Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Serv Res. 2009 Sep 23;44(6):1933–1949. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01022.x

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics for physicians’ responses to CHD population prevalence assessments and diagnostic certainty for the individual patient

Physicians’ assessments of prevalence of CHD in U.S. adult population, %
 Higher in men 48.1
 Higher in women 7.0
 Similar for men and women 44.9
Certainty of CHD for the observed patient (mean, on a scale of 0-100)
 Female patient 53.0
 Male patient 61.7
Physicians’ change in certainty of CHD for the observed patient, with patient gender substitution, %
 Higher in a male patient 32.4
 Higher in a female patient 16.0
 Similar for a male or female patient 51.6
Consistency between physician estimate of prevalence and CHD certainty for the individual patient regarding gender effects
 Physicians who were consistent, % 51.6
 Physicians who were inconsistent, % 48.4