Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 13.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2018 Feb 19;45(3):1178–1190. doi: 10.1002/mp.12763

Table 4.

Comparison of correlation values of the proposed algorithm and LIBRA. The correlation is between the PD estimates and radiologists’ BI-RADS assessments

N = 91 exams (182 mammograms) Proposed LIBRA Difference p-value
CC 0.81 [0.74, 0.85] 0.58 [0.43, 0.68] 0.24 [0.12, 0.41] <0.0001*
MLO 0.79 [0.7, 0.85] 0.71 [0.57, 0.79] 0.08 [−0.02, 0.24] 0.18
CC-MLO averaged 0.85 [0.8, 0.89] 0.69 [0.55, 0.77] 0.17 [0.08, 0.3] 0.006*
*

Statistically significant with significance level was 0.0167 after Bonferroni correction.