AnimaliaTeleosteiCoregonidaeSelzOliver M.DönzCarmela J.VonlanthenPascalSeehausenOleA taxonomic revision of the whitefish of lakes Brienz and Thun, Switzerland, with descriptions of four new species (Teleostei, Coregonidae)Zookeys091120209897916210.3897/zookeys.989.32822A7E464BB-B907-5E06-A9C4-E5BAA1944AC7 Coregonus profundus http://zoobank.org/6B17CFFD-08A3-4A6E-A4AA-CAE0678370FF Selz, Dönz, Vonlanthen & Seehausensp. nov. Coregonus alpinus: Kottelat 1997; Kottelat and Freyhof 2007; Hudson et al. 2011, 2013, 2016; Ingram et al. 2012; Vonlanthen et al. 2012, 2015; Dönz et al. 2018 Coregonus lavaretusnatio arurensis, oekot. profundus: Steinmann 1950 Coregonus "Tiefenalbock", "Kropfer": Steinmann 1950 Coregonus "Kropfer": Heuscher 1901 Coregonus "Kropfer": Rufli 1978, 1979; Kirchhofer and Tschumi 1986; Kirchhofer 1995; Bittner et al. 2010 (see also synonymy of C. albellus) Coregonus "Kropfer", "THU3": Douglas et al. 1999, 2003; Douglas and Brunner 2002Material examined.

Holotype. NMBE-1077208, Switzerland, Lake Thun (46°40'N, 7°46'E), 194 mm SL, male.

Paratypes. NMBE-1077161–1077179, NMBE-1077203–1077207, NMBE-1077209–1077211, Switzerland, Lake Thun (46°40'N, 7°46'E), N = 27, 188–316 mm SL.

Diagnosis.

Coregonus profundus is a small whitefish species with moderate pigmentation of all fins and the body; brown-orange colouration on the flanks above the lateral line; elongate slender body; long head; large eye with a thick and triangular shaped eye socket; tip of snout is fleshy and roundish; few (15–27) and short gill rakers.

Differential diagnosis.

Coregonus profundus occurs only in Lake Thun and we therefore compare the characters of this species specifically with the species of Lake Thun. The differential diagnoses against C. albellus, C. alpinus, C. fatioi, and C. steinmanni are given under those species’ accounts. The lower number of gill rakers of C. profundus (total gill raker number: 15–27, mode = 21) distinguishes this species from all other 5 whitefish species, C. albellus (32–44, mode = 38), C. alpinus (25–34, mode = 30), C. fatioi (32–43, mode = 38), C. steinmanni (30–35, mode = 31), and C. acrinasus (30–40, mode = 36) (Suppl. material 1: Table S6).

Coregonus profundusCoregonus acrinasus

Coregonus profundus can be distinguished from C. acrinasus by having shorter gill rakers (middle gill raker length: 7.6–11.7% HL, mean = 9.2 vs. 9.1–16.6% HL, mean = 13.4; longest gill raker length: 7.8–12.4% HL, mean = 10.1 vs. 11.4–16.9% HL, mean = 14.5) and a longer head (15.5–18.4% HL, mean = 16.4 vs. 13.8–16.1% HL, mean = 15.2) (Tables 8, 9).

Description.

General appearance is shown in Figure 9. Morphological and meristic characters of both sexes can be found in Table 8 and Suppl. material 1: Table S6 and first- and second-best ratios for both sexes combined can be found in Table 10. The description is valid for both sexes.

Shape: Body elongate. Slender bodied with greatest body depth anterior of the dorsal fin. Dorsal and ventral profile similar and slightly arched. Dorsal and ventral profile from tip of snout to interorbital area mostly straight and then slightly convex to dorsal and pelvic fin origin respectively. Head long. Snout often 60° angle to the body axis anterior of the eye, such that the profile from the tip of the snout to the vertical projection where the anterior part of the eye crosses the dorsal profile is straight and afterwards slightly convex. Mouth is wide (i.e., width of upper and lower jaw), rather short and mostly strongly sub-terminal and only rarely terminal. Snout is weakly pronounced, since the tip of the snout is often fleshy and roundish. Eye rather large with a large eye cavity and a thick and triangular eye-socket (i.e., sickle-shaped). Pectoral fin long and moderately tapered. Dorsal fin long with the anterior unbranched ray of the erected dorsal fin approx. 70–80° angle to body axis and only slightly bent posteriorly at the end of the ray. Caudal peduncle narrow and short with caudal fin forked and sometimes moderately to strongly asymmetrical with either the ventral or dorsal part being longer. Unbranched ray of anal fin straight and rarely bent posteriorly at the end of the ray. Anal fin is longest anteriorly and progressively shortening posteriorly with the outer margin of the anal fin slightly concave and only rarely straight.

Meristics : Very few and very short gill rakers.

Colour: Pigmentation of fins and body is overall moderate in live specimens. Pectoral fin is translucent or yellowish in colouration with moderate pigmentation at the median to distal parts of the fin. Dorsal, adipose, pelvic, anal and caudal fins are moderately pigmented. Silvery appearance along the flanks and dorsally above the lateral line the silvery appearance changes to a pale brown-orange colouration (e.g., RGB (232, 172, 52)) and very rarely the brown-orange colouration can have a hint of light greenish colour (e.g., RGB (136, 245, 205)). Sometimes the colouration above the lateral line is pale rose (e.g., RGB (247, 187, 175)) and then towards the dorsum becomes a brown-orange. This transition from one colouration to another can also be observed in C. albellus. For a comparison to the main colouration found in the other species see Suppl. material 1: Figure S8. Dorsal part of the head is moderately pigmented. Snout around the nostrils is moderately pigmented and rarely with a gap of less pigmentation posteriorly of the nostrils up to the height of the middle of the eyes. The operculum and pre-operculum are silvery with one black dot on the lower margin of the pre-operculum. Preserved specimens are pale in colouration with similar pigmentation as described for live specimens. Silvery, translucent, not coloured or unpigmented parts of the body become brown-yellowish (e.g., RGB (239, 210, 40)), whereas the pigmented parts are conserved and the coloured parts (dorsally above the lateral line) become brownish (e.g., RGB (186, 140, 100)).

