Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 17.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2018 Jul 11;63(14):145007. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aacb65

Table 3.

Geometric evaluation for all VOIs and auto-segmentation approaches: mean values for DSC, HD, mean HD and HD95. All mean values have been calculated by averaging over all 12 patients. For a reference, we also include the inter-expert variability (IEV), derived from the manual contours of three different experts.

VOI method DSC¯ HD¯ [mm] HD95¯ [mm] MSD¯ [mm]
right A 0.74±0.04 15.07±5.03 6.84±1.95 2.24±0.75
parotid B 0.80±0.03 16.51±6.96 5.65±1.41 1.61±0.43
C 0.81±0.02 13.33±5.20 5.20±0.97 1.56±0.38
IEV 0.84±0.04 10.76±4.35 4.97±1.66 1.40±0.45

left A 0.77±0.04 13.89±5.36 5.84±1.64 1.84±0.54
parotid B 0.82±0.03 15.00±4.62 5.17±1.62 1.47±0.41
C 0.83±0.03 12.13±3.91 4.63±1.21 1.35±0.40
IEV 0.83±0.04 10.94±3.75 5.27±1.76 1.59±0.63

spinal A 0.71±0.08 12.72±3.91 7.68±3.56 2.26±1.10
cord B 0.80±0.05 10.12±4.83 4.26±1.36 1.24±0.45
C 0.80±0.05 10.35±3.75 4.39±1.33 1.21±0.44
IEV 0.79±0.07 7.12±5.15 4.64±3.06 1.55±0.81

mandible A 0.64±0.09 16.65±3.60 6.96±1.84 2.14±0.60
B 0.80±0.04 13.33±4.06 4.31±1.05 1.10±0.28
C 0.80±0.04 10.88±2.07 4.44±1.09 1.35±0.30
IEV 0.85±0.04 8.94±3.16 3.85±1.56 0.92±0.45