Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Apr;31(4):499–514. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20882

TABLE IV.

Comparison of sample size estimates (with 80% power) between TBM-derived measures and clinical measures

AD MCI
Loss rate %/year (1.5 T) 37 108
Loss rate %/year (3 T) 49 166
Change in CDR-SB 327 549
Change in ADAS-Cog 583 1183
Change in MMSE 3962 1531

These numbers are calculated based on the same sample of subjects. Both 1.5 and 3 T scans (using a TBM-derived loss rate in %/year) have a much lower n80 compared to the cognitive measures. These estimates may differ slightly from those in prior reports, as they depend to some degree on the specific cohort studied. Also, perhaps paradoxically, the change in MMSE has greater effect size in MCI than AD, so for that score, the sample size estimates are smaller for MCI than for AD.