Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Apr;31(4):499–514. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20882

TABLE III.

Sample size estimates (with 80% power) for TBM-derived measures versus SIENA-derived measures

TBM SIENA
1.5 T MRI AD MCI 1.5 T MRI AD MCI
n80 37 107 n80 116 207
3 T MRI AD MCI 3 T MRI AD MCI
n80 48 159 n80 92 265

Power was excellent at both field strengths and somewhat higher for AD than for MCI, as expected.