. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2019 Apr 8;46(5):2497–2511. doi: 10.1002/mp.13497

TABLE III.

Summary of RP2 prediction results from all the 4 strategies

Methods	Num of features	AUC	Delong test
Case B (VAE+MLP)	7 (latent_Z)	0.624 (95%CI: 0.577–0.658)	p-value: 1.33 × 10−7
Case C (VAE-MLP)	2 (latent_Z)	0.781 (95%CI: 0.737–0.808)	p-value: 1.33 × 10−7
Case A (WP+MLP)	29	0.804 (95% CI: 0.761–0.823)	p-value: 6.42 × 10−4
Case D ([latent Z + WP]+MLP)	22+2 (latent_Z)	0.831 (95% CI: 0.805–0.863)	p-value: 6.42 × 10−4