Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019 Jul 20;27(9):1390–1403. doi: 10.1002/oby.22540

Table 1:

Summary of findings table

Intervention
Outcome
Age group
Number of studies, study design Reason for downgraded quality Effect estimate and direction of effects GRADE
Food labeling
Energy consumed none NA NA NA
Energy expended none NA NA NA
Fiscal measures
Energy consumed 1 RCT Consistency could not be assessed
Study limitation
No statistically significant difference (SMD 0.10; CI −0.24, 0.44) Very low
Energy expended none NA NA NA
Physical environment and transportation
Energy consumed 1 CT
1 Cohort study
Inconsistent ES could not be calculated for the CT (but favored the intervention group); the control group had lower intake in the cohort study (SMD 0.41; CI 0.14, 0.69; 1 Cohort study) Very low
Energy expended none NA NA NA
Supply of food and lifestyle commodities
Energy consumed 3 RCTs
1 CT
Inconsistent
Study limitations
RCTs report positive but not statistically significant differences (SMD −0.23; CI −0.45, −0.00; 3 RCTs); the CT reported insufficient data Low
Energy expended none NA NA NA
Worksite interventions
Energy consumed 2 RCTs
1 CT
1 pre-post study
Inconsistency
Study limitation
2 studies reported positive results but ES could not be computed, 2 studies reported conflicting results and were based on diverse study designs (SMD −0.20; CI −0.53, 0.13; 1 RCT; SMD −0.98; CI −1.32, −0.65; 1 pre-post study) Very low
Energy expended 6 RCTs
1 CT
2 pre-post studies
Inconsistency
Imprecision
4 RCTs found no statistically significant difference (SMD 0.22; CI −0.17, 0.61; 4 RCTs); 2 pre-post studies reported improvements but could not be combined in a summary estimate Low
Population-based healthcare initiatives
Energy consumed 15 RCTs Inconsistency (sensitivity analysis) Reduced consumption (SMD −0.13; CI −0.18, −0.08; 9 RCTs) Moderate
Energy consumed children only 2 RCTs Imprecision No statistically significant difference (SMD −0.19; CI −0.61, 0.24; 2 RCTs) Low
Energy expended 5 RCTs Study limitations
Inconsistency
Studies could not be combined, effect varied Very low
School-based interventions
Energy consumed
Children
10
6 RCTs
3 CTs
1 cohort study
Inconsistency Significant reduction (SMD −0.11; CI −0.19, −0.04; 6 studies) Moderate
Energy expended
Children
5 RCTs
1 CT
2 pre-post studies
Inconsistency No systematic effect (SMD −0.08; CI −0.65, 0.49; 6 trials) Low
Health education campaigns
Energy consumed 17 RCTs
3 pre-post studies
Inconsistency RCTs showed a statistically significant effect (SMS −0.17; CI −0.26, −0.08; 10 RCTs), pre-post studies both positive but could not be combined Moderate
Energy consumed
Children only
3 RCTs Inconsistency
Imprecision
SMD −0.20; CI −0.41, 0.01; 3 RCTs) Very low
Energy expended 13 RCTs
2 pre-post studies
Inconsistency Positive pooled effects but individual results varied (SMD 0.37; 0.07, 0.67; 10 RCTs; SMD 0.48; CI 0.16, 0.79; 2 pre-post studies) Low
Energy expended
Children only
2 RCTs Inconsistency
Imprecision
Difference not statistically significant (SMD 0.06; CI −0.41, 0.52; 2 RCTs) Very low
Social group approaches
Energy consumed 2 RCTs
1 CT
Inconsistency
Imprecision
Studies could not be combined, conflicting results Very low
Energy expended 7 RCTs
1 CT
1 pre-post study
Inconsistency Statistically significant increase (SMD 0.26; CI −0.07, 0.44; 8 trials) Moderate
Energy expended
Children only
3 RCTs Imprecision Not statistically significant (SMD 0.17; CI −0.17, 0.51; 3 RCTs) Low

Note: CI confidence interval, CT controlled trial, ES effect size, RCT randomized controlled trial, SMD standardized mean difference