single

Results per mix

Mix3_vs_Mix2

Method Comparison TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure AUC
edgeR Mix3_vs_Mix2 18 13 55303 1 1.000 0.581 0.947 1 0.720 0.974
DESeq2 Mix3_vs_Mix2 18 15 55301 1 1.000 0.545 0.947 1 0.692 0.993
limma Mix3_vs_Mix2 15 8 55308 4 1.000 0.652 0.789 1 0.714 0.993
NOISeq Mix3_vs_Mix2 18 27 55289 1 0.999 0.400 0.947 1 0.562 0.984
combined Mix3_vs_Mix2 18 14 55302 1 1.000 0.562 0.947 1 0.706 0.998
Comparison Cut TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Cut_1 18 28 55288 1 0.999 0.391 0.947 0.999 0.554
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Cut_2 18 15 55301 1 1.000 0.545 0.947 1.000 0.692
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Cut_3 18 13 55303 1 1.000 0.581 0.947 1.000 0.720
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Cut_4 18 13 55303 1 1.000 0.581 0.947 1.000 0.720
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Combined 18 14 55302 1 1.000 0.562 0.947 1.000 0.706
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Naive_Bayes 18 14 55302 1 1.000 0.562 0.947 1.000 0.706

Mix3_vs_Mix1

Method Comparison TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure AUC
edgeR Mix3_vs_Mix1 16 16 55300 3 1.000 0.500 0.842 1.000 0.627 0.921
DESeq2 Mix3_vs_Mix1 16 16 55300 3 1.000 0.500 0.842 1.000 0.627 0.953
limma Mix3_vs_Mix1 12 10 55306 7 1.000 0.545 0.632 1.000 0.585 0.953
NOISeq Mix3_vs_Mix1 16 41 55275 3 0.999 0.281 0.842 0.999 0.421 0.940
combined Mix3_vs_Mix1 16 16 55300 3 1.000 0.500 0.842 1.000 0.627 0.940
Comparison Cut TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Cut_1 16 41 55275 3 0.999 0.281 0.842 0.999 0.421
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Cut_2 16 16 55300 3 1.000 0.500 0.842 1.000 0.627
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Cut_3 16 16 55300 3 1.000 0.500 0.842 1.000 0.627
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Cut_4 16 16 55300 3 1.000 0.500 0.842 1.000 0.627
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Combined 16 16 55300 3 1.000 0.500 0.842 1.000 0.627
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Naive_Bayes 16 16 55300 3 1.000 0.500 0.842 1.000 0.627

Mix2_vs_Mix1

Method Comparison TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure AUC
edgeR Mix2_vs_Mix1 17 15 55301 2 1 0.531 0.895 1 0.667 0.974
DESeq2 Mix2_vs_Mix1 17 15 55301 2 1 0.531 0.895 1 0.667 0.993
limma Mix2_vs_Mix1 12 11 55305 7 1 0.522 0.632 1 0.571 0.986
NOISeq Mix2_vs_Mix1 17 16 55300 2 1 0.515 0.895 1 0.654 0.972
combined Mix2_vs_Mix1 17 15 55301 2 1 0.531 0.895 1 0.667 0.986
Comparison Cut TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Cut_1 17 16 55300 2 1 0.515 0.895 1 0.654
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Cut_2 17 15 55301 2 1 0.531 0.895 1 0.667
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Cut_3 17 15 55301 2 1 0.531 0.895 1 0.667
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Cut_4 17 15 55301 2 1 0.531 0.895 1 0.667
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Combined 17 15 55301 2 1 0.531 0.895 1 0.667
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Naive_Bayes 18 15 55301 1 1 0.545 0.947 1 0.692

Comparing methods

AUC vals:

Comparison DESeq2 NOISeq combined edgeR limma
Mix2_vs_Mix1 0.993 0.972 0.986 0.974 0.986
Mix3_vs_Mix1 0.953 0.940 0.940 0.921 0.953
Mix3_vs_Mix2 0.993 0.984 0.998 0.974 0.993

F1 vals:

Comparison DESeq2 NOISeq combined edgeR limma
Mix2_vs_Mix1 0.667 0.654 0.667 0.667 0.571
Mix3_vs_Mix1 0.627 0.421 0.627 0.627 0.585
Mix3_vs_Mix2 0.692 0.562 0.706 0.720 0.714
FP FN Precision Recall FMeasure AUC
combined 15.00 2 0.531 0.895 0.667 0.974
DESeq2 15.33 2 0.526 0.895 0.662 0.979
edgeR 14.67 2 0.537 0.895 0.671 0.956
limma 9.67 6 0.573 0.684 0.624 0.977
NOISeq 28.00 2 0.399 0.895 0.546 0.965

