Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 20;9:CD011756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011756.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Alport 2012 Comparison of different peripherally-inserted central venous catheters in non-coagulopathic patients
Amarapurkar 2014 Non-randomised observational study
Bartelmaos 2013 Comparison of quarantine, methylene blue and solvent/detergent plasmas in liver transplant recipients
Carino 2009 Non-randomised observational study
Corash 2006 Comparison of standard FFP and photochemically-treated FFP in coagulopathic patients prior to invasive procedures
De Pietri 2016 Comparison of FFP transfusion guided by thromboelastography versus standard coagulation tests prior to invasive procedures. Fewer than 10% of included participants received central venous catheterisation
Etemadrezaie 2007 Comparison of FFP and saline in severe traumatic brain injury
Freeman 1998 Comparison of solvent/detergent FFP and standard FFP in orthotopic liver transplantation
Friedman 1989 Non-randomised, observational study
Gallieni 1995 Case-series
Harter 2004 Commentary
Holcomb 2015 Comparison of plasma:platelet: red blood cell ratios in severe trauma with massive haemorrhage
Mintz 2006 Comparison of photochemically-treated and standard FFP in patients with coagulopathy of liver disease
Napolitano 2012 Non-randomised, observational study
NCT00233246 Study withdrawn prior to enrolment
NCT00953901 Study withdrawn prior to enrolment
NCT01754545 Study withdrawn prior to enrolment; wrong subject group
Tinmouth 2008 Comparison of high and standard dose FFP in coagulopathic patients undergoing invasive procedures
Weigand 2009 Non-randomised, observational study
Williamson 1999 Comparison of solvent/detergent and standard FFP

FFP: fresh frozen plasma