Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Trop Med Int Health. 2015 May 13;20(8):1015–1032. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12517

Table 2.

Methodological quality and risk of bias assessment for included studies

Randomised controlled trials
Domains Sequence generation
Blinding of participants and outcome assessors Incomplete outcome data Selective outcome reporting Other sources of potential bias
Signalling questions Was the allocation sequence adequately generated? Was allocation adequately concealed? Was knowledge of the allocated intervention adequately prevented during the study? Were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed? Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting Was the study free of other problems that could put it at a high risk of bias? Overall quality of study
Adolescents’ completion of steps of HIV care pathway
 No studies
Adolescents’ retention on antiretroviral therapy
 No studies
Adolescents’ adherence to antiretroviral therapy
 Berrian [18] Yes No No Yes Unclear No Low
 Bhana [19] Unclear Unclear Unclear No No No Low
 Letourneau [26] No No No No No No Low
Non-randomised studies
Participant selection
Exposure to intervention
Comparability Assessment of outcomes
Other potential sources of bias
Domains Were participants selected to be representative of the target population Were there clear participant selection criteria (for both exposed and control group if relevant), avoiding in appropriate exclusions? Was a comparator/control group assessed? Was the intervention being studied applied consistently to all eligible participants? Were potential confounders identified and appropriately adjusted for? Were procedures for assessment of outcome sufficient to satisfy confirmation of presence of condition of interest? Was follow-up long enough for outcome to occur? Were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed? Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting? Was the study free of other problems that could put it at a high risk of bias? Overall quality of study
Adolescents’ completion of steps of HIV care pathway
 Lamb [25] Yes Yes Yes Unclear Yes Yes Yes Unclear Yes No Good
Adolescents’ retention on antiretroviral therapy
 Davila [20] Unclear Yes Yes No No Unclear Yes No No No Good
 Lamb [25] Yes Yes Yes Unclear Yes Yes Yes Unclear Yes No Good
Adolescents’ adherence to antiretroviral therapy
 Foster [21] Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Good
 Funck-Brentano [22] No No Yes Yes No No Yes Unclear No No Low
 Glikman [23] No Yes No Unclear No Yes Yes Yes No No Moderate
 Kaihin [24] Unclear No Yes Unclear No No Yes Yes Yes No Moderate
 Lyon [27] No No No Unclear No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Moderate
 Parsons [28] Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Moderate