Plot AUC and F1

Comparing vote cutoffs

Accuracy vals:

Comparison Combined Cut_1 Cut_2 Cut_3 Cut_4 Naive_Bayes
Mix2_vs_Mix1 1 1.000 1 1 1 1
Mix3_vs_Mix1 1 0.999 1 1 1 1
Mix3_vs_Mix2 1 0.999 1 1 1 1

F1 vals:

Comparison Combined Cut_1 Cut_2 Cut_3 Cut_4 Naive_Bayes
Mix2_vs_Mix1 0.667 0.654 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.692
Mix3_vs_Mix1 0.627 0.421 0.627 0.627 0.627 0.627
Mix3_vs_Mix2 0.706 0.554 0.692 0.720 0.720 0.706
FP FN Precision Recall FMeasure
Combined 15.0 2.00 0.531 0.895 0.667
Cut_1 28.3 2.00 0.396 0.895 0.543
Cut_2 15.3 2.00 0.526 0.895 0.662
Cut_3 14.7 2.00 0.537 0.895 0.671
Cut_4 14.7 2.00 0.537 0.895 0.671
Naive_Bayes 15.0 1.67 0.536 0.912 0.675

Plot Accuracy and F1

multi

Results per mix

Mix3_vs_Mix2

Method Comparison TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure AUC
edgeR Mix3_vs_Mix2 8 23 55300 4 1.000 0.258 0.667 1.000 0.372 0.916
DESeq2 Mix3_vs_Mix2 10 23 55300 2 1.000 0.303 0.833 1.000 0.444 0.978
limma Mix3_vs_Mix2 5 18 55305 7 1.000 0.217 0.417 1.000 0.286 0.944
NOISeq Mix3_vs_Mix2 9 36 55287 3 0.999 0.200 0.750 0.999 0.316 0.898
combined Mix3_vs_Mix2 9 23 55300 3 1.000 0.281 0.750 1.000 0.409 0.963
Comparison Cut TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Cut_1 10 36 55287 2 0.999 0.217 0.833 0.999 0.345
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Cut_2 10 23 55300 2 1.000 0.303 0.833 1.000 0.444
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Cut_3 8 23 55300 4 1.000 0.258 0.667 1.000 0.372
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Cut_4 8 23 55300 4 1.000 0.258 0.667 1.000 0.372
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Combined 9 23 55300 3 1.000 0.281 0.750 1.000 0.409
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Naive_Bayes 9 23 55300 3 1.000 0.281 0.750 1.000 0.409

Mix3_vs_Mix1

Method Comparison TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure AUC
edgeR Mix3_vs_Mix1 12 20 55303 0 1.000 0.375 1.000 1.000 0.545 1.000
DESeq2 Mix3_vs_Mix1 12 20 55303 0 1.000 0.375 1.000 1.000 0.545 1.000
limma Mix3_vs_Mix1 7 15 55308 5 1.000 0.318 0.583 1.000 0.412 0.989
NOISeq Mix3_vs_Mix1 12 45 55278 0 0.999 0.211 1.000 0.999 0.348 0.943
combined Mix3_vs_Mix1 12 20 55303 0 1.000 0.375 1.000 1.000 0.545 1.000
Comparison Cut TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Cut_1 12 45 55278 0 0.999 0.211 1 0.999 0.348
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Cut_2 12 20 55303 0 1.000 0.375 1 1.000 0.545
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Cut_3 12 20 55303 0 1.000 0.375 1 1.000 0.545
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Cut_4 12 20 55303 0 1.000 0.375 1 1.000 0.545
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Combined 12 20 55303 0 1.000 0.375 1 1.000 0.545
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Naive_Bayes 12 20 55303 0 1.000 0.375 1 1.000 0.545

