Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2019 Jul 1;82(5):1905–1919. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27852

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Self-consistency evaluation given by projected NCC-similarities for all slices of obtained abdominal SRRs for an increasing number of input stacks for different motion correction strategies summarized for all eight subjects. All self-consistency outcomes between SRR approaches, except for RG-HT2W vs Static SRR for “a+c+s,” are significantly different within each source data configuration based on Kruskal-Wallis with post hoc Dunn tests (p < 0.05)