Distribution and notes on biology.Coregonus profundus is found in Lake Thun (46°40'N, 7°46'E). It is believed to have been endemic to this lake. Yet, based on matching genetic (microsatellite) and morphological (gill raker number, morphological characters) evidence one ripe specimen of C. profundus has been caught by a local fisherman, Stefan Dasen, in 2016 in Lake Biel (47°05'N, 7°10'E) (Suppl. material 1: Figure S9). Lake Biel has been artificially connected with Lake Thun through the river Aare since the Jura water correction from 1868–1878, where the river Aare was artificially bypassed downstream from Lake Thun into Lake Biel. For another Lake Thun species, C. albellus, it had been known since at least 2004 that it can be found in Lake Biel (see details in the note on biology for C. albellus) (Bittner 2009; this study Suppl. material 1: Figure S9).

It is important to note that native whitefish species of Lake Biel were only known to spawn in the winter months (Fatio 1885; Steinmann 1950; Rufli 1978), whereas C. profundus as well as C. albellus spawn in late summer and winter. Our study reports the first record of C. profundus in Lake Biel. It is unclear though if C. profundus has established as a self-sustaining population in Lake Biel. So far, we only know of one ripe specimen of C. profundus from Lake Biel, whereas for C. albellus reasonable numbers of ripe specimen have been caught for several years in Lake Biel during what is the normal spawning period (late summer) of this species in lakes Thun and Brienz (Bittner 2009; 2016: Suppl. material 1: Figure S9). Based on isotopic signatures C. profundus feeds on benthic prey items (Selz 2008; Hudson 2011; Ingram et al. 2012) and has a slow growth rate (Bittner et al. unpublished). Interestingly specimens of C. profundus that have been caught on the spawning grounds of C. albellus were often in past-spawning condition and occasional stomach content analysis revealed that these fish had been heavily preying on whitefish eggs (Bittner 2009). Earlier stomach content analysis of C. profundus from the months of October and February of 1971 and 1972, respectively, showed that C. profundus mainly feed on chironomid larvae and occasionally on fish eggs (Rufli 1979). Even earlier stomach content analysis by Steinmann (1950) also show that they feed on chironomid larvae, but also on pisidium and other benthic invertebrates. Habitat-stratified random sampling of Lake Thun (mid-October 2013: Vonlanthen et al. 2015) shows that C. profundus occupies mostly the moderately deep to the deepest waters in the benthic habitat (approx. 15 – 210 m; N = 16) and rarely the moderately deep pelagic waters (approx. 15 – 45 m; N = 3)(Dönz et al. 2018). The habitat-stratified random sampling did not distinguish between ripe and unripe specimens, and thus in the case of C. profundus, the distribution pattern along the depth in the benthic zone is biased by the spawning aggregation of this species since the sampling period coincides partially with the spawning season of this species. Coregonus profundus phenotypically resembles superficially C. albellus. The average size (total length) at 3 years of age for specimens used in this study is 263±16 mm (mean and standard deviation, N = 11) (Suppl. material 1: Figures S4, S6). The size of 3-year-old specimens of C. profundus is similar to that of C. albellus and C. fatioi, but smaller than that of C. acrinasus and considerably smaller than that of C. alpinus and C. steinmanni (Suppl. material 1: Figure S6). Coregonus profundus has a moderately long spawning season from August to December with one major peak from late August to late September / early October (Suppl. material 1: Figure S3; Bittner 2009; Dönz et al. 2018). Spawning depth varies with spawning season and can range from approx. 30 m to 150 m (Suppl. material 1: Figure S3; Bittner 2009; Dönz et al. 2018). The spawning season and depth of C. profundus partially overlaps with that of C. steinmanni, C. fatioi, and C. albellus (Suppl. material 1: Figure S3; Bittner 2009; Dönz et al. 2018).

Coregonus profundus is known by the common name "Kropfer" and has previously been described under the name C. alpinus (Kottelat (1997) and Kottelat and Freyhof (2007)). As we explain in detail under the species account of C. alpinus, the designated lectotype of C. alpinus is incongruent with the description of the species (with the common name "Kropfer": Kottelat (1997) and Kottelat and Freyhof (2007)). We have thus retained the name C. alpinus for the lectotype designated by Kottelat (1997) and provided a new description of this taxon. For the species otherwise described by Kottelat (1997) and Kottelat and Freyhof (2007) as C. alpinus (with the common name "Kropfer") we designated a new name, C. profundus.

Etymology.

The adjective profundus means deep in Latin and is used for C. profundus to describe the species unique ecology of living and breeding in great depths in Lake Thun.

Common name.

Kropfer.

Morphological and meristic data of C. profundus from Lake Thun, NMBE-1077208, male, holotype; paratypes N = 27. For ranges of males and for both sexes, the total range and mean include the holotype.

