Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 9.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Hypertens. 2021 Aug 9;34(7):737–743. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpab028

Table 2. Conventional and corrected carotid dimensions and stiffness measures.

Parameter Baseline Follow-up Δ (unit/year)
IMT (mm) 0.75 ± 0.15 0.78 ± 0.18 0.01 ± 0.08
IMTcorr (mm) 0.76 ± 0.15 0.78 ± 0.18 0.01 ± 0.08
Dd (mm) 7.24 ± 0.85 7.55 ± 0.87 0.12 ± 0.30**
Dd,corr (mm) 7.20 ± 0.87 7.56 ± 0.88 0.13 ± 0.30**
cPWV (m/s) 7.5 ± 1.3 7.7 ± 1.2 0.1 ± 0.6*
cPWVcorr (m/s) 7.1 ± 1.2 7.5 ± 1.2 0.1 ± 0.6*
E (MPa) 0.59 ± 0.23 0.65 ± 0.23 0.02 ± 0.11*
Ecorr (MPa) 0.53 ± 0.20 0.61 ± 0.22 0.03 ± 0.10**
ß0 8.5 ± 2.9 9.3 ± 2.9 0.3 ± 1.3*

Data are presented as mean ± SD, n = 124.Δ = (follow-up value – baseline value)/(follow-up time in years). Abbreviations: β0, pressure-independent stiffness index; cPWV, carotid pulse wave velocity; cPWVcorr, pressure-corrected cPWV; D d, diastolic diameter; D d,corr, diameter corresponding to a pressure of 80 mm Hg; E, Young’s modulus; E corr, pressure-corrected Young’s modulus; IMT, intima media thickness; IMTcorr, IMT corresponding to a pressure of 80 mm Hg.

Follow-up (2.9 ± 1.0 years) values were tested against baseline values using paired t-tests

*

P < 0.05

**

P < 0.001.