Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 1;20(2):e27–e37. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30629-2

Figure 3. Barchart showing the number of articles that looked for, reported diagnosis of and contributed data for each of 40, 31 and 30 zoonoses respectively.

Figure 3

These data were tabulated for all zoonoses (n=40) and articles included in the review (n=244). Bar colour indicates pathogen type and shading differentiates studies that i) contribute data meeting study diagnostic criteria (left hand bar sections with darkest shading, n=30 pathogens indicated by *), ii) report diagnosis with approaches that do not meet study diagnostic criteria (central bar sections with lighter shading, n=31 pathogens that comprised the 30 with extracted data and Escherichia coli), iii) report looking for but not diagnosing a zoonosis (right hand bar section with lightest shading, n=40 pathogens, also including Burkholderia spp. Tick borne encephalitis virus, Marburg virus, Rabies virus, Newcastle Disease virus, Mycobacterium bovis, Francisella tularensis, Ebola virus and Cryptosporidium parvum).