Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: Vision Res. 2021 Jun 2;186:112–123. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.05.005

Fig. 4. Results from Experiment 2.

Fig. 4

A) Scatter plots for all detection thresholds compared between the circularity-decrease (C↓, horizontal axis) and circularity-increase condition (C↑, vertical axis) of Experiment 2A. Data points below the diagonal dashed line indicate lower thresholds for the circularity-increase change direction. B) Points of subjective equality (PSE) compared between pre- and postsaccadic condition in Experiment 2B. PSEs below 0.5 indicate a participant’s bias for disproportionally often judging shapes to be more circular. Data points above the dashed diagonal line indicate a less circular appearance in the postsaccadic condition compared to the presaccadic condition. C) Just-noticeable differences (JNDs) compared between pre- and postsaccadic conditions in Experiment 1B. Data on the diagonal dashed line indicate that participants were equally precise in both conditions. A-C) Light-grey dots represent individual participant data and the dark-grey dot indicates the overall mean. The error bars indicate 95%-confidence intervals within each condition (cardinal bars) or between conditions (oblique bar).