Table 2.
Randomised controlled trials | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Domains | Sequence generation |
Blinding of participants and outcome assessors | Incomplete outcome data | Selective outcome reporting | Other sources of potential bias | ||
Signalling questions | Was the allocation sequence adequately generated? | Was allocation adequately concealed? | Was knowledge of the allocated intervention adequately prevented during the study? | Were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed? | Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting | Was the study free of other problems that could put it at a high risk of bias? | Overall quality of study |
Adolescents’ completion of steps of HIV care pathway | |||||||
No studies | |||||||
Adolescents’ retention on antiretroviral therapy | |||||||
No studies | |||||||
Adolescents’ adherence to antiretroviral therapy | |||||||
Berrian [18] | Yes | No | No | Yes | Unclear | No | Low |
Bhana [19] | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | No | No | No | Low |
Letourneau [26] | No | No | No | No | No | No | Low |
Non-randomised studies | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participant selection |
Exposure to intervention |
Comparability | Assessment of outcomes |
Other potential sources of bias | |||||||
Domains | Were participants selected to be representative of the target population | Were there clear participant selection criteria (for both exposed and control group if relevant), avoiding in appropriate exclusions? | Was a comparator/control group assessed? | Was the intervention being studied applied consistently to all eligible participants? | Were potential confounders identified and appropriately adjusted for? | Were procedures for assessment of outcome sufficient to satisfy confirmation of presence of condition of interest? | Was follow-up long enough for outcome to occur? | Were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed? | Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting? | Was the study free of other problems that could put it at a high risk of bias? | Overall quality of study |
Adolescents’ completion of steps of HIV care pathway | |||||||||||
Lamb [25] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | No | Good |
Adolescents’ retention on antiretroviral therapy | |||||||||||
Davila [20] | Unclear | Yes | Yes | No | No | Unclear | Yes | No | No | No | Good |
Lamb [25] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | No | Good |
Adolescents’ adherence to antiretroviral therapy | |||||||||||
Foster [21] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Good |
Funck-Brentano [22] | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Unclear | No | No | Low |
Glikman [23] | No | Yes | No | Unclear | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Moderate |
Kaihin [24] | Unclear | No | Yes | Unclear | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Moderate |
Lyon [27] | No | No | No | Unclear | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Moderate |
Parsons [28] | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Moderate |