Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 21.
Published in final edited form as: ISME J. 2018 Aug 10;12(12):3014–3024. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0224-8

Figure 4. Plasmids do not mediate activation of SOS response.

Figure 4

Not all plasmids induce the SOS response in PAO1. The figure represents the area under the curve of luminescence production over OD600 [AUC (lux/OD600)] during the exponential phase of the growth curves of PAO1 WTplex:lux reporter strain, which encodes the luciferase operon under the control of an SOS inducible promoter (PAO1 in the figure). We also present the AUC (lux/OD600) of the different plasmid-carrying WTplex:lux, and a control with the plasmid-free WTplex:lux growing in the presence of a sub-inhibitory concentration of the SOS-inducing antibiotic ciprofloxacin (45 μg/L). The bars indicate the average of 8 biological replicates and the error bars indicate the standard error. Asterisks indicate significant differences in SOS activation (Tukey’s post-hoc test, P< 0.05). As expected, plasmid pNUK73 and the presence of ciprofloxacin induced the SOS response. However, none of the remaining plasmids produced the activation of the stress response.