AnimaliaTeleosteiCoregonidaeSelzOliver M.DönzCarmela J.VonlanthenPascalSeehausenOleA taxonomic revision of the whitefish of lakes Brienz and Thun, Switzerland, with descriptions of four new species (Teleostei, Coregonidae)Zookeys091120209897916210.3897/zookeys.989.3282225F5D317-28F5-5A22-B2B2-1C9938656B6D Coregonus fatioi , Kottelat, 1997 Coregonus "Albock": Heuscher 1901 Coregonus "Albock", "BRI1": Douglas et al. 1999, 2003; Douglas and Brunner 2002 (see also synonymy of C. acrinasus) Coregonus "Felchen": Kirchhofer 1990; Kirchhofer 1995 (see also synonymy of C. alpinus and C. brienzii) Coregonus "Large type": Maurer and Guthruf 2005; Müller et al. 2007 (see also synonymy of C. alpinus and C. brienzii) Coregonus lavaretus wartmanninatio fatioi: Berg 1932 Coregonus lavaretusnatio arurensis, oekot. pelagicus: Steinmann 1950 (see also synonymy of C. steinmanni) Coregonus lavaretusnatio arurensis, oekot. primigenius: Steinmann 1950 (see also synonymy of C. steinmanni and C. alpinus) Coregonus "Bodenalbock", "Albock", "Schwebalbock", "Wanderalbock": Steinmann 1950 (see also synonymy of C. alpinus, C. steinmanni) Coregonus sp. "Felchen": Hudson et al. 2011, 2013, 2016; Ingram et al. 2012 Coregonus sp. "Tiefenalbock": Vonlanthen et al. 2015 Coregonus wartmanni alpinus: Fatio 1890Material examined.

Lectotype. MHNG-809.059, Switzerland, Lake Thun (46°40'N, 7°46'E), 154.5 mm SL, sex unknown.

Non-types. NMBE-1077133, NMBE-1077180–1077185, NMBE-1077135– 1077157, Switzerland, Lake Thun (46°40'N, 7°46'E), N = 30, 191–288 mm SL; NMBE-1077342, NMBE-1077291–1077317, NMBE-1077266, NMBE-1077267, Switzerland, Lake Brienz (46°43'N, 7°57'E), N = 30, 132–244 mm SL.

Diagnosis.

Coregonus fatioi is a medium-sized whitefish with weak pigmentation of all fins and body; light to dark green colour on the flanks above the lateral line; moderate to many pigmented small dots on the scales along the flank and the dorsum; slender, elongated and slightly torpedo-like body; long head; tip of snout is fleshy and roundish; small eye with a thin and triangular to roundish eye socket for individuals from Lake Thun and a thick and triangular shaped eye socket for individuals from Lake Brienz; many and long gill rakers.

Differential diagnosis.

Differential diagnoses against C. albellus and C. alpinus are given under those species’ accounts.

Coregonus fatioi-Coregonus brienzii

In Brienz C. fatioi can be differentiated from C. brienzii by being deeper bodied (22.1–26.2% SL, mean = 23.9 vs. 19.6–25.1% SL, mean = 22.6) and having a smaller eye (eye depth: 21.2–27.6% HL, mean = 24.8 vs. 23.1–28.3% SL, mean = 25.3) (Tables 5, 7, 11).

Coregonus fatioi-Coregonus steinmanni

The specimens of C. fatioi from Lake Thun differ from those of C. steinmanni by having longer gill rakers (middle gill raker length: 12.5–21.3% HL, mean = 15.8 vs. 9.1–14.3% HL, mean = 11.5; longest gill raker length: 12.8–22.6% HL, mean = 16.9 vs. 10–14.4% HL, mean = 12.1), a longer and wider underjaw (under jaw length: 28–34.1% HL, mean = 30.5 vs. 25.2–30% HL, mean = 27.3; under jaw width: 21–30.3% HL, mean = 24.7 vs. 19.3–25% HL, mean = 23). Based on ratios C. fatioi can be differentiated from C. steinmanni by having a smaller "caudal peduncle depth / upper jaw length" ratio (CD/UJ: 1.02–1.34 vs. 1.36–1.55) and "caudal peduncle depth / postdorsal length" ratio (CD/PostD: 0.14–0.17 vs. 0.17–0.20 (Tables 5, 6, 10).

Coregonus fatioiCoregonus profundus

Coregonus fatioi from Lake Thun can be distinguished from C. profundus by having more and longer gill rakers (upper arch gill raker number: 10– 16, mode = 14 vs. 5–10, mode = 9; lower arch gill raker number: 22– 27, mode = 24 vs. 10–18, mode = 14; total gill raker number: 32–43, mode = 38 vs. 15–27, mode = 21; middle gill raker length: 12.5– 21.3% HL, mean = 15.8 vs. 7.6–11.7% HL, mean = 9.2; longest gill raker length: 12.8–22.6% HL, mean = 16.9 vs. 7.8–12.4% HL, mean = 10.1), shorter pectoral fin (pectoral fin 1 length: 13.3–18.9% SL, mean = 16.5 vs. 16.6–21% SL, mean = 18.4; pectoral fin 2 length: 13.8–20.6% SL, mean = 17.7 vs. 17.7–23.2% SL, mean = 20.2), a shorter head (13.6–16.2% SL, mean = 14.8 vs. 15.5–18.4% SL, mean = 16.4), a longer postdorsal length (41.6–50.7% SL, mean = 44.9 vs. 38.9–44.5% SL, mean = 42.5), and a longer upper jaw (28–34.1% HL, mean = 30.5 vs. 26.4–30.6% HL, mean = 28.7) (Tables 5, 8, Suppl. material 1: Table S6).

Coregonus fatioi-Coregonus acrinasus

Coregonus fatioi can be distinguished from C. acrinasus by having a longer postdorsal length (41.6–50.7% SL, mean = 44.9 vs. 40.3– 45.6% SL, mean = 43) and longer gill rakers (middle gill raker length: 12.5–21.3% HL, mean = 15.8 vs. 9.1–16.6% HL, mean = 13.4; longest gill raker length: 12.8–22.6% HL, mean = 16.9 vs. 11.4–16.9% HL, mean = 14.5) (Tables 5, 9).

Description.

General appearance is shown in Figure 6. Morphological and meristic characters of both sexes can be found in Table 5 and Suppl. material 1: Table S6 and first- and second-best ratios for both sexes combined can be found in Tables 10, 11. The description is valid for both sexes and both lakes; differences between the populations of lakes Thun and Brienz are mentioned.

Shape: Elongated. Slender bodied with greatest body depth anterior of the dorsal fin resulting in a slightly torpedo-like form. Dorsal and ventral profile similar and slightly arched. Dorsal and ventral profile from tip of snout to interorbital area mostly straight and then slightly convex to dorsal and pelvic fin origin respectively. Head long. Very rarely does the snout have an approx. 40–50° angle to the body axis anterior of the eye, such that the profile from the tip of the snout to the vertical projection where the anterior part of the eye crosses the dorsal profile is straight and afterwards slightly convex. Mouth thick (i.e., width of upper and lower jaw), long and often terminal and only rarely slightly sub-terminal. Snout mostly wider than deep, not strongly pronounced, since the tip of the snout is often fleshy and roundish. Specimens from Lake Thun have a thin, roundish and rarely triangular shaped eye-socket, whereas specimens from Lake Brienz have an eye-socket that is thick and triangular (i.e., sickle-shaped). Pectoral fin moderately tapered. Anterior unbranched ray of the erected dorsal fin ranges from almost vertically straight to an approx. 60–80° angle to body axis and only bent slightly posteriorly at the end of the ray. Caudal peduncle narrow and elongated with caudal fin forked in specimens from both lakes and sometimes moderately asymmetrical (mostly the ventral part is longer) in specimens from Lake Thun but very rarely in specimens from Lake Brienz. Unbranched ray of anal fin straight and rarely bent posteriorly at the end of the ray. Anal fin longest anteriorly and progressively shortening posteriorly with the outer margin of the anal fin ranging from being straight to slightly concave.

Meristics : Specimens of Lake Thun have many and long gill rakers, whereas specimens from Lake Brienz have a bit less and moderately long gill rakers.

Colour: Pigmentation of fins and body overall weak in live specimens. In specimens from Lake Thun the pectoral fin is translucent, sometimes yellowish with faint pigmentation at the median to distal parts of the fin. In Thun the pelvic fin ranges from completely translucent to moderately pigmented and the dorsal, adipose, anal and caudal fins are moderately pigmented. Specimens from Lake Brienz have a fully translucent pectoral fin that sometimes has a faint pigmentation on the unbranched ray. Pelvic and anal fins range from fully transparent to moderately pigmented and dorsal, adipose and caudal fins are moderately pigmented. In both lakes fish have a silvery appearance along the flanks. Specimens from both lakes sometimes have many pigmented small dots on the scales along the flank and the dorsum, which is rare in specimens from Lake Thun and common in specimens from Lake Brienz. Distribution of the dots is bound to the scale patterning such that the dots are found at the edge of the scales or at the boundary point of two scales (as can be found for the species of C. alpinus, C. brienzii and C. steinmanni). Colouration on the dorsum above the lateral line of specimens from Lake Thun ranges from a light green colouration (e.g., RGB (136, 245, 205)) to an olive-green colouration (e.g., RGB (176, 192, 125)), where the former is more common. In specimens from Lake Brienz the upper dorsum is light greenish in colouration (e.g., RGB (136, 245, 205)). For a comparison to the main colouration found in the other species see Suppl. material 1: Figure S8. The dorsal part of the head of specimens of Lake Brienz is weakly pigmented, whereas that of specimens from Lake Thun is moderately pigmented. The snout around the nostrils is weakly (Lake Brienz) to moderately (Lake Thun) pigmented with a gap of very weak (Brienz) to moderate (Thun) pigmentation posteriorly of the nostrils up to the height of the middle of the eyes. Operculum and pre-operculum are silvery with one black dot on the lower margin of the pre-operculum. Preserved specimens are pale in colouration with similar pigmentation as described for live specimens. Silvery, translucent, not coloured or unpigmented parts of the body become brown-yellowish (e.g., RGB (239, 210, 40)), whereas the pigmented parts are conserved and the coloured parts (dorsally above the lateral line) become brownish (e.g., RGB (186, 140, 100)).

Distribution and notes on biology.

Coregonus fatioi is found in the lakes Thun (46°40'N, 7°46'E) and Brienz (46°43'N, 7°57'E) that are connected through the river Aare at Interlaken. Based on isotopic signatures C. fatioi feeds predominantly on zooplankton (Selz 2008; Hudson 2011; Ingram et al. 2012). Stomach content analyses of specimens of C. fatioi from Lake Brienz suggest that C. fatioi feeds on a mix of zooplankton and benthic prey (Maurer and Guthruf 2005; Müller et al. 2007). Coregonus fatioi has a moderately fast growth rate (Both lakes: Kirchhofer 1995; Bittner et al. unpublished; Lake Brienz: Müller et al. 2007). It has to be noted that the work by Kirchhofer (1995), Maurer and Guthruf (2005) and Müller et al. (2007) did not distinguish between all species in lakes Thun or Brienz and thus lumped different species together into few groups. Maurer and Guthruf (2005) and Müller et al. (2007) differentiated between "small-type" and "large-type" whitefish based on cohort-specific threshold values for length-at-age. Based on morphology and ecology Kirchhofer (1995) differentiated in Lake Thun between "Albock" (comprising most likely of C. alpinus, C. steinmanni and C. acrinasus), "Brienzlig" (comprising most likely of C. albellus and C. fatioi) and "Kropfer" (C. profundus) and in Lake Brienz between "Felchen" (comprising most likely of C. alpinus, C. fatioi and C. brienzii) and "Brienzlig" and "Winter-Brienzlig" (comprising of summer- and winter-spawning specimens of C. albellus). The gill raker number and length of C. fatioi (many and long gill rakers) suggests, based on the functional properties of the number of gill rakers (Lundsgaard-Hansen et al. 2013; Roesch et al. 2013), that C. fatioi feeds more on zooplankton and less on benthic prey. However, this assumption needs to be verified with stomach content analyses that distinguish between the different species within a lake. Habitat stratified random sampling of Lake Thun (mid-October 2013; Vonlanthen et al. 2015) and Brienz (mid-September 2011; Vonlanthen et al. 2013) shows, that C. fatioi occupies the moderately shallow (Brienz: approx. 1–48 m, N = 9; Thun: approx. 25–140 m, N = 4) to the deepest waters of the benthic habitat in both lakes (down to 217 m and 261 m in lakes Thun and Brienz, respectively) (Dönz et al. 2018). In the pelagic habitat C. fatioi aggregates in lakes Thun and Brienz in moderate water depths (Brienz: approx. 1–100 m, N = 10; Thun: approx. 10–40 m, N = 9) (Dönz et al. 2018). Note that the habitat-stratified random sampling data for both lakes only covers a short period of time (one month in late summer) and it is thus not clear how the species are distributed spatially through the rest of the year. Furthermore, the habitat-stratified random sampling in the both lakes did not distinguish between ripe and unripe specimens, and thus in the case of C. fatioi the distribution pattern along the depth in the benthic zone is biased by the spawning aggregation of this species since the sampling period in both lakes coincides partially with the spawning season of this species. Coregonus fatioi resembles phenotypically C. albellus and to some extent C. profundus. Interestingly, Steinmann (1950) already mentioned for Lake Thun that the ecotype "Coregonus lavaretus L. nat. arurenis, oekot. nanus" (most likely C. albellus) should be grouped based on its ecology closely to the ecotype "Coregonus lavaretus L. nat. arurenis, oekot. pelagicus" (most likely C. fatioi). Steinmann mentions the German name "Schwebalbock" for the ecotype "pelagicus", which means verbally translated the "floating whitefish" and mentions that the "nanus" ecotype seems to be a small species with similar ecological properties. For the large whitefish species in Lake Thun, Steinmann (1950) defined one central ecotype, the "primigenius" ecotoype, which he places – based on the size – with two other ecotypes namely the "litoralis" ecotoype (most likely C. alpinus) and the "pelagicus" ecotype (most likely C. fatioi). Besides referring to a "primigenius" ecotype, Steinmann (1950) also refers to a "primigenius"-group, which most likely comprises of the "pelagicus" and "litoralis" ecotypes. A further indication of this is that he also mentions that yet another ecotype, namely the "profundus" ecotype, can be directly deduced from the "primigenius" ecotype. Steinmann (1950) further mentions that specimens, which he places in the "primigenius"-group, used to migrate before the construction of water gates (see below) upstream from Lake Thun into the river Aare, which connects Lake Thun with Lake Brienz. Steinmann (1950) mentions that these fish belong to the "primigenius"-group, but did not specify if the migrating population constituted of individuals of the "litoralis" or the "pelagicus" ecotype or both. This migrating population was referred to as "Wanderalbock" (i.e. migrating whitefish) in German and historically migrated from Lake Thun into Lake Brienz during the spawning season, before migration became impossible due to the construction of water gates in 1856 (Fatio 1890; Dönz et al. 2018). Fatio (1890) mentioned that a large part of the population of C. fatioi "disappeared" at the beginning of the spawning season in late August and was caught by fishermen in the river Aare downstream (near the city of Thun or Bern) or upstream (near the city of Interlaken) of Lake Thun before and after the construction of the water gate. We compared six whitefish specimens from the museum collections of the MHNG and NMBE, which had no species designation but where it was mentioned that they were caught in the river Aare near the city of Bern (in the years 1881 and 1895), Thun (in the year 1950) and Interlaken (in the year 1945), to the contemporary specimens of Lake Thun including the type specimens of C. albellus, C. fatioi and C. alpinus. All the specimens were caught after the construction of the water gate, when free movement between the lakes was already constrained. All six specimens from the river Aare group in morphospace within the range or adjacent to the range of the contemporary specimens of C. fatioi including the type specimen (Suppl. material 1: Figure S11a–c), suggesting that the historically migrating population of whitefish from Lake Thun most likely belonged to the species C. fatioi. Bittner (2009) sampled and genotyped individuals of a population of whitefish spawning in the river Aare near Interlaken. Dönz et al. (2018) re-analysed those individuals and was able to assign 4 individuals with high assignment probability (>70%) to several different contemporary species of Lake Thun, namely C. alpinus (individual assignment probability of THL15N18 = 86%), C. acrinasus (ind. assign. prob. of THL15N07 and THL15N23 = 77% and 80%, respectively) and C. fatioi (ind. assign. prob. of THL15NfS1124 = 92%). This suggest either that historically more species than just C. fatioi migrated to the river Aare for spawning and were missed both by Fatio (1890) and Steinmann (1950) and are thus not represented in our PCA morphospace of Aare river whitefish (Suppl. material 1: Figure S11 a–c). Or the historical migratory population consisted – as has been suggested by Fatio (1890) and Steinmann (1950) – of individuals of C. fatioi. The average size (total length) at 3 years of age for specimens in this study is 266±15 mm (mean and standard deviation, N = 14) and 244±14 mm (N = 16) for lakes Thun and Brienz respectively (Suppl. material 1: Figures S4–S6). In Lake Brienz the size of 3-year-old specimens of C. fatioi is considerably larger than that of C. albellus and similar to that of C. alpinus and C. brienzii, whereas in Lake Thun it is similar to that of C. profundus and C. albellus and smaller than that of C. alpinus, C. steinmanni, and C. acrinasus (Suppl. material 1: Figure S6). Coregonus fatioi has a long spawning season with two peaks. One spawning peak is in late summer/early autumn from August to October, which seems more common in Lake Thun than Lake Brienz, and the second peak is in early to late winter from December to March (Suppl. material 1: Figure S3; Bittner 2009; Dönz et al. 2018). Spawning depth varies with spawning season and can range from approx. 40 m down to the max. depth of 210 m and 261 m in lakes Thun and Brienz, respectively (Suppl. material 1: Figure S3; Bittner 2009; Dönz et al. 2018). Occasionally C. fatioi can be found spawning shallower (up to 10 m), but generally it spawns in deeper waters. The spawning season and depth of C. fatioi partially overlaps with that of C. steinmanni, C. albellus, C. acrinasus, and C. profundus in Lake Thun and with that of C. albellus and C. brienzii in Lake Brienz.

Etymology.

The name given to this species by Fatio (1890) was preoccupied by another species described by Fatio (1885). Kottelat (1997) proposed C. fatioi as a replacement name. The specific epithet fatioi is the genitive of Fatio. It was named by Kottelat (1997) after the late researcher Viktor Fatio, a zoologist from Switzerland who wrote a standard reference work on the Swiss vertebrates entitled "Faune des Vertébrés de la Suisse Partie 1–3"and in which he also described part of the whitefish species diversity of Switzerland.

Common name.

Tiefenalbock in Lake Thun and Felchen in Lake Brienz.

Morphological and meristic data of C. fatioi Kottelat, 1997 from lakes Thun and Brienz, MHNG-809.059 lectotype from Lake Thun; non-type material N = 30 from Lake Thun and N = 30 from Lake Brienz.

Morphological characters C. fatioi Both lakes Lake Thun Lake Brienz
Lectotype Non-types both sexes Non-types Non-types
Ntotal = 60 Ntotal = 30 Nfemales = 17 Nmales = 13 Ntotal = 30 Nfemales = 12 Nmales = 18
Mean ± StDev Range Mean ± StDev Range Mean ± StDev Range Mean ± StDev Range Mean ± StDev Range Mean ± StDev Range Mean ± StDev Range
SL (mm) 154.5207.5±35.2(132-288)230.2±21.2(191-288)226.6±14.3(191-245)234.9±27.8(202-288)184.8±31.7(132-244)195.9±29.7(141-244)177.3±31.6(132-225)
Percentage of standard length
PelvFB 3.63.8±0.4(3.1-4.8)4.0±0.4(3.2-4.8)3.9±0.3(3.3-4.4)4.0±0.4(3.2-4.8)3.7±0.4(3.1-4.6)3.7±0.3(3.1-4.1)3.7±0.4(3.2-4.6)
PelvFS 5.46.2±0.8(3.9-8.0)6.2±0.9(3.9-8.0)6.3±0.8(4.6-7.4)6.1±1.0(3.9-8.0)6.2±0.8(3.9-7.4)6.2±0.8(3.9-7.0)6.2±0.9(3.9-7.4)
PelvF 17.416.1±1(13.7-19.3)16.4±1.2(13.7-19.3)16.6±1(15.1-19.3)16.1±1.4(13.7-18.6)15.8±0.8(14.6-17.4)15.8±0.7(14.7-17.1)15.9±0.8(14.6-17.4)
PecFB 3.13.2±0.3(2.7-3.8)3.3±0.3(2.8-3.8)3.2±0.3(2.8-3.7)3.4±0.3(2.9-3.8)3.1±0.2(2.7-3.4)3.0±0.2(2.7-3.4)3.1±0.2(2.7-3.4)
PecF1 17.816.2±1.3(13.3-18.9)16.5±1.4(13.3-18.9)16.8±1.2(14.7-18.9)16.1±1.5(13.3-18.4)16.0±1.1(14.1-18.7)15.8±1.0(14.2-17.3)16.0±1.2(14.1-18.7)
PecF2 18.417.2±1.4(13.8-20.6)17.7±1.5(13.8-20.6)18±1.4(15.5-20.6)17.2±1.7(13.8-19.8)16.8±1.1(14.9-19.7)16.5±0.9(14.9-17.9)17±1.2(15.3-19.7)
DFB 11.411.9±0.7(10.3-13.3)11.8±0.7(10.3-13.1)11.6±0.7(10.3-12.9)12.0±0.6(11.2-13.1)12.0±0.7(10.3-13.3)12.0±0.4(11.3-12.6)12.0±0.9(10.3-13.3)
DFAe na17.9±1.3(15.4-21.9)18.0±1.4(15.4-21.9)18.4±1.4(15.4-21.9)17.4±1.2(15.8-19.8)17.8±1.1(15.7-20.0)17.6±1.0(15.7-19.4)18.0±1.2(16.5-20.0)
DFAd 19.119.1±1.3(16.7-23.5)19.3±1.4(16.7-23.5)19.7±1.4(16.7-23.5)18.8±1.3(17.0-21.3)18.8±1.1(17.1-21.1)18.8±0.9(17.1-20.3)18.8±1.3(17.1-21.1)
DFPe 6.35.1±0.6(3.9-7.0)5.0±0.7(3.9-6.9)5.1±0.7(3.9-6.9)4.8±0.7(4.1-6.3)5.3±0.5(4.3-7.0)5.3±0.5(4.7-6.3)5.3±0.6(4.3-7.0)
AFB 12.112.3±0.9(10.6-15.1)12.6±1.0(10.7-15.1)12.5±1.0(10.7-14.0)12.8±1.1(11.7-15.1)11.9±0.8(10.6-13.3)12.0±0.6(11.4-13.0)11.9±0.8(10.6-13.3)
AFAe na11.5±0.9(9.8-13.9)11.9±0.9(10.2-13.9)12.1±0.9(10.5-13.9)11.7±1.0(10.2-13.3)11.1±0.6(9.8-12.7)11.0±0.5(9.8-11.9)11.1±0.7(10.2-12.7)
AdFB 5.75.5±0.8(4.0-8.1)5.6±0.7(4.6-8.1)5.7±0.7(4.8-8.1)5.4±0.6(4.6-6.9)5.5±0.8(4.0-7.7)5.5±0.7(4.3-6.7)5.5±0.9(4.0-7.7)
CF na23.8±1.3(19.6-27.2)23.6±1.3(19.6-26.6)23.9±1.1(22.1-26.4)23.3±1.6(19.6-26.6)24±1.2(22.4-27.2)23.8±1.3(22.4-27.2)24.1±1.1(22.7-26.4)
CD 7.77.2±0.3(6.7-8.5)7.1±0.3(6.7-8.5)7.1±0.4(6.7-8.5)7.2±0.2(6.9-7.7)7.3±0.3(6.8-8)7.3±0.3(6.8-7.8)7.4±0.3(6.9-8)
CL 13.913.7±0.9(11.5-16.1)13.3±0.8(11.5-14.7)13.1±0.8(11.5-14.7)13.5±0.6(12.6-14.6)14.2±0.8(13.1-16.1)13.9±0.7(13.1-15.5)14.3±0.8(13.2-16.1)
PAdC 19.118.9±1(16.8-22.2)18.8±1(16.8-22.2)18.6±1.1(16.8-22.2)19±0.8(17.8-20)19±1.1(16.9-20.8)18.7±1.1(16.9-20.4)19.1±1.1(17.2-20.8)
DHL 15.915.2±0.8(13.6-16.8)14.8±0.7(13.6-16.2)14.9±0.6(13.9-16.1)14.6±0.9(13.6-16.2)15.7±0.7(14.5-16.8)15.4±0.8(14.5-16.8)15.8±0.6(14.7-16.7)
PreP 52.152.0±1.5(47.5-55.5)51.8±1.7(47.5-55.1)52.2±1.7(47.5-55.1)51.3±1.6(48.5-53.8)52.1±1.3(48.8-55.5)52.7±1.4(51.3-55.5)51.8±1.1(48.8-53.9)
PreA 78.877.0±1.3(74.4-80.2)76.9±1.5(74.4-80.2)77.4±1.6(74.7-80.2)76.3±1.1(74.4-78.1)77.1±1.0(75.2-79.2)77.4±0.9(76.4-79.2)76.8±1.0(75.2-78.6)
PreD 48.446.8±1.3(41.5-49.1)46.8±1.5(41.5-49.1)46.5±1.7(41.5-48.8)47.2±1.1(44.8-49.1)46.8±1(43.4-49)46.7±1.4(43.4-49)46.9±0.7(45.9-48)
BD 24.924.4±1.4(22.1-28.1)24.9±1.4(22.7-28.1)25.3±1.3(23.2-28.1)24.4±1.4(22.7-28.1)23.9±1.2(22.1-26.2)24.7±1.1(22.4-26.2)23.4±0.9(22.1-24.9)
PostD 45.444.5±1.4(41.6-50.7)44.9±1.7(41.6-50.7)44.5±2(41.6-50.7)45.3±1.2(43.4-47.1)44.2±0.9(42.5-45.8)44±0.8(42.5-45.6)44.3±1(42.5-45.8)
TL na121.1±1.8(117.3-126)120.7±1.9(117.3-124.2)121.3±1.7(117.3-124)120±1.9(117.4-124.2)121.5±1.8(118.8-126)121.3±2.1(119-126)121.6±1.5(118.8-124.2)
HL (mm) 35.143.5±6.5(27.9-55.9)47.5±3.4(42-55.9)47.4±2.8(42.6-50.9)47.7±4.2(42-55.9)39.5±6.3(27.9-48.8)41.3±5.1(31.4-48.2)38.3±6.9(27.9-48.8)
Percentage of head length
SN 19.923.6±1.9(18.2-27)24.3±1.6(18.2-27)24.2±2(18.2-27)24.5±1.1(23-26.5)22.8±1.9(18.5-26.4)23.2±1.4(21.4-25.5)22.5±2.2(18.5-26.4)
ED 25.823.6±2(19.9-27.6)22.4±1.4(19.9-25.9)22.8±1.3(20.9-25.9)22±1.5(19.9-24.7)24.8±1.7(21.2-27.6)24.9±1(22.9-26.6)24.8±2.1(21.2-27.6)
EC 31.827.6±2.2(23.2-33)26.3±1.6(23.2-29)26.6±1.5(23.6-29)25.9±1.7(23.2-28.6)29±1.9(25.3-33)29.1±0.9(27.5-30.6)28.9±2.4(25.3-33)
EH 25.823.4±1.6(19.7-26.3)22.4±1.3(19.7-25.3)22.6±1.2(20.8-25.3)22.1±1.4(19.7-25)24.4±1.3(22.1-26.3)24.4±1.2(22.8-26.2)24.4±1.4(22.1-26.3)
ES 3.64.3±1.2(1.7-6.8)3.6±1.1(1.7-5.9)3.3±0.9(1.7-5.2)4.1±1.1(2.1-5.9)4.9±0.9(3.4-6.8)4.9±0.8(4.0-6.8)4.9±1.1(3.4-6.5)
PostO 49.851.3±1.8(46.8-54.8)52.2±1.4(48.7-54.8)52±1.6(48.7-54.1)52.5±1.1(51.4-54.8)50.5±1.7(46.8-54)50.7±1(49.8-53)50.3±2.1(46.8-54)
HD 68.369.6±3.1(63.6-78.6)70.7±3.3(65.5-78.6)70.6±3.7(65.5-78.6)70.8±2.7(66.3-74.8)68.5±2.6(63.6-73.2)68.8±2.8(65.7-73.2)68.3±2.5(63.6-72.2)
MW 11.510.1±0.8(8.2-12.1)10±0.9(8.2-12.1)10.1±0.9(8.5-12.1)9.8±0.9(8.2-11)10.1±0.8(8.5-11.4)10±0.9(8.5-11.4)10.2±0.8(8.6-11.4)
UJ 30.530±1.4(27.6-34.1)30.5±1.5(28-34.1)30.8±1.6(28-34.1)30.2±1.3(28.2-33.1)29.5±1.3(27.6-32)29.4±1.2(28.1-31.2)29.6±1.3(27.6-32)
LJ 38.441.6±2.6(36.9-48.4)40.7±2.1(36.9-46.1)41.3±2.1(37.4-46.1)39.8±1.8(36.9-42.3)42.6±2.6(37.6-48.4)43.1±2.3(40.6-47.8)42.2±2.9(37.6-48.4)
M 26.621.8±1.3(18.5-25.6)21.8±1.6(18.5-25.6)22.1±1.4(19.8-25.6)21.5±1.7(18.5-25.1)21.7±1(18.7-24.2)22±0.8(21-23.8)21.5±1.1(18.7-24.2)
SD 8.19.3±1.2(6.7-12.4)9.5±1.2(6.7-12.4)9±1(6.7-10.5)10.1±1.1(8.7-12.4)9±1.1(6.7-10.9)9.4±1.2(6.9-10.9)8.8±1(6.7-10.4)
SW 1517.7±1.3(14.7-20.4)17.5±1.3(14.7-20.4)17.6±1.5(14.7-20.4)17.5±1.1(16-19.6)17.8±1.3(14.7-19.7)17.4±1.6(14.7-19.7)18±1.1(15.8-19.7)
HW 45.249.8±3.1(42.3-57.2)51.1±3(45.8-56.6)51.5±3.4(45.8-56.6)50.6±2.3(47.8-54.1)48.5±2.7(42.3-57.2)48.8±3.5(42.3-57.2)48.3±2(44.8-52.8)
IOW 24.527±1.5(22.8-31.5)27.7±1.6(23.6-31.5)27.2±1.4(23.6-29.7)28.3±1.6(25.4-31.5)26.4±1.1(22.8-28.8)26.6±0.9(25.4-28.8)26.2±1.3(22.8-28.5)
INW 10.911.5±1.1(9.2-13.5)11.7±1(9.8-13.5)11.6±1.1(9.8-13.3)11.8±0.9(10.6-13.5)11.4±1.2(9.2-13.5)11.2±1(10.1-13.3)11.5±1.3(9.2-13.5)
LJW 14.712±1.9(7.9-16)12.4±2.3(7.9-16)12.5±2.2(7.9-15.8)12.4±2.5(7.9-16)11.6±1.2(8.6-13.3)11.4±1.3(8.7-13.3)11.8±1.2(8.6-13.2)
UJW 23.724±1.8(20.3-30.3)24.7±1.8(21-30.3)25.2±2(21-30.3)24.1±1.3(22.1-26.8)23.4±1.5(20.3-26.5)23.1±1.7(20.3-26.5)23.5±1.5(21-26)
MGR 14.314.5±2(10.5-21.3)15.8±1.9(12.5-21.3)16.3±1.8(13.9-21.3)15±1.8(12.5-19.6)13.2±1.2(10.5-15)13±1(11.5-14.4)13.3±1.4(10.5-15)
LGR 14.915.6±2.1(12.3-22.6)16.9±2(12.8-22.6)17.5±1.9(15.4-22.6)16.1±1.9(12.8-19.6)14.3±1.1(12.3-16.4)14.3±0.9(12.7-15.5)14.3±1.2(12.3-16.4)
UA 1918.6±1.5(15.7-22.6)19.1±1.6(16.1-22.6)18.6±1.4(16.1-21.2)19.7±1.7(17.3-22.6)18.2±1.1(15.7-20.1)18±0.8(16.7-19.4)18.4±1.3(15.7-20.1)
LA 35.335.8±1.8(32.5-41.3)35.9±1.7(32.5-41.3)36.1±1.4(34-38.6)35.7±2.1(32.5-41.3)35.7±1.9(32.9-39.8)35.7±1.2(33.4-37.3)35.8±2.3(32.9-39.8)
Meristic characters Mode Range Mode Range Mode Range Mode Range Mode Range Mode Range Mode Range
PelvF unbranched 11(1-1)1(1-1)1(1-1)1(1-1)1(1-1)1(1-1)1(1-1)
PelvF branched 1110(9-11)10(9-11)10(9-11)10(9-11)10(9-11)10(10-11)10(9-11)
PecF unbranched 11(1-1)1(1-1)1(1-1)1(1-1)1(1-1)1(1-1)1(1-1)
PecF branched 1616(14-17)16(14-17)16(14-17)16(15-17)16(14-17)16(14-17)16(14-17)
DF unbranched 44(3-4)4(3-4)4(3-4)4(3-4)4(3-4)4(3-4)4(3-4)
DF branched 1010(10-13)10(10-11)10(10-11)10(10-11)11(10-13)11(10-12)11(10-13)
AF unbranched 33(2-5)3(2-4)3(2-4)2(2-4)4(3-5)3(3-5)4(3-4)
AF branched 1212(10-14)12(10-14)12(11-14)12(10-14)12(11-13)12(11-13)12(11-13)
LS 8286(78-93)86(78-93)85(78-86)86(78-93)86(79-92)86(81-92)86(79-91)
PDS 3236(30-44)32(30-44)36(30-40)38(31-44)34(30-40)34(30-38)34(33-40)
TDS 109(8-11)9(8-11)9(9-10)10(8-11)10(9-10)10(9-10)10(9-10)
TAS 78(7-10)8(7-9)8(7-9)8(7-9)8(7-9)8(8-9)8(7-9)
TPS 89(7-10)9(7-9)9(8-9)9(7-9)9(8-9)9(8-9)9(8-9)
UGR 1112(10-16)14(10-16)14(12-16)14(10-15)12(11-15)12(11-14)12(11-15)
LGR 2224(19-27)24(22-27)24(22-27)24(22-26)22(19-27)22(22-26)24(19-27)
total GR 3338(32-43)38(32-43)38(34-43)38(32-40)35(32-40)37(33-38)39(32-40)

Morphological and meristic data of C. brienzii from Lake Brienz, Switzerland, NMBE-1077126, female, holotype; paratypes N = 12. For females and for both sexes the range and the mean include the holotype.

Morphological characters C. brienzii Lake Brienz
Holotype Both sexes
N-total = 13 N-females = 4 N-males = 9
Mean ± Stdev Range Mean ± Stdev Range Mean ± Stdev Range
SL (mm) 223.0181.5±37.0(118–226)187.8±47.4(118–223)178.7±34.3(129–226)
Percentage of standard length
PelvFB 4.13.7±0.6(2.8–4.8)3.6±0.6(2.8–4.2)3.8±0.6(2.9–4.8)
PelvFS 6.16.1±0.8(4.6–7.4)5.8±0.4(5.1–6.1)6.3±0.9(4.6–7.4)
PelvF 15.215.6±1.1(14–17.5)15±0.5(14.6–15.7)15.9±1.2(14–17.5)
PecFB 3.13.1±0.2(2.6–3.4)3.0±0.3(2.6–3.2)3.1±0.2(2.8–3.4)
PecF1 16.015.9±1.6(13.9–20.1)15.4±0.7(14.5–16.0)16.2±1.8(13.9–20.1)
PecF2 17.016.8±1.6(14–20.7)16.4±0.7(15.5–17)17±1.9(14–20.7)
DFB 12.311.8±0.8(10.4–12.9)11.7±0.4(11.3–12.3)11.9±1.0(10.4–12.9)
DFAe 17.617.9±1.2(15.5–19.8)17.7±0.7(16.9–18.6)18.0±1.4(15.5–19.8)
DFAd 18.718.6±1.5(15.3–20.8)18.3±0.4(17.8–18.7)18.8±1.8(15.3–20.8)
DFPe 5.15.2±0.6(4.2–6.5)5.0±0.2(4.7–5.2)5.3±0.7(4.2–6.5)
AFB 13.712.4±0.9(11.1–13.7)12.9±1.1(11.4–13.7)12.2±0.7(11.1–13.6)
AFAe 11.111.2±1.0(9.4–12.6)11.2±0.5(10.5–11.6)11.2±1.2(9.4–12.6)
AdFB 5.15.5±0.8(4.0–7.1)5.2±0.3(5.0–5.7)5.6±0.9(4.0–7.1)
CF 23.824.1±1.1(22.6–26.3)23.2±0.5(22.6–23.8)24.5±1.1(22.7–26.3)
CD 7.37.3±0.3(6.7–7.7)7.1±0.4(6.7–7.5)7.4±0.2(7.1–7.7)
CL 13.913.8±1.0(12.2–15.8)14.0±0.4(13.7–14.6)13.7±1.1(12.2–15.8)
PAdC 18.819.1±0.7(17.9–20.7)19±0.4(18.6–19.4)19.1±0.9(17.9–20.7)
DHL 15.015.6±0.7(14.6–16.8)15.4±0.6(15.0–16.3)15.7±0.7(14.6–16.8)
PreP 48.651.1±1.7(47.8–54.0)50.9±1.8(48.6–52.8)51.2±1.8(47.8–54.0)
PreA 75.377.1±1.5(74.3–79.5)76.2±1.7(74.3–78.2)77.5±1.3(75.4–79.5)
PreD 46.247.5±1.7(43.9–49.4)47.2±1.1(46.2–48.2)47.6±2(43.9–49.4)
BD 24.622.6±1.7(19.6–25.1)22.7±2.5(20.5–25.1)22.6±1.5(19.6–24.2)
PostD 45.944.1±1.1(42.4–45.9)44.6±1.3(43–45.9)43.9±1.1(42.4–45.5)
TL 122.0121.5±1.9(117.8–124.4)121.2±2.5(117.8–123.8)121.6±1.7(119.2–124.4)
HL (mm) 45.438.7±7.3(26.7–47.4)39.2±8.5(26.7–45.4)38.5±7.3(28.3–47.4)
Percentage of head length
SN 25.623.3±1.8(20.5–26.3)23.6±2.1(21.1–25.6)23.2±1.7(20.5–26.3)
ED 24.425.3±1.6(23.1–28.3)25.2±1.6(24.2–27.6)25.3±1.7(23.1–28.3)
EC 27.829±2.3(25.6–32.9)28.8±3.1(25.6–32.9)29.1±2.1(26.5–32.7)
EH 22.024.4±1.4(22–27.2)23.9±1.7(22–26.2)24.7±1.3(23–27.2)
ES 3.54.7±1.2(3.3–7.2)4.8±1.4(3.5–6.5)4.7±1.2(3.3–7.2)
PostO 50.950.7±1.1(48.2–52.3)49.8±1.5(48.2–51.1)51.1±0.7(50.3–52.3)
HD 75.268.5±3.3(64.4–75.2)69.8±4.4(65.2–75.2)67.9±2.8(64.4–73.1)
MW 9.79.9±0.9(8.5–10.9)9.4±0.8(8.5–10.3)10.1±0.8(8.6–10.9)
UJ 30.229.5±1.6(27.1–32)29±1.8(27.1–30.8)29.6±1.6(27.3–32)
LJ 42.942.2±1.5(40.5–45.7)43.2±1.7(42–45.7)41.8±1.2(40.5–43.7)
M 23.421±2.4(15.4–24)21±3.9(15.4–24)21.1±1.7(18.3–23.8)
SD 7.08.8±1.4(6.4–11.6)7.4±0.9(6.4–8.6)9.4±1.2(8–11.6)
SW 18.017.8±1.2(15.7–20.2)17.6±0.6(16.7–18)17.8±1.4(15.7–20.2)
HW 52.148.1±3.1(44.1–52.4)48.5±4(44.1–52.1)47.9±2.9(44.1–52.4)
IOW 28.426.2±1.9(22.8–30.7)26.3±1.7(25–28.4)26.1±2.1(22.8–30.7)
INW 9.711.1±0.8(9.7–12.6)10.8±0.7(9.7–11.2)11.3±0.9(10–12.6)
LJW 14.111.5±1.2(10.1–14.1)11.9±2(10.1–14.1)11.3±0.6(10.5–12.4)
UJW 25.923.4±1.6(20.2–26.1)23.3±2.3(20.2–25.9)23.5±1.3(21.4–26.1)
MGR 13.513.5±1.3(10.9–15.1)13.7±1.6(11.6–15.1)13.3±1.3(10.9–14.9)
LGR 13.914 .7±1.6(12.1–16.8)14.8±2.2(12.1–16.8)14.7±1.4(13–16.7)
UA 20.418.5±1.7(15.3–20.5)19.6±0.8(18.5–20.4)18±1.7(15.3–20.5)
LA 40.435.5±2(33–40.4)37.2±2.5(35–40.4)34.8±1.4(33–37.5)
Meristic characters Mode Range Mode Range Mode Range
PelvF unbranched 11(1–1)1(1–1)1(1–1)
PelvF branched 1010(9–11)10(9–10)10(10–11)
Meristic characters C. brienzii Lake Brienz
Holotype Both sexes
N-total = 13 N-females = 4 N-males = 9
Mode Range Mode Range Mode Range
PecF unbranched 11(1–1)1(1–1)1(1–1)
PecF branched 1515(15–17)15(15–17)15(15–17)
DF unbranched 44(3–4)4(4–4)4(3–4)
DF branched 1211(10–13)11(10–12)10(10–13)
AF unbranched 44(3–4)4(4–4)4(3–4)
AF branched 1312(11–13)13(11–13)12(12–12)
LS 8986(80–91)89(80–91)86(80–88)
PDS 3635(32–40)na(34–37)32(32–40)
TDS 99(7–10)9(7–9)9(8–10)
TAS 88(7–8)8(7–8)8(7–8)
TPS 88(8–9)8(8–8)8(8–9)
UGR 1414(11–14)13(13–14)12(11–14)
LGR 2524(20–25)24(24–25)23(20–25)
total GR 3937(32–39)37(37–39)32(32–38)

The first- and second-best ratios retrieved from the LDA ratio extractor of either head or body characters (see Table 1) alone or combined, used for pair-wise comparisons of all contemporary specimens from the four whitefish species of Lake Brienz. For some species comparisons only a subset of characters could be used (a-l); the respective characters that were excluded are listed at the end of the table. Only external characters were used for the LDA comparisons, since internal characters (gill raker and gill arch length) cannot be measured on live specimens, and are thus not informative to assign specimens to species in the field. Due to large size differences between the species the LDA ratios were calculated with three different datasets; once each with individuals larger or smaller than 163.5mm standard length and once with the full size ranges of all species. For the multi-species comparisons, only the comparisons that yielded distinguishing ratios are shown. δ is a measure of how good shape discriminates in comparison to size (i.e., the smaller the less allometry). Ratios marked with an asterisk * have very little (for the pairwise species comparisons not more than one specimen of one species overlaps with that of the other species) or no overlap and were thus eligible for use in the species key and the diagnoses.

CharactersSpecies comparisonSize rangeBest ratiosRange species 1Range species 2Standard distanceδ (Shape vs. size)
head + body C. albellus vs. C. alpinus (a) <163.5mm1: PreA/LJ *6.33-7.449.24-9.9727.130.04
2: AFAe/M1.65-2.252.58-2.6325.940.04
body C. albellus vs. C. alpinus <163.5mm1: PecF2/DFAd *0.81-1.060.78-0.89.970.14
2: DHL/PreD0.34-0.420.32-0.349.40.15
head C. albellus vs. C. alpinus <163.5mm1: HD/LJ1.30-1.551.77-1.9215.430.02
2: IOW/UJW0.89-1.301.20-1.2614.140.02
head + body C. albellus vs. C. fatioi <163.5mm1: PecF2/PreA *0.22-0.280.2-0.225.780.16
2: DHL/PreP0.31-0.380.30-0.324.490.2
body C. albellus vs. C. fatioi <163.5mm1: PecF2/PreA *0.22-0.280.2-0.226.760.17
2: DHL/TL0.13-0.180.13-0.145.70.19
head C. albellus vs. C. fatioi <163.5mm1: UJ/ES *6.81-12.424.51-6.158.630.12
2: EH/HL *0.27-0.310.23-0.277.30.14
head + body C. albellus vs. C. brienzii (b) <163.5mm1: PreD/LJ *3.99-4.685.05-5.5747.90.01
2: M/ES *5.35-9.763.31-4.3747.630.01
body C. albellus vs. C. brienzii <163.5mm1: PecF2/PreD *0.36-0.450.29-0.3215.950.06
2: DHL/TL0.13-0.180.13-0.149.910.05
head C. albellus vs. C. brienzii <163.5mm1: LJ/ES *9.62-17.286.01-6.4912.510.05
2: HL/UJ2.87-3.53.19-3.68.870.04
Characters Species comparison Size range Best ratios Range species 1 Range species 2 Standard distance δ (Shape vs. size)
head + body C. alpinus vs. C. fatioi (b) >163.5mm1: AFAe/UJ *1.96-2.51.66-1.9626.080.04
2: CL/PreA0.14-0.180.17-0.2126.460.04
body C. alpinus vs. C. fatioi >163.5mm1: AFae/TL0.1-0.110.09-0.113.410.11
2: CL/PreA0.14-0.180.17-0.2113.410.11
head C. alpinus vs. C. fatioi >163.5mm1: HL/UJ *3.55-3.933.13-3.5511.510.07
2: LJW/UJW0.33-0.440.38-0.5511.020.07
head + body C. alpinus vs. C. brienzii (c) >163.5mm1: CD/SW *2.25-2.641.82-2.0434.250.02
2: LJW/UJW *0.33-0.440.45-0.5533.910.02
body C. alpinus vs. C. brienzii (d) >163.5mm1: DFAe/PAdC *1.11-1.320.96-1.1618.530.07
2: CD/AFB0.61-0.680.52-0.6218.310.07
head C. alpinus vs. C. brienzii (e) >163.5mm1: LJW/UJW *0.33-0.440.45-0.557.440.08
2: PostO/UJ1.8-2.121.57-1.866.780.08
Characters Species comparison Size range Best ratios Range species 1 Range species 2 Standard distance δ (Shape vs. size)
head + body C. fatioi vs. C. brienzii (f) >163.5mm1: CL/PAdC0.71-0.860.66-0.767.460.08
2: BD/LJ2.44-3.052.31-2.827.360.08
body C. fatioi vs. C. brienzii >163.5mm1: CL/PAdC0.71-0.860.66-0.766.040.1
2: CF/BD0.87-1.130.93-1.125.920.1
head C. fatioi vs. C. brienzii >163.5mm1: ED/M1.03-1.191.04-1.573.580.18
2: HW/UJW1.89-2.231.88-2.333.380.19
Characters Species comparison Size range Best ratios Range species 1 Range species 2 Standard distance δ (Shape vs. size)
head + body C. alpinus vs. other 3 species <163.5mm1: DFAd/LJ *2.57-2.581.6-2.123.470.03
2: AdFB/PAdC0.26-0.280.21-0.4222.660.03
head + body C. albellus vs. other 3 species <163.5mm1: PostD/EH *5.47-6.937.5-8.948.360.02
2: UJW/ES4.88-9.33.41-5.3148.130.02
head + body C. alpinus vs. C. fatioi + C. brienzii (g) >163.5mm1: DFAe/UJ *3.28-4.12.58-3.1924.710.05
2: CD/SW *2.25-2.641.76-2.2724.370.05
Characters Species comparison Size range Best ratios Range species 1 Range species 2 Standard distance δ (Shape vs. size)
head + body C. albellus vs. C. alpinus (h) 100-2901: PreD/LJ *3.99-4.685.6-6.8122.860.13
2: DFAe/UJ *2.14-2.793.25-4.121.650.14
head C. albellus vs. C. alpinus 100-2901: HD/UJ *1.87-2.22.38-2.7814.390.18
2: LJ/IOW *1.53-1.991.33-1.5713.250.19
head + body C. albellus vs. C. fatioi 100-2901: PreP/EH *6.56-7.988.94-11.4315.950.13
2: CL/UJ1.44-2.021.93-2.7215.090.14
head + body C. albellus vs. C. brienzii (i) 100-2901: PreD/EH *6.1-7.588.12-10.3250.860.04
2: CL/LJ0.99-1.451.38-1.6550.60.04
head C. albellus vs. C. brienzii 100-2901: EH/HL *0.27-0.310.22-0.279.330.18
2: LJ/ES9.62-17.286.08-12.438.570.22
Characters Species comparison Size range Best ratios Range species 1 Range species 2 Standard distance δ (Shape vs. size)
head + body C. alpinus vs. C. brienzii (j) 100-2901: DFAd/LJW *9.84-14.826.05-8.9120.720.03
2: DHL/LJ *1.84-2.221.63-1.8220.470.02
body C. alpinus vs. C. brienzii (k) 100-2901: PecF2/DFAd *0.74-0.850.85-1.0387.52<0.01
2: CD/PostD0.17-0.20.15-0.1887.48<0.01
head C. alpinus vs. C. brienzii 100-2901: HD/LJW *6.72-9.395.23-6.6611.940.04
2: HL/LJ *2.54-2.962.19-2.4711.610.04
head + body C. alpinus vs. C. fatioi (h) 100-2901: DFAe/UJ *3.25-4.12.45-3.1718.980.03
2: PecF2/AFAe1.24-1.471.37-1.6318.630.03
body C. alpinus vs. C. fatioi 100-2901: PecF2/DFAe0.77-0.890.87-1.029.250.08
2: AFAe/PostD0.27-0.320.22-0.298.710.08
head C. alpinus vs. C. fatioi 100-2901: LJW/UJW0.33-0.470.37-0.555.620.08
2: HL/UJ3.43-3.933.13-3.634.980.08
Characters Species comparison Size range Best ratios Range species 1 Range species 2 Standard distance δ (Shape vs. size)
head + body C. fatioi vs. C. brienzii (l) 100-2901: AFB/BD0.45-0.670.44-0.5828.19<0.01
2: PreD/M8.87-14.859.13-11.4128.16<0.01
body C. fatioi vs. C. brienzii 100-2901: AFB/BD0.45-0.670.44-0.582.760.05
2: PreP/PreA0.58-0.650.57-0.642.510.05
head C. fatioi vs. C. brienzii 100-2901: ED/M1.04-1.571.03-1.281.720.1
2: SN/MW2.09-2.631.78-2.871.520.1
Characters Species comparison Size range Best ratios Range species 1 Range species 2 Standard distance δ (Shape vs. size)
head + body C. albellus vs. other 3 species 100-2901: PreD/EH *6.1-7.588.12-10.510.890.16
2: CL/UJ1.44-2.021.85-2.729.790.17
head + body C. alpinus vs. other 3 species 100-2901: DFAe/UJ *3.25-4.12.14-3.199.590.11
2: LJW/UJW0.33-0.470.34-0.558.980.12

(a) PelvS, PecF1, DFAd, DFAe, DFPe, TL, SL, EH, SD, SW, INW, IOW (b) PelvFS, PelvFB, PecFB, DFPe, TL, EH, ED, SD, IOW (c) PelvFB, PelvFS, PelvF, PecF1, DFB, DFAe, DFPe, AFB, AFAe, AdFB, CF, PAdC, PreP, PreA, SL, TL, BD, PostD, DHL, ED, EH, ES, PostO, HD, MW, SN, SD, SW, IOW, INW (d) PecFB, PelvFB, PelvF, PelvFS, PecF1, DFAe, DFPe, AFAe, AdFB, PreP, CF, TL, PostD (e) ED, EH, HD, SD, SW, INW (f) PelvFB, PelvFS, PelvF, PecFB, DFAe, DFAd, DFPe, CF, PreP, SL, TL, ED, EH, MW, SD, SW, IOW, INW, ES (g) PelvFS, PecF1, PecFB, DFAd, DFPe, SL, TL, ED, EH, INW, CF (h) PelvS, PecF1, DFAd, DFAe, DFPe, TL, SL, EH, SD, SW, INW, IOW (i) PelvFS (j) PelvFB, PelvFS, PelvF, PecF1,DFAe, DFPe, AFB, AFAe,CF, SL, TL, BD, ED, EH, ES, PostO, HD, MW, SN, SD, SW, IOW, INW (k) PelvFS, PecF1, CF, SL, TL (l) PelvS, TL, INW

Morphological characters, their acronyms and a brief description of each character.

Morphological charactersAcronymDescription
Body
Pelvic fin basePelvFBLength between insertions of fin
Pelvic fin "spine" lengthPelvFSLength from upper insertion point of fin to tip of spine; the spine is actually an elongated scale structure
Pelvic fin lengthPelvFLength from upper insertion point of fin to tip of longest branched ray
Pectoral fin basePecFBLength between insertions of fin
Pectoral fin 1 lengthPecF1Length from upper insertion point of fin to tip of unbranched ray
Pectoral fin 2 lengthPecF2Length from upper insertion point of fin to tip of longest branched ray
Dorsal fin baseDFBLength between insertions of fin
Length of anterior part of dorsal fin erectedDFAeLength from anterior insertion point of fin to tip of longest unbranched ray, when fin is fully erected
Length of anterior part of dorsal fin depressedDFAdLength from anterior insertion point of fin to tip of longest unbranched ray, when fin is depressed
Length of posterior part of dorsal fin erectedDFPeLength from posterior insertion point of fin to tip of most posterior branched ray, when fin is erected
Anal fin baseAFBLength between insertions of fin
Length of anterior part of the anal finAFAeLength from anterior insertion point of fin to tip of longest branched ray, when fin is fully erected
Adipose fin baseAdFBLength between insertions of fin
Caudal fin lengthCFLength from the middle of hypural plate of the caudal fin (internally this is the expanded bones at the end of the backbone that support the caudal fin, externally where the lateral line scales end) to the tip of the longest unbranched ray either being on the dorsal or ventral part of the caudal fin
Caudal peduncle depthCDVertical distance between dorsal and ventral margins of the caudal peduncle at its narrowest part
Caudal peduncle lengthCLLength from posterior insertion point of anal fin to the middle of the hypural plate of the caudal fin
Length from anterior part of adipose fin to caudal fin basePAdCLength from anterior insertion point of adipose fin to the middle of the hypural plate of the caudal fin
Dorsal head lengthDHLLength from tip of snout to most posterior part of the frontal head bone
Prepelvic lengthPrePLength from tip of snout to anterior insertion point of pelvic fin
Preanal lengthPreALength from tip of snout to anterior insertion point of anal fin
Standard lengthSLLength from tip of snout to the middle of the hypural plate of the caudal fin
Total lengthTLLength from tip of snout to the tip of longest unbranched ray either being on the dorsal or ventral part of the caudal fin
Predorsal lengthPreDLength from tip of snout to anterior insertion point of dorsal fin
Body depthBDVertical distance between dorsal and ventral margins of body from anterior insertion point of dorsal fin to anterior insertion of pelvic fin: not necessarily the greatest body depth
Postdorsal lengthPostDLength from posterior insertion point of dorsal fin to middle of hypural plate of the caudal fin
Head
Eye diameterEDHorizontal distance across the midline of the eye from the anterior to the posterior margin of the soft eye tissue
Eye cavityECHorizontal distance across the midline of the eye from the anterior margin of the eye socket to the posterior margin of the eye cavity
Eye heightEHVertical distance across the midline of the eye from the dorsal margin of the eye cavity to the ventral margin of the eye cavity
Eye socketESHorizontal distance from the anterior margin of the eye socket to the most anterior point of the the posterior margin of the eye socket
Postorbital lengthPostOLength from posterior margin of the eye to the most posterior point of the operculum
Head lengthHLLength from the tip of snout to most posterior point of the operculum margin
Head depthHDThe transverse distance between margins at the widest point of the head.
Head widthHWDistance between the posterior margins of the left and right operculum
Mouth widthMWThe transverse distance between margins of the upper and lower jaw
Upper jaw lengthUJLength from the tip of the snout to most posterior point of the upper jaw
Lower jaw lengthLJLength from the most anterior point of the lower jaw to the lower jaw insertion
Lower jaw widthLJWLength between the anterior left and right side of the lower jaw
Uperr jaw widthUJWLength between the posterior left and right point of the upper jaw
Length of maxillaMLength from the most anterior point of the maxilla to the most posterior point of the maxilla
Snout lengthSNLength from tip of snout to anterior margin of the eye
Snouth depthSDVertical distance from the upper to the lower margin of the rostral plate
Snouth widthSWHorizontal distance from the left to the right margin of the rostral plate
Interorbital widthIOWDistance between the anterior margin of the left and right eye cavity
Internarial widthINWDistance between the right and left nostrils
Gill
Upper arch lengthUALength of the first hypobranchial (upper arch) from the most anterior point to the joint of the hypo- and ceratobranchial where the middle raker emerges
Lower arch lengthLALength of the first ceratobranchial (lower arch) from the most anterior point to the joint of the hypo- and ceratobranchial where the middle raker emerges
Middle gill raker lengthMGRLength of the gill raker directly at the joint of the the upper and lower first arch, from the insertion of the gill raker to the tip of the gill raker
Longest gill raker lengthLGRLength of the longest gill raker either on the upper and lower first arch, from the insertion of the gill raker to the tip of the gill raker

Morphological and meristic data of C. steinmanni from Lake Thun, Switzerland, NMBE-1077219, female, holotype from Lake Thun; paratypes N = 12. For females and for both sexes the range and mean include the holotype.

Morphological characters C. steinmanni Lake Thun
Holotype Both sexes
N-total = 12 N-females = 3 N-males = 9
Mean ± Stdev Range Mean ± Stdev Range Mean ± Stdev Range
SL (mm) 301275.3±29.4(211-323)276.5±36.9(234-301)274.9±29.2(211-323)
Percentage of standard length
PelvFB 4.04.4±0.3(4.0-4.8)4.1±0.2(4.0-4.3)4.5±0.3(4.1-4.8)
PelvFS 5.76.2±0.5(5.3-6.9)6.2±0.4(5.7-6.5)6.2±0.6(5.3-6.9)
PelvF 15.316.5±1.1(14.6-18.3)16.1±1.1(15.3-17.4)16.6±1.1(14.6-18.3)
PecFB 3.23.4±0.3(3.1-3.8)3.2±0.2(3.1-3.4)3.4±0.3(3.1-3.8)
PecF1 14.716.2±1.3(13.9-18.2)15.8±1.1(14.7-16.9)16.4±1.4(13.9-18.2)
PecF2 15.217±1.3(15.2-19.1)16.2±1(15.2-17.2)17.3±1.3(15.5-19.1)
DFB 11.412.6±0.8(11.4-13.8)12.4±1.2(11.4-13.7)12.6±0.7(11.7-13.8)
DFAe 16.218.8±1.7(16.2-21.2)18.4±2.3(16.2-20.9)19.0±1.6(16.2-21.2)
DFAd 17.820.1±1.6(17.5-22.4)20.0±2.3(17.8-22.4)20.2±1.4(17.5-22.1)
DFPe 4.84.8±0.7(3.9-6.3)4.6±0.2(4.4-4.8)4.9±0.7(3.9-6.3)
AFB 12.112.6±0.8(11.5-14.2)12.6±0.5(12.1-13.0)12.6±0.9(11.5-14.2)
AFAe 11.212.4±1.0(10.8-13.7)12.3±1.3(11.2-13.7)12.4±0.9(10.8-13.5)
AdFB 54.5±0.6(3.7-5.4)4.4±0.5(4.0-5.0)4.5±0.6(3.7-5.4)
CF 23.623.4±1.2(22.2-25.9)23.7±1.2(22.4-24.9)23.3±1.3(22.2-25.9)
CD 7.88±0.4(7.5-8.6)7.9±0.2(7.7-8.1)8±0.4(7.5-8.6)
CL 1313.0±0.7(11.4-14.0)13.5±0.5(13.0-14.0)12.9±0.7(11.4-13.9)
PAdC 18.218±1(16.4-19.6)17.8±0.8(16.9-18.4)18±1.1(16.4-19.6)
DHL 13.614.0±0.7(13.2-15.1)14.3±0.7(13.6-14.9)13.9±0.7(13.2-15.1)
PreP 53.451.7±1.9(48.6-54.3)52.8±1.2(51.4-53.6)51.3±2.0(48.6-54.3)
PreA 78.177.5±0.9(75.0-78.4)78.0±0.6(77.4-78.4)77.3±0.9(75.0-77.9)
PreD 5047.2±1.5(44.5-50)48.2±1.7(46.7-50)46.9±1.4(44.5-49.7)
BD 3027.0±1.5(24.6-30.0)28.0±1.8(26.5-30.0)26.7±1.3(24.6-28.7)
PostD 43.343.3±1.2(41.9-45.6)42.5±0.8(41.9-43.3)43.6±1.2(42-45.6)
TL 120.1119.6±2.3(115.3-122.5)119.5±0.6(118.8-120.1)119.6±2.7(115.3-122.5)
HL (mm) 58.755.3±4.9(44.8-63.3)55.6±5.3(49.4-58.7)55.2±5.1(44.8-63.3)
Percentage of head length
SN 22.223.2±1.7(20.5-26.3)23.5±1.2(22.2-24.6)23.1±1.9(20.5-26.3)
ED 22.222±1.1(20.5-24.5)22.6±1.7(21.1-24.5)21.8±0.8(20.5-23)
EC 25.526.2±1.2(24.2-27.8)26.3±1.3(25.5-27.8)26.2±1.2(24.2-27.4)
EH 22.521.6±1.1(19.6-24.1)22.5±1.5(21-24.1)21.3±0.8(19.6-22)
ES 5.14.8±0.6(3.9-5.6)4.9±0.5(4.3-5.2)4.8±0.7(3.9-5.6)
PostO 54.452.4±1.4(50.3-54.4)53±1.4(51.6-54.4)52.2±1.5(50.3-54.3)
HD 72.172.1±2.1(68.9-76.3)72.8±0.9(72.1-73.8)71.8±2.4(68.9-76.3)
MW 10.79.3±0.7(8.3-10.7)9.7±0.8(9.1-10.7)9.2±0.7(8.3-10.6)
UJ 2727.3±1.4(25.2-30)27.3±0.7(26.9-28.1)27.3±1.6(25.2-30)
LJ 39.439±1.2(36.6-40.4)39.7±0.3(39.4-40)38.7±1.3(36.6-40.4)
M 19.719.7±1.2(18.1-21.8)19.4±0.7(18.6-19.9)19.8±1.3(18.1-21.8)
SD 10.410±1.7(6.5-13.2)10.1±0.4(9.7-10.4)10±2(6.5-13.2)
SW 15.816.7±1.1(15.3-18.9)16±0.8(15.3-17)16.9±1.1(15.7-18.9)
HW 53.151.6±3.1(44.5-56.9)49±4.3(44.5-53.1)52.4±2.2(49.5-56.9)
IOW 29.627.6±2.3(23.8-31.2)27.9±2.2(25.4-29.6)27.5±2.4(23.8-31.2)
INW 11.612.1±0.7(11-13.2)11.7±0.1(11.6-11.8)12.3±0.7(11-13.2)
LJW 14.311.9±1.4(9.7-14.3)12±2.3(9.7-14.3)11.9±1.1(10.1-13.6)
UJW 24.123±1.6(19.3-25)21.6±2.4(19.3-24.1)23.4±1.1(21.2-25)
MGR 11.311.5±1.7(9.1-14.3)11.3±1.1(10.2-12.4)11.5±1.9(9.1-14.3)
LGR 11.712.1±1.5(10-14.4)11.6±1.2(10.4-12.9)12.3±1.6(10-14.4)
UA 19.618.6±0.6(17.8-19.8)18.9±0.6(18.4-19.6)18.6±0.6(17.8-19.8)
LA 34.734.3±1.2(31.6-36.5)33.9±0.8(33-34.7)34.4±1.3(31.6-36.5)
Meristic characters Mode Range Mode Range Mode Range
PelvF unbranched 11(1-1)1(1-1)1(1-1)
PelvF branched 1010(10-12)na(10-12)10(10-12)
PecF unbranched 11(1-1)1(1-1)1(1-1)
PecF branched 1515(14-16)na(14-16)15(15-16)
DF unbranched 44(3-4)4(3-4)4(3-4)
DF branched 1010(10-12)10(10-11)10(10-12)
AF unbranched 33(3-3)3(3-3)3(3-3)
AF branched 1112(11-13)12(11-12)12(11-13)
LS 7878(78-87)78(78-80)85(78-87)
PDS 4036(32-40)na(32-40)35(33-40)
TDS 910(8-10)9(9-10)10(8-10)
TAS 88(8-9)8(8-8)8(8-9)
TPS 89(8-9)8(8-8)9(8-9)
UGR 1011(10-12)11(10-11)12(10-12)
LGR 2020(19-23)20(20-21)21(19-23)
total GR 3031(30-35)na(30-32)31(30-35)

The first- and second-best ratios retrieved from the LDA ratio extractor of either head or body characters (see Table 1) alone or combined, used for pair-wise comparisons of all contemporary specimens from the six whitefish species of Lake Thun. For some comparisons only a subset of characters could be used (a-d); the respective characters that were excluded are listed at the end of the table. Only external characters were used for the LDA comparisons, since internal characters (gill raker and gill arch length) cannot be measured on live specimens, and are thus not informative to assign specimens to species in the field. Additionally, species were combined to find first- and second-best ratios that distinguish one species or a combination of species vs. all other species. For multi-species comparisons, only the comparisons that yielded distinguishing ratios are shown. δ is a measure of how good shape discriminates in comparison to size (i.e., the smaller δ the less allometry). Ratios marked with an asterisk * have very little (for the pairwise species comparisons not more than one specimen of one species overlaps with the other species) or no overlap and were thus eligible for use in the species key and the diagnoses.

CharactersSpecies comparisonBest ratiosRange species 1Range species 2Standard distanceδ (Shape vs. size)
head + body C. albellus vs. C. alpinus1: CD/UJ *0.96–1.291.36–1.6518.090.1
2: AdFB/ES5.54–13.542.87–5.9417.490.1
body C. albellus vs. C. alpinus1: CD/DHL *0.44–0.540.54–0.625.980.26
2: DFB/AdFB1.6–2.662.31–4.024.860.31
head C. albellus vs. C. alpinus1: UJ/ES6.48–16.014.52–7.9360.22
2: HL/UJ2.88–3.473.33–4.115.260.25
head + body C. albellus vs. C. fatioi1: TL/EH21.93–27.5721.91–29.463.070.08
2: PelvF/PecF10.87–1.030.87–1.072.890.08
body C. albellus vs. C. fatioi1: PecF1/TL0.12–0.160.11–0.151.40.19
2: DFAe/DFAd0.88–10.9–0.981.180.21
head C. albellus vs. C. fatioi1: EH/HL0.21–0.260.2–0.251.630.08
2: LJW/ES2.14–7.791.59–8.181.350.1
head + body C. albellus vs. C. steinmanni1: CD/UJ *0.96–1.291.36–1.5513.80.12
2: AdFB/ES5.54–13.543.31–6.31130.12
head C. albellus vs. C. steinmanni1: HL/UJ2.88–3.473.33–3.975.30.21
2: LJ/ES8.25–20.336.65–12.454.590.23
head + body C. albellus vs. C. profundus1: CL/EC *1.97–2.871.56–2.0913.190.03
2: DHL/M2.77–3.533.21–3.7912.790.03
body C. albellus vs. C. profundus1: CL/DHL0.75–1.040.61–0.824.430.06
2: CD/BD0.26–0.310.28–0.343.380.07
head C. albellus vs. C. profundus1: EC/UJ0.74–0.950.87–1.055.020.1
2: SW/ES3.22–9.672.31–5.264.050.12
head + body C. albellus vs. C. acrinasus1: AdFB/ES5.54–13.543.31–6.59.130.06
2: CD/UJW1.14–1.791.4–28.690.07
body C. albellus vs. C. acrinasus1: PecF1/CD2.13–2.761.8–2.394.50.11
2: DFB/AdFB1.6–2.661.98–3.453.880.13
head C. albellus vs. C. acrinasus1: UJW/ES5.27–13.653.22–7.964.190.14
2: ED/UJ0.66–0.840.74–0.93.510.16
Characters Species comparison Best ratios Range species 1 Range species 2 Standard distance δ (shape vs. Size)
head + body C. alpinus vs. C. fatioi1: CD/PostD *0.17–0.210.14–0.1722.730.07
2: DFAe/UJ3.14–3.932.43–3.4122.330.07
body C. alpinus vs. C. fatioi1: CD/PostD *0.17–0.210.14–0.178.980.17
2: DFAe/DHL1.26–1.551.02–1.367.90.19
head C. alpinus vs. C. fatioi1: HD/UJ2.34–2.92.13–2.573.860.3
2: MW/ES1.47–31.82–6.163.150.34
head + body C. alpinus vs. C. steinmanni (a)ED/EC0.74–0.90.74–0.98.070.05
CD/CL0.6–0.750.54–0.78.020.05
body C. alpinus vs. C. steinmanni1: DFAe/AFAe1.5–1.831.43–1.625.70.06
2: PelvFS/DFAe0.24–0.360.29–0.375.580.07
head C. alpinus vs. C. steinmanni1: EC/SW1.47–2.131.43–1.72.450.16
2: ED/EC0.74--0.90.79–0.92.20.18
head + body C. alpinus vs. C. profundus1: CD/DHL *0.54–0.620.4–0.4919.860.07
2: PecF2/CF0.63–0.820.74–0.9019.010.07
body C. alpinus vs. C. profundus1: CD/DHL *0.54–0.620.4–0.499.310.15
2: PecF2/CF0.63–0.820.74–0.907.320.19
head C. alpinus vs. C. profundus1: EH/PostD0.09–0.110.11–0.154.320.21
2: SD/UJW0.35–0.510.30–0.443.930.23
head + body C. alpinus vs. C. acrinasus1: CD/LJ0.95–1.110.79–165.210.02
2: CF/M *5.55–6.554.4–5.5765.130.02
body C. alpinus vs. C. acrinasus1: CD/DHL0.54–0.620.46–0.584.690.25
2: DFAe/DFPe3.39–4.722.84–4.543.910.29
head C. alpinus vs. C. acrinasus1: PostO/M2.4–32.17–2.564.260.21
2: HD/MW6.57–8.76.02–8.873.650.24
Characters Species comparison Best ratios Range species 1 Range species 2 Standard distance δ (shape vs. Size)
head + body C. fatioi vs. C. steinmanni (b)1: CD/UJ *1.02–1.341.36–1.5533.960.04
2: PelvF/PAdC0.73–10.84–0.133.710.04
body C. fatioi vs. C. steinmanni1: CD/PostD *0.14–0.170.17–0.206.340.22
2: DHL/BD0.5–0.70.45–0.585.370.25
head C. fatioi vs. C. steinmanni1: HD/UJ2.13–2.572.42–2.834.410.23
2: HW/LJW3.17–6.123.72–5.13.250.29
head + body C. fatioi vs. C. profundus1: CL/EC1.84–2.981.56–2.0910.030.02
2: DHL/UJ2.11–2.702.32–2.929.540.02
body C. fatioi vs. C. profundus1: CL/DHL0.76–1.040.61–0.824.44<0.01
2: DFPe/CD0.56–0.870.56.0.823.2<0.01
head C. fatioi vs. C. profundus1: EC/SW1.32–1.731.63–2.385.050.08
2: UJ/UJW1.04–1.501–1.294.280.09
head + body C. fatioi vs. C. acrinasus1: CD/PostD0.14–0.170.16–0.28.30.05
2: ED/SW1.08–1.51.3–1.7980.05
body C. fatioi vs. C. acrinasus1: CD/PostD0.14–0.170.16–0.23.660.07
2: AFAe/DHL0.69–0.90.61–0.932.930.09
head C. fatioi vs. C. acrinasus1: ED/SW1.08–1.51.3–1.793.050.15
2: MW/ES1.82–6.161.4–3.022.450.18
Characters Species comparison Best ratios Range species 1 Range species 2 Standard distance δ (shape vs. Size)
head + body C. steinmanni vs. C. profundus (c)1: CD/DHL *0.53–0.630.4–0.4923.90.05
2: CL/IOW2.05–2.691.69–2.2823.30.05
body C. steinmanni vs. C. profundus1: CD/DHL *0.53–0.630.4–0.499.130.14
2: PecF2/DFAe0.76–0.960.82–1.217.440.17
head C. steinmanni vs. C. profundus1: SW/UJW0.65–0.800.54–0.695.90.12
2: EH/PostO0.36–0.470.41–0.525.370.13
head + body C. steinmanni vs. C. acrinasus (d)1: CD/M *1.86–2.241.4–1.9160.64<0.01
2: PostD/LJ4.96–5.94.65–5.43160.6<0.01
body C. steinmanni vs. C. acrinasus1: CD/DHL0.53–0.630.46–0.584.460.23
2: PelvF/DHL1.08–1.260.95–1.163.830.26
head C. steinmanni vs. C. acrinasus1: ED/HD0.29–0.330.31–0.374.540.13
2: HL/M4.6–5.534.21–5.173.410.17
Characters Species comparison Best ratios Range species 1 Range species 2 Standard distance δ (shape vs. Size)
head + body C. profundus vs. C. acrinasus1: PecF2/CD2.37–3.161.91–2.5913.460.01
2: LJ/UJW1.34–1.861.54–2.2713.120.01
body C. profundus vs. C. acrinasus1: PecF2/CD2.37–3.161.91–2.594.580.05
2: DHL/TL0.13–0.150.12–0.133.480.06
head C. profundus vs. C. acrinasus1: M/UJW0.69–0.940.8–1.224.450.02
2: EC/LJ0.66–0.810.58–0.723.880.02
Characters Mulitple species comparison Best ratios Range group 1 Range group 2 Standard distance δ (shape vs. Size)
head + body C. alpinus + C. steinmanni vs. 4 other species1: CD/UJ *1.36–1.650.96–1.435.340.24

(a) PelvFS, PecF1, DFAd, DFAe, DFPe, TL, SL, EH, SD, SW, INW, IOW (b) PelvFS, PecF1, DFAd, TL (c) PelvFS, PecF1, DFAd, TL,EH (d) PelvFS, PecF1, DFAd, TL, EH, ES, EC

Morphological and meristic data of C. profundus from Lake Thun, NMBE-1077208, male, holotype; paratypes N = 27. For ranges of males and for both sexes, the total range and mean include the holotype.

Morphological characters C. profundus Lake Thun
Holotype Both sexes
N-total = 28 N-females = 6 N-males = 22
Mean ± Stdev Range Mean ± Stdev Range Mean ± Stdev Range
SL (mm) 194.0223.3±26.7(188–316)248.7±42.2(188–316)216.3±16(188–241)
Percentage of standard length
PelvFB 4.44.2±0.3(3.6–5.0)4.2±0.2(4–4.5)4.2±0.4(3.6–5)
PelvFS 7.26.0±0.8(4.0–7.2)5.7±1(4–6.8)6.1±0.7(4.8–7.2)
PelvF 16.917.7±1.1(15.1–19.6)17.3±0.9(16.5–18.9)17.9±1.1(15.1–19.6)
PecFB 3.53.7±0.2(3.2–4.3)3.6±0.2(3.2–3.8)3.7±0.2(3.4–4.3)
PecF1 16.918.4±1.1(16.6–21.0)18.1±1.3(16.6–19.8)18.5±1(16.8–21)
PecF2 17.820.2±1.3(17.7–23.2)19.9±1.5(17.7–22.1)20.2±1.3(17.8–23.2)
DFB 12.612.5±0.9(10.5–14.5)12.3±0.7(11.3–13.4)12.5±1(10.5–14.5)
DFAe 18.719.5±1.4(15.9–21.9)18.7±1.9(15.9–21.6)19.7±1.2(17–21.9)
DFAd 20.620.7±1.3(17.5–23.2)19.9±1.4(17.5–21.5)20.9±1.2(18.3–23.2)
DFPe 5.15.0±0.5(3.9–6.1)5.1±0.4(4.5–5.6)5±0.6(3.9–6.1)
AFB 13.513.2±1.0(10.8–15.3)13.4±0.8(12.1–14.4)13.1±1.1(10.8–15.3)
AFAe 13.613.3±1.0(10.9–14.7)12.8±1(10.9–13.9)13.4±0.9(11.3–14.7)
AdFB 5.15.3±0.6(3.8–6.3)5.3±0.4(4.6–5.8)5.2±0.6(3.8–6.3)
CF 24.124.5±1.4(21.8–27.8)24.3±2(21.8–27.8)24.6±1.3(22.2–27.8)
CD 7.57.3±0.3(6.5–7.9)7.5±0.2(7.2–7.8)7.3±0.3(6.5–7.9)
CL 12.511.8±0.7(10.2–13.0)12±0.8(10.9–13)11.8±0.7(10.2–13)
PAdC 16.918.3±1.1(15.8–20.1)18.5±0.9(17.1–19.6)18.2±1.1(15.8–20.1)
DHL 16.416.4±0.6(15.5–18.4)16.2±0.5(15.5–16.7)16.5±0.6(15.7–18.4)
PreP 55.254.2±1.5(51.2–58.1)53.3±1.2(51.2–54.1)54.5±1.4(52.1–58.1)
PreA 79.278.4±1.4(75.0–80.6)77.8±1.3(75.8–79.4)78.6±1.4(75–80.6)
PreD 48.548.3±1.3(45.8–51.1)47.8±1.8(45.8–50)48.5±1.2(46.9–51.1)
BD 24.424.2±1.4(22.1–27.6)25.4±1.3(24–27.6)23.9±1.2(22.1–26.6)
PostD 40.642.5±1.5(38.9–44.5)43.2±1.4(41.3–44.5)42.3±1.5(38.9–44.4)
TL 122.2121.3±1.7(117.3–125.6)120.5±1.1(118.9–121.8)121.5±1.8(117.3–125.6)
HL (mm) 41.248.9±5.5(39.8–66.2)54.1±8.7(39.8–66.2)47.4±3.2(41.2–53.7)
Percentage of head length
SN 23.623.5±0.8(21.8–24.8)23.3±0.6(22.5–24)23.6±0.8(21.8–24.8)
ED 23.323.8±1.4(21.3–26.2)23.7±1.5(21.9–25.7)23.8±1.4(21.3–26.2)
EC 30.929.2±1.4(26.2–32.1)28.2±1.6(26.2–31.1)29.5±1.3(26.9–32.1)
EH 24.523.6±0.9(21.8–25.5)23.2±0.7(21.9–23.9)23.7±0.9(21.8–25.5)
ES 5.74.6±0.8(3.0–5.9)4.3±0.9(3.5–5.9)4.7±0.7(3–5.7)
PostO 51.150.9±1.4(48–54)52.2±1.8(49.2–54)50.6±1(48–52.1)
HD 78.371.8±2.8(65.9–78.3)73±2.1(69.4–75.7)71.5±2.9(65.9–78.3)
MW 11.210±0.8(8.5–11.7)10±0.5(9.4–10.7)10±0.9(8.5–11.7)
UJ 29.128.7±1.2(26.4–30.6)28.1±1.3(26.4–30)28.9±1.1(26.8–30.6)
LJ 41.439.9±1.7(37–43.6)39.1±1.4(37–40.9)40.1±1.8(37.2–43.6)
M 2420.7±1.2(17.3–24)20.1±1.4(17.3–21.2)20.8±1.1(18.7–24)
SD 10.110±0.8(8.1–11.3)9.7±0.6(8.8–10.7)10±0.8(8.1–11.3)
SW 17.615.8±1.3(12.5–17.8)15.3±1.6(13.7–17.3)16±1.1(12.5–17.8)
HW 57.352.4±3.3(46.7–58.6)53.1±3.9(46.7–58.6)52.2±3.1(47.4–57.7)
IOW 28.728.1±1.2(26.1–30.3)28.9±1.4(26.5–30.3)27.9±1.1(26.1–29.5)
INW 11.111.1±1(8.2–13.3)11.7±1.1(10.3–13.3)10.9±1(8.2–12.5)
LJW 9.311.7±2.2(7.8–16.2)12.7±0.7(11.4–13.6)11.5±2.4(7.8–16.2)
UJW 28.926±1.7(22.7–29.2)25.2±1.5(22.7–27.4)26.2±1.7(22.8–29.2)
MGR 109.2±1.1(7.6–11.7)9.4±1.2(7.6–10.9)9.2±1.1(8–11.7)
LGR 10.710.1±1.2(7.8–12.4)10.5±1.6(7.8–12.4)9.9±1.1(8.1–12.3)
UA 19.618±1.8(15.5–21.8)18.7±2.4(15.5–21.8)17.8±1.6(15.5–21.2)
LA 35.834.3±1.8(30.3–37.7)35.1±2.1(32.9–37.7)34.1±1.7(30.3–36.6)
Meristic characters Mode Range
PelvF unbranched 11(1–1)1(1–1)1(1–1)
PelvF branched 1010(9–11)10(10–11)10(9–11)
PecF unbranched 11(1–1)1(1–1)1(1–1)
Meristic characters C. profundus Lake Thun
Holotype Both sexes
N-total = 28 N-females = 6 N-males = 22
Mode Range Mode Range Mode Range
PecF branched 1616(13–17)16(16–16)16(13–17)
DF unbranched 54(3–5)4(3–4)4(3–5)
DF branched 1010(9–12)11(10–12)10(9–11)
AF unbranched 53(2–5)2(2–4)3(2–5)
AF branched 1112(11–14)12(12–14)12(11–13)
LS 8384(76–90)83(80–89)84(76–90)
PDS 3434(32–38)32(32–37)34(32–38)
TDS 99(8–10)9(8–10)9(8–10)
TAS 88(6–8)8(8–8)8(6–8)
TPS 88(7–9)9(8–9)8(7–9)
UGR 89(5–10)7(6–10)9(5–9)
LGR 1314(10–18)17(11–18)14(10–18)
total GR 2121(15–27)na(18–27)21(15–26)

Morphological and meristic data of C. acrinasus from Lake Thun, NMBE-1077271, male, holotype; paratypes N = 25. For males and for both sexes, the range and mean include the holotype.

