Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2015 Apr 2;64(5):531–537. doi: 10.1007/s00262-015-1684-6

Table 1.

Interspecies amino acid sequence comparisons

Molecule Human Canine Sequence identity (%) Sequence similarity (%)
CEAR HNRPM_HUMAN XP_005633012.1 99.3 99.5
CEA (CEACAM5) CEAM5_HUMAN n.d. [20]
TGF-β-RI TGFR1_HUMAN F1PS63_CANFA 91.8 92.2
TGF-β-RII TGFR2_HUMAN F1PNA9_CANFA 87.4 90.3
TGF-β-RIII TGBR3_HUMAN F1PIG0_CANFA 88.6 93.0
TGF-β1 TGFB1_HUMAN TGFB1-CANFA 94.1 96.7
TGF-β2 TGFB2_HUMAN F1PKH0_CANFA 99.5 99.8
TGF-β3 TGFB3_HUMAN F1PR85_CANFA 88.4 89.5
NFκB1 NFκB1_HUMAN NFκB1_CANFA 91.0 94.2
NFκB2 NFκB2_HUMAN E2RLL2_CANFA 92.3 94.9
RelA TF65_HUMAN F1PCU1_CANFA 91.2 93.5

Sequences were from UniProt (http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/) and from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein). Sequences were aligned using a Needleman–Wunsch algorithm (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/psa/) with a BLOSUM 62 matrix; gap penalty and end penalty were defined as 10.0 and 0.5, respectively