Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2019 Jul 1;82(5):1905–1919. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27852

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Qualitative comparison between the SRR approaches using either two or six input stacks. Both motion correction frameworks, i.e. the HT2W-guided one and NiftyMIC, achieve SRRs with visually improved anatomical plausibility. However, in areas where MRCP lacks contrast, NiftyMIC tends to produce superior results. Moreover, using six input stacks can lead to better SRR outcomes in case of adequate motion correction which is especially visible in the sagittal view. Examples for such visual improvements are indicated by arrows