Mix2_vs_Mix1

Method Comparison TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure AUC
edgeR Mix2_vs_Mix1 11 21 55302 1 1 0.344 0.917 1 0.500 0.958
DESeq2 Mix2_vs_Mix1 11 21 55302 1 1 0.344 0.917 1 0.500 0.989
limma Mix2_vs_Mix1 10 13 55310 2 1 0.435 0.833 1 0.571 0.989
NOISeq Mix2_vs_Mix1 11 22 55301 1 1 0.333 0.917 1 0.489 0.978
combined Mix2_vs_Mix1 11 21 55302 1 1 0.344 0.917 1 0.500 0.978
Comparison Cut TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Cut_1 11 22 55301 1 1 0.333 0.917 1 0.489
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Cut_2 11 21 55302 1 1 0.344 0.917 1 0.500
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Cut_3 11 21 55302 1 1 0.344 0.917 1 0.500
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Cut_4 11 21 55302 1 1 0.344 0.917 1 0.500
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Combined 11 21 55302 1 1 0.344 0.917 1 0.500
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Naive_Bayes 11 22 55301 1 1 0.333 0.917 1 0.489

Comparing methods

AUC vals:

Comparison DESeq2 NOISeq combined edgeR limma
Mix2_vs_Mix1 0.989 0.978 0.978 0.958 0.989
Mix3_vs_Mix1 1.000 0.943 1.000 1.000 0.989
Mix3_vs_Mix2 0.978 0.898 0.963 0.916 0.944

F1 vals:

Comparison DESeq2 NOISeq combined edgeR limma
Mix2_vs_Mix1 0.500 0.489 0.500 0.500 0.571
Mix3_vs_Mix1 0.545 0.348 0.545 0.545 0.412
Mix3_vs_Mix2 0.444 0.316 0.409 0.372 0.286
FP FN Precision Recall FMeasure AUC
combined 21.3 1.33 0.333 0.889 0.485 0.980
DESeq2 21.3 1.00 0.341 0.917 0.497 0.989
edgeR 21.3 1.67 0.326 0.861 0.473 0.958
limma 15.3 4.67 0.323 0.611 0.423 0.974
NOISeq 34.3 1.33 0.248 0.889 0.384 0.939

Plot AUC and F1

Comparing vote cutoffs

Accuracy vals:

Comparison Combined Cut_1 Cut_2 Cut_3 Cut_4 Naive_Bayes
Mix2_vs_Mix1 1 1.000 1 1 1 1
Mix3_vs_Mix1 1 0.999 1 1 1 1
Mix3_vs_Mix2 1 0.999 1 1 1 1

F1 vals:

Comparison Combined Cut_1 Cut_2 Cut_3 Cut_4 Naive_Bayes
Mix2_vs_Mix1 0.500 0.489 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.489
Mix3_vs_Mix1 0.545 0.348 0.545 0.545 0.545 0.545
Mix3_vs_Mix2 0.409 0.345 0.444 0.372 0.372 0.409
FP FN Precision Recall FMeasure
Combined 21.3 1.33 0.333 0.889 0.485
Cut_1 34.3 1.00 0.254 0.917 0.394
Cut_2 21.3 1.00 0.341 0.917 0.497
Cut_3 21.3 1.67 0.326 0.861 0.473
Cut_4 21.3 1.67 0.326 0.861 0.473
Naive_Bayes 21.7 1.33 0.330 0.889 0.481

Plot Accuracy and F1

all

Results per mix

Mix3_vs_Mix2

Method Comparison TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure AUC
edgeR Mix3_vs_Mix2 26 5 55299 5 1 0.839 0.839 1 0.839 0.952
DESeq2 Mix3_vs_Mix2 28 5 55299 3 1 0.848 0.903 1 0.875 0.987
limma Mix3_vs_Mix2 20 3 55301 11 1 0.870 0.645 1 0.741 0.974
NOISeq Mix3_vs_Mix2 27 18 55286 4 1 0.600 0.871 1 0.711 0.951
combined Mix3_vs_Mix2 27 5 55299 4 1 0.844 0.871 1 0.857 0.984
Comparison Cut TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Cut_1 28 18 55286 3 1 0.609 0.903 1 0.727
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Cut_2 28 5 55299 3 1 0.848 0.903 1 0.875
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Cut_3 26 5 55299 5 1 0.839 0.839 1 0.839
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Cut_4 26 5 55299 5 1 0.839 0.839 1 0.839
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Combined 27 5 55299 4 1 0.844 0.871 1 0.857
Mix3_vs_Mix2 Naive_Bayes 27 5 55299 4 1 0.844 0.871 1 0.857

