Table 2. Projection of Prostate Cancer Mortality Reduction in a Hypothetical Screening Trial Ignoring and Preserving Subtypes According to their Distribution Among Late-Stage Diagnoses.
Box 1: Inputs to Mortality Reduction Projection | |||
---|---|---|---|
Low Grade | High Grade | Total | |
(A) Years of follow-up | 10 | ||
(B) Incidence Hazard | 0.005 | ||
(C) Distribution of Cases | |||
Early Stage | 66% | 13% | 80% |
Late Stage | 8% | 13% | 20% |
Total | 74% | 26% | 100% |
(D) Mortality Hazard | |||
Early Stage | 0.017 | 0.087 | 0.026 |
Late Stage | 0.161 | 0.258 | 0.209 |
Total | 0.026 | 0.138 | 0.045 |
Box 2: Mortality Reduction Projection | |||
---|---|---|---|
Low Grade | High Grade | Total | |
(E) Stage Shift Multiplier | 0.399 | 0.292 | 0.437 |
(F) Stage Shift | 11% | 19% | 30% |
Mortality Reduction | |||
(G) Projected Ignoring Grade | 13% | ||
(H) Projected Preserving Grade | 5% | 5% | 10% |
(I) Absolute Difference | +3% | ||
(J) Relative Difference | +31% |
-
(A)Years of follow-up for hypothetical trial
-
(B)Incidence hazard of prostate cancer estimated from SEER (9 registries, Nov 2004 submission) for men ages 50-59 years in 1980-1984
-
(C)Distribution of cases from SEER for men diagnosed ages 50-59 years in 1980-1984
-
(D)Hazard of mortality following diagnosis, derived from SEER 10-year survival rates, assuming a constant hazard of mortality.
-
(E)Stage-shift multipliers calculated as in Owens et al. [5], see formulas G and H in that text. The inputs to these values are the length of follow-up (A), overall incidence rate of the disease (B), the rates at which the disease is diagnosed in each stage (C), and stage-specific survival rates (D). The calculation is performed with all grades combined, and then separately by grade using the corresponding inputs. This value is used below to convert a percent reduction in late-stage disease (F) to a percent reduction in disease-specific mortality (G, H).
-
(F)Percent reduction in late-stage cases. Hypothetical value of 30% in screening arm, allocated between grades proportional to late-stage case mix (C).
-
(G)= (E) x (F) in total
-
(H)= (E) x (F) for each grade separately and summed across grades
-
(I) and (J)Absolute and relative differences of projection in total compared to projection by grades