{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["Sheet2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":0,"defined_names":0,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Sheet2","index":0,"n_rows":15,"n_cols":6,"rows_kept":15,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,5]]}
["Table S2: Replication of previously identified associatins with GDM. Gene symbols are listed. Two previously reported SNPs were not on our chip, and therefore a proxy SNP in linkage disequilibrium (LD) was used (See methods). The degree of disequilibrium (r^2) was high for both. The probability of genetic assocaiton is presented for GDM (P GDM) and DM2 (P DM2).  Significant associatons (at p < 0.05) are bolded. "]
[]
[]
[]
[]
["Gene","SNP","SNP in ld","r^2","P GDM","P DM2"]
["TCF7L2","rs7903146"," ",null,4.9369999999999997E-2,3.8570000000000001E-13]
["TCF7L2","rs12255372 ","rs12243326",0.95899999999999996,6.4369999999999997E-2,6.7009999999999997E-11]
["GCK","rs1799884"," ",null,0.24410000000000001,0.3483]
["KCNJ11","rs5219","rs5215",0.93500000000000005,0.16120000000000001,8.3929999999999994E-3]
["CDKAL1","rs7754840"," ",null,0.46710000000000002,1.673E-3]
["IGF2BP2","rs4402960"," ",null,0.66090000000000004,4.5859999999999998E-3]
["MTNR1B","rs10830963"," ",null,3.7490000000000002E-3,6.4680000000000001E-2]
["MTNR1B","rs1387153"," ",null,9.4439999999999996E-2,2.6710000000000001E-2]
["IRS1","rs1801278"," ",null,0.24629999999999999,0.40810000000000002]