Table 3:
Outcome variables |
Model | Q1b | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 |
P for trend |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cereals-savoury foods dietary pattern | |||||||
Obesity | Age-adjusted | 1.0 | 0.62 (0.47, 0.83) |
0.51 (0.38, 0.69) |
0.92 (0.71, 1.21) |
1.47 (1.13, 1.90) |
0.001 |
Fully adjustedc | 1.0 | 0.63 (0.45, 0.88) |
0.55 (0.36, 0.85) |
0.84 (0.53, 1.34) |
1.14 (0.67, 1.94) |
0.330 | |
Central obesity | Age-adjusted | 1.0 | 0.34 (0.24, 0.48) |
0.26 (0.18, 0.37) |
0.43 (0.31, 0.59) |
0.73 (0.55, 0.98) |
0.041 |
Fully adjustedc | 1.0 | 0.36 (0.24, 0.54) |
0.38 (0.22, 0.65) |
0.56 (0.32, 0.99) |
0.97 (0.51, 1.84) |
0.796 | |
Fruit-veg-sweets-snacks dietary pattern | |||||||
Obesity | Age-adjusted | 1.0 | 1.38 (1.03, 1.85) |
1.53 (1.15, 2.05) |
1.65 (1.24, 2.21) |
1.68 (1.26, 2.24) |
<0.001 |
Fully adjustedc | 1.0 | 0.93 (0.65, 1.33) |
0.95 (0.66, 1.37) |
0.92 (0.63, 1.34) |
0.79 (0.51, 1.22) |
0.349 | |
Central obesity | Age-adjusted | 1.0 | 1.86 (1.29, 2.67) |
2.17 (1.51, 3.12) |
2.15 (1.50, 3.08) |
2.39 (1.67, 3.42) |
<0.001 |
Fully adjustedc | 1.0 | 1.13 (0.74, 1.72) |
1.15 (0.75, 1.78) |
1.07 (0.69, 1.68) |
0.98 (0.58, 1.63) |
0.780 | |
Animal-food dietary pattern | |||||||
Obesity | Age-adjusted | 1.0 | 0.84 (0.63, 1.13) |
1.00 (0.75, 1.33) |
1.21 (0.91, 1.62) |
1.57 (1.19, 2.07) |
<0.001 |
Fully adjustedc | 1.0 | 0.97 (0.70, 1.35) |
1.31 (0.94, 1.83) |
1.36 (0.97, 1.90) |
1.68 (1.20, 2.36) |
0.001 | |
Central obesity | Age-adjusted | 1.0 | 0.93 (0.65, 1.32) |
0.95 (0.67, 1.34) |
1.26 (0.89, 1.78) |
1.46 (1.05, 2.05) |
0.004 |
Fully adjustedc | 1.0 | 1.10 (0.75, 1.62) |
1.27 (0.85, 1.89) |
1.75 (1.17, 2.63) |
1.80 (1.20, 2.70) |
0.001 |
Using mixed effects logistic regression analysis
Q1 is the lowest quintile and Q5 is the highest quintile
Adjusted for age, education, standard of living, factory location, migration status, tobacco consumption, alcohol consumption, total energy intake and physical activity