Morphological characters C. profundus Lake Thun
Holotype Both sexes
N-total = 28 N-females = 6 N-males = 22
Mean ± Stdev Range Mean ± Stdev Range Mean ± Stdev Range
SL (mm) 194.0223.3±26.7(188–316)248.7±42.2(188–316)216.3±16(188–241)
Percentage of standard length
PelvFB 4.44.2±0.3(3.6–5.0)4.2±0.2(4–4.5)4.2±0.4(3.6–5)
PelvFS 7.26.0±0.8(4.0–7.2)5.7±1(4–6.8)6.1±0.7(4.8–7.2)
PelvF 16.917.7±1.1(15.1–19.6)17.3±0.9(16.5–18.9)17.9±1.1(15.1–19.6)
PecFB 3.53.7±0.2(3.2–4.3)3.6±0.2(3.2–3.8)3.7±0.2(3.4–4.3)
PecF1 16.918.4±1.1(16.6–21.0)18.1±1.3(16.6–19.8)18.5±1(16.8–21)
PecF2 17.820.2±1.3(17.7–23.2)19.9±1.5(17.7–22.1)20.2±1.3(17.8–23.2)
DFB 12.612.5±0.9(10.5–14.5)12.3±0.7(11.3–13.4)12.5±1(10.5–14.5)
DFAe 18.719.5±1.4(15.9–21.9)18.7±1.9(15.9–21.6)19.7±1.2(17–21.9)
DFAd 20.620.7±1.3(17.5–23.2)19.9±1.4(17.5–21.5)20.9±1.2(18.3–23.2)
DFPe 5.15.0±0.5(3.9–6.1)5.1±0.4(4.5–5.6)5±0.6(3.9–6.1)
AFB 13.513.2±1.0(10.8–15.3)13.4±0.8(12.1–14.4)13.1±1.1(10.8–15.3)
AFAe 13.613.3±1.0(10.9–14.7)12.8±1(10.9–13.9)13.4±0.9(11.3–14.7)
AdFB 5.15.3±0.6(3.8–6.3)5.3±0.4(4.6–5.8)5.2±0.6(3.8–6.3)
CF 24.124.5±1.4(21.8–27.8)24.3±2(21.8–27.8)24.6±1.3(22.2–27.8)
CD 7.57.3±0.3(6.5–7.9)7.5±0.2(7.2–7.8)7.3±0.3(6.5–7.9)
CL 12.511.8±0.7(10.2–13.0)12±0.8(10.9–13)11.8±0.7(10.2–13)
PAdC 16.918.3±1.1(15.8–20.1)18.5±0.9(17.1–19.6)18.2±1.1(15.8–20.1)
DHL 16.416.4±0.6(15.5–18.4)16.2±0.5(15.5–16.7)16.5±0.6(15.7–18.4)
PreP 55.254.2±1.5(51.2–58.1)53.3±1.2(51.2–54.1)54.5±1.4(52.1–58.1)
PreA 79.278.4±1.4(75.0–80.6)77.8±1.3(75.8–79.4)78.6±1.4(75–80.6)
PreD 48.548.3±1.3(45.8–51.1)47.8±1.8(45.8–50)48.5±1.2(46.9–51.1)
BD 24.424.2±1.4(22.1–27.6)25.4±1.3(24–27.6)23.9±1.2(22.1–26.6)
PostD 40.642.5±1.5(38.9–44.5)43.2±1.4(41.3–44.5)42.3±1.5(38.9–44.4)
TL 122.2121.3±1.7(117.3–125.6)120.5±1.1(118.9–121.8)121.5±1.8(117.3–125.6)
HL (mm) 41.248.9±5.5(39.8–66.2)54.1±8.7(39.8–66.2)47.4±3.2(41.2–53.7)
Percentage of head length
SN 23.623.5±0.8(21.8–24.8)23.3±0.6(22.5–24)23.6±0.8(21.8–24.8)
ED 23.323.8±1.4(21.3–26.2)23.7±1.5(21.9–25.7)23.8±1.4(21.3–26.2)
EC 30.929.2±1.4(26.2–32.1)28.2±1.6(26.2–31.1)29.5±1.3(26.9–32.1)
EH 24.523.6±0.9(21.8–25.5)23.2±0.7(21.9–23.9)23.7±0.9(21.8–25.5)
ES 5.74.6±0.8(3.0–5.9)4.3±0.9(3.5–5.9)4.7±0.7(3–5.7)
PostO 51.150.9±1.4(48–54)52.2±1.8(49.2–54)50.6±1(48–52.1)
HD 78.371.8±2.8(65.9–78.3)73±2.1(69.4–75.7)71.5±2.9(65.9–78.3)
MW 11.210±0.8(8.5–11.7)10±0.5(9.4–10.7)10±0.9(8.5–11.7)
UJ 29.128.7±1.2(26.4–30.6)28.1±1.3(26.4–30)28.9±1.1(26.8–30.6)
LJ 41.439.9±1.7(37–43.6)39.1±1.4(37–40.9)40.1±1.8(37.2–43.6)
M 2420.7±1.2(17.3–24)20.1±1.4(17.3–21.2)20.8±1.1(18.7–24)
SD 10.110±0.8(8.1–11.3)9.7±0.6(8.8–10.7)10±0.8(8.1–11.3)
SW 17.615.8±1.3(12.5–17.8)15.3±1.6(13.7–17.3)16±1.1(12.5–17.8)
HW 57.352.4±3.3(46.7–58.6)53.1±3.9(46.7–58.6)52.2±3.1(47.4–57.7)
IOW 28.728.1±1.2(26.1–30.3)28.9±1.4(26.5–30.3)27.9±1.1(26.1–29.5)
INW 11.111.1±1(8.2–13.3)11.7±1.1(10.3–13.3)10.9±1(8.2–12.5)
LJW 9.311.7±2.2(7.8–16.2)12.7±0.7(11.4–13.6)11.5±2.4(7.8–16.2)
UJW 28.926±1.7(22.7–29.2)25.2±1.5(22.7–27.4)26.2±1.7(22.8–29.2)
MGR 109.2±1.1(7.6–11.7)9.4±1.2(7.6–10.9)9.2±1.1(8–11.7)
LGR 10.710.1±1.2(7.8–12.4)10.5±1.6(7.8–12.4)9.9±1.1(8.1–12.3)
UA 19.618±1.8(15.5–21.8)18.7±2.4(15.5–21.8)17.8±1.6(15.5–21.2)
LA 35.834.3±1.8(30.3–37.7)35.1±2.1(32.9–37.7)34.1±1.7(30.3–36.6)
Meristic characters Mode Range
PelvF unbranched 11(1–1)1(1–1)1(1–1)
PelvF branched 1010(9–11)10(10–11)10(9–11)
PecF unbranched 11(1–1)1(1–1)1(1–1)
Meristic characters C. profundus Lake Thun
Holotype Both sexes
N-total = 28 N-females = 6 N-males = 22
Mode Range Mode Range Mode Range
PecF branched 1616(13–17)16(16–16)16(13–17)
DF unbranched 54(3–5)4(3–4)4(3–5)
DF branched 1010(9–12)11(10–12)10(9–11)
AF unbranched 53(2–5)2(2–4)3(2–5)
AF branched 1112(11–14)12(12–14)12(11–13)
LS 8384(76–90)83(80–89)84(76–90)
PDS 3434(32–38)32(32–37)34(32–38)
TDS 99(8–10)9(8–10)9(8–10)
TAS 88(6–8)8(8–8)8(6–8)
TPS 88(7–9)9(8–9)8(7–9)
UGR 89(5–10)7(6–10)9(5–9)
LGR 1314(10–18)17(11–18)14(10–18)
total GR 2121(15–27)na(18–27)21(15–26)

