Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci. 2019 Aug 14;39(40):7934–7946. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0006-19.2019

Figure 2. CRH-1c and e are required for associative learning in C. elegans.

Figure 2

A, Schematic showing C. elegans CRH-1 and the deletion in the mutant. Two major functional domains KID and bZIP (DNA-binding domain) domains are depicted. The red bar shows the deletion found in the crh-1-null mutant tz2. This deletion affects all CRH-1 isoforms. B, Scatter plot showing chemotaxis indices of WTand crh-1-null mutants. C, Graph showing quantitative PCR results comparing mRNA expression levels of different CRH-1 isoforms to the CRH-1eisoform in young adult WT C. elegans. D, Scatter plot showing chemotaxis indices of WT, crh-1-null mutants, and pan-neuronal CRH-1 rescue lines using different crh-1 isoforms. E, Scatter plot showing chemotaxis indices of WT, crh-1-null mutants and crh-1 isoform deletion lines. Error bars are SD. Multiple comparisons were done using one-way ANOVA and p values were adjusted using Bonferroni (B, D, E) and Dunnett’s (C) methods. Data points represented with dark blue dots in the scatter plots represents outliers identified using Grubb’s method (α. = 0.05). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ns, p > 0.05.