Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Leukemia. 2021 Aug 19;36(2):507–515. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01382-3

Table 2. Association between myeloid CH subtypes and eGFR.cys score after removing participants with prevalent myeloid neoplasms.

Predictor Cases β CI 2.5% CI 97.5% P
myeloid CH 3330 -1.05 -1.54 -0.57 8.80x10-5
myeloid mCA 148 -3.36 -5.65 -1.07 9.11 x10-3
myeloid genes 3241 -1.08 -1.57 -0.60 6.25 x10-5
DNMT3A 1446 0.14 -0.59 0.87 0.73
TET2 778 -1.74 -2.74 -0.73 1.84x10-3
ASXL1 283 -1.59 -3.21 0.03 0.09
JAK2 92 -4.69 -7.56 -1.82 3.21x10-3
GNB1 86 -3.51 -6.40 -0.62 0.04
SRSF2 67 -2.42 -5.94 1.11 0.27
TP53 62 -0.01 -3.30 3.29 1.00
PPM1D 61 -5.87 -9.43 -2.31 3.08 x10-3
SF3B1 52 -2.37 -6.27 1.52 0.32
FLT3 36 -0.65 -5.49 4.19 0.81
GNAS 33 1.89 -2.61 6.40 0.49
NF1 28 -1.03 -6.07 4.01 0.73
CBL 28 -12.14 -17.40 -6.88 3.44 x10-5
STAG2 27 3.90 -1.37 9.16 0.23
PRPF40B 26 2.96 -2.29 8.21 0.35
CREBBP 24 -3.10 -8.49 2.30 0.34
KDM6A 22 -2.68 -8.49 3.14 0.45
BRCC3 21 -1.72 -7.70 4.27 0.66
IDH2 14 -5.56 -13.78 2.67 0.28
KMT2D 13 -3.43 -10.54 3.69 0.44
*

59 participants had both myeloid mutated genes and mCA