Morphological and meristic data of C. acrinasus from Lake Thun, NMBE-1077271, male, holotype; paratypes N = 25. For males and for both sexes, the range and mean include the holotype.

Morphological characters C. acrinasus Lake Thun
Holotype Both sexes
N-total = 26 N-females = 4 N-males = 22
Mean±Stdev Range Mean±Stdev Range Mean±Stdev Range
SL (mm) 239.5237.3±21.2(197–278)235.5±26.5(197–254)237.6±20.8(197–278)
Percentage of standard length
PelvFB 5.14.1±0.4(3.5–5.1)3.7±0.4(3.5–4.3)4.1±0.4(3.5–5.1)
PelvFS 76.2±0.7(4.6–7.5)6.2±0.3(5.7–6.4)6.2±0.7(4.6–7.5)
PelvF 17.416±0.9(14.3–17.5)15.6±1.2(14.6–17.2)16.1±0.8(14.3–17.5)
PecFB 3.63.4±0.2(3.1–4.0)3.2±0.1(3.1–3.4)3.5±0.2(3.1–4)
PecF1 17.415.9±1.1(13.8–18.2)15.6±1.8(14.1–18.1)16±1(13.8–18.2)
PecF2 18.616.9±1.3(15–19.7)16.5±2.2(15–19.7)17±1.1(15–19)
DFB 14.812.4±0.8(11.2–14.8)12.3±0.8(11.5–13.4)12.4±0.9(11.2–14.8)
DFAe 20.918.1±1.2(15.7–20.9)17.8±1.5(15.8–19.1)18.1±1.2(15.7–20.9)
DFAd 21.719.3±1.1(17.0–21.7)19.1±1.1(18.0–20.3)19.3±1.2(17–21.7)
DFPe 5.55.0±0.5(4.0–6.1)4.9±0.5(4.2–5.3)5±0.5(4–6.1)
AFB 13.612.6±0.6(11.3–13.6)12.6±0.6(11.9–13.3)12.6±0.6(11.3–13.6)
AFAe 1311.6±0.8(9.2–13.0)11.4±0.5(11.0–12.2)11.7±0.9(9.2–13)
AdFB 4.54.7±0.7(3.7–6.2)4.8±0.6(4.2–5.6)4.7±0.7(3.7–6.2)
CF 2423.3±0.9(21.5–25.1)23.2±0.2(23–23.4)23.4±1(21.5–25.1)
CD 7.57.6±0.4(7.1–8.3)7.8±0.3(7.6–8.2)7.6±0.4(7.1–8.3)
CL 11.712.8±0.6(11.7–14.2)12.4±0.4(11.9–12.8)12.9±0.6(11.7–14.2)
PAdC 1518.1±1.2(15–20.1)17.6±1(16.2–18.4)18.2±1.2(15–20.1)
DHL 14.915.2±0.6(13.8–16.1)14.9±0.9(14.0–15.9)15.2±0.5(13.8–16.1)
PreP 50.352.6±1.6(49.1–56.8)51.9±0.5(51.4–52.4)52.7±1.8(49.1–56.8)
PreA 78.577.7±1.2(75.3–80.3)77.1±0.5(76.5–77.6)77.8±1.3(75.3–80.3)
PreD 45.447.5±1.4(45–50.7)47.5±1.1(46.3–48.6)47.5±1.4(45–50.7)
BD 25.624.7±1.6(20.7–28.1)26.1±1.6(24.4–28.1)24.4±1.5(20.7–26.7)
PostD 41.243±1.3(40.3–45.6)42.2±1.6(41–44.3)43.1±1.3(40.3–45.6)
TL 123.2120.6±1.7(116–123.2)119±2.5(116–121.5)120.8±1.4(118.2–123.2)
HL (mm) 4949.9±4(41.5–58.4)48.5±4.7(41.5–51.3)50.1±3.9(41.5–58.4)
Percentage of head length
SN 23.423.9±1.4(20.5–27)22.6±1.8(20.5–24.6)24.1±1.3(21.6–27)
ED 23.223.7±0.8(21.6–25.5)23.8±0.8(22.6–24.4)23.7±0.9(21.6–25.5)
EC 27.427.7±1(26–29.6)28.6±1(27.2–29.6)27.6±0.9(26–28.8)
EH 22.822.9±0.9(21.7–24.8)23.6±1.1(22.2–24.8)22.8±0.8(21.7–24.5)
ES 4.94.7±0.8(3.2–6.4)5.6±0.9(4.8–6.4)4.5±0.6(3.2–6.1)
PostO 5150.9±1.5(48.5–54.1)52±1.8(49.8–54.1)50.7±1.4(48.5–53)
HD 69.869.1±2.4(65.1–74.9)69.8±2(67.8–72.5)68.9±2.5(65.1–74.9)
MW 9.79.8±0.7(8.1–11.4)9.8±0.6(8.8–10.3)9.8±0.8(8.1–11.4)
UJ 28.829.4±1.2(26.7–30.9)30.1±0.8(29.3–30.8)29.2±1.3(26.7–30.9)
LJ 40.540.9±1.7(38.6–47)40.5±1.1(39–41.5)41±1.8(38.6–47)
M 21.121.8±1(19.4–23.8)21.9±0.9(21.3–23.2)21.8±1(19.4–23.8)
SD 9.88.6±1.3(6–11.3)9±1.1(7.9–10.5)8.6±1.3(6–11.3)
SW 17.116±1.5(13.1–18.1)16.2±1.3(14.7–17.6)15.9±1.5(13.1–18.1)
HW 53.849.6±3.2(43.9–56.2)51.1±2.4(48.2–53.8)49.4±3.3(43.9–56.2)
IOW 25.827±2.1(21.3–31.5)27.1±1.4(25.1–28.1)27±2.3(21.3–31.5)
INW 10.811.7±1(9.5–13.4)11.7±1.2(10.5–13.3)11.7±1(9.5–13.4)
LJW 12.412.2±1.2(9.2–14.3)12.5±1(11–13.4)12.1±1.2(9.2–14.3)
UJW 2422.8±2.1(18.2–27.5)23.7±2.7(20.4–26.3)22.6±2(18.2–27.5)
MGR 13.113.4±1.6(9.1–16.6)14.4±1.9(11.9–16.6)13.2±1.6(9.1–15.1)
LGR 1514.5±1.4(11.4–16.9)15.7±1.2(14.4–16.9)14.3±1.3(11.4–16.3)
UA 19.718.1±1.6(13.5–20.3)18.5±1.6(16.2–19.8)18.1±1.6(13.5–20.3)
LA 36.734.9±1.7(32.3–38.9)35.9±2.1(34–38.9)34.8±1.7(32.3–38.4)
Meristic characters Mode Range Mode Range Mode Range
PelvF unbranched 11(1–1)1(1–1)1(1–1)
PelvF branched 1110(9–12)10(10–11)11(9–12)
PecF unbranched 11(1–1)1(1–1)1(1–1)
PecF branched 1515(13–16)16(15–16)15(13–16)
Meristic characters C. acrinasus Lake Thun
Holotype Both sexes
N-total = 26 N-females = 4 N-males = 22
Mode Range Mode Range Mode Range
DF unbranched 34(3–4)3(3–4)4(3–4)
DF branched 1210(9–12)11(10–12)10(9–12)
AF unbranched 33(2–4)3(3–3)3(2–4)
AF branched 1311(11–13)12(11–13)11(11–13)
LS 8084(79–88)85(84–85)80(79–88)
PDS 3434(33–42)34(34–41)35(33–42)
TDS 1010(9–10)10(9–10)10(9–10)
TAS 88(8–9)8(8–8)8(8–9)
TPS 98(8–9)9(8–9)8(8–9)
UGR 1313(10–15)na(10–15)13(10–14)
LGR 2024(20–26)24(21–24)24(20–26)
total GR 3336(30–40)35(34–36)36(30–40)

