Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 2.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Apr 13;(4):CD001035. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001035.pub2

Table 6. Outcome data: casual sexual partners.

Study Intervention group 1 Intervention group 2 Intervention group 3 Statistical significance Other
Boyer 2005 post-intervention (mean 14 months from baseline) Cognitive-behavioural intervention Health promotion control N/A Statistical significance Other
Sexual intercourse with a casual partner 285 (21.8%)a 276 (21.1%)a NR
Roye 2007 1: Video + counselling; 2: Counselling only; 3: Video only; 4: Usual care Group differences Other
Number of causal sex partners (3 months follow-up) NR Not explicitly reported but implied that there was no statistically significant difference between groups for this outcome (P > 0. 05)
a

Denominator for both groups is 1,307 (which is less than the 1381 who completed the study). It is not clear what the denominator is for each of the randomised study groups.