Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019 Mar 12;68(6):897–905. doi: 10.1007/s00262-019-02318-8

Table3:

Associations of rs1893217 and rs17388568 with response in anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 under different genetic modelsa

Additive Model
Dominant Model
Recessive Model
Anti-CTLA-4b
rs1893217
OR(95%CI) p-value OR(95%CI) p-value OR(95%CI) p-value



AA Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
AG 2.26(1.21-4.20)
0.01
2.79(1.36-5.73)
0.005
GG 5.11(2.97-9.51)
0.01
1.89(0.35-10.11)
0.45
Anti-PD-1c
rs17388568



GG Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
GA 0.38(0.21-0.67)
0.0008*
0.26(0.12-0.53) 0.0002*
AA 0.14(0.08-0.25) 0.0008* 0.38(0.11-1.33) 0.13
a

Models adjusted for age, sex and treatment drug (ipilimumab or tremelimumab; nivolumab or pembrolizumab)

b

N Controls= 78, N Cases= 135 (Controls: ICI responders; Cases: ICI non-responders); for the dominant model: the genotype group comparisons were as follows: AA (reference) vs AG/GG; for the recessive model: AA/AG(reference) vs GG

c

N Controls= 88, N Cases= 81 (Controls: ICI responders; Cases: ICI non-responders) ; for the dominant model: the genotype group comparisons were as follows: GG (reference) vs GA/AA; for the recessive model: GG/GA(reference) vs AA

*

Asterisk indicates p-value surpassing the Bonferroni multiple testing adjustment (p<0.002).