The first- and second-best ratios retrieved from the LDA ratio extractor of either head or body characters (see Table 1) alone or combined, used for pair-wise comparisons of all contemporary specimens from the six whitefish species of Lake Thun. For some comparisons only a subset of characters could be used (a-d); the respective characters that were excluded are listed at the end of the table. Only external characters were used for the LDA comparisons, since internal characters (gill raker and gill arch length) cannot be measured on live specimens, and are thus not informative to assign specimens to species in the field. Additionally, species were combined to find first- and second-best ratios that distinguish one species or a combination of species vs. all other species. For multi-species comparisons, only the comparisons that yielded distinguishing ratios are shown. δ is a measure of how good shape discriminates in comparison to size (i.e., the smaller δ the less allometry). Ratios marked with an asterisk * have very little (for the pairwise species comparisons not more than one specimen of one species overlaps with the other species) or no overlap and were thus eligible for use in the species key and the diagnoses.

CharactersSpecies comparisonBest ratiosRange species 1Range species 2Standard distanceδ (Shape vs. size)
head + body C. albellus vs. C. alpinus1: CD/UJ *0.96–1.291.36–1.6518.090.1
2: AdFB/ES5.54–13.542.87–5.9417.490.1
body C. albellus vs. C. alpinus1: CD/DHL *0.44–0.540.54–0.625.980.26
2: DFB/AdFB1.6–2.662.31–4.024.860.31
head C. albellus vs. C. alpinus1: UJ/ES6.48–16.014.52–7.9360.22
2: HL/UJ2.88–3.473.33–4.115.260.25
head + body C. albellus vs. C. fatioi1: TL/EH21.93–27.5721.91–29.463.070.08
2: PelvF/PecF10.87–1.030.87–1.072.890.08
body C. albellus vs. C. fatioi1: PecF1/TL0.12–0.160.11–0.151.40.19
2: DFAe/DFAd0.88–10.9–0.981.180.21
head C. albellus vs. C. fatioi1: EH/HL0.21–0.260.2–0.251.630.08
2: LJW/ES2.14–7.791.59–8.181.350.1
head + body C. albellus vs. C. steinmanni1: CD/UJ *0.96–1.291.36–1.5513.80.12
2: AdFB/ES5.54–13.543.31–6.31130.12
head C. albellus vs. C. steinmanni1: HL/UJ2.88–3.473.33–3.975.30.21
2: LJ/ES8.25–20.336.65–12.454.590.23
head + body C. albellus vs. C. profundus1: CL/EC *1.97–2.871.56–2.0913.190.03
2: DHL/M2.77–3.533.21–3.7912.790.03
body C. albellus vs. C. profundus1: CL/DHL0.75–1.040.61–0.824.430.06
2: CD/BD0.26–0.310.28–0.343.380.07
head C. albellus vs. C. profundus1: EC/UJ0.74–0.950.87–1.055.020.1
2: SW/ES3.22–9.672.31–5.264.050.12
head + body C. albellus vs. C. acrinasus1: AdFB/ES5.54–13.543.31–6.59.130.06
2: CD/UJW1.14–1.791.4–28.690.07
body C. albellus vs. C. acrinasus1: PecF1/CD2.13–2.761.8–2.394.50.11
2: DFB/AdFB1.6–2.661.98–3.453.880.13
head C. albellus vs. C. acrinasus1: UJW/ES5.27–13.653.22–7.964.190.14
2: ED/UJ0.66–0.840.74–0.93.510.16
Characters Species comparison Best ratios Range species 1 Range species 2 Standard distance δ (shape vs. Size)
head + body C. alpinus vs. C. fatioi1: CD/PostD *0.17–0.210.14–0.1722.730.07
2: DFAe/UJ3.14–3.932.43–3.4122.330.07
body C. alpinus vs. C. fatioi1: CD/PostD *0.17–0.210.14–0.178.980.17
2: DFAe/DHL1.26–1.551.02–1.367.90.19
head C. alpinus vs. C. fatioi1: HD/UJ2.34–2.92.13–2.573.860.3
2: MW/ES1.47–31.82–6.163.150.34
head + body C. alpinus vs. C. steinmanni (a)ED/EC0.74–0.90.74–0.98.070.05
CD/CL0.6–0.750.54–0.78.020.05
