Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 24.
Published in final edited form as: Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2010 Nov 1;1(4):149–162. doi: 10.1177/2040622310376137

Table 2.

Summary of methodological characteristics of cohort studies.

[Briesacher et al. 2007] [Caro et al. 2004] [Curtis et al. 2008b] [Gallagher et al. 2008] [Hoer et al. 2009] [Huybrechts et al. 2006] [Penning-van Beest et al. 2008] [Sheehy et al. 2009] [Siris et al. 2006]
Treatment ALD, RSD ALD, CCT, ETD, RSD, HT ALD, RSD, IBD ALD, RSD ALD, RSD, ETD ALD, RSD, HT ALD, RSD ALD, RSD ALD, RSD
Evaluated drug class separately NA No NA NA NA No NA NA NA
Baseline (lookback)
period
1 year NP 6 months 1 year (new user) 0.25–1 year (covariates) 6 months (new user) 1 year (covariates) Variable 1 year 2 years (new user, prior fx and drug covariates) 1 year (other covariates) 6 months
New users (drug) Yes (BP) No Yes (BP) Yes (ALD, RSD) Yes (BP) No Yes (All OP drugs) Yes (weekly BP) Yes (BP)
Allowed switching Yes NP Yes (between BPs; others censored) NP Yes Yes (any) NP NP NP
>1 Rx needed No No No Sub-analysis for 2 + Rxs No No Sub-analysis for 2 + Rxs No No
Immeasurable time NP Assumed 100%
compliance
NP NP NP Assumed 100%
compliance
NP NP NP
Compliance measure PDC MPR MPR MPR MPR MPR PDC MPR MPR
How compliance quantified (1 = primary 2 = secondary) 0–19%, 20–39%; 40–59%; 60–79%; 80–100% 1) ≥80%
2) <50%, 50–80%, 80–90%, >90%
1) ≥80%
2) <50%, 50–80%, ≥80%
Not Stated: linear regression with 10 subgroups ≥80% 1)≥80%
2)<50%, 50–80%, 80–90%, >90%
1)≥80%
2)<20, 20– 49, 50–69, 70–89, ≥90%
≥80% 1) ≥80% 2) Continuous range (0–100%)
How compliance measured (1 = primary 2 = secondary) Time Varying (1 year) 1) Entire follow-up 2) Ascertainment Period (6/12 months) 1) Time Varying (90 days)
2) Entire Follow-up
Entire follow-up Entire follow-up Entire follow-up Time varying (90 days) Entire follow-up Entire follow-up
Start of fracture identification Fx after 1 year Fx after 180 days Fx after 90 days Any Any Fx after 180 days Fx after 182 days Any Any
Length of follow-up to identify fracture risk Minimum 2 yrs; 60,208 person-years follow-up 22,753 person-years; mean 2 years Variable Mean 2.32 years Minimum 180 days (82% had 1 + year, 47% 2 + years) 63,438 person-years; mean of 1.7 years 22,484 person-years 1 year 2 years
Minimum confounders for adjustment
Age Yes Yes Yes Yesc Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sex Yes Yesa Yes Yesc Yes Yesa Yesa Yes Yesa
Prior fracture Yes Yes Yes Yesc Yes Yes Yes Yesb Yes
Comorbidity/drug
score
Yes No Yes Yesc No No No No No

ALD, alendronate; BMD, bone mineral density; BP, bisphosphonates; CCT, calcitonin; ETD, etidronate; Fx, fracture; GCC, glucocorticoids; HT, hormone therapy; IBD, ibandronate; MPR, medication possession ratio; NA, not applicable; NP, data not provided; OP, osteoporosis; PDC, proportion of days covered; RAL, raloxifene; RSD, risedronate; Rx, prescription.

a

Study only evaluated females.

b

Study separated cohorts into those with and without a prior fracture (primary and secondary prevention).

c

Confounder considered –however it is unclear what was included in the final adjusted analysis.