Ray et al. 10.1073/pnas.0407020102. |
Fig. 6. Radioimaging of gel analysis showing that almost 100% of the oligos contain the thiol modification.
Fig. 7. The various oligomers studied and their notations.
Fig. 8. Topography as imaged by tapping-mode atomic force microscopy of an atomically flat (111) gold surface and of the same substrate covered with various ss (with a different number of G) and dsDNA oligomers.
Fig. 9. The x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra.
Fig. 10. Gel electrophoresis of the DNA oligomer 8G.
Fig. 11. The electron signal as a function after being exposed to 193-nm radiation for 14 sec, the laser intensity.
Fig. 12. Electron transmission spectra from pure gold substrate. The intensity shown after dividing by 10.
Table 2. The thickness of different ds and ss monolayers calculated from spectroscopic ellipsometry for incidence angle θ = 70°
Sample |
1G3 |
1G5 |
3G |
5G |
8G |
8C |
15A |
5C |
G3C |
Thickness (± 2 Å), Å |
33 |
31 |
30 |
33 |
32 |
30 |
30 |
32 |
37 |
Table 3. Coverage calculated from radioactive labeling for different ssDNA and dsDNA monolayers
Sample |
1G |
3G |
5G |
8G |
8C |
15A |
G3C |
Molecules per cm2 ´ 1013 ± 0.4 |
1.5 |
1.8 |
1.2 |
1.7 |
1.9 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
Average number of molecules = 1.4 ± 0.4 ´ 1013 molecules per cm2.
Table 4. Contact angles for different DNA monolayers
Sample |
1G |
3G |
5G |
8G |
8C |
15A |
5C |
G3C |
Contact angle (± 3° ), ° |
32 |
31 |
31 |
32 |
31 |
36 |
31 |
26* |
*The monolayer made from dsDNA could not be washed extensively, because denaturation occurs. Therefore, the salt content on the surface is higher, causing a reduction in the contact angle.
Table 5. Atomic ratios calculated from x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra
Atomic ratio |
N/P |
O/N |
C/P |
N/S |
||||
Sample |
1G |
8G |
1G |
8G |
1G |
8G |
1G |
8G |
Theoretical |
5 |
5 |
1.1 |
1.03 |
10.4 |
10.4 |
37.5 |
37.5 |
Experimental (± 10%) |
4.8 |
4.4 |
1.63 |
1.63 |
15.5 |
14.2 |
29 |
31.5 |