body C. alpinus vs. C. steinmanni1: DFAe/AFAe1.5–1.831.43–1.625.70.06
2: PelvFS/DFAe0.24–0.360.29–0.375.580.07
head C. alpinus vs. C. steinmanni1: EC/SW1.47–2.131.43–1.72.450.16
2: ED/EC0.74--0.90.79–0.92.20.18
head + body C. alpinus vs. C. profundus1: CD/DHL *0.54–0.620.4–0.4919.860.07
2: PecF2/CF0.63–0.820.74–0.9019.010.07
body C. alpinus vs. C. profundus1: CD/DHL *0.54–0.620.4–0.499.310.15
2: PecF2/CF0.63–0.820.74–0.907.320.19
head C. alpinus vs. C. profundus1: EH/PostD0.09–0.110.11–0.154.320.21
2: SD/UJW0.35–0.510.30–0.443.930.23
head + body C. alpinus vs. C. acrinasus1: CD/LJ0.95–1.110.79–165.210.02
2: CF/M *5.55–6.554.4–5.5765.130.02
body C. alpinus vs. C. acrinasus1: CD/DHL0.54–0.620.46–0.584.690.25
2: DFAe/DFPe3.39–4.722.84–4.543.910.29
head C. alpinus vs. C. acrinasus1: PostO/M2.4–32.17–2.564.260.21
2: HD/MW6.57–8.76.02–8.873.650.24
Characters Species comparison Best ratios Range species 1 Range species 2 Standard distance δ (shape vs. Size)
head + body C. fatioi vs. C. steinmanni (b)1: CD/UJ *1.02–1.341.36–1.5533.960.04
2: PelvF/PAdC0.73–10.84–0.133.710.04
body C. fatioi vs. C. steinmanni1: CD/PostD *0.14–0.170.17–0.206.340.22
2: DHL/BD0.5–0.70.45–0.585.370.25
head C. fatioi vs. C. steinmanni1: HD/UJ2.13–2.572.42–2.834.410.23
2: HW/LJW3.17–6.123.72–5.13.250.29
head + body C. fatioi vs. C. profundus1: CL/EC1.84–2.981.56–2.0910.030.02
2: DHL/UJ2.11–2.702.32–2.929.540.02
body C. fatioi vs. C. profundus1: CL/DHL0.76–1.040.61–0.824.44<0.01
2: DFPe/CD0.56–0.870.56.0.823.2<0.01
head C. fatioi vs. C. profundus1: EC/SW1.32–1.731.63–2.385.050.08
2: UJ/UJW1.04–1.501–1.294.280.09
head + body C. fatioi vs. C. acrinasus1: CD/PostD0.14–0.170.16–0.28.30.05
2: ED/SW1.08–1.51.3–1.7980.05
body C. fatioi vs. C. acrinasus1: CD/PostD0.14–0.170.16–0.23.660.07
2: AFAe/DHL0.69–0.90.61–0.932.930.09
head C. fatioi vs. C. acrinasus1: ED/SW1.08–1.51.3–1.793.050.15
2: MW/ES1.82–6.161.4–3.022.450.18
Characters Species comparison Best ratios Range species 1 Range species 2 Standard distance δ (shape vs. Size)
head + body C. steinmanni vs. C. profundus (c)1: CD/DHL *0.53–0.630.4–0.4923.90.05
2: CL/IOW2.05–2.691.69–2.2823.30.05
body C. steinmanni vs. C. profundus1: CD/DHL *0.53–0.630.4–0.499.130.14
2: PecF2/DFAe0.76–0.960.82–1.217.440.17
head C. steinmanni vs. C. profundus1: SW/UJW0.65–0.800.54–0.695.90.12
2: EH/PostO0.36–0.470.41–0.525.370.13
head + body C. steinmanni vs. C. acrinasus (d)1: CD/M *1.86–2.241.4–1.9160.64<0.01
2: PostD/LJ4.96–5.94.65–5.43160.6<0.01
body C. steinmanni vs. C. acrinasus1: CD/DHL0.53–0.630.46–0.584.460.23
2: PelvF/DHL1.08–1.260.95–1.163.830.26
head C. steinmanni vs. C. acrinasus1: ED/HD0.29–0.330.31–0.374.540.13
2: HL/M4.6–5.534.21–5.173.410.17
Characters Species comparison Best ratios Range species 1 Range species 2 Standard distance δ (shape vs. Size)
head + body C. profundus vs. C. acrinasus1: PecF2/CD2.37–3.161.91–2.5913.460.01
2: LJ/UJW1.34–1.861.54–2.2713.120.01
body C. profundus vs. C. acrinasus1: PecF2/CD2.37–3.161.91–2.594.580.05
2: DHL/TL0.13–0.150.12–0.133.480.06
head C. profundus vs. C. acrinasus1: M/UJW0.69–0.940.8–1.224.450.02
2: EC/LJ0.66–0.810.58–0.723.880.02
Characters Mulitple species comparison Best ratios Range group 1 Range group 2 Standard distance δ (shape vs. Size)
head + body C. alpinus + C. steinmanni vs. 4 other species1: CD/UJ *1.36–1.650.96–1.435.340.24

