqbF0ZYChqp7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:10,3/13/13 19:01,1,Pap,686360,NJstrong,Firefox,Macintosh,1920x1200,-1,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1978,"Yes, Puerto Rican",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$100,000 to $149,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The piece of evidence presented against the witness is unreliable. The fact that a person said they wacthed him during the crime is not proof beyond the burden of reason to jail a man for life. The defendant might or might not be the perpetrator of this crime but, a lot could be in the surface here. Racial discrimination, previous altercations, mind problems, memory problems, etc. In my mind there's a 50/50 chance that this man commited the crime. Hence, he's not guilty.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,no,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_afbK9dC5LBJ5BpH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:36,3/13/13 19:07,1,Pap,932071,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.2,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The subject has been identified in a lineup, however, I still feel that there is insufficient evidence to prosecute the perpetrator.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, none at all.","Great study, rather long video.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_aWRpwPdMpKzmAPH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:48,3/13/13 19:16,1,Pap,136314,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1400x1050,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I don't feel like the officer provided enough information about the lineup, and the guys in the lineup were not wearing hats. I just feel like the defendant has been wrongfully accused. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"no problems, but it would be nice to see the remaining time on the video ",,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_1NcJzSDMSoW7Xhz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:51,3/13/13 19:16,1,Pap,298985,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1280x800,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; Tablet PC 2.0; MAAR; .NET4.0C),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"Less than $10,000",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",the one witness was there and was able to get a good look at the man and was able to identify him out of a line up and she was able to give a good descrition on what he looked like which gave the officers somebody to look for also because he got arrested for fighting three weeks later which to me is violence almost similar to him murdering someone,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_2mf8QdUv4LYJlEp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:40,3/13/13 19:17,1,Pap,605954,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1990,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only evidence given was the eyewitness identification of the suspect. Eyewitness identification in itself is very unreliable in the first place. In addition the lack of standard procedure for a photo identification and the procedure used by the officer, most importantly the fact that he did not state that the shooter may not be in the line up, leads me to reasonably doubt the reliability of the witness. This in addition to the fact that they recovered no other evidence of the crime linking the suspect to the shooting or robbery gives me reasonable doubt.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_etGRoOLWD2kzu3X,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:38,3/13/13 19:22,1,Pap,392079,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Some Other Race,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was absolutely no evidence (no gun, no dna, no camera evidence, nothing at all) that pointed to his guilt except for the witness' testimony which was brought into question quite well to the point of making me question her. Not because she's a liar but because eye-witness testimony is more often than not questionable at best statistically.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),No evidence beyond eyewitness and I've seen that prove to be untrustworthy way too much to convict somebody for something as serious as murder based on that alone.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"Video wouldn't play, had to use an extension to download it and play it in a separate player. ","This was quite a fun survey, although the woman playing Barbera Dunn cracked up and started having to hide her laughter behind her hand at one point. ",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_4UiBJBFwPNkOMx7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:54,3/13/13 19:28,1,Pap,822096,RIstrong,Chrome,Macintosh,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/537.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/24.0.1312.57 Safari/537.17",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Professional degree (e.g., MD, DDS, JD)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","One eyewitness who only identified the suspect three weeks later is not sufficient to show he committed the crime beyond a reasonable doubt , since the witness was traumatized and because of the amount of time that had passed.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,Yes,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_em8Bqhfi9ClDrxj,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:45,3/13/13 19:30,1,Pap,759317,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1360x768,11.3.300,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) RockMelt/0.16.91.483 Chrome/16.0.912.77 Safari/535.7",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The individual was not identified excepty by one eye witness who was scared and hiding behind a bread shelf. the witness stated she wateched the robber for 2 minutes at 15 feet away and yet was unseen, these actions seem unlikely as most people would try to hide and not view the murder/robbery. Aside from this the line up took place 3 weeks after the case and her memory could have been less accurate then the next day. with the standard not actually set by the police like the officer said and ""each line up is a case by case basis"" means it could have been tailored to the crime in favor of finding the defendant guilty by using people not matching the discriptions such as the obviously way to heavy set guy as the witness described. / / The prosecution says the defendant walked home and a walk that took 7 minutes on average took the defendant 15 this time which would lead you to believe he was teh robber, but at the same time it is possible that he either a) did go back out for his mail after entering his house or b) possibly was in the area of the crime and was slowed on his way home because he was avoiding a man with a gun. / / Without any proof beyond a scared eyewitness to place the defendant at the crime there is no way i can state that without a reasonable doubt he was guilty. There should have been something els something physical placing him there. Capital Murder is not a punishment he deserves for walking slow home from a night with his girl friend. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,"it may be better to get actors that fit the roles better. An officer that has 15 years on the force shoudlnt look 19. They didnt mention in the jury instructions the crimes they were facing which in a real trial can influence a jury members verdict. i.e. casey anthoney, many of the members would have voted guilty if they would have been voting on a lesser crime but knowing they were going to put someone to death swayed their opinion. In this case the same situation would arise in most states as murder in teh comission of a robberys is a capital offence.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_51nIu5x1rk8L7Ol,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:49,3/13/13 19:42,1,Pap,112843,NJstrong,Safari,iPad,768x1024,-1,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 6_1_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10B146 Safari/8536.25",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only evidence was an eyewitness who picked out the defendant out three weeks after the fact. She stated that she was 10 to 15 ft away from him at the time, was terrified, and also listened to the information being reported to the news media. All that combined with the defendants alibi, no gun, his fingerprints not at the scene, and I have reasonable doubt.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),I'd wasn't made until 3 was later,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_ehfFYutMp8tyaAR,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:21,3/13/13 19:58,1,Pap,482013,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.2,1720x968,11.6.602.171,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; Trident/6.0; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; HPNTDFJS; BRI/2),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1962,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","I had doubts about the eyewitness, it is said that eyewitnesses are unreliable. But the defendants girlfriend said he was out of breath when he answered the phone, at least 15 minutes after he left her place. She lived 10 blocks from the store, and Peter had to pass the store to get home so he lived very close to the store. It would be normal for someone to pick up their mail on their way into the house, and if they forgot, they would probably wait until the morning to get their mail.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,"This was interesting. I have always been interested in the law. I am in a wheelchair so I cannot serve on jury duty, which may be a good thing. I think it would be difficult to judge another person, especially about a serious crime like murder.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3xV5xXf1kV9KYvz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:26,3/13/13 20:00,1,Pap,509101,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,-1,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","the eye witness was able to identify him, his own girlfriend was not actually with him at the time of the incident. She wasn't able to give a definitive time for when they talked and he was winded when he got the mail. That seems suspicious to me for someone his age. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_daL9ug7cndqCchT,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:27,3/13/13 20:04,1,Pap,116179,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.97 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$150,000 to $199,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The woman did not see the lineup for 3 weeks. She may of been wrong and forgotten what the defendant looked like. The cop did not have enough proof other than the defendant was nervous.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,thank you,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eX9wC4pQ6O8zU2h,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:16,3/13/13 20:06,1,Pap,438612,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$80,000 to $89,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","First, the amount of time that had passed between the time that the crime was committed and the time between when the witness was shown the line-up. Also, she gave a description the day after. She was under duress when the crime was being committed and could have been distracted by the weapon which would've reflected in the light. The witness saw someone wearing a baseball cap which would've distorted her view. She was close, but said she hid behind a bread rack... the exchange didn't seem long enough for her to have gotten a two minute look at the subject. One of the officers was alleged to have known the accused and conducted the line up possibly influencing the witness. Seeing the accused in court does not convince me due to the amount of press the trial would have received prior to the witnesses testimony. The witness wasn't credible to me and there was no physical evidence.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ disagree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bqGXuUdlonrnghv,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:26,3/13/13 20:07,1,Pap,813443,RIweak,Safari,Macintosh,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/534.57.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.7 Safari/534.57.2",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I had a reasonable doubt the the defendent committed the crimes. His fingerprints and DNA were not found anywhere at the crime scene. The gun was never recovered. Ms. Diana Reyes testified that the times he saw and spoke to him on his home phone did not fit with the time the robbery and murder were committed. She is his girlfriend, so she might not be as reliable, but Mrs. Dunn didn't point him out in a photo lineup until three weeks later and she was the primary evidence the police had about his guilt. She also seemed insincere.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The main reason was that she did not seem sincere and looked away when answering the question about wearing contacts. She seemed like she had something to hide.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,"I wish a few key details were available at all times becuase it's hard to remember every detail and since it wasn't a real trial, I didn't write much down.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_a5m0hlI6QOfvKHX,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:36,3/13/13 20:11,1,Pap,724337,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The first witness seemed almost positive about everything. Certain of times and if she was staring at his face for about 2 minutes, it's unlikely she would forget. The police officer obviously didn't have any previous problems or they would have been noted. The girlfriend seemed unsure about many things, including time. She seemed hestitate to answer the question about the mail. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,The very beginning of the video - where the judge was speaking - was lagging for about 2-3 seconds. But I could still hear everything. ,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5atmKZcykDmeinH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:13,3/13/13 20:15,1,Pap,479564,,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.97 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Click to write Choice 5,47,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_baut5lknEtNjXo1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:30,3/13/13 20:18,1,Pap,309376,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.4.402,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","Less than $10,000",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Eyewitness testimony has been proven time and again to be faulty. I knew this before the judge read it out. No other evidence was provided either. Was a bullte found in the victim? Was she close enought to see? The state did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendent committed this crime.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly disagree,1,2,3,4,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),no other evidence given,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,"Liven up the actors a bit? I almost fell asleep twice. And why was the eyewitness smiling so much at the end? That was disturbing, like she was flirting!",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6m3M6SNkHzIXsyx,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:43,3/13/13 20:24,1,Pap,370177,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1993,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,Some college credit,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I think that Mr. Peter Brown was not guilty, or at least he had not been proven guilty yet, because in the video there was no concrete evidence that pointing towards him as the robber and killer. First of all, Ms, Dunn's memory could be distorted, and even though she had a good view in the convenience store, there could be a probability that she had mistakenly identified the robber. Second of all, there was not any solid evidence found, such as fingerprints, DNA, or guns found belonging to Mr.Peter Brown. Therefore, even though the witness' memory and the timeline of the event may be pointing towards him, there are still no proof that can frame him as a robber and killer.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3yfS5eP5eTXfIoZ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:36,3/13/13 20:26,1,Pap,779509,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was no physical evidence left at the scene, the weapon was never found so that couldn't be connected to the crime or the suspect/defendent, in the judges instructions he said that the photo lineup should be conducted by someone who doesn't know which one of the pictures is the suspect and that they should have at least 6 photos to choose from, neither of these were followed. The witness was 15 to 20 feet away from the suspect and behind a rack, he couldn't see her so how good was her view. In the judges instructions he said that time and the presence of a weapon can alter the witnesses judgement and both of those were true in this case. I have many doubts and therefore had to find not guilty.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,none,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_87wytNKua9wSC3j,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:43,3/13/13 20:30,1,Pap,651641,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1970,"Yes, Mexican/Mexican American/Chicano",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I did not believe that there was sufficient evidence to prove Peter Brown guilty. I reached this verdict because of the lack of evidence such as no DNA, not finding the gun, and not finding any fingerprints. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The lapse of time between the actual crime and the eyewitness identification.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eu5SefGJ0MD95OZ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:52,3/13/13 20:40,1,Pap,360525,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1991,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I believe the suspect may have been at the crime scene and possibly committed the crime, but the prosecution did not provide evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to convince me otherwise.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,Nope,"Very nice study, but would like the audio to be a bit louder!",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0qBUTJfwxpMsfaJ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:58,3/13/13 20:41,1,Pap,368691,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1993,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","While substantial circumstantial evidence was built up by the prosecution, no concrete evidence placing the defendent at the scene was ever produced, thus creating substantial reasonable doubt. Furthermore, Mrs. Dunn, the first witness for the prosecution, repeatedly said that while viewing the crime and also afterwards she was in a state of shock, calling in to question how reliable her description, the only evidence produced against the defendent, could be held to be.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),My largest reason for reaching my verdict was the lack of concrete evidence placing the victim at the scene. The eyewitness and the procedures used to interview her are a moot point next to this gaping hole in the case for the prosecution,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,No,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_820zaG1EHYPPs3j,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:04,3/13/13 20:49,1,Pap,328535,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1959,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$150,000 to $199,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",The eyewitness was very reliable and sure of her id.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,none,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5nDG83IqBl0KBOR,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:04,3/13/13 20:50,1,Pap,311998,NJstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.0,1280x768,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET4.0C; BRI/2),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1964,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Professional degree (e.g., MD, DDS, JD)","$100,000 to $149,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Did not find the identification to be convincing; too much time had passed before the picture line up, witness was far from robber and under stress.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),distance from perp,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, none.",Good. God. Longest jury instructions EVER.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cZvcUEKXSLx3cAl,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:58,3/13/13 20:51,1,Pap,527793,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1954,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$10,000 to 19,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There is too little evidence, and it is poorly presented. The distance between the witness and the crime was not measured, the lighting conditions were not explored, the amount of blockage between the witness and the crime was not measured, or at least not entered into evidence. The police photo lineup was OK as far as it went, but the first batch of photos should probably not have included the suspect, especially as the officer conducting the lineup did know who the suspect was, and this wasn't compensated for. / There just wasn't enough evidence presented to convince me that Peter Brown was the perpetrator. I'm not sure that he wasn't, just that the state didn't present a compelling case.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),"Thelength of time between the crime and the photo lineup, and the lack of other evidence,",1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, it all worked fine.","The quality was pretty stagey - this may be unavoidable, but I wasn't really convinced this was a person on trial for first degree murder.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bgczksvFJy5qWWx,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:42,3/13/13 20:52,1,Pap,442801,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1951,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I don't feel that the state proved it's case, beyond a reasonable dought. I think the eye wiyness could not have gotten a good look at the suspect from behind the bread rack, where she was hiding. She was also focused on the gun, since she said she had never seen one before. She also claimed to have seen him for two minutes. I think the amount of time was considerably shorter. Then there was the amount of time that passed before before the photo line up. There was also only five photos in that line up, rather than the six or more recommended. Also I'm sure that the witness was very frightened during the crime, which could have caused a false identification. There was also no other evidence at the sceen of the crime. Nor did they find the gun that was used in the crime. Last is the evidence given by the girlfriend as to his where about during the crime.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No problems whatsoever.,I would have had a couple of other questions. / I quess that the convinence store didn't have video camera survalence? / Why wasn't his girlfriend asked what kind of clothes the suspect was wearing when he left her house that night?,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9tdfw7PsFDL7J1b,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:11,3/13/13 20:57,1,Pap,444072,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.33 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1430.3 Safari/537.33",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There is some doubt. While not its not 100% positive that he did not commit the crime, it is also not 100% positive that he did. And with the U.S system, the defendant is innocent until proven guilty. So there I believe he is innocent. There is also some slight mishaps that hurt the prosecutors case.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no problems,"Interesting study! I enjoyed it,",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eVzq2Pg3dljToFL,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:13,3/13/13 20:58,1,Pap,649086,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","Less than $10,000",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I believe it is likely the defendent did commit the crime, but that is based upon the identification of the suspect in a lineup that was not properly conducted.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,none,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0pO3mKo6pdkF2D3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:29,3/13/13 21:01,1,Pap,216057,RIstrong,Firefox,Macintosh,1280x800,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","One witness does not complete evidence make. This is especially true since she did not view the pictures for an entire three weeks after the robbery/murder. There was no other evidence presented, so there is extreme reasonable doubt. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,None. Everything ran smoothely. ,I have none other than this really was fun and unique. Thank you. ,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bOQaly1Cbihrhl3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:24,3/13/13 21:03,1,Pap,137619,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.5.502,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20130205 Firefox/20.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1974,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","Personally, there are number of questions I would have liked to have heard an answer to. Did Peter Brown own a gun? If so, was it the same caliber as the one that killed David Ames? What was Peter Brown wearing when he left his girlfriend's house and did it match the description given by the eye-witness? As it stands, I saw nothing wrong with how the police interviewed the eye-witness nor in how the photo lineup was given to her. The girlfriend's testimony did not place the defendant somewhere else at the time of the killing.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_ahpk0fHpSEpzPMN,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:21,3/13/13 21:09,1,Pap,778988,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1994,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$100,000 to $149,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",The eyewitness account was reliable while the defendant's girlfriend failed to provide accurate and reliable information about his whereabouts. The defense's argument was further diminished by the inability of the defense attorney to formulate good questions and to properly explain the claims that he was making. It seemed as if he was just making empty claims without any support or explanation. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),Weak defense arguments as well as useless arguments made by defense's witness,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,"None, thank you. ",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_diqJr8146gfwBW5,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:18,3/13/13 21:09,1,Pap,416983,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1962,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The eye witness gave a description at the seen, the next morning and in the lineup. As the officer stated, her description did not change. Plus with the defendants girlfriend testified he was out of breath when she called him and he did have to drive past the store to get to his place. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,N/A,N/A,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_ddsizQTGu5WMibz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:34,3/13/13 21:12,1,Pap,836654,RIweak,Chrome,Macintosh,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1992,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only incriminating evidence against Peter Brown is Mrs. Dunn's eye-witness testimony. That is not enough evidence to conclude that Peter Brown is indeed guilty. Eye-witness testimonies are notorious for their inaccuracy. There are many factors which have affected Mrs. Dunn's memory of whom she believed to be the murderer (e.g. distractions at the crime scene, time passed after the crime, news on TV etc.) ",1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eUV22DiQPm1r0wt,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:25,3/13/13 21:18,1,Pap,968507,NJweak,Safari,Macintosh,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/534.57.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.7 Safari/534.57.2",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1987,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only true evidence is the eye witness testimony, which was from an uncertain distance during a stressful situation. She also had weeks between the event and identifying the defendant. All other evidence presented by the prosecution was open to interpretation. The fact that the defendant was out of breath when answering the phone proves nothing. One eyewitness account combined with questionable techniques by the officer does not prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),An overall lack of evidence for either side,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5p5orAZhUylmqAl,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:31,3/13/13 21:25,1,Pap,952907,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1024x600,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1965,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The eyewitness was called in for a line up until 3 weeks later. Earlier she was given a set up photos to look at. She had seen some information regarding the victim and suspect from tv news and newspaper. She was stressed at the time of the crime, because she was focusing on the weapon. The distance the witness was from the suspect. The suspect wore a hat.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,The case and testimonies were interesting,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9oTJio8iawP4KQR,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:49,3/13/13 21:27,1,Pap,200527,RIweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.2.202.235,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; WinTSI 17.11.2009; .NET4.0C; MS-RTC LM 8),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1973,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Because the line up was done three weeks after the murder. There is also a witness that states he was home around the time of the robbery and murder.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,none,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cC3meRP5J2dqGot,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:52,3/13/13 21:41,1,Pap,397323,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$150,000 to $199,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Due to the eye witness' stress at the time of the incident, the length of time that passed (3 weeks) before she did the photo line-up, the fact that only 5 photos were presented to her during the photo line-up and that the line-up was not conducted double blind all lead me to conclude that the witness is not reliable.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),3 weeks passed before the eyewitness saw the photo lineup,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_7Ve6VYaVPbhgxJX,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 21:29,3/13/13 21:43,1,Pap,127116,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1978,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The defendant was grieviously guilty. As a juror I could not find a reasonable doubt. The factual and statistical evidence was overwhelming. If I was to see the case from a spectator standpoint, I would have reached the same verdict. I can't begin to say how much I sympathize with the victim's family. The defendant should be punished as specified by the law, no more, no less.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No and the survey ran smothly.,Thank you! I enjoyed the survey with no problems.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0MWRaeJXSZFNrlH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:39,3/13/13 21:43,1,Pap,736723,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1969,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$80,000 to $89,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Ms. Dunn was the only eye witness. She did not have enough time (2 min.) to properly identify the suspect, was admittedly focused on the gun (she had never seen a real one before), hid behind the bakery stand (obstacle), and was 15 to 20 feet way from the suspect (from behind, which means that she could only see the back for the most part). / / There was no sufficient evidence produced by the prosecution to disprove that the defendant did not go straight home from Ms. Reyes'. / / No other evidence such as fingerprints, video recording, DNA was available to help with further ID of the accused. / / The 911 call with a description and the one given to the officers the next day were never compared and given as evidence. / / In my opinion the prosecutor did not supply sufficient evidence for a conviction.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),Identification three weeks after.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,I would love to be on a jury now.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_efaWXGCeTyURwGh,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 21:13,3/13/13 21:54,1,Pap,409241,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.5.502,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only evidence the prosecution had against the defendant was the eyewitness. Eyewitness accounts are notoriously flawed. Additionally, the photo line-up occurred 3 weeks after the fact. The eye witness was terrified during the encounter. It stands to reason she was not focusing on who the person robbing her was, but in trying to get out of the situation alive. I do not believe the eye witness's testimony is conclusive, and thus have a reasonable doubt as to whether the defendant was at the store when the crime was committed.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No computer problems.,None.