Table 3.

Logistic regression analysis of the association of race/ethnicity with food insecurity and intimate partner violence (IPV) among respondents in the California Women’s Health Survey (1999–2001, 2003–2005)

	Food insecurity						IPV
	Unadjusted			Adjusted†			Unadjusted			Adjusted†
	OR	95 % CI		OR	95 % CI		OR	95 % CI		OR	95 % CI
Race/ethnicity
Non-Hispanic White	1·00	–		1·00	–		1·00	–		1·00	–
African-American	2·30*	1·78, 2·97		1·60*	1·20, 2·14		2·04*	1·33, 3·14		1·56	1·01, 2·41
Hispanic	8·80*	7·94, 9·75		2·78*	2·45, 3·16		1·89*	1·54, 2·32		0·92	0·70, 1·21
Other	1·68*	1·37, 2·07		1·40*	1·17, 1·75		1·25	0·88, 1·76		1·06	0·75, 1·51
Age (years)	–	–		0·98*	0·97, 0·98		–	–		0·94*	0·93, 0·95
Educational attainment
High school or less	–	–		1·00	–		–	–		1·00	–
More than high school	–	–		0·50*	0·68, 0·57		–	–		0·88	0·68, 1·14
Income as indexed by the FPL
Above 200 %	–	–		1·00	–		–	–		1·00	–
Below 200 %	–	–		5·43*	4·76, 6·20		–	–		1·60*	1·23, 2·08
Employment
Out of workforce	–	–		1·00	–		–	–		1·00	–
In workforce	–	–		0·83*	0·74, 0·93		–	–		1·22	1·00, 1·49

FPL, federal poverty level.

^*P < 0·01.

^†Adjusted models include age, race, education, poverty, employment and survey year.