Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Public Health Nutr. 2015 Feb 20;18(16):3031–3041. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000312

Table 3:

Odds Ratios (95% Confidence Interval)a of anthropometric indicators according to quintiles of the three dietary patterns for 3823 men, Indian Migration Study, 2006

Outcome
variables
Model Q1b Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 P for
trend
Cereals-savoury foods dietary pattern
Obesity Age-adjusted 1.0 0.62
(0.47, 0.83)
0.51
(0.38, 0.69)
0.92
(0.71, 1.21)
1.47
(1.13, 1.90)
0.001
Fully adjustedc 1.0 0.63
(0.45, 0.88)
0.55
(0.36, 0.85)
0.84
(0.53, 1.34)
1.14
(0.67, 1.94)
0.330
Central obesity Age-adjusted 1.0 0.34
(0.24, 0.48)
0.26
(0.18, 0.37)
0.43
(0.31, 0.59)
0.73
(0.55, 0.98)
0.041
Fully adjustedc 1.0 0.36
(0.24, 0.54)
0.38
(0.22, 0.65)
0.56
(0.32, 0.99)
0.97
(0.51, 1.84)
0.796
Fruit-veg-sweets-snacks dietary pattern
Obesity Age-adjusted 1.0 1.38
(1.03, 1.85)
1.53
(1.15, 2.05)
1.65
(1.24, 2.21)
1.68
(1.26, 2.24)
<0.001
Fully adjustedc 1.0 0.93
(0.65, 1.33)
0.95
(0.66, 1.37)
0.92
(0.63, 1.34)
0.79
(0.51, 1.22)
0.349
Central obesity Age-adjusted 1.0 1.86
(1.29, 2.67)
2.17
(1.51, 3.12)
2.15
(1.50, 3.08)
2.39
(1.67, 3.42)
<0.001
Fully adjustedc 1.0 1.13
(0.74, 1.72)
1.15
(0.75, 1.78)
1.07
(0.69, 1.68)
0.98
(0.58, 1.63)
0.780
Animal-food dietary pattern
Obesity Age-adjusted 1.0 0.84
(0.63, 1.13)
1.00
(0.75, 1.33)
1.21
(0.91, 1.62)
1.57
(1.19, 2.07)
<0.001
Fully adjustedc 1.0 0.97
(0.70, 1.35)
1.31
(0.94, 1.83)
1.36
(0.97, 1.90)
1.68
(1.20, 2.36)
0.001
Central obesity Age-adjusted 1.0 0.93
(0.65, 1.32)
0.95
(0.67, 1.34)
1.26
(0.89, 1.78)
1.46
(1.05, 2.05)
0.004
Fully adjustedc 1.0 1.10
(0.75, 1.62)
1.27
(0.85, 1.89)
1.75
(1.17, 2.63)
1.80
(1.20, 2.70)
0.001
a

Using mixed effects logistic regression analysis

b

Q1 is the lowest quintile and Q5 is the highest quintile

c

Adjusted for age, education, standard of living, factory location, migration status, tobacco consumption, alcohol consumption, total energy intake and physical activity