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cC5uadsE8xvTy1T,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 21:01,3/13/13 22:20,1,Pap,639514,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,943x530,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; BRI/1; MDDC; .NET4.0C),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1964,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I reached a not guilty verdict because I have doubt. Peter Brown was identified by one witness three weeks after the crime took place. There was no other evidence to prove that Peter Brown comitted the crime. Ms. Dunn was probably upset and in shock when the robbery/murder happened. Waiting three weeks is a long time to identify the perpatrator in a photo line up. No gun was found and it was not proven that Peter Brown owned a gun. While Ms. Dunn identified Peter Brown as the person that comitted the crime there was a witness (his girlfriend) that said he was with her.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,Yes,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,My internet is very slow at my home. I had to pause the video to let the streaming catch up. I don't think it was a problem with the video but with my slow internet connection.,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3C26RjLRFxhV4BD,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 21:53,3/13/13 22:27,1,Pap,495576,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I agree that the only incriminating evidence presented is the profile verification by Dunn. Given the testimony provided by the witness of the defense, there is too much ambiguity for me to vote guilty.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,This was an enjoyable HIT.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3PoeyKHnn92m7ml,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 21:46,3/13/13 22:29,1,Pap,218857,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1994,"Yes, Mexican/Mexican American/Chicano",Some Other Race,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The prosecutor was not able to provide strong evidence of the defendant's involvement in the crime. The only thing pointing toward his guilt was the testimony of one eye witness. More concrete evidence is needed to determine the defendant's guilt.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),Not enough evidence,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5jThDzJcNj2xY8Z,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 21:49,3/13/13 22:41,1,Pap,987406,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1978,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$80,000 to $89,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","I reached that verdict based on the statements of the eyewitness as well as the reliable statement of the police officer. I don't think the statement of the defendant's girlfriend was credible and convincing and that is why I didn't take it into account while taking my decision. Also, after listening to the final notes of the judge, I feel pretty confident that he is guilty.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly disagree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8BsmlDUQ1fsc4hD,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:11,3/13/13 22:49,1,Pap,895853,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.2,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","well, the eye witness Mrs. Dunn did not provide enough evidence to support the fact that Mr. Peter Brown is guilty, considering the fact that the eye witness identify the suspect 3 weeks after the robbery has occurred. It is safe to say that she might not accurately remember the looks of the criminal. Besides, the defendant has evidence to prove that he was not there at the time of the crime. ",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_82MdTZYrnLXkV37,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:06,3/13/13 22:54,1,Pap,736907,NJweak,,,,,,,,,,,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I nwould never convict someone based on eyewitness testimony and the eywitness testimony in this case was especially weak,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,"It was very hard to watch this trial, the acting was very boring.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_2fYIPN7BzNmFqTz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:04,3/13/13 22:55,1,Pap,569944,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1440x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1969,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","Less than $10,000",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",There was not enough evidence provided by the prosecution to indicate that the defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. There did not appear to be enough physical evidence. The prosecution witness lacked credibility. ,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The identification was several weeks after the crime.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,There were no problems.,This was interesting.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_7TYh9fVpdhEPgGx,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:20,3/13/13 22:58,1,Pap,365164,RIstrong,Firefox, Ubuntu,1680x1050,11.2.202,0,Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1978,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",The eye witness positively identified the defendant in a police line up and in the courtroom. The testimony from the girlfriend seemed unreliable as she didn't know exact times.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6KIDZzQAUx8fzeZ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:40,3/13/13 22:58,1,Pap,899734,NJstrong,Chrome,Linux,2560x1504,-1,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Nexus 10 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Safari/535.19",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1990,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$60,000 to $69,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",The witnesses testimony was reliable and convincing.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0PayUKKesYU9AZ7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:13,3/13/13 23:05,1,Pap,261620,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1024x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Eye witness was too far away and only saw the alleged perp for a few seconds, also she said she was very afraid, which was a high level of stress. I am already iffy about line ups because of the ease of bias that comes with them. The girlfriend said he was with her and then she called him when he got home. She also said he does not own a gun.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,"It gave me a chance to serve on a jury, which interests me. The judges instructions were too long. It was hard to pay attention.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5ywfySnwckGnlqd,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:39,3/13/13 23:11,1,Pap,360389,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1991,"Yes, Puerto Rican",Some Other Race,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",There is no physical evidence that the defendant was at the scene at the time of the crime. All they have is a testimony from one eye witness who identified him a full three weeks after the crime and she did not seem to have such a great memory (she couldn't remember if the men in the line up had pants or not),1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eJQ0bWeGyaLKaG1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:23,3/13/13 23:17,1,Pap,136226,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1967,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Not enough evidence in my opinion. The only evidence presented is the eye witness who I gave less then 100 percent reliability. The girl friend of the defendant gave an alibi that was not discounted by the prosecution.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),lack of evidence,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,Yes,Yes,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No problems,I enjoyed this surey.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5tEEaNDWvL60zyd,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:28,3/13/13 23:18,1,Pap,153958,NJweak,Safari,Windows NT 5.1,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/534.57.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.7 Safari/534.57.2",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",There was not concrete evidence to convict Peter Brown. There were no finger prints and no gun was recovered. The witness was under stress and could have been influenced in the three weeks it too to identify the suspect. The police were also influencing the witness to identify Peter Brown as the suspect by only supplying four other people in the lineup. ,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6DvtCBgYUxSEd3D,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:39,3/13/13 23:29,1,Pap,622004,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$50,000 to $59,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Lady that was at the store that day was wearing her contacts which indicates her vision problems and she is the main evidence of the person who was charged guilty. Her memory was not a reliable source of proving anyone wrong. ,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_4OZ6ae86q1rWsXr,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:41,3/13/13 23:33,1,Pap,843011,RIstrong,Chrome,Macintosh,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.155 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Neither side's argument was particularly convincing. However, it is difficult to convict someone of any crime based on one eyewitness' account and no other evidence, especially when the lineup happened three weeks after the crime took place. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),"There was only one eyewitness and although she looked at the perpetrator for two minutes, she was 1. hidding behind the bread shelf, 2. saw the lineup 3 weeks after the fact, 3. gave a discription of the body and hair (or lack thereof on the suspect's face) but failed to identify facial features",1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No. ,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_e3aWPoFi9UIiLc1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:45,3/13/13 23:37,1,Pap,995740,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was a lack of evidence. There was no weapon found, no dna from Peter Brown, no fingerprints from Peter Brown. Also, the eye-witness was interviewed three weeks after the crime occurred. Considering her memory is not infallible, it is entirely possible that she was mistaken. Also, the officer asked if the suspect had blonde hair (to the eye-witness) I would consider this a form of ""leading."" Without the prosecution presenting any other evidence, I would have to say guilty because there is plenty of room for reasonable doubt.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),Officer asked her if he had blonde hair,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,I would definitely be willing to do another one!,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6SvFYBI61Tg3pqt,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 23:17,3/14/13 0:08,1,Pap,449794,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602.171,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; eSobiSubscriber 1.0.0.40; MAAR; .NET4.0C; AskTbORJ/5.15.15.36191),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1969,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The first witness, Barbara Dunn, knew the defendant and identified him as being the one who robbed the store and shot the clerk. Her story was consistent and she picked him out of the line up. ",1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3dFbps3mx86BjlX,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 23:08,3/14/13 0:11,1,Pap,733965,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Professional degree (e.g., MD, DDS, JD)","$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",A single eye witness is not sufficient to overcome reasonable doubt that the person did not commit the crime. There needs to be some amount of direct evidence provided. There is no direct evidence here. One circumstantial bit of eyewitness testimony is not good enough.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),Lack of evidence and testimony beyond eyewitness,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,Nope!,I am an attorney. The DA in this video did a good job. The defense - not so much. Your actor playing Barbara was excellent. The officer was awful. The girlfriend was phony. Those bad performances will affect your study. Just my two cents. I think you need actors more invested in the roles.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8vlS2bvTeDPs6LH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 0:00,3/14/13 0:42,1,Pap,227871,NJstrong,Safari,iPad,0x0,-1,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 5_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9B176 Safari/7534.48.3",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1982,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",No other real evidence other than an eye witness that picked someone out of a small handful of photos three weeks later. No gun found or any other evidence to link him to the crime.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,"Thank you, much enjoyed!",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bx6ri4ZLSJyakYd,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 23:59,3/14/13 0:44,1,Pap,167678,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.2,1366x768,11.5.502,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1987,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","No evidence aside from eye-witness testimony was provided. The witness's identification was not obtained through a photo lineup until three weeks after the fact, during which time it is feasible her memory of the perpetrator's face may be compromised. Without DNA, fingerprints, a gun or video, there is no concrete evidence as to the defendant's guilt, leaving only a weak circumstancial case at best.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_4TKF3DSIt7j1LV3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 0:11,3/14/13 0:48,1,Pap,380608,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Doctorate degree (e.g., PhD, EdD)","$200,000 or more",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",1. The eye-witness identified Mr. Peter Brown. / 2. Peter Brown's girlfriend cannot provide very solid evidence that he was not in the crime spot. / 3. Peter Brown's girlfriend doesn't know he has gun does not mean he doesn't has gun. / 4. The photo identifying process was well conducted. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,"I suspect it is not a real court session. Mrs. Dunn looks more like an äóìactress"" than a ""witness""",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_02PMjpUnYnLzRs1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 23:49,3/14/13 0:58,1,Pap,243516,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.5.502,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I didn't feel that the witness was very reliable. especially after she said she was terrified, she may have mistaken what she saw.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),the eyewitness was terrified,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,the video kept freezing and skipping. ,This was a fun study because I love Law and Order,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6DQMZ9Drq8mf0ln,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 0:48,3/14/13 1:04,1,Pap,235775,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; CPNTDF; BRI/1; .NET4.0C; AskTbPGL/5.14.1.20007),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1992,"Yes, Mexican/Mexican American/Chicano",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"Less than $10,000",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",I reached the verdict that the suspect is guilty because there was a witness and she was not distracted and she was very close to be able to recognize what she saw,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,the volume was pretty low kind of hard to hear.,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_50CgWB8SWHADUkR,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 0:18,3/14/13 1:06,1,Pap,311442,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1280x1024,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$90,000 to $99,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was no other evidence other than the eyewitness testimony of one person. The eyewitness testimony did not seem accurate for several reasons. Three weeks had gone by before she identified the suspect in the lineup which seems like a long time for someone to remember. Another reason is that she was probably distracted by the gun the suspect was waving around considering she had never seen one before and was very scared. The lineup was also done incorrectly. As the judge mentioned, there should be at least six people and ther were only five. None of them were wearing hats, while the suspect was wearing one during the comission of the crime so he may have looked different. Also, the officer conducting the lineup knew the identity of the suspect when he shouldn't have, and then he also gave the witness positive reinforcement that she made the correct decision after she pointed him out. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),The lineup was 3 weeks after the crime occured.,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, it all worked fine.",This was a realy fun survey and I really enjoyed taking it.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_2af1n0KuNBJfwUd,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 0:47,3/14/13 1:24,1,Pap,854165,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",THE WITNESS HAD ACESS TO COVERAGE AND CONVERSATION BASED ON THIS CASE AND A 3 WEEK DELAT BEFORE POINTING HIM OUT IN A LINE UP. THE DEFENDANT DID HAVE OPPURTUNITY AND THE DEFENSE WITNESS WAS UNSURE OF HER TIMES IN THE TESTIMONY. THE DEFESE WITNESS ALSO STATED HE WAS OUT OF BREATH. HOWEVER THERE IS NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE PROCESCUTIONS WITNESS'S ID. SO THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY BEYOND A RESONABLE DOUBT. ALTHOUGH THERE IS A GOOD POSIBITLITY THAT THE DEFENDANT MAY HAVE COMMITED THE CRIME,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),THE 3 WEEK DELAY BEFORE THE LINEUP OCCURED ,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8fi5Wc3xYRt2xVz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 1:10,3/14/13 1:46,1,Pap,933141,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.97 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$90,000 to $99,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","It was the clear lack of evidence that led me to the clear conclusion that the defendant, peter brown, was not guilty. He may have been the killer, but the police departments ineptitude and clear lack of prowess at finding any sort of reasonable evidence to convict him led me to believe that he did, in fact, not commit the crime, as it were. If, perhaps, they had some DNA evidence, or fingerprint matching, or the gun used in the crime. The outcome would have been different.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,I did not.,They were not very...skilled actors.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_esY3KcLybRQnKfj,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 1:20,3/14/13 1:54,1,Pap,216126,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I believe there was reasonable doubt. The only evidence that had was an eye witness account which at best was shaky. Also the defendendant had a good alibi because the time from when he left his girlfriend's apt to when he talked to her on the phone it would have been almost impossible for him to committ the crime in that short span of time.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_77YBSWcDqGPlOVT,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 0:47,3/14/13 2:02,1,Pap,868392,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1972,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",There were two eyewitness putting the suspect in two different places at the same time. Both witnesses were convincing in there accounts with the subject and both were positive about the witnesses location. He could have possibly still committed the crime but the lawyer could not prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. ,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),suspect was not interviewed,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0Pz9vxth4jEpjAV,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 1:47,3/14/13 2:23,1,Pap,340485,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1970,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","there is no way I would ever find someone guilty of homicide based solely upon eyewitness evidence, which is totally unreliable and dubious, at best. The witness, mrs. barbara dunn stated that she got a ""good look"" at the perpetrator of the crime for approximately ""2 minutes."" I found that very interesting, because ii doubt very much the crime took as long as two minutes, and if she was hiding behind a bread rack, trying not to be seen by the gun-waving robber, she could not have been looking directly at this face for two straight minutes. If she could see him, then he might have been able to see her, and shoot her! They gave no evidence stating that they had any proof that the defendant had ever owned or possessed a gun, and therefore my vote is relosutely not guilty.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eDksQb38nm0fRvT,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 2:09,3/14/13 2:41,1,Pap,982777,RIstrong,Firefox, Ubuntu,1600x900,11.2.202,1,Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only evidence the prosecution has is one eye witness, following a line-up that happened three weeks after the crime. There is no other evidence, fingerprints, gun. There is a weak alibi from the defendant's girlfriend as well, that the prosecution should have been able to invalidate if the defendant was guilty.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,"I'm a little confused about the definition of witness that was used in the survey. Whether it was eye witnesses only, or everybody who was called by the prosecution and defense to give their information.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_e9UgDGftU53udnL,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 2:01,3/14/13 2:50,1,Pap,881975,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1974,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only evidence was an eyewitness. I believe he is guilty, but as instructed, he must be found not guilty. There were several factors, that influence the eyewitness testimony, that were violated.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,none,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_4NF92HMXI7Eajgp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 2:49,3/14/13 3:24,1,Pap,450689,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",One witness who was stunned wearing contacts at 20 feet away hid by a tall shelf could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt mr. brown was the shooter.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_2ajP7mdsImf7YG1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 2:43,3/14/13 3:34,1,Pap,118602,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I do not believe that a single eye witness account is enough evidence. Also proper procedure was not used when the police conducted the line up.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3rPlrSZ4NSBTTO5,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 2:26,3/14/13 3:37,1,Pap,212067,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.2,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1972,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Some Other Race,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$100,000 to $149,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","All verdict rested on a single eye witness report, with identification taken 3 WEEKS after the event. There is too much uncertainty involved.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),identification took place 3 weeks after the event,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,Why couldn't some of the actors speak and even read properly!,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9ZGrd2jBqLemFlb,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 3:57,3/14/13 4:41,1,Pap,481355,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1976,"Yes, Mexican/Mexican American/Chicano",Some Other Race,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The fact that the defendant was picked up three weeks later while involved in a fight proves that he is a violent man, and most of the evidence points to his guilt- the time he left his girlfriend's apartment fits, the fact that he was out of breath when she called, and the fact that the eyewitness got a really good look at him in the store says he's guilty to me.",1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The defendant was out of breath when his girlfriend called.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5j2cYiNYqk2p4I5,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 4:41,3/14/13 5:16,1,Pap,552118,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1982,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I do not believe that a single eye-witness identification is sufficient. Her vision was obscured at the time of the crime and she was obviously in a heightened emotional state, making her memory less reliable. There seem to be no other witnesses or security camera footage to support her story. In addition, making the identification three full weeks after the crime introduces further doubt into her identification. The police have failed to find ANY other evidence such as the gun or fingerprints that link the defendant to the crime. More information is required to make a fair ruling; as the case stands, evidence is insufficient to convict the defendant.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The lineup as done too long after the crime was committed. ,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8DhAJubSijcTKtL,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 5:22,3/14/13 6:07,1,Pap,533400,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.2,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$100,000 to $149,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",Because the eyewitness was unreliable and there were glitches in the police line-up,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,thanks,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0ofn3fAbyGGUgKh,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 6:23,3/14/13 6:59,1,Pap,942540,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1280x720,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1965,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",I do not believe the witness was unbiased and remembered clearly what she saw,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3jDxSYPXeNVG6bP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 7:37,3/14/13 8:14,1,Pap,333963,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1982,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I honestly think that the defendant did it, but I do not think that the prosecutor proved that beyond a reasonable doubt. I don't believe the girlfriend's testimony to be accurate but while the eye witness is credible I do not think that her recollection is good enough to convict the defendant.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),There was no physical evidence.,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,No,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_4HfZnHmYd9fPba5,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 7:31,3/14/13 8:23,1,Pap,146287,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1360x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1976,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$100,000 to $149,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The eyewitness testimony was strong. Also, the suspect pleaded the Fifth Amendment. That to me, is an indication of guilt.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,None.,The fact that there was no suspect actually shown makes the task more difficult. We cannot see the suspect's body language or see him speak. I don't think that is a good thing.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8AP7mnLQK04vvfL,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 7:57,3/14/13 8:29,1,Pap,250553,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.3.300.257,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; Trident/5.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; SLCC2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; InfoPath.3; .NET4.0C),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1961,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Some Other Race,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","The eyewitness testimony was convincing and I believed her. The girlfriend testimony was less so; she has a stake in finding the accused innocent, and there is no collaboration of the phone call she said she received from the accused. She and the defendant had three weeks to create the story she told.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3KuY4y8Xwf4iH0p,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 8:08,3/14/13 8:49,1,Pap,769541,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1280x800,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1940,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I have spent plenty of time in juries over the years. The case is too flimsey, I don't accept that the line up was performed poorly as much as I really doubt that in a few frightening minutes a person can make a totally reliable memory. Minds simply are not that reliable.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no things went predictably,"none in the moment, the film looked like it was recorded to train young lawyers.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_1LlbWzlUtHGYz3L,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 7:50,3/14/13 8:56,1,Pap,213773,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 5.1,1280x800,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Mrs. Dunn arrived at the Quick Stop at 8:40. She did not immediatly enter the Market and when she did she went to the restroom. Allowing one to two minutes for this activity and allowing two minutes to observe the crime Would place the accussed in the Quick Stop anywhere from 8:42-8:44. The accused lives 5 blocks away from the market this would provide insufficient time for him to be able to drive home and answer a call on his home phone at 8:45. / / Commecial breaks commonly occur at 15 minute intervals during commecial TV programs. I believe the defense witness to be credible in regards to this event. / / There were differences in testimony between the police officer and the prosecutions' eye witness. Mrs. Dunn stated she went to the police station the following morning to give a description of the shooter. The Police officer reported he took a description from her the night of the shooting. Ms. Dunn's description was highly detailed and she had a good vantage point. There was news coverage of the event further providing Mrs. Dunn with information she may or may not have witnessed. However, she appeared to still be anxious and effected weeks later by the events of the night of the shooting. This would tend to decrease the accuracy of her identification. / / No physical evidence connects the accused to the crime. / / In my opinion, there is sufficient contradictory testimony and evidence to find reasonable doubt to exist. In the presence of this doubt, I could not vote for guilt.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),The timeline did not seem to fit.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cvgsMQ8Flb9xFqZ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 8:30,3/14/13 9:05,1,Pap,582609,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$70,000 to $79,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",No evidence other than eyewitness testimony. So no he is not guilty by a reasonable doubt.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,No,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bkIwn0V0VWf4PTD,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 8:35,3/14/13 9:12,1,Pap,935224,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","I believed the eye witness testimony, I believe the girlfriend was too shaky on her testimony about the defendant. She may not know if he had a gun, he may have had one.. and the testimony about the phone call and the drive time was inconsistent. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no problems,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_b3oZpxcD3dTjE8d,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 9:03,3/14/13 9:43,1,Pap,797364,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1280x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1963,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$90,000 to $99,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I do not believe that the prosecution proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that Peter Brown committed the crime. I do not think the eyewitness testimony alone proves that Peter committed the crime. I witnesses make mistakes, they are scared and upset. There should be some other evidence to corroborate the witness testimony. ",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),There was no other evidence. ,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,Yes,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_55aQMok8PUeehj7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 8:51,3/14/13 9:43,1,Pap,613164,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.2,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I believe that too much time passed between when the crime occured and when the witness picked the defendant out of the line up. She also mentioned she was scared which means she was stressed and the judge mentioned when witnesses are under stress they have trouble making positive identifications. She mentioned nothing about actually seeing his face or any facial features and only identified his skin color, hair length and color, height, weight, and age. I do not believe this is sufficient evidence against the defendant.