Methods | Between November 1992 and October 1993, adult patients undergoing primary elective coronary artery bypass grafting entered the prospective, randomised, controlled study. Method of randomisation was not described. Allocation concealment was by means of sealed envelopes | |
Participants | 120 adult patients undergoing primary elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly allocated to one of two groups:
|
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes | Outcomes reported: amount of blood re-transfused from the cell saver, amount of allogeneic blood transfused, number of patients transfused allogeneic blood, adverse events, sternal infections, myocardial infarction, sepsis, mortality, blood loss | |
Notes | Transfusion threshold: patients were transfused allogeneic blood if the haemoglobin concentration was less than 5.0mmol/L in the intensive care unit and less than 5.5mmol/L during the rest of the hospital stay | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method used to generate allocation sequences was not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Method used to conceal treatment allocation was inadequate. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes |
High risk |