(a) PelvFS, PecF1, DFAd, DFAe, DFPe, TL, SL, EH, SD, SW, INW, IOW (b) PelvFS, PecF1, DFAd, TL (c) PelvFS, PecF1, DFAd, TL,EH (d) PelvFS, PecF1, DFAd, TL, EH, ES, EC

Morphological characters, their acronyms and a brief description of each character.

Morphological charactersAcronymDescription
Body
Pelvic fin basePelvFBLength between insertions of fin
Pelvic fin "spine" lengthPelvFSLength from upper insertion point of fin to tip of spine; the spine is actually an elongated scale structure
Pelvic fin lengthPelvFLength from upper insertion point of fin to tip of longest branched ray
Pectoral fin basePecFBLength between insertions of fin
Pectoral fin 1 lengthPecF1Length from upper insertion point of fin to tip of unbranched ray
Pectoral fin 2 lengthPecF2Length from upper insertion point of fin to tip of longest branched ray
Dorsal fin baseDFBLength between insertions of fin
Length of anterior part of dorsal fin erectedDFAeLength from anterior insertion point of fin to tip of longest unbranched ray, when fin is fully erected
Length of anterior part of dorsal fin depressedDFAdLength from anterior insertion point of fin to tip of longest unbranched ray, when fin is depressed
Length of posterior part of dorsal fin erectedDFPeLength from posterior insertion point of fin to tip of most posterior branched ray, when fin is erected
Anal fin baseAFBLength between insertions of fin
Length of anterior part of the anal finAFAeLength from anterior insertion point of fin to tip of longest branched ray, when fin is fully erected
Adipose fin baseAdFBLength between insertions of fin
Caudal fin lengthCFLength from the middle of hypural plate of the caudal fin (internally this is the expanded bones at the end of the backbone that support the caudal fin, externally where the lateral line scales end) to the tip of the longest unbranched ray either being on the dorsal or ventral part of the caudal fin
Caudal peduncle depthCDVertical distance between dorsal and ventral margins of the caudal peduncle at its narrowest part
Caudal peduncle lengthCLLength from posterior insertion point of anal fin to the middle of the hypural plate of the caudal fin
Length from anterior part of adipose fin to caudal fin basePAdCLength from anterior insertion point of adipose fin to the middle of the hypural plate of the caudal fin
Dorsal head lengthDHLLength from tip of snout to most posterior part of the frontal head bone
Prepelvic lengthPrePLength from tip of snout to anterior insertion point of pelvic fin
Preanal lengthPreALength from tip of snout to anterior insertion point of anal fin
Standard lengthSLLength from tip of snout to the middle of the hypural plate of the caudal fin
Total lengthTLLength from tip of snout to the tip of longest unbranched ray either being on the dorsal or ventral part of the caudal fin
Predorsal lengthPreDLength from tip of snout to anterior insertion point of dorsal fin
Body depthBDVertical distance between dorsal and ventral margins of body from anterior insertion point of dorsal fin to anterior insertion of pelvic fin: not necessarily the greatest body depth
Postdorsal lengthPostDLength from posterior insertion point of dorsal fin to middle of hypural plate of the caudal fin
Head
Eye diameterEDHorizontal distance across the midline of the eye from the anterior to the posterior margin of the soft eye tissue
Eye cavityECHorizontal distance across the midline of the eye from the anterior margin of the eye socket to the posterior margin of the eye cavity
Eye heightEHVertical distance across the midline of the eye from the dorsal margin of the eye cavity to the ventral margin of the eye cavity
Eye socketESHorizontal distance from the anterior margin of the eye socket to the most anterior point of the the posterior margin of the eye socket
Postorbital lengthPostOLength from posterior margin of the eye to the most posterior point of the operculum
Head lengthHLLength from the tip of snout to most posterior point of the operculum margin
Head depthHDThe transverse distance between margins at the widest point of the head.
Head widthHWDistance between the posterior margins of the left and right operculum
Mouth widthMWThe transverse distance between margins of the upper and lower jaw
Upper jaw lengthUJLength from the tip of the snout to most posterior point of the upper jaw
Lower jaw lengthLJLength from the most anterior point of the lower jaw to the lower jaw insertion
Lower jaw widthLJWLength between the anterior left and right side of the lower jaw
Uperr jaw widthUJWLength between the posterior left and right point of the upper jaw
Length of maxillaMLength from the most anterior point of the maxilla to the most posterior point of the maxilla
Snout lengthSNLength from tip of snout to anterior margin of the eye
Snouth depthSDVertical distance from the upper to the lower margin of the rostral plate
Snouth widthSWHorizontal distance from the left to the right margin of the rostral plate
Interorbital widthIOWDistance between the anterior margin of the left and right eye cavity
Internarial widthINWDistance between the right and left nostrils
Gill
Upper arch lengthUALength of the first hypobranchial (upper arch) from the most anterior point to the joint of the hypo- and ceratobranchial where the middle raker emerges
