Table3:
Associations of rs1893217 and rs17388568 with response in anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 under different genetic modelsa
Additive Model |
Dominant Model |
Recessive Model |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anti-CTLA-4b rs1893217 |
OR(95%CI) | p-value | OR(95%CI) | p-value | OR(95%CI) | p-value |
AA | Reference |
Reference |
Reference |
Reference |
Reference |
Reference |
AG | 2.26(1.21-4.20) |
0.01 |
2.79(1.36-5.73) |
0.005 |
||
GG | 5.11(2.97-9.51) |
0.01 |
1.89(0.35-10.11) |
0.45 |
||
Anti-PD-1c rs17388568 |
||||||
GG | Reference |
Reference |
Reference |
Reference |
Reference |
Reference |
GA | 0.38(0.21-0.67) |
0.0008* |
0.26(0.12-0.53) | 0.0002* | ||
AA | 0.14(0.08-0.25) | 0.0008* | 0.38(0.11-1.33) | 0.13 |
Models adjusted for age, sex and treatment drug (ipilimumab or tremelimumab; nivolumab or pembrolizumab)
N Controls= 78, N Cases= 135 (Controls: ICI responders; Cases: ICI non-responders); for the dominant model: the genotype group comparisons were as follows: AA (reference) vs AG/GG; for the recessive model: AA/AG(reference) vs GG
N Controls= 88, N Cases= 81 (Controls: ICI responders; Cases: ICI non-responders) ; for the dominant model: the genotype group comparisons were as follows: GG (reference) vs GA/AA; for the recessive model: GG/GA(reference) vs AA
Asterisk indicates p-value surpassing the Bonferroni multiple testing adjustment (p<0.002).