Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14;(4):CD001888. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub4
Methods Prospective, randomised controlled trial of patients undergoing coronary artery surgery to compare inflammatory response, myocardial injury, and post-operative bleeding when cardiotomy suction blood and mediastinal shed blood were either discarded or re-transfused. Method of randomisation and allocation concealment were not described
Participants 35 patients undergoing cardiac surgery were randomly allocated to one of two groups:
  • Group 1 (Autotransfusion group): n=12; M//F=9//3; mean (sd) age = 64 (7.0) years

  • Group 2 (Control group): n=17; M//F=16//1; mean (sd) age = 67 (8.3) years

NB: Six patients were excluded from the final analysis.
Interventions
  • Group 1: Autotransfusion group had their cardiotomy suction blood during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and mediastinal shed blood during the first 12 hours post-operatively re-transfused.

  • Group 2: Control group had their cardiotomy suction blood and mediastinal shed blood discarded.

NB: All patients received intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) 2g before surgery and 2g after skin closure
Outcomes Outcomes reported: number of patients transfused allogeneic blood, volume of shed mediastinal blood, blood loss
Notes Transfusion threshold: transfusion protocol was not reported.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method used to generate allocation sequences was not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method used to conceal treatment allocation was not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes
High risk