{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["Sheet1"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":0,"defined_names":0,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Sheet1","index":0,"n_rows":11,"n_cols":4,"rows_kept":11,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["Suppl. Table S5: Criteria applied during the manual curation of sample growth habit and geographic origin."]
[]
["Filter criteria","Information found","Number of samples","Action"]
["Growth habit discrepancy between PCA and experimental assessment","PCA in agreement with CGN or EVIGEZ record","4*","Reclassified"]
["No geographic origin associated to sample ID in original genebank","Cultivar name matches other samples or records",3,"Reclassified"]
["Origin discrepancy between PCA and original genebank passport data","PCA in agreement with CGN, Tsukuba or EVIGEZ record",51,"Reclassified"]
["Has more than 80% missing genotypes",null,44,"Filtered out"]
["Origin discrepancy between PCA and original genebank passport data","No match for cultivar name found in CGN, Tsukuba or EVIGEZ record",17,"Filtered out"]
[]
[]
["* Two samples in the “growth habit discrepancy” category also fell in the “origin discrepancy” group. They are counted only in this latter category to avoid counting samples twice in this table."]