Table 1.
Molecule | Human | Canine | Sequence identity (%) | Sequence similarity (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CEAR | HNRPM_HUMAN | XP_005633012.1 | 99.3 | 99.5 |
CEA (CEACAM5) | CEAM5_HUMAN | n.d. [20] | – | – |
TGF-β-RI | TGFR1_HUMAN | F1PS63_CANFA | 91.8 | 92.2 |
TGF-β-RII | TGFR2_HUMAN | F1PNA9_CANFA | 87.4 | 90.3 |
TGF-β-RIII | TGBR3_HUMAN | F1PIG0_CANFA | 88.6 | 93.0 |
TGF-β1 | TGFB1_HUMAN | TGFB1-CANFA | 94.1 | 96.7 |
TGF-β2 | TGFB2_HUMAN | F1PKH0_CANFA | 99.5 | 99.8 |
TGF-β3 | TGFB3_HUMAN | F1PR85_CANFA | 88.4 | 89.5 |
NFκB1 | NFκB1_HUMAN | NFκB1_CANFA | 91.0 | 94.2 |
NFκB2 | NFκB2_HUMAN | E2RLL2_CANFA | 92.3 | 94.9 |
RelA | TF65_HUMAN | F1PCU1_CANFA | 91.2 | 93.5 |
Sequences were from UniProt (http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/) and from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein). Sequences were aligned using a Needleman–Wunsch algorithm (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/psa/) with a BLOSUM 62 matrix; gap penalty and end penalty were defined as 10.0 and 0.5, respectively