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),the police had no other evidence besides the eyewitness testamony,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_1ZgQqvShjfUKnyd,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 9:47,3/14/13 9:48,1,Pap,153392,,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1249x702,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E),1,2,3,4,1,Click to write Choice 6,47,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_6PQiQlqkIZYn4aN,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 9:20,3/14/13 9:56,1,Pap,379080,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 5.1,1280x1024,10.3.181.34,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1961,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only evidences that the prosecutor has is the eye witnesses. You need more evidence this is a very serious case and a person is dead, but you may be convicting the wrong person for a crime that they did not commit.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,thought provoking and interesting,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_donZgKZ8vVvbh2t,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 9:31,3/14/13 10:09,1,Pap,584465,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1024x600,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1991,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","there was no gun found, also no finger prints. his girlfriend sayed he was at home doing the call. also she said she never seen him with a gun, so i say he is not guilty.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),no gun found,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bEqlCKhnAKUnLo1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 9:22,3/14/13 10:18,1,Pap,864433,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1152x864,11.5.502,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1957,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",American Indian or Alaskan Native,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There were to many problems with the police line up proceedure. Not enough photos in the line up, the officer knew who the suspect was, he sugested the blond hair in the interview, he let her know that she chose the suspect. I think if the line up had been done right I would have believed the witness.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_56BeM1N6ckEUSgt,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 10:03,3/14/13 10:39,1,Pap,825758,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1966,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$80,000 to $89,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",There is no evidence to prove that the defendant is guilty.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),The witness viewing the line-up three weeks after the crime was committed could cause her to forget facial features and key factors in how the suspect was dressed.,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No problems,VERY interesting and FUN. Would love to do more like this!,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3rxFeSVeqeceY8B,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 10:03,3/14/13 10:40,1,Pap,114997,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1093x614,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; Trident/5.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; SLCC2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; BOIE9;ENUSMSE),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was no physical evidence connecting the accused to the crime scene, there is only one single eye witness' testimony to link him to the scene of the crime. Although it is not impossible that the accused committed the crimes, there is no solid evidence proving that he actually committed the crimes either. All evidence presented in the trial is circumstantial in the case, and that would not be enough to incarcerate someone for a crime that cannot be 100% physically proven to have been committed by the person in question.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,None.,Thank You!,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_2sCcmD0UqUt9ifz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 9:51,3/14/13 10:53,1,Pap,484320,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1961,"Yes, other Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I reach this verdict because there was only one eye witness, and there was not other evidence that point to Peter Brown as the murder. Also I have in account the testimony of the Mr. Brown's girfriend that say that he was with him at the time of the crime. ",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,It was interesting to me to follow the case.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cToei3kxHkczOZv,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 10:07,3/14/13 10:54,1,Pap,557606,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1400x1050,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The eyewitness, although seemingly reliable, had 3 weeks of being exposed to outside influences. In her testimony, she also said she stared at the killer for 2 minutes. I find it hard to believe that instead of covering or hiding, she stared at him that in detail. While the girlfriend was not helpful at all the the boyfriends case, the police failed to turn up any other evidence. He may or may not have done it, but the state did not prove without a reasonable doubt that he did.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0OCDIgdPfdjzx7D,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 10:04,3/14/13 10:57,1,Pap,345225,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1280x1024,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Eyewitness accounts alone are not sufficient evidence. I have been in a similar situation and I could not remember the robber's face, only his clothes. And that was right after it occurred. You are usually in shock and fearing for your life, not thinking about facial features of the person committing the crime. She also identified him 3 weeks later in a line up of only 5 people. I think the whole process was flawed and I am not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),eyewitness account are often inaccurate,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,"I think too many people are put in jail based on eyewitness testimony. I have been involved in a violent crime and I know for certain that eyewitness testimony is inaccurate and should not be used as the only evidence. There were no fingerprints, no weapon, and no other witnessess. This influenced my decision.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8qAcH0WdX6Pfyyp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 11:13,3/14/13 11:53,1,Pap,117255,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.2,1366x768,11.6.602.171,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; Trident/6.0; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; ASU2JS),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",because even through the witness only seen him for 2min. from the time he left his girlfriend house tell the time she called him he had enough time to comment the crime and do to him being out of breath saying he was checking his mail when he usably do it when he just get home. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_d0gpmETLDlRQaUd,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 11:24,3/14/13 12:06,1,Pap,465460,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1280x800,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",The circumstancial evidence is strong. The eyewitness testimony by Ms. Dunn was credible. The alibi provided by Ms. Reyes was weak. She did not have a positive timeline and there is a great possiblity that Mr. Brown had committed the crime in question. He had time after leaving his girlfriend's place to commit the crime and return to his own place before his girlfriend called him. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No. The video played just fine. ," I think having a survelience video, the weapon, or other witness would have made this case stronger. The defendent had a weak alibi and was positively identified by an eyewitness. Having the defendant testify in this own behalf may have changed my mind on whether or not he was guilty. ",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_4OP75ekW2gcyp6d,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 11:30,3/14/13 12:08,1,Pap,469315,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","It is suspicious, but it was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Peter Brown is the robber/murderer. Three weeks is far too long to wait before showing the witness a lineup. She wasn't told that the suspect might not be on the lineup she was given, and her memory of how the suspect looked during a traumatic event alone isn't enough to convict him. Plus his girlfriend says he didn't even own a gun, and she spoke to him on his home phone soon after he left her apartment. Why would he leave her house after watching sitcoms and rob a store- and kill someone- quickly on his way home? It just wasn't completely proven beyond a reasonable doubt to me.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),Three weeks passed before viewing the lineup.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, everything worked just fine.",This was fun! I'm glad I could be a part of it. ,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eRwlgZsSNl0Dxhb,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 11:34,3/14/13 12:09,1,Pap,841855,RIweak,Firefox,Macintosh,1280x800,10.3.183,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was not enough evidence to convict Peter Brown of this felony charge. The only evidence they had was an eye witness, but she indentified him long after the crime was commited. In the 3 weeks, she could've easily mistaken him for another person. Just like the defense attorney argued, there was no other evidence, fingerprints, DNA, murder weapon, found at the crime scene that justifies Mr. Brown as being guilty.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,I would like to know what the final verdict was.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_8qfIo6eze3d0gL3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 11:21,3/14/13 12:15,1,Pap,296466,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1972,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$10,000 to 19,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","THEY HAVE NO EVIDENCE BUT ONE PERSON THAT SAW IT HAPPEN, AND TO ME THAT IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO PUT A MAN IN JAIL FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE",1,2,3,4,Somewhat
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,NO,NONE,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_1zhk6tFObxceKqx,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 11:40,3/14/13 12:16,1,Pap,172423,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1366x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1982,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There is no evidence to put Peter Brown at the scene of the crime except for one eyewitness. No gun, no video, no fingerprints, no dna. He is a medium built white man with blonde hair of which there are many so I have absolutely no faith in the identification made by the eyewitness and would not convict someone is a first degree murder trial with so little to go on.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),line up was not done until 3 weeks later,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,"Please get better actors, their facial tics and constant side glances at the camera are distracting and take your mind off listening. It was difficult to take Ms. Dunn seriously with her furtive glances and what seemed to be a desire to laugh on several occasions. Maybe it was intentional or I was supposed to perceive it as being emotional but it came off more like someone who breaks character in a SNL sketch.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0dEgqm1WSWIiTfD,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 11:34,3/14/13 12:22,1,Pap,818135,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1982,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was not sufficient evidence. The eyewitness did not view the lineup until 3 weeks after the crime, and then only viewed 5 people from which to choose. There was no gun or fingerprints found, and no actual proof the defendant was present at the scene of the crime. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat disagree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,Other (please explain),There was no supporting evidence. ,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_agFXucIUgwzG5FP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 11:39,3/14/13 12:32,1,Pap,874544,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1987,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There is insufficient evidence to prove without a doubt that the defendant committed the crime. The prosecution did not have fingerprints or the weapon and is solely going on eyewitness testimony, which can be faulty given trauma of the event and the time between the crime and her identification of the suspect.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),It was several weeks from the time the crime occurred to the time the eyewitness identified the suspect.,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,Yes,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3kLIea7U6uYa9rT,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 12:01,3/14/13 12:35,1,Pap,752236,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1680x1050,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1959,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The 3 weeks inbetween the crime and the suspect identification by means of the line up. I question the validity of the lineup,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,Yes,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,Yes the trail video stopped after the judge's jury instructions and when I hit play to resume it started at the beginning,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6o3J7kkyP7BAcfP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 11:52,3/14/13 12:42,1,Pap,871051,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1956,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The witness was not seen by the perpertrator. So how could she be sure of what he looked like when she was behind him. she didn't see the lineup til 3 weeks after the crime. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,No,Very
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3yKvqAIKkW56oZf,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 12:13,3/14/13 12:47,1,Pap,218665,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,Some college credit,"$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",The gun was never found to link the defendant to the crime and the eyewitness did not make a positive identification until 3 weeks after the crime occurred.,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Moderately
