Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 5.
Published in final edited form as: Depress Anxiety. 2017 Jan 30;34(4):348–355. doi: 10.1002/da.22602

Table 2. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and regression statistics of week two diagnoses to predict week nine traumatic stress diagnoses.

Week two predictor Week nine outcome
Regression statistics
Positive predictive value Negative predictive value Sensitivity Specificity % correctly identified
χ2 p Odds ratio
DSM-5
ASD PTSD 28.95 <.0001 26.91 0.48 0.97 0.70 0.92 89.9
            - 4+ symptoms PTSD 28.95 <.0001 15.79 0.30 0.97 0.80 0.80 79.8
‘Two-week PTSD’a PTSD 36.55 <.0001 22.64 0.41 0.97 0.75 0.88 87.0
Preschool PTSD Preschool PTSD 39.08 <.0001 26.08 0.39 0.98 0.80 0.87 86.1
DSM-IV
ASD (DSM-IV) PTSD (DSM-IV) 34.58 <.0001 24.21 0.37 0.98 0.78 0.87 86.5
Either algorithm
ASD PTSD 35.59 <.0001 21.52 0.39 0.97 0.75 0.88 86.5

Note. Sensitivity = likelihood that someone with a given diagnosis at week nine would have met criteria for the relevant diagnosis at week two. Specificity = likelihood that someone without a given diagnosis at week nine would also not have met criteria for the relevant diagnosis at week two. Positive predictive value = likelihood that someone with a given diagnosis at week two would have the relevant diagnosis at week nine. Negative predictive value = likelihood that someone without a given diagnosis at week two would not have the relevant diagnosis at week nine.

a

‘Two-week PTSD’ this refers to an ‘early PTSD’ algorithm, i.e. ignores the requirement that symptoms be present for at least four weeks.