Lower arch lengthLALength of the first ceratobranchial (lower arch) from the most anterior point to the joint of the hypo- and ceratobranchial where the middle raker emerges
Middle gill raker lengthMGRLength of the gill raker directly at the joint of the the upper and lower first arch, from the insertion of the gill raker to the tip of the gill raker
Longest gill raker lengthLGRLength of the longest gill raker either on the upper and lower first arch, from the insertion of the gill raker to the tip of the gill raker
KottelatM (1997) European freshwater fishes. A heuristic checklist of the freshwater fishes of Europe (exclusive of former USSR), with an introduction for non-systematists and comments on nomenclature and conservation.Biologia, Bratislava, Section Zoology52: 1271. [Suppl. material 1]KottelatMFreyhofJ (2007) Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes.Kottelat, Cornol, and Freyhof, Berlin, 646 pp.HudsonAGVonlanthenPSeehausenO (2011) Rapid parallel adaptive radiation from a single hybridogenic ancestral population.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences278: 5866. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0925HudsonAGVonlanthenPBezaultESeehausenO (2013) Genomic signatures of relaxed disruptive selection associated with speciation reversal in whitefish.BMC Evolutionary Biology13: 1108. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-108HudsonAGLundsgaard-HansenBLucekKVonlanthenPSeehausenO (2016) Managing cryptic biodiversity: fine- scale intralacustrine speciation along a benthic gradient in Alpine whitefish (Coregonus spp.).Evolutionary Applications10: 251266. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12446IngramTHudsonAGVonlanthenPSeehausenO (2012) Does water depth or diet divergence predict progress towards ecological speciation in whitefish radiations? Evolutionary Ecology Research 14: 487–502.VonlanthenPBittnerDHudsonAYoungKAMüllerRLundsgaard-HansenBRoyDDi PiazzaSLargiaderCRSeehausenO (2012) Eutrophication causes speciation reversal in whitefish adaptive radiations.Nature482: 357363. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10824VonlanthenPPériatGDönzCHellmannJAlexanderTJSeehausenO (2015) Artenvielfalt und Zusammensetzung der Fischpopulation im Thunersee.Projet Lac, Eawag, Kastanien- baum, 41 pp.DönzCJBittnerDVonlanthenPWagnerCESeehausenO (2018) Rapid buildup of sympatric species diversity in Alpine whitefish.Ecology and Evolution2018: 115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4375SteinmannP (1950) Monographie der schweizerischen Koregonen. Beitrag zum Problem der Entstehung neuer Arten. Spezieller Teil.Schweizerische Zeitung für Hydrologie12: 340491. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02489885HeuscherJ (1901) Thuner- und Brienzer-See. Ihre Biologischen und Fischerei-Verhältnisse. Druck E.Zwingli, Pfäffikon, 104 pp.RufliH (1978) Die heutigen sympatrischen Felchenpopulationen (Coregonus spp.) des Thuner- und Bielersees und ihre Morphologie.Schweizerische Zeitung für Hydrologie40: 731. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02502369RufliH (1979) Ernährung und Wachstumder Felchen populationen (Coregonus spp.) des Thuner-und Bielersees.Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Hydrologie41: 6493. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551760KirchhoferATschumiPA (1986) Age structure and growth of coregonid fish populations in Lake Thun.Archiv für Hydrobiologie – Beiheft Ergebnisse der Limnologie22: 303318.KirchhoferA (1995) Growth characteristics of coregonid populations in three lakes with different trophic states and decreasing nutrient concentrations.Archiv für Hydrobiologie Special Issues Advances in Limnology46: 6170.BittnerDExcoffierLLargiaderCR (2010) Patterns of morphological changes and hybridization between sympatric whitefish morphs (Coregonus spp.) in a Swiss lake: a role for eutrophication? Molecular Ecology19: 21522167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04623.xDouglasMRBrunnerPCBernatchezL (2003) Doassemblages of Coregonus (Teleostei: Salmoniformes) in the Central Alpine region of Europe represent species flocks? Molecular Ecology 8: 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00581.xDouglasMRBrunnerPC (2002) Biodiversity of central alpine Coregonus (Salmoniformes): impact of one-hundred years of management. Ecological Applications 12: 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0154:BOCACS]2.0.CO;2BittnerD (2009) Gonad deformations in whitefish (Coregonus spp.) from Lake Thun, Switzerland – A population genetic and transcriptomic approach. PhD Thesis, University of Bern, Bern.FatioV (1885) Les corégones de la Suisse (féras diverses) classification et conditions de frai. Recueil Zoologie Suisse 1, 2: 649–665. [22, 23 pls]SelzOM (2008) Building a link between dN and dC stable isotopes signatures and the ecological phenotypic forms of Whitefish (Coregonus laveratus (L.)) in 4 Swiss Lakes. B.Sc. Thesis: University of Bern, Bern.HudsonAG (2011) Population genomics and ecology of parallel adaptive radiations: the Alpine lake whitefish. PhD Thesis, University of Bern, Bern.