Mix3_vs_Mix1

Method Comparison TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure AUC
edgeR Mix3_vs_Mix1 28 4 55300 3 1.000 0.875 0.903 1.000 0.889 0.952
DESeq2 Mix3_vs_Mix1 28 4 55300 3 1.000 0.875 0.903 1.000 0.889 0.971
limma Mix3_vs_Mix1 19 3 55301 12 1.000 0.864 0.613 1.000 0.717 0.967
NOISeq Mix3_vs_Mix1 28 29 55275 3 0.999 0.491 0.903 0.999 0.636 0.941
combined Mix3_vs_Mix1 28 4 55300 3 1.000 0.875 0.903 1.000 0.889 0.963
Comparison Cut TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Cut_1 28 29 55275 3 0.999 0.491 0.903 0.999 0.636
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Cut_2 28 4 55300 3 1.000 0.875 0.903 1.000 0.889
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Cut_3 28 4 55300 3 1.000 0.875 0.903 1.000 0.889
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Cut_4 28 4 55300 3 1.000 0.875 0.903 1.000 0.889
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Combined 28 4 55300 3 1.000 0.875 0.903 1.000 0.889
Mix3_vs_Mix1 Naive_Bayes 28 4 55300 3 1.000 0.875 0.903 1.000 0.889

Mix2_vs_Mix1

Method Comparison TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure AUC
edgeR Mix2_vs_Mix1 28 4 55300 3 1 0.875 0.903 1 0.889 0.968
DESeq2 Mix2_vs_Mix1 28 4 55300 3 1 0.875 0.903 1 0.889 0.991
limma Mix2_vs_Mix1 22 1 55303 9 1 0.957 0.710 1 0.815 0.987
NOISeq Mix2_vs_Mix1 28 5 55299 3 1 0.848 0.903 1 0.875 0.975
combined Mix2_vs_Mix1 28 4 55300 3 1 0.875 0.903 1 0.889 0.983
Comparison Cut TP FP TN FN Accuracy Precision Recall Specificity FMeasure
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Cut_1 28 5 55299 3 1 0.848 0.903 1 0.875
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Cut_2 28 4 55300 3 1 0.875 0.903 1 0.889
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Cut_3 28 4 55300 3 1 0.875 0.903 1 0.889
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Cut_4 28 4 55300 3 1 0.875 0.903 1 0.889
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Combined 28 4 55300 3 1 0.875 0.903 1 0.889
Mix2_vs_Mix1 Naive_Bayes 29 4 55300 2 1 0.879 0.935 1 0.906

Comparing methods

AUC vals:

Comparison DESeq2 NOISeq combined edgeR limma
Mix2_vs_Mix1 0.991 0.975 0.983 0.968 0.987
Mix3_vs_Mix1 0.971 0.941 0.963 0.952 0.967
Mix3_vs_Mix2 0.987 0.951 0.984 0.952 0.974

F1 vals:

Comparison DESeq2 NOISeq combined edgeR limma
Mix2_vs_Mix1 0.889 0.875 0.889 0.889 0.815
Mix3_vs_Mix1 0.889 0.636 0.889 0.889 0.717
Mix3_vs_Mix2 0.875 0.711 0.857 0.839 0.741
FP FN Precision Recall FMeasure AUC
combined 4.33 3.33 0.865 0.892 0.878 0.977
DESeq2 4.33 3.00 0.866 0.903 0.884 0.983
edgeR 4.33 3.67 0.863 0.882 0.872 0.957
limma 2.33 10.67 0.897 0.656 0.758 0.976
NOISeq 17.33 3.33 0.647 0.892 0.741 0.955

Plot AUC and F1

Comparing vote cutoffs

Accuracy vals:

Comparison Combined Cut_1 Cut_2 Cut_3 Cut_4 Naive_Bayes
Mix2_vs_Mix1 1 1.000 1 1 1 1
Mix3_vs_Mix1 1 0.999 1 1 1 1
Mix3_vs_Mix2 1 1.000 1 1 1 1

F1 vals:

Comparison Combined Cut_1 Cut_2 Cut_3 Cut_4 Naive_Bayes
Mix2_vs_Mix1 0.889 0.875 0.889 0.889 0.889 0.906
Mix3_vs_Mix1 0.889 0.636 0.889 0.889 0.889 0.889
Mix3_vs_Mix2 0.857 0.727 0.875 0.839 0.839 0.857
FP FN Precision Recall FMeasure
Combined 4.33 3.33 0.865 0.892 0.878
Cut_1 17.33 3.00 0.649 0.903 0.746
Cut_2 4.33 3.00 0.866 0.903 0.884
Cut_3 4.33 3.67 0.863 0.882 0.872
Cut_4 4.33 3.67 0.863 0.882 0.872
Naive_Bayes 4.33 3.00 0.866 0.903 0.884

Plot Accuracy and F1