Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 10.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 5;76(3):e920–e929. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac556

Table 1. Accuracy of direct MTBDRplus and MTBDRsl testing for TB and phenotypic second-line drug resistance in sputum of Xpert-positive rifampicin-resistant patients. Data are % (n/N) 95% CI.

  Overall Smear-positive Smear-negative
Sensitivity Specificity Sensitivity Specificity Sensitivity Specificity
MTBDRplus TB 88 (751/849)
86-90
43 (40/93)
32-53
97 (363/373)
94-98
36 (4/11)
10-69
82 (388/476)
77-84 *p<0.001
44 (36/82)
32-54 *p=0.635
MTBDRsl TB 82 (696/849)
79-84 p<0.001
51 (47/93)
32-54 p=0.303
93 (347/373)
90-95 p=0.006
73 (8/11)
39-93 p=0.086
73 (349/476)
69-77 *p<0.001
p=0.002
48 (39/82)
36-58 *p=0.117
p<0.001
Fluoroquinolones 87 (71/82)
77-93
93 (297/321)
90-96
89 (40/45)
75-96
92 (180/195)
88-96
84 (31/37)
67-93 *p=0.105
93 (117/126)
89-98 *p=0.855
Second-line injectables drugs 84 (32/38)
68-93 **p=0.720
94 (317/339)
90-95 **p=0.820
86 (19/22)
65-97 **p=0.001
97 (205/212)
93-98 **p=0.108
81 (13/16)
54-95 *p=0.011 **p=0.821
88 (112/127)
81-93 *p=0.002 **p=0.052
Fluoroquinolone and second-line injectable drugs 70 (19/27)
69-98
97 (257/264)
94-98
85 (11/13)
54-98
97(165/169)
94-99
57 (8/14)
28-82 *p=0.118
97 (92/95)
91-99 *p=0.701
*

Within row comparisons between smear statuses

**

Within column comparisons for second-line injectables vs. fluoroquinolones

Within column comparisons for MTBDRsl vs. MTBDRplus