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The eyewitness did not make a positive identification until 3 weeks after the crime.,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,none,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bDaMlmcSr5aXUyh,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 12:29,3/14/13 13:00,1,Pap,981873,RIweak,Chrome,Macintosh,1152x720,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1991,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The defense provided reasonable doubt. There were no fingerprints, gun, or DNA evidence.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,The acting was not very good which made it difficult to believe anyone.,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_eRMjc5bYAvDMtLL,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 12:22,3/14/13 13:13,1,Pap,623860,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1992,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$50,000 to $59,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There just wasn't enough evidence. I found it very hard to believe that the eyewitness report was as accurate as the eyewitness thought it was; the fact that she didn't give her report until three weeks after the crime was committed, when she had plenty of time to access news coverage, and that she claimed she wasn't distracted while she was witnessing a robbery seemed like weak evidence. And the girlfriend stating that she received a call from the defendant's home phone during the time the robbery was taking place, coupled with the fact that the police didn't find a gun or fingerprints or any sort of physical evidence makes me think that this man was not guilty.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_e5MKgGBGq3WcZIp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 12:42,3/14/13 13:17,1,Pap,274343,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1440x900,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1945,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$80,000 to $89,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","No gun was found, no finger prints were found and no DNA existed to even indicate Peter Brown was at the scene of the crime. I would think Mrs. Brown's recollection of the incident had faded some over a three week period. For those reasons, I say not guilty.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,Other (please explain),Lack of evidence.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,None,I would like to have know if Peter Brown had been involved in other robberies and or murders.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0jrjy1SYSLMXJiZ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 12:31,3/14/13 13:20,1,Pap,479865,NJstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1440x900,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; HPDTDF; OfficeLiveConnector.1.5; OfficeLivePatch.1.3; .NET4.0C; InfoPath.3; BOIE9;ENUSMSCOM),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1971,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"Less than $10,000",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I beleive that he is not guilty because there are reasonable doubts. To state a few; the witness was under stressful cicumstances and she also saw a gun and was clearly able to identify what color and shape it was. That being said the ""two minutes"" of her seeing his face wasn't all just the guy's face.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),she saw a gun,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,none,none,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_diJZtjv3eWzCCrP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:21,3/14/13 13:58,1,Pap,254235,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1280x800,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1982,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","There was an eyewitness that saw him and picked him out of the lineup. Nothing that was done during the line up made me believe it was not valid. The testiomony with the girlfriend was inconsistent, she was unsure of the time.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_5vUw34u6Y20AaSV,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:23,3/14/13 14:00,1,Pap,693296,RIweak,Safari,Macintosh,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_4) AppleWebKit/534.56.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.6 Safari/534.56.5",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1994,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","As was stated by the defense, the only evidence that the defendant committed the crime is the witness's testimony. I do not believe that the the photo line up was conducted in a way that the witness could have misidentified the defendant.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3wqqU7SrTrpWYzb,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:26,3/14/13 14:02,1,Pap,140262,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$70,000 to $79,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",I feel that he had a credible eye witness and that Mr. Brown was picked out of a lineup from standard police procedures.,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,Yes,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_3HKhCu53WeVpUBT,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:28,3/14/13 14:07,1,Pap,339157,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.2,1120x630,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1978,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",The witness at the story was very sure of what she saw. I believe her testimony. I can't say the same about he testimony of the Girlfriend. I didn't feel like she was lying but I did feel that she was lied to by her boyfriend. She couldn't have known what he was really up to after he left her home. ,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Strongly agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Not at all
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0pnTIKrUrKkKhsV,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:19,3/14/13 14:07,1,Pap,587654,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1200,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.97 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1991,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","Much of the evidence seemed concrete and the witnesses were very certain in their testimonials. For example, the older woman in the beginning stated that she knew the man the moment that she saw him and was without doubt. His girlfriend also stated that when she called him, he seemed out of breath and said he had gotten his mail, even though he usually always did this before going into his apartment.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,"No, there were no problems. Everything seemed to work just fine.",,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_7PUvEC5wWnsBLFP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:32,3/14/13 14:07,1,Pap,515962,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",tHE WITTNESS HAS NO REASON TO SAY THAT the defendent was there unless he was there. Also The defendent's Girlfriend has reason to lie. The defendent normally get his mail when he gets home yet that day of all days he does not get his mail and is out of breath when he answered his phone. He had time to comit the crime and get hme to answer the phone if he was running,1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,No,No,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,yes had to press the arrow key after watching the video twice because the first time a error poped up saying i could not use my back button when i had not. But that was it,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_0fiAn9AQtlprHxj,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:22,3/14/13 14:14,1,Pap,287655,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1987,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I personally believe the defendant is guilty but there is reasonable doubt that he is guilty. One factor that may have influenced the witness account was that she did admit to seeing reports on the news about the crime, which may have influenced her memory of the crime. She did admit that she did not see any suspect photos prior to the photo line-up, but it is still possible that suspect descriptions were made on the news. This possibility tied in with the 3 week gap and also the defendant's girlfriend's account, there is too much potential for innocence to declare guilty.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Not at all
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Other (please explain),The eyewitness had 3 weeks to be influenced by public news,1,2,3,4,Very fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,No,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,"One thing that I wish was clarified, or asked was the type of phones the defendant and his girlfriend used the night of the crime. Unless I missed it, I did not hear the girlfriend say that she called his home phone to tell him he left his jacket, but just that she called him. It is possible that she called his cellular phone, in which case, the alibi is hardly solid. / / I feel the need to repeat, that I believe the defendant was guilty, even though I voted not guilty. I believe he was guilty but there was not enough proof to accuse him of such. ",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6D9mshAFHsyLie1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:29,3/14/13 14:17,1,Pap,161429,NJstrong,Chrome,Macintosh,1920x1200,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_2) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1990,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$40,000 to $49,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Based on the low amount of evidence, and only going off of eye witness testimony, I can't convict a person as guilty.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,0,Other (please explain),There was no gun.,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,No,Moderately
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,Thanks!,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_6x6axHoWgGRgQQt,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:42,3/14/13 14:18,1,Pap,800435,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1680x1050,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","There was no physical evidence to place him at the scene of the crime. Without the weapon, fingerprints or a video surveillance tape I cannot say he is guilty. The three weeks it took before the eye witness identified the suspect also puts doubt in my mind.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,Yes,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_03bDFpnxEFqy5Br,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:22,3/14/13 14:19,1,Pap,320670,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.2,1242x698,11.6.602.171,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; Trident/6.0; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; HPNTDFJS),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1976,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","Well first of all the eye witness I believe she was afraid and probably she was shocked like she said at the scene of the crime, also they did not find any fingerprint of the suspect, and nether a gun was found. The suspect in question was the night of the robbery and murder with his girlfriend at dinner by her place and drove to his apartment approx., around 8.45 when she think was the time that she called his home phone witch he answer. At the police station the line up did not seems so clearly follow the regulation, like it supposed to be, and also with the other photograph. In my conclusion that were not evidence to charge the suspect with robbery and murder.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness knew who the suspect was.,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,No,No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,I did really enjoy this type of study you should think to do more of this.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cUbXMmKVvYkzJD7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:37,3/14/13 14:22,1,Pap,252242,RIstrong,Firefox,Macintosh,1440x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The didn't produce enough evidence to convince me that he was guilty. His location was unverified due to countering claims of his whereabouts. Also, there was no murder weapon or DNA shown that linked him to the crime scene. It seems like they arrested him just because he was there.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Absolutely
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Unfair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,No,Yes,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,No.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_9twFLdT3PykrbTL,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:27,3/14/13 14:27,1,Pap,681528,RIstrong,Firefox,Macintosh,1280x800,11.5.502,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","The only testimony available linking the defendent to the crime was witness identification. Though the protocol was followed correctly for the procedure, it was done long after the incident. There is a possibility that the memory has changed or was not accurate. SInce the prosecutor could offer no other evidence linking the the defendant to the actual crime of robbery and murder I'm inclined to say the the burden of reasonable doubt was not met. ",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,0,0,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 8 photos in the lineup.,0,0,0,Most of the men in the lineup matched the eyewitness description.,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes,No,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,no,"realistically, would this case go to trail based on just that evidence? I think this scenario is more plausible as a grand jury deciding whether there is enough evidence to go to trail.",1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_cYZb6ofvHonk5Rr,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:41,3/14/13 14:31,1,Pap,245660,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1680x1050,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","With what I heard regarding the evidence, I can't say that I can prove that he's guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a man's life we're talking about here.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Confident,1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,The eyewitness was not questioned in an interview room.,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat fair,1,2,3,4,No,Yes,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_e9wKkO8xEUMEXVr,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:41,3/14/13 14:40,1,Pap,639722,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1680x1050,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","All the evidence provided seemed to point it in that direction. i would be hardpressed, reasonably, to say that there's any reasonable doubt.",1,2,3,4,Agree,1,2,3,4,2,1,2,3,4,Very
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,The eyewitness viewed the perpetrator for 2 minutes during the crime.,The eyewitness was not instructed to avoid discussing the crime and to avoid media stories.,The suspect was questioned at the Lakeside Police Department for 45 minutes.,There were 5 photos in the lineup.,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,A statement of confidence was not taken immediately after the eyewitness identification.,0,,1,2,3,4,Fair,1,2,3,4,Yes,Yes,No,Knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,,,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_bvY0CZ4OvxP26y1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 14:58,3/14/13 15:33,1,Pap,374018,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty","I did not feel that there was enough evidence to prove that he was in fact the person who committed the crime. Also, the fact that the line up could have been biased and took place weeks after the crime, it makes it more believable that the witness was just mistaken by that photograph. There needed to be hard proof, such as fingerprints or the gun, in order for me to say he was guilty.",1,2,3,4,Strongly
/ agree,1,2,3,4,3,1,2,3,4,Only slightly
/ confident,1,2,3,4,Somewhat agree,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not use standardized lineup instructions.,The interviewing officer of the eyewitness did not give cautionary instruction that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup.,0,0,0,0,,1,2,3,4,Somewhat unfair,1,2,3,4,"I have been called, but never served",No,No,Only slightly
/ knowledgeable,1,2,3,4,No.,This was fun and interesting.,1,2,3,4,,,-1 R_doLkd0E34MnFVeB,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 1:19,3/13/13 1:24,0,Pap,228596,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_0pIdgtUkX0FOxIF,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:49,3/13/13 22:51,0,Pap,318109,RIstrong,Firefox, Ubuntu,1366x768,11.2.202,0,Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_6hWONU7KPABc5Zb,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:42,3/13/13 7:46,0,Pap,634179,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1280x1024,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1957,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_3t5689cgCVCALQx,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:48,3/13/13 11:08,0,Pap,258685,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1152x864,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1953,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_8odipmm3cA3WSEJ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 23:07,3/13/13 23:21,0,Pap,504935,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,10.3.181,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.68 Safari/534.24",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1993,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_d4t327jM2Y5OuZn,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 8:36,3/14/13 9:12,0,Pap,602844,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1990,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_b8FxGsvMH1UFlVr,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 7:48,3/14/13 7:49,0,Pap,427795,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_cArPTsukYykWrXL,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:31,3/13/13 9:33,0,Pap,236321,RIweak,Chrome,Macintosh,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_4ShEw91qnqj3vgx,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:01,3/13/13 17:09,0,Pap,579376,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.5.502,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1962,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$90,000 to $99,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty","I did not get to watch the whole video, I pressed the button thinking it was the pause button because someone walked into the room. But instead it was the next button. ",1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_3UHKMi2Q04CNndX,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 6:32,3/13/13 7:44,0,Pap,737139,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,880x495,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1965,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_e4NdEzmLXeZz2QZ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 