Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Jan 22;40(7):2153–2173. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24514

TABLE 5.

Pearson’s multiple correlations table between NAVS measures, aphasia severity, and lesion size

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 ASPT-A
2 ASPT-G 0.810**
3 ASPT-W 0.781** 0.707**
4 SPPT total 0.750** 0.882** 0.734**
5 SCT total 0.579** 0.627** 0.458** 0.760**
6 ASPT-2–1 0.142 0.217 0.152 0.101 −0.096
7 ASPT-3–1 0.147 0.385* 0.101 0.461** 0.197 0.508**
8 SPPT-NC-C −0.090 −0.097 −0.224 0.033 0.076 −0.208 −0.056
9 SCT-NC-C 0.060 0.154 0.253* 0.187 0.113 0.037 0.095 0.273*
10 WAB-R AQ 0.826** 0.856** 0.804** 0.889** 0.706** 0.023 0.217 −0.015 0.116
11 Lesion size −0.550** −0.716** −0.579** −0.696** −0.542** −0.026 −0.237 −0.046 −0.135 −0.742**

ASPT-A = Argument Structure Production Test, Code A; ASPT-G = Argument Structure Production Test; Code G; ASPT-W = Argument Structure Production Test, Code W; ASPT-2–1 = Argument Structure Production Test, 2–1; ASPT-3–1 = Argument Structure Production Test, 3–1; NAVS = Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences; NC-C = Noncanonical minus canonical; SCT = Sentence Comprehension Test; SPPT = Sentence Production Priming Test; WAB-R = Western Aphasia Battery-Revised, aphasia quotient.

*

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (uncorrected; two-tailed); n range = 64–71 (not all participants were able to complete all NAVS tasks).

**

Correlation is significant at the 0.0009 level (p < 0.05 with Bonferroni correction; two-tailed).