Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 16.
Published in final edited form as: BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 29;9(7):e026998. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026998

Table 5.

Risk of being born small for gestational age (birth weight <10th percentile for gestational age) by partner’s employment and stratified by parity in the University Hospital Southampton maternity population-based cohort (singleton live births 2004–2016)

Sample Model Unemployed partner at first antenatal appointment
OR 99% CI P value
Whole sample, n mothers=41 841 Unadjusted risk 1.60 1.42 to 1.81 <0.001
Adjusted risk—model 1 1.61 1.41 to 1.82 <0.001
Adjusted risk—model 2 1.43 1.26 to 1.63 <0.001
Adjusted risk—model 3 1.44 1.26 to 1.64 <0.001
Adjusted risk—model 4 1.26 1.11 to 1.44 <0.001

Primiparous women only, n births=26 498 Unadjusted risk 1.76 1.50 to 2.06 <0.001
Adjusted risk—model 1 1.60 1.36 to 1.88 <0.001
Adjusted risk—model 2 1.44 1.21 to 1.70 <0.001
Adjusted risk—model 3 1.45 1.22 to 1.71 <0.001
Adjusted risk—model 4 1.33 1.12 to 1.58 <0.001

Multiparous women only, n births=15 343 Unadjusted risk 1.65 1.36 to 2.01 <0.001
Adjusted risk—model 1 1.62 1.32 to 1.98 <0.001
Adjusted risk—model 2 1.42 1.15 to 1.74 <0.001
Adjusted risk—model 3 1.43 1.16 to 1.76 <0.001
Adjusted risk—model 4 1.15 0.93 to 1.43   0.088

Model 1 adjusts for maternal age, ethnicity, gestational diabetes and systolic blood pressure.

Model 2 is model 1 plus maternal education and employment.

Model 3 is model 2 plus maternal body mass index as a potential mediator.

Model 4 is model 3 plus maternal smoking history as an additional mediator.

All models for the whole sample are adjusted for parity.