Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2019 May 23;125(18):3225–3233. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32200

Table 2.

Adjusted hazard ratios of subsequent invasive breast cancer classified by laterality and hormone receptor status according to race and ethnicity in women with DCIS in the SEER, 1990 to 2015

Person-years All second invasive events ER+ or PR+ ER- and PR-
Cases HR†† (95% CI) Cases HR†† (95% CI) Cases HR†† (95% CI)
Subsequent invasive breast cancer
White 1018475 5884 1.00 4653 1.00 821 1.00
Black 129931 1002 1.42 (1.32, 1.52) 720 1.31 (1.21, 1.43) 190 1.86 (1.57, 2.20)
Asian 128657 807 1.08 (0.99, 1.17) 620 1.01 (0.92, 1.11) 135 1.40 (1.14, 1.71)
Hispanic 102614 640 1.09 (1.00, 1.18) 505 1.09 (0.99, 1.20) 102 1.24 (1.00, 1.54)
Pheterogeneity=0.0004
Ipsilateral invasive breast cancer§
White 709275 2438 1.00 1846 1.00 393 1.00
Black 89081 478 1.65 (1.49, 1.83) 341 1.58 (1.40, 1.78) 86 1.83 (1.43, 2.35)
Asian 86294 378 1.23 (1.09, 1.38) 286 1.19 (1.03, 1.36) 61 1.34 (0.99, 1.81)
Hispanic 72785 309 1.19 (1.05, 1.35) 235 1.20 (1.04, 1.38) 59 1.40 (1.05, 1.87)
Pheterogeneity=0.57
Contralateral invasive breast cancer
White 971003 3134 1.00 2556 1.00 363 1.00
Black 126291 446 1.18 (1.07, 1.31) 322 1.07 (0.95, 1.20) 92 1.97 (1.55, 2.52)
Asian 125104 396 0.97 (0.86, 1.10) 306 0.89 (0.78, 1.02) 68 1.61 (1.20, 2.16)
Hispanic 98900 292 0.98 (0.87, 1.11) 234 0.97 (0.84, 1.11) 38 1.13 (0.80, 1.60)
Pheterogeneity<.0001

Abbreviations: ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

Second invasive breast cancer included those positive for ER or PR (ER+ or PR+), those negative for both ER and PR (ER-PR-), and those with no information on ER and PR.

Subsequent invasive breast cancer included ipsilateral invasive breast cancer, contralateral invasive breast cancer, and subsequent metastatic breast cancer.

§

The analysis included the patients who had been treated with breast-conserving surgery or no surgical treatment for their primary DCIS.

Patients who had received bilateral mastectomy for their primary DCIS were excluded.

††

Relative risks were adjusted for age (20–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, or ≥70 years) and year of the primary DCIS diagnosis (1990–1999, 2000–2009, or 2010–2015), registry, treatment for primary DCIS (no surgical treatment, breast-conserving surgery alone, breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy, mastectomy, or unknown), histopathological features of primary DCIS including tumor size (<2 cm, 2–5 cm, ≥5 cm or unknown), grade (well differentiated, moderately differentiated, poorly differentiated, or unknown), histology (comedo, papillary, cribriform, solid, or NOS), and hormone receptor expression (positive, negative, or unknown).