Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 10.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 5;76(3):e920–e929. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac556

Table 4. Comparison of key care cascade gaps for the diagnosis of drug-resistance before and after the implementation of improved molecular diagnostics for resistance beyond rifampicin.

Implementation of first-line MTBDRplus testing on Xpert rifampicin-resistant sputum to include smear-negatives and MTBDRsl testing on all sputum resulted in a greater proportion of patients receiving second-line DST, reduced reliance on culture, and reduced turnaround time. The Supplementary Methods contains more information on these periods. Data are median (IQR) or % (n/N).

  Retrospective period
MTBDRplus only on smear-positives Second-line DST by pDST only
Prospective period
MTBDRplus and MTBDRsl irrespective of smear-status
Second-line pDST still done
Overall (n=2938) Smear-positive (n=1674) Smear-negative (n=1264) Overall (n=799) Smear-positive (n=416) Smear-negative (n=383)
On treatment without receiving any second-line DST 23 (668/2938) 21 (357/1674) 25 (311/1264)
*p=0.358
5 (40/799)
^p<0.001
2 (7/416)
^p<0.001
9 (33/383)
*p<0.001 ^p<0.001
MTBDRplus direct testing N/A 100 (1674/1674) N/A 100 (799/799) 100 (416/416) 100 (383/383)
With an actionable result N/A 79 (1317/1674) N/A 99 (797/799) 100 (416/416) 99 (381/383)
*p=0.140
Without an actionable result N/A 21 (357/1674) N/A 0 (2/799) 0 (0/416) 1 (2/383)
MTBDRsl direct testing N/A N/A N/A 100 (799/799) 100 (416/416) 100 (383/383)
With an actionable result N/A N/A N/A 78 (622/799) 91 (380/416) 63 (242/383) *p<0.001
Without an actionable result N/A N/A N/A 22 (177/799) 9 (36/416) 37 (141/383) *p<0.001
Days-to-result (actionable or non-actionable) N/A N/A N/A 6 (5-7) 6 (5-7) 6 (5-7) *p<0.001
MTBDRsl indirect testing N/A N/A N/A 22 (177/177) 9 (36/36) 37 (141/141)
With an actionable result N/A N/A N/A 22 (177/177) 9 (36/36) 37 (141/141)
Without an actionable result N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0
Days-to-result (actionable or non-actionable) N/A N/A N/A 22 (16-26) 16 (13-22) 22 (18-27) *p=0.081
pDST 77 (2270/2938) 79 (1317/1674) 75 (953/1264) *p=0.358 94 (750/799) ^p<0.001 96 (400/416) ^p<0.001 91 (350/383) *p=0.500 ^p<0.001
Days-to-result (IQR) 37 (35-46) 33 (29-38) 42 (36-50) *p<0.001 30 (27-36) ^p<0.001 28 (25-35) ^p<0.001 34 (30-40) *p<0.001 ^p<0.001
Overall, second-line DST
Patients who required second-line DST on isolates (indirect MTBDRsl or pDST) when direct MTBDRsl was non-actionable 0 0 0 22 (177/799) 9 (36/416) 37 (141/383) *p<0.001
Days-to-first actionable second line DST result (direct MTBDRsl, indirect MTBDRsl, or pDST) 37 (35-46) 33 (29-38) 42 (36-50) *p<0.001 6 (5-7) 6 (5-7) 6 (5-7) *p<0.001
^

Comparisons within rows in “retrospective” vs “prospective” periods

*

Comparisons within rows and between columns by same smear status

Abbreviations and definitions: pDST-phenotypic drug susceptibility testing, IQR-interquartile range, n-number, N/A-non applicable, DST-drug susceptibility testing.