. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 16.

Published before final editing as: Public Health Nutr. 2018 Dec 3:1–9. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003282

Table 4.

Association between CANTAB cognitive testing outcomes and height-for-age z-score (HAZ) for whole sample

CANTAB outcomes	Unadjusted regression of CANTAB outcomes on HAZ		Adjusted (age, sex, HIV, SES) regression of CANTAB outcomes on HAZ
CANTAB outcomes	Unit Difference (CI)	P value	Unit Difference (CI)	P value
BLC % correct	0·80 (-0·18, 1·79)	0·11	0·94 (-0·10, 1·97)	0·08
IED total errors	-0·61 (-10·0, 8·80)	0·90	2·05 (-7·25, 11·35)	0·66
MOT mean error	-0·24 (-0·52, 0·05)	0·11	-0·24 (-0·5, 0·07)	0·13
MOT mean latency (millisecs)	-60·5 (-107, -13·2)	0·01^*	-66·0 (-115, -16·7)	0·009^*
PAL total errors	-0·27 (-7·5, 6·9)	0·94	0·53 (-6·9, 8·0)	0·88
PAL total errors (6 shapes)	-0·21 (-2·3, 1·8)	0·84	0·06 (-2·1, 2·2)	0·95
PRM % correct	0·65 (-1·15, 2·45)	0·48	0·48 (-1·25, 2·22)	0·58

Linear regression of CANTAB outcomes against height-for-age z-score (HAZ) for whole sample (n=326).

indicated significant difference (p<0·05)