23:12,3/14/13 13:48,0,Pap,462297,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_4MEiM795976n99X,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:58,3/13/13 12:10,0,Pap,609152,,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.5.502,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_3CACKCmPVt28Y0B,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 2:08,3/14/13 2:21,0,Pap,733867,,Chrome, Linux i686,1600x900,11.2.202,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/24.0.1312.56 Chrome/24.0.1312.56 Safari/537.17",1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_7VA5iW10mxRoLTn,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:31,3/13/13 18:36,0,Pap,594783,NJweak,Chrome,Macintosh,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_2) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1410.28 Safari/537.31",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1966,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$200,000 or more",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_0k6pgb26BDARQq1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 21:48,3/13/13 21:48,0,Pap,345538,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_9HqZ667IvyEDJDD,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:09,3/12/13 18:12,0,Pap,832519,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Male,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_af4cu10gcpYaQgl,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 0:59,3/13/13 1:13,0,Pap,409959,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1947,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,,,,,"No, not guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_3WR230izs6MHSMR,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 6:19,3/13/13 6:21,0,Pap,731822,,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_82nBnmTAY4JC7fT,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:41,3/13/13 18:41,0,Pap,792219,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_3UDfqoVJLtUOR6Z,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 5:21,3/13/13 5:21,0,Pap,759286,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_5Bi8GsWS8riJzpz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:15,3/13/13 17:18,0,Pap,350414,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602.171,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; Trident/4.0; GTB7.4; chromeframe/25.0.1364.172; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618; InfoPath.2; .NET4.0C; BRI/2),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1982,"Yes, Puerto Rican",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$80,000 to $89,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_brqeFRO9hT57VWJ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:00,3/13/13 21:26,0,Pap,111960,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1970,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_2nxjPXvW5vRxHw1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:48,3/13/13 17:51,0,Pap,377758,RIstrong,Safari,Macintosh,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/536.26.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.2 Safari/536.26.17",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1986,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$200,000 or more",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_9TDeorD6CRF4rdP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:22,3/13/13 9:22,0,Pap,968114,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_agVQToRPOEC5Rxb,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:29,3/14/13 15:22,0,Pap,138499,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_5ok68eJkOzixNpb,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:42,3/13/13 8:43,0,Pap,809904,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_bQsQD4HZKQcN8hv,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:28,3/13/13 16:34,0,Pap,283223,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_cT8oh3GTqTUgreB,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 21:06,3/13/13 21:54,0,Pap,492036,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1280x1024,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1968,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$80,000 to $89,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_0ADITRcDHXVda7P,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:08,3/12/13 18:10,0,Pap,780634,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1280x1024,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Female,1920,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Elementary school,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_0jsN5RShhVYNGvj,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 2:16,3/14/13 2:16,0,Pap,589412,,Safari,Android 4.0.4,1280x800,11.1.111,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; en-us; GT-P7510 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.30",1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_bacXORwyh0sPzh3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 23:07,3/14/13 0:34,0,Pap,958158,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_bOW01CkkxRLGZ3D,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:49,3/13/13 16:53,0,Pap,152925,NJweak,Safari,PPC Mac OS X 10_4_11,1024x768,10.0.45,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10_4_11; en) AppleWebKit/533.19.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.1.3 Safari/533.19.4",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1952,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","Less than $10,000",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_bQ2pOKqEtA7hwNf,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:09,3/12/13 18:12,0,Pap,767075,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1280x1024,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Female,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_9SGHoQkWL7pNsrP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:54,3/13/13 9:56,0,Pap,602386,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; BRI/2),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1976,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_dfYEjD73BVZBuXb,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:44,3/13/13 14:47,0,Pap,375435,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_dhEEbXt1TvJpwpv,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:20,3/13/13 14:22,0,Pap,621810,,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1280x1024,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_6x7INmCmq9tP4H3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 9:28,3/14/13 9:30,0,Pap,327085,,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_5vR6LDGg1a8DG8R,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:08,3/13/13 22:10,0,Pap,200745,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.97 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1991,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$90,000 to $99,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_2l5aNNlx7QEX7vf,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:39,3/13/13 14:44,0,Pap,273379,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1280x1024,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1963,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_3vDbG5gb1JS3BS5,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:44,3/13/13 15:46,0,Pap,305628,,Safari,Android 2.2.2,800x1143,10.1.120,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.2; de-de; Dell Streak 7 Build/FRG83G) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/533.1",1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_dnHGVM6WywMSMXX,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:10,3/13/13 16:13,0,Pap,368656,NJstrong,Firefox,PPC Mac OS X 10.4,1280x800,10.1.102,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20110902 Firefox/3.6.22,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1946,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Doctorate degree (e.g., PhD, EdD)","$70,000 to $79,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_8odoJ8gKdk8sxdb,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:23,3/13/13 8:47,0,Pap,235988,NJstrong,Safari,Intel Mac OS X 10_6_3,960x540,11.1.115,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_3; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/533.16",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$30,000 to $39,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_b7uXlaIFh2o1fbT,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 20:58,3/13/13 22:06,0,Pap,408745,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$70,000 to $79,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_6fXx7SpVBQnjyPr,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:36,3/13/13 14:43,0,Pap,544241,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1152x864,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_6hdEtXWjswML9Rj,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 13:29,3/13/13 13:38,0,Pap,857970,RIweak,Firefox,Macintosh,1280x800,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_29JcztCcARQ4Vjn,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:00,3/13/13 8:02,0,Pap,638326,RIstrong,MSIE,Windows NT 5.1,1280x1024,11.0.1.152,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1958,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_0iDD2U9syIDSNLL,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:50,3/13/13 8:52,0,Pap,200052,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1947,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_eUUxMgcRhHt4o6N,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:10,3/12/13 18:10,0,Pap,537334,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1024x600,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Male,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_3K6mmZd5MfQyB6Z,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 5:34,3/13/13 5:37,0,Pap,453854,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1067x600,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1956,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_eIMgK74dxb081c9,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 12:38,3/14/13 13:12,0,Pap,385321,NJweak,Chrome,Macintosh,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_2) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1990,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_5mRK3pUwwy0LT3T,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 4:04,3/13/13 4:52,0,Pap,541894,RIweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1280x960,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/6.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; InfoPath.2; Media Center PC 5.0; SLCC1; XF_mmhpset; EIE10;ENUSMSN),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1966,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_4ODwZjP729hMamF,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 12:12,3/14/13 12:49,0,Pap,269721,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1993,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_b4tiKhovx1zv7FP,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:47,3/13/13 15:52,0,Pap,306389,NJstrong,Safari,Macintosh,1152x720,10.3.183,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8) AppleWebKit/534.50.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.6 Safari/533.22.3",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$40,000 to $49,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_9ZFXpmvmYzIbpYx,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:08,3/12/13 18:09,0,Pap,349485,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Female,1975,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$90,000 to $99,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_3eeBgNEcij8VioB,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:09,3/13/13 18:27,0,Pap,778283,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1152x864,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1970,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$50,000 to $59,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_6E7ldTCxCDyVxl3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:57,3/13/13 19:00,0,Pap,697980,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1525x857,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; MS-RTC LM 8; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Tablet PC 2.0; BOIE9;ENUS),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1972,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_0JP7Hof4Vj1XOlv,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:18,3/13/13 8:28,0,Pap,140241,,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,670x1072,11.6.602.171,0,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C; InfoPath.3),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_eb9K6EvFvPJiK57,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:34,3/13/13 7:36,0,Pap,379762,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1680x1050,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1954,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_6EboS0YvDn1HirH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:06,3/13/13 9:12,0,Pap,820168,,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_esqt9fnYaNkPgfH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:24,3/13/13 16:24,0,Pap,765434,,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1024x600,10.0.32.18,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; MAAU; OfficeLiveConnector.1.3; OfficeLivePatch.0.0; MAAU),1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_6X3yQtZUHsb7gxv,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 3:46,3/13/13 3:50,0,Pap,372188,RIstrong,Firefox,Macintosh,1440x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1964,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_3pBnrxRqcjrQU29,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:35,3/14/13 13:37,0,Pap,470989,,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1280x1024,-1,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_5dNOAbZKd5WoEF7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 3:44,3/13/13 3:50,0,Pap,239463,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1333x750,11.5.502,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1977,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_8BLnmmPYtCEE1yl,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:24,3/13/13 14:28,0,Pap,769069,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.1.102,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1956,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","Less than $10,000",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_09xVC8u7gg6dCoR,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:17,3/14/13 13:21,0,Pap,816850,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1440x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1976,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_6QFzXHJ6XdSFFpH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:44,3/13/13 14:46,0,Pap,765567,RIweak,Firefox,Macintosh,1440x900,11.5.502,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1990,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_1TXevV3GIsxLvTL,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 1:27,3/13/13 9:19,0,Pap,761956,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1024x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1972,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_1HQzoW4X4SRHIvH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 17:11,3/12/13 17:17,0,Pap,309818,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1050x1680,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; InfoPath.2; OfficeLiveConnector.1.5; OfficeLivePatch.1.3; .NET4.0C; Tablet PC 2.0),1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Female,1929,"Yes, Cuban",Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander,Some college credit,"$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_eV6fMdonGxLC3qt,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:39,3/13/13 9:56,0,Pap,938347,RIweak,Firefox,Macintosh,1707x960,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1971,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$90,000 to $99,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_cHLX5VhFI95BYj3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:33,3/13/13 7:35,0,Pap,887930,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,800x600,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_6l1v2AEe04HOk0B,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:38,3/13/13 14:47,0,Pap,965196,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1956,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_3F74fCzQp1biluZ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:49,3/13/13 13:08,0,Pap,899283,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.2,1366x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1978,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_9Nw8eTbpl9hDY6V,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,8,3/13/13 14:45,3/15/13 17:12,0,Pap,910724,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_1FImOZ64eGZkgi9,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:06,3/13/13 18:07,0,Pap,259413,,Safari,Android 2.3.5,800x390,11.1.111,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5; en-us; Sprint APA9292KT Build/GRJ90) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1",1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_8cVUM2sqBfb3Avb,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:33,3/13/13 7:36,0,Pap,446244,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_9T72QAgPAzPL0WN,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:16,3/14/13 7:10,0,Pap,584786,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_0rpFC76mUJOmRH7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:23,3/13/13 18:40,0,Pap,628361,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.2,1920x1200,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1983,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_a3r8vc3LwjZxfgh,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:09,3/12/13 18:10,0,Pap,275461,NJstrong,MSIE,Windows Phone OS 7.5,720x1280,-1,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows Phone OS 7.5; Trident/5.0; IEMobile/9.0; HTC; HTC6990LVW),1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Male,1987,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_03qkAeoW9EdEYdL,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 1:52,3/14/13 3:06,0,Pap,200593,NJstrong,Chrome,Macintosh,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1992,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_aWVa8i30vAKVZ7n,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:06,3/13/13 10:13,0,Pap,805506,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1993,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$80,000 to $89,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_6gLgUlvShKn4Bb7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:10,3/13/13 12:11,0,Pap,391268,,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,-1,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; Trident/5.