Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD000270. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000270.pub2
Methods Allocation: randomised, sealed envelopes, stratified by previous contacts with psychiatric services.
Blindness: double; blinding tested +3 = no blinding, −3 = perfect blinding: mean 1.95. N=87.
Follow up: 3 months.
Analysis: ITT.
Participants Diagnosis: schizophrenia (38), mood disorders (32), neurotic (25), other (5). Personality disordered 50 (ICD-10), 35 (PAS)**.
History: 51% previous psychiatric contact.
N=100*.
Age: median 32.
Sex: 40 M, 60 F.
Setting: inner city.
Interventions 1. Community focused multidisciplinary team, open referral, in-home assessments, collaboration maintained with already involved agencies, clinical decisions by team consensus. N=48
2. Standard hospital treatment : usually outpatient clinic assessments with occasional home visits. N=52
Outcomes Death.
Leaving study early.
Satisfaction with care (Satisfaction with Service Questionnaire, displayed as not very satisfied with care).
Hospital admission.
Duration of hospital care.
Team utilisation (mean visits).
Social functioning/networks (Network Schedule, SFQ).
Police contacts.
Unable to use -
Psychiatric symptoms: BAS, MADRAS (no SD).
Notes *Randomisation at point of referral to psychiatric emergency services (A&E presentations, urgent GP or social work referrals), not currently in contact with psychiatric services
Additional diagnosis of personality disorder made & data presented on this subgroup.
2 ’natural cause’ deaths subtracted from original number randomised.
**Data relating to those with personality disorder presented in separate comparison
Risk of bias
Item Authors’ judgement Description
Allocation concealment? Yes A - Adequate