Morphological characters C. acrinasus Lake Thun
Holotype Both sexes
N-total = 26 N-females = 4 N-males = 22
Mean±Stdev Range Mean±Stdev Range Mean±Stdev Range
SL (mm) 239.5237.3±21.2(197–278)235.5±26.5(197–254)237.6±20.8(197–278)
Percentage of standard length
PelvFB 5.14.1±0.4(3.5–5.1)3.7±0.4(3.5–4.3)4.1±0.4(3.5–5.1)
PelvFS 76.2±0.7(4.6–7.5)6.2±0.3(5.7–6.4)6.2±0.7(4.6–7.5)
PelvF 17.416±0.9(14.3–17.5)15.6±1.2(14.6–17.2)16.1±0.8(14.3–17.5)
PecFB 3.63.4±0.2(3.1–4.0)3.2±0.1(3.1–3.4)3.5±0.2(3.1–4)
PecF1 17.415.9±1.1(13.8–18.2)15.6±1.8(14.1–18.1)16±1(13.8–18.2)
PecF2 18.616.9±1.3(15–19.7)16.5±2.2(15–19.7)17±1.1(15–19)
DFB 14.812.4±0.8(11.2–14.8)12.3±0.8(11.5–13.4)12.4±0.9(11.2–14.8)
DFAe 20.918.1±1.2(15.7–20.9)17.8±1.5(15.8–19.1)18.1±1.2(15.7–20.9)
DFAd 21.719.3±1.1(17.0–21.7)19.1±1.1(18.0–20.3)19.3±1.2(17–21.7)
DFPe 5.55.0±0.5(4.0–6.1)4.9±0.5(4.2–5.3)5±0.5(4–6.1)
AFB 13.612.6±0.6(11.3–13.6)12.6±0.6(11.9–13.3)12.6±0.6(11.3–13.6)
AFAe 1311.6±0.8(9.2–13.0)11.4±0.5(11.0–12.2)11.7±0.9(9.2–13)
AdFB 4.54.7±0.7(3.7–6.2)4.8±0.6(4.2–5.6)4.7±0.7(3.7–6.2)
CF 2423.3±0.9(21.5–25.1)23.2±0.2(23–23.4)23.4±1(21.5–25.1)
CD 7.57.6±0.4(7.1–8.3)7.8±0.3(7.6–8.2)7.6±0.4(7.1–8.3)
CL 11.712.8±0.6(11.7–14.2)12.4±0.4(11.9–12.8)12.9±0.6(11.7–14.2)
PAdC 1518.1±1.2(15–20.1)17.6±1(16.2–18.4)18.2±1.2(15–20.1)
DHL 14.915.2±0.6(13.8–16.1)14.9±0.9(14.0–15.9)15.2±0.5(13.8–16.1)
PreP 50.352.6±1.6(49.1–56.8)51.9±0.5(51.4–52.4)52.7±1.8(49.1–56.8)
PreA 78.577.7±1.2(75.3–80.3)77.1±0.5(76.5–77.6)77.8±1.3(75.3–80.3)
PreD 45.447.5±1.4(45–50.7)47.5±1.1(46.3–48.6)47.5±1.4(45–50.7)
BD 25.624.7±1.6(20.7–28.1)26.1±1.6(24.4–28.1)24.4±1.5(20.7–26.7)
PostD 41.243±1.3(40.3–45.6)42.2±1.6(41–44.3)43.1±1.3(40.3–45.6)
TL 123.2120.6±1.7(116–123.2)119±2.5(116–121.5)120.8±1.4(118.2–123.2)
HL (mm) 4949.9±4(41.5–58.4)48.5±4.7(41.5–51.3)50.1±3.9(41.5–58.4)
Percentage of head length
SN 23.423.9±1.4(20.5–27)22.6±1.8(20.5–24.6)24.1±1.3(21.6–27)
ED 23.223.7±0.8(21.6–25.5)23.8±0.8(22.6–24.4)23.7±0.9(21.6–25.5)
EC 27.427.7±1(26–29.6)28.6±1(27.2–29.6)27.6±0.9(26–28.8)
EH 22.822.9±0.9(21.7–24.8)23.6±1.1(22.2–24.8)22.8±0.8(21.7–24.5)
ES 4.94.7±0.8(3.2–6.4)5.6±0.9(4.8–6.4)4.5±0.6(3.2–6.1)
PostO 5150.9±1.5(48.5–54.1)52±1.8(49.8–54.1)50.7±1.4(48.5–53)
HD 69.869.1±2.4(65.1–74.9)69.8±2(67.8–72.5)68.9±2.5(65.1–74.9)
MW 9.79.8±0.7(8.1–11.4)9.8±0.6(8.8–10.3)9.8±0.8(8.1–11.4)
UJ 28.829.4±1.2(26.7–30.9)30.1±0.8(29.3–30.8)29.2±1.3(26.7–30.9)
LJ 40.540.9±1.7(38.6–47)40.5±1.1(39–41.5)41±1.8(38.6–47)
M 21.121.8±1(19.4–23.8)21.9±0.9(21.3–23.2)21.8±1(19.4–23.8)
SD 9.88.6±1.3(6–11.3)9±1.1(7.9–10.5)8.6±1.3(6–11.3)
SW 17.116±1.5(13.1–18.1)16.2±1.3(14.7–17.6)15.9±1.5(13.1–18.1)
HW 53.849.6±3.2(43.9–56.2)51.1±2.4(48.2–53.8)49.4±3.3(43.9–56.2)
IOW 25.827±2.1(21.3–31.5)27.1±1.4(25.1–28.1)27±2.3(21.3–31.5)
INW 10.811.7±1(9.5–13.4)11.7±1.2(10.5–13.3)11.7±1(9.5–13.4)
LJW 12.412.2±1.2(9.2–14.3)12.5±1(11–13.4)12.1±1.2(9.2–14.3)
UJW 2422.8±2.1(18.2–27.5)23.7±2.7(20.4–26.3)22.6±2(18.2–27.5)
MGR 13.113.4±1.6(9.1–16.6)14.4±1.9(11.9–16.6)13.2±1.6(9.1–15.1)
LGR 1514.5±1.4(11.4–16.9)15.7±1.2(14.4–16.9)14.3±1.3(11.4–16.3)
UA 19.718.1±1.6(13.5–20.3)18.5±1.6(16.2–19.8)18.1±1.6(13.5–20.3)
LA 36.734.9±1.7(32.3–38.9)35.9±2.1(34–38.9)34.8±1.7(32.3–38.4)
Meristic characters Mode Range Mode Range Mode Range
PelvF unbranched 11(1–1)1(1–1)1(1–1)
PelvF branched 1110(9–12)10(10–11)11(9–12)
PecF unbranched 11(1–1)1(1–1)1(1–1)
PecF branched 1515(13–16)16(15–16)15(13–16)
Meristic characters C. acrinasus Lake Thun
Holotype Both sexes
N-total = 26 N-females = 4 N-males = 22
Mode Range Mode Range Mode Range
DF unbranched 34(3–4)3(3–4)4(3–4)
DF branched 1210(9–12)11(10–12)10(9–12)
AF unbranched 33(2–4)3(3–3)3(2–4)
AF branched 1311(11–13)12(11–13)11(11–13)
LS 8084(79–88)85(84–85)80(79–88)
PDS 3434(33–42)34(34–41)35(33–42)
TDS 1010(9–10)10(9–10)10(9–10)
TAS 88(8–9)8(8–8)8(8–9)
TPS 98(8–9)9(8–9)8(8–9)
UGR 1313(10–15)na(10–15)13(10–14)
LGR 2024(20–26)24(21–24)24(20–26)
total GR 3336(30–40)35(34–36)36(30–40)
HeuscherJ (1901) Thuner- und Brienzer-See. Ihre Biologischen und Fischerei-Verhältnisse. Druck E.Zwingli, Pfäffikon, 104 pp.DouglasMRBrunnerPCBernatchezL (2003) Doassemblages of Coregonus (Teleostei: Salmoniformes) in the Central Alpine region of Europe represent species flocks? Molecular Ecology 8: 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00581.xDouglasMRBrunnerPC (2002) Biodiversity of central alpine Coregonus (Salmoniformes): impact of one-hundred years of management. Ecological Applications 12: 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0154:BOCACS]2.0.CO;2KirchhoferA (1990) Limnologische und Ichtyologische Untersuchungen im Brienzersee unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Differenzierung der sympatrischen Felchenpopulationen. Dissertation, Phil.-nat. Fakultät der Universität Bern.KirchhoferA (1995) Growth characteristics of coregonid populations in three lakes with different trophic states and decreasing nutrient concentrations.Archiv für Hydrobiologie Special Issues Advances in Limnology46: 6170.MaurerVGuthrufK (2005) Brienzerseefelchen – Magenanalysen – Schlussbericht. Bericht i.A. Fischereiinspektorat des Kantons Bern. HYDRA: 1–18.MüllerRBreitensteinMBiaMMRellstabCKirchhoferA (2007) Bottom-up control of whitefish populations in ultra- oligotrophic Lake Brienz.Aquatic Sciences69: 271288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-007-0874-5BergLS (1932) Übersicht der Verbreitung der Süsswasserfische Europas.Zoogeographica1: 107208.SteinmannP (1950) Monographie der schweizerischen Koregonen. Beitrag zum Problem der Entstehung neuer Arten. Spezieller Teil.Schweizerische Zeitung für Hydrologie12: 340491. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02489885HudsonAGVonlanthenPSeehausenO (2011) Rapid parallel adaptive radiation from a single hybridogenic ancestral population.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences278: 5866. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0925HudsonAGVonlanthenPBezaultESeehausenO (2013) Genomic signatures of relaxed disruptive selection associated with speciation reversal in whitefish.BMC Evolutionary Biology13: 1108. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-108HudsonAGLundsgaard-HansenBLucekKVonlanthenPSeehausenO (2016) Managing cryptic biodiversity: fine- scale intralacustrine speciation along a benthic gradient in Alpine whitefish (Coregonus spp.).Evolutionary Applications10: 251266. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12446IngramTHudsonAGVonlanthenPSeehausenO (2012) Does water depth or diet divergence predict progress towards ecological speciation in whitefish radiations? Evolutionary Ecology Research 14: 487–502.VonlanthenPPériatGDönzCHellmannJAlexanderTJSeehausenO (2015) Artenvielfalt und Zusammensetzung der Fischpopulation im Thunersee.Projet Lac, Eawag, Kastanien- baum, 41 pp.FatioV (1890) Faune des Vertébrés de la Suisse (Vol.V, 2partie). In: Georg H (Ed.) Genf und Basel, 569 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.124573SelzOM (2008) Building a link between dN and dC stable isotopes signatures and the ecological phenotypic forms of Whitefish (Coregonus laveratus (L.)) in 4 Swiss Lakes. B.Sc. Thesis: University of Bern, Bern.HudsonAG (2011) Population genomics and ecology of parallel adaptive radiations: the Alpine lake whitefish. PhD Thesis, University of Bern, Bern.Lundsgaard-HansenBMatthewsBVonlanthenPTavernaASeehausenO (2013) Adaptive plasticity and genetic divergence in feeding efficiency during parallel adaptive radiation of whitefish (Coregonus spp.).Journal of Evolutionary Biology26: 483498. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12063RoeschCLundsgaard-HansenBVonlanthenPTavernaASeehausenO (2013) Experimental evidence for trait utility of gill raker number in adaptive radiation of a north temperate fish.Journal of Evolutionary Biology26: 15781587. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12166DönzCJBittnerDVonlanthenPWagnerCESeehausenO (2018) Rapid buildup of sympatric species diversity in Alpine whitefish.Ecology and Evolution2018: 115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4375BittnerD (2009) Gonad deformations in whitefish (Coregonus spp.) from Lake Thun, Switzerland – A population genetic and transcriptomic approach. PhD Thesis, University of Bern, Bern.FatioV (1885) Les corégones de la Suisse (féras diverses) classification et conditions de frai. Recueil Zoologie Suisse 1, 2: 649–665. [22, 23 pls]KottelatM (1997) European freshwater fishes. A heuristic checklist of the freshwater fishes of Europe (exclusive of former USSR), with an introduction for non-systematists and comments on nomenclature and conservation.Biologia, Bratislava, Section Zoology52: 1271. [Suppl. material 1]