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; SLCC2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; Tablet PC 2.0; .NET4.0C),1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_b8B1ojryLQKw5oh,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:56,3/13/13 12:58,0,Pap,499618,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1966,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_1FBsXxBTtScXfsF,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 0:37,3/13/13 1:38,0,Pap,716826,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1923,"Yes, Puerto Rican",Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander,Some college credit,"$80,000 to $89,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_4OAdCX6znbKEiSV,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:18,3/13/13 18:47,0,Pap,164227,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1987,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_0J02EBHIFNbGS33,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:29,3/13/13 19:50,0,Pap,234591,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1152x864,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/24.0.1312.57 Safari/537.17",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Professional degree (e.g., MD, DDS, JD)","$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_6X1XnIwqhzErjCd,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 11:50,3/13/13 12:48,0,Pap,765975,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_6hVhH67SGlLKCpf,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:31,3/13/13 16:41,0,Pap,427363,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1987,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_8ArvNamwKQnTu7P,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:00,3/13/13 7:06,0,Pap,474403,NJstrong,Chrome,Macintosh,1680x1050,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_2) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1984,"Yes, other Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Some Other Race,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_erE5bFJyUeQUkND,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:07,3/14/13 13:17,0,Pap,588691,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1280x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1971,"Yes, other Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Some Other Race,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$100,000 to $149,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_42DtmInyHNkjylL,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:02,3/13/13 22:06,0,Pap,544545,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1954,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some high school,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_8dB4xogkQq0ClOl,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:09,3/13/13 9:12,0,Pap,444887,,MSIE,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,-1,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; GTB7.4; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.3),1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_2tvyC8FQsSzfonH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 9:44,3/14/13 9:46,0,Pap,581475,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1979,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$50,000 to $59,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_7PVd88C3Y9h3hit,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 21:20,3/13/13 21:33,0,Pap,897423,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,-1,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_1GkXYoEz45KJhD7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 6:49,3/13/13 6:51,0,Pap,853604,NJstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.2,1600x900,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1962,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_0U1yeZX8WNQIEhn,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:20,3/13/13 14:22,0,Pap,122338,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:21.0) Gecko/20130312 Firefox/21.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1989,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_3I8C8BBS2EFOn0V,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:48,3/13/13 18:52,0,Pap,645681,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_9KQWUKhOxjIxsRT,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:10,3/12/13 18:15,0,Pap,647684,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.4.402,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Male,1993,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_07ArdbnkNiPPrtb,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:27,3/14/13 13:27,0,Pap,616891,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_3C4dxDUPQcmyhqR,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:36,3/13/13 19:37,0,Pap,564876,,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1152x864,-1,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_2iBJMxrxxdo7GND,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:51,3/13/13 15:05,0,Pap,119897,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.5.502,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1981,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$100,000 to $149,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_0URlf91yWMAsOmp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 16:43,3/13/13 18:22,0,Pap,912413,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$80,000 to $89,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_1Nyvv0TYihEvN9X,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 17:02,3/13/13 17:03,0,Pap,454555,,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1024x600,10.0.32.18,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; MAAU; OfficeLiveConnector.1.3; OfficeLivePatch.0.0; MAAU),1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_81jmOmHPeyvM7UV,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:20,3/13/13 10:09,0,Pap,594936,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_9o7zpj9QexDosn3,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:36,3/13/13 8:37,0,Pap,381938,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_1YXyMKbsh6j1zVj,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 8:39,3/13/13 9:34,0,Pap,675417,,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_6yZHtk8aUMjZyy9,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:20,3/14/13 13:26,0,Pap,750937,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1978,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_2fLDKXxKYALSwEB,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:08,3/12/13 18:18,0,Pap,221838,RIstrong,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Female,1976,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_cUq9DNcxAa1dnZb,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 18:07,3/13/13 18:09,0,Pap,488608,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1992,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_2mHYsWP9DlfBUZ7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 6:38,3/14/13 6:41,0,Pap,223072,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1957,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$70,000 to $79,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"Yes, guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_3Wuqyld9gKH87MF,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:30,3/13/13 13:53,0,Pap,161028,,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1360x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_4Hmcps7ZY0Pwxsp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:32,3/14/13 13:36,0,Pap,643607,NJweak,Safari,Macintosh,1920x1200,10.3.183,0,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8) AppleWebKit/534.50.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.6 Safari/533.22.3",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1972,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_0CXhUFeEoVotiKN,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 21:31,3/13/13 21:32,0,Pap,338235,,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_3OvDtTHJwtPg5ed,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:08,3/12/13 21:02,0,Pap,799831,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1280x1024,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Female,1959,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$20,000 to $29,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_2mdlUCkwbV0Nf7f,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:48,3/13/13 13:30,0,Pap,218858,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1080,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1948,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Master's degree (e.g., MA, MS, MEd)","$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_eQeVjCZfNTBro9L,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 6:55,3/13/13 7:12,0,Pap,435888,NJweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1200,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1990,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$90,000 to $99,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_afS3sQh3QRzYR8x,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 15:23,3/13/13 22:59,0,Pap,518390,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.97 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1985,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","Less than $10,000",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_1KNrCOswTrQTtMp,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 5:29,3/13/13 16:43,0,Pap,226030,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_cuJZjlMvkxqaMjb,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:45,3/13/13 21:28,0,Pap,720749,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1993,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,Some college credit,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_a33lqPXomfC2Bvf,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:18,3/13/13 22:21,0,Pap,882704,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1962,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$10,000 to 19,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_9tvCc4e6SgtkKUt,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:06,3/14/13 17:17,0,Pap,133022,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.0,1440x900,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1965,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Asian,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,"No, not guilty",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_4U8nv77lijkefuB,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 1:42,3/13/13 1:43,0,Pap,455863,,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_8ueHt0xncBFMJed,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 12:22,3/13/13 12:25,0,Pap,421026,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1280x800,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/24.0.1312.57 Safari/537.17",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$60,000 to $69,999",1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_9YKTO8Ak98LORUh,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:01,3/13/13 9:32,0,Pap,277342,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_a5eEANhG2SqCgnj,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:10,3/12/13 18:12,0,Pap,540928,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Male,1970,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,High school graduate (diploma or GED),"$80,000 to $89,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_aaOLXl8PTatk7Ah,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/12/13 18:17,3/12/13 18:19,0,Pap,888984,NJweak,Firefox,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,11.6.602,0,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,1,2,3,4,Female,1976,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_8HVunH9sgM4LJn7,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 21:03,3/13/13 21:06,0,Pap,174875,RIweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1920x1200,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1952,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Associate degree (e.g., AA, AS)","$150,000 to $199,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_bHNM7DrTmQRXqrH,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/14/13 13:40,3/14/13 19:12,0,Pap,964067,NJstrong,Safari,Macintosh,1366x768,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_2) AppleWebKit/536.26.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.2 Safari/536.26.17",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1985,"Yes, Mexican/Mexican American/Chicano",Asian,Some college credit,"$40,000 to $49,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_5byzsc2a8GMQWW1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 10:57,3/13/13 11:01,0,Pap,609705,RIweak,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1152x864,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.160 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1982,"Yes, Cuban",White,Some high school,"$10,000 to 19,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_2s1k9HxVhDYS2gZ,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:31,3/13/13 9:40,0,Pap,599910,RIstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1440x900,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1991,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,Some college credit,"$80,000 to $89,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_73c73HUnjjPtqex,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 22:22,3/13/13 22:57,0,Pap,546952,RIweak,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1984,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_8wgDgja3N353Agd,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 9:17,3/13/13 9:18,0,Pap,603620,,Firefox,Windows NT 6.1,1600x900,11.5.502,1,Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_8dK8mV3o9cZUDI1,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 14:02,3/13/13 14:08,0,Pap,987301,RIweak,MSIE,Windows NT 5.1,1024x768,10.2.159.1,1,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1988,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,Some college credit,"$30,000 to $39,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_bIby7qGWDR75WEl,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 0:43,3/13/13 0:44,0,Pap,998347,,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602.171,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; Trident/5.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; SLCC2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; InfoPath.3),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_1GqNS81oIRjCiXz,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 19:43,3/13/13 19:44,0,Pap,115803,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_6x5gKbO5J0QOJNj,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 7:05,3/13/13 7:20,0,Pap,774350,NJstrong,Chrome,Windows NT 6.0,1680x1050,11.6.602,1,"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22",1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Male,1980,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",White,"Bachelor's degree (e.g., BA, AB, BS)","$50,000 to $59,999",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1 R_9S20boKq6IGhH1j,Default Response Set,Anonymous,,,0,3/13/13 21:08,3/13/13 21:12,0,Pap,863992,NJweak,MSIE,Windows NT 6.1,1366x768,11.6.602.180,1,Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; eSobiSubscriber 1.0.0.40; MAAR; .NET4.0C; AskTbOVO2/5.14.1.20007),1,2,3,4,1,Elephant,47,1,2,3,4,Female,1958,"No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino",Black or African American,Some college credit,"$20,000 to $29,999",,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,1,1,2,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-1