Supplementary Materials

This PDF file includes:

  • Section I. Fabrication of the LGG membranes
  • Section II. Tuning the average interlayer spacing through the capillary compression method
  • Section III. Determination of the average interlayer spacing from membrane thickness
  • Section IV. Small-angle neutron scattering of the compressed LGG membranes
  • Section V. Time-lag diffusion and electrokinetic ion transport experiments
  • Section VI. Continuum modeling of concentration-driven ion diffusion through the cascading nanoslits contained in the LGG membranes
  • Section VII. Continuum modeling of electrokinetic ion transport through the cascading nanoslits contained in the LGG membranes
  • Fig. S1. A schematic showing the fabrication of the LGG membranes and tuning of the interlayer spacing.
  • Fig. S2. Isotropic SANS patterns of the compressed LGG membranes.
  • Fig. S3. Concentration-driven ion transport through the LGG membranes.
  • Fig. S4. Effect of circulation rate on ion permeation through the LGG membranes.
  • Fig. S5. The continuum simulation model for steady-state diffusion across charge-neutral cascading nanoslits.
    Fig. S6. Determination of the geometrical variables L and δ through a reverse Monte Carlo method.
  • Fig. S7. The continuum simulation model for steady-state diffusion across negatively charged cascading nanoslits.
  • Fig. S8. Concentration and electric potential distribution profiles of the steady-state KCl diffusion across negatively charged cascading nanoslits.
  • Fig. S9. An AFM image of CCG on mica substrates.
  • Fig. S10. Continuum simulations of the electrokinetic ion flow across negatively charged cascading nanoslits.
  • Fig. S11. Representative I-V curves of the electrokinetic ion transport measurements.
  • Fig. S12. Typical I-V curves for the establishment of membrane selectivity.
  • Fig. S13. The increase in channel concentration as a result of channel surface charge.
  • Fig. S14. Scaling behaviors of the electrokinetic ion transport as a function of channel size across the range of sub–10 nm and of varied ionic concentrations.
  • Fig. S15. The continuum simulation model for electroosmotic current across the negatively charged cascading nanoslits.
  • Table S1. Geometries of the cascading nanoslits model.
  • Table S2. Effect of surface charge status on ion diffusion coefficient across the cascading nanoslits.
  • References (56–72)

Download PDF

Files in this Data Supplement: