Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 30.
Published in final edited form as: Pharm Stat. 2017 Dec 19;17(2):182–197. doi: 10.1002/pst.1845

Table 5.

GLM estimated through MLE with Firth correction for T = 200, J = 10, b = 20, K = 3 in a case of scenario (ii) in which qj = [0.5 : 0.05 : 0.95]. Results for 5000 trials. True values were assumed to be β0 ≈ −0.8473, βz ≈ 1.2528 and βt = β1 = β2 = 0

(II) GLM fitting with correction for CR

E (β̂i) E (MSE) E (pvalue < 0.05)

β̂0 -0.8527 0.1307 0.6778
β̂z 1.2597 0.1142 0.9758
β̂1 -0.0084 0.1305 0.0458
β̂2 -0.0029 0.1304 0.0486

(IV) GLM fitting with correction for FLGI

β̂0 -0.8771 0.1724 0.6740
β̂z 1.2471 0.1169 0.9702
β̂1 0.0114 0.2228 0.0598
β̂2 -0.0097 0.2246 0.0620

(VI) GLM fitting with correction for CFLGI

β̂0 -0.8455 0.1338 0.6632
β̂z 1.2505 0.1200 0.9686
β̂1 -0.0226 0.1471 0.0558
β̂2 -0.0196 0.1477 0.0492