Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 7.
Published in final edited form as: Health Technol Assess. 2014 Jul;18(45):1–190. doi: 10.3310/hta18450

Table 11. The effect of vitamin D supplementation in gestation on offspring birth length – Intervention studies.

First Author,
year
Risk of
bias
Setting Randomisation Adjustments/ confounders accounted for Number of weeks gestation when 25(OH)D was measured Mean (SD) or median (IQR) 25(OH)D concentration (nmol/1) Mean (SD) or Mean (SE)* birth length (cm) in un-supplemented group Mean (SD) or Mean (SE)* birth length (cm) in supplemented group Conclusion
Brooke, 1980 4 −2 (high) London, UK, n=126 women(all Asian) Double-blinded Randomised to either placebo (n=67) or 1000 IU/day of vitamin D2 in last trimester (n=59) Nil, but groups of similar age, height, parity, offspring sex, length of gestation 28-32 weeks and at birth At allocation 25(OH)D = 20.1 (1.9) At term, Controls 25(OH)D= 16.2 (2.7) At term, supplemented group 25(OH)D = 168.0 (12.5) 49.5 (0.4)* 49.7 (0.3)* No significant difference in birth length between groups p>0.05
Marya, 1988 6 −2 (high) Rohtak, India Randomised to either no supplement (n=100) or oral 600,000 IU vitamin D3; 2 doses in 7th and 8th months gestation (n=100) Nil, but groups had similar maternal age, maternal height, maternal height, parity, haemoglobin, calcium intake and vitamin D intake Not measured Not measured directly, but mean daily vitamin D intake given as follows Un-supplemented = 35.71 (6.17) IU/day Supplemented group = 35.01 (7.13) IU/day 48.45 (2.04) 50.06 (1.79) Birth length significantly higher in the supplemented group p<0.001