Table 11. The effect of vitamin D supplementation in gestation on offspring birth length – Intervention studies.
| First Author, year |
Risk of bias |
Setting | Randomisation | Adjustments/ confounders accounted for | Number of weeks gestation when 25(OH)D was measured | Mean (SD) or median (IQR) 25(OH)D concentration (nmol/1) | Mean (SD) or Mean (SE)* birth length (cm) in un-supplemented group | Mean (SD) or Mean (SE)* birth length (cm) in supplemented group | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brooke, 1980 4 | −2 (high) | London, UK, n=126 women(all Asian) | Double-blinded Randomised to either placebo (n=67) or 1000 IU/day of vitamin D2 in last trimester (n=59) | Nil, but groups of similar age, height, parity, offspring sex, length of gestation | 28-32 weeks and at birth | At allocation 25(OH)D = 20.1 (1.9) At term, Controls 25(OH)D= 16.2 (2.7) At term, supplemented group 25(OH)D = 168.0 (12.5) | 49.5 (0.4)* | 49.7 (0.3)* | No significant difference in birth length between groups p>0.05 |
| Marya, 1988 6 | −2 (high) | Rohtak, India | Randomised to either no supplement (n=100) or oral 600,000 IU vitamin D3; 2 doses in 7th and 8th months gestation (n=100) | Nil, but groups had similar maternal age, maternal height, maternal height, parity, haemoglobin, calcium intake and vitamin D intake | Not measured | Not measured directly, but mean daily vitamin D intake given as follows Un-supplemented = 35.71 (6.17) IU/day Supplemented group = 35.01 (7.13) IU/day | 48.45 (2.04) | 50.06 (1.79) | Birth length significantly higher in the supplemented group p<0.001 |