Methods | A prospective, randomised study to assess the impact of cell salvage autotransfusion on the requirements for allogeneic blood in patients undergoing a total knee replacement was conducted. Patients were allocated to groups according to a computer generated randomisation schedule. Method of allocation concealment was not described | |
Participants | 100 consecutive patients undergoing total knee replacement were randomised to one of two groups:
|
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes | Outcomes reported: amount of blood collected by the cell saver, amount of allogeneic blood transfused, number of patients transfused allogeneic blood, adverse events, hospital length of stay | |
Notes | Transfusion threshold: allogeneic blood was given in the post-operative period when the haemoglobin fell below 9.0g/dL. Routine procedure of crossmatching two units of packed cells was performed for all patients in the study | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Method used to generate allocation sequences was adequate. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method used to conceal treatment allocation was unclear. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes |
High risk |