Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: Stud Fam Plann. 2018 Nov 20;49(4):295–317. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12073

TABLE 1.

 Main features of cash transfer programs and evaluations

Malawi Zambia

Program Social Cash Transfer Program (SCTP) Multiple Categorical Targeted Grant (MCTG)
Implementer Ministry of Gender, Children, Disability and Social Welfare Ministry of Community Development and Social Services
Targeting Ultra-poor and labor-constrained householdsa Female- or elderly-headed households keeping orphans; households with a disabled member; or special cases (critically vulnerable)
Transfer size Variable by household size and number of children enrolled in school, bimonthly (~18% of pre-program consumption)b Flat transfer of 120 kwacha [ZMW] (US$24), bimonthly (~21% of pre-program consumption)
Evaluation timeline 2013–2015 (30 months) 2011–2013 (36 months)
Location (stratification) Two rural districts: Salima and Mangochi (two traditional authorities in each district) Two rural districts: Luwingu and Serenje
Evaluation design Cluster randomized-controlled trial (cRCT); 29 villages (14 assigned to the treatment arm through public lottery) Cluster randomized-controlled trial (cRCT); 92 communities (46 assigned to the treatment arm through public lottery)
Household sample size 3,531 3,078
a

Proxy means test (PMT) was used to target the ultra-poor. A household is defined as labor constrained if it has a dependency ratio (ratio of “not fit for productive work” to “fit for productive work”) higher than three. “Unfit” household members are those below 19 years of age or above 64 years of age, or those between 19 and 64 years of age who have a chronic illness or disability, or are otherwise unable to work.

b

After May 2015, the transfer size was adjusted up to 23% of average pre-program consumption.