Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: JACC CardioOncol. 2020 Mar 17;2(1):26–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.02.016

Table 2.

Differences, derived by least square mean (LSM) (95% confidence intervals), of centrally quantified echocardiographic parameters between cases and controls as a function of time prior to the index time point (i.e., cardiomyopathy diagnosis)*

≥6 years prior to index 4 to <6 years Prior to index 2 to <4 years prior to index <2 years prior to index Index timepoint All times prior to index >2 years prior to index
LV Systolic Function
2D derived FS, % 4.0 (1.2, 6.7) p=0.005 3.1 (0.7, 5.5) p=0.013 2.8 (0.7, 4.8) p=0.008 3.0 (1.0, 4.8) p=0.003 8.4 (6.7, 10.1) p<0.001 3.2 (1.9, 4.5) p<0.001 3.3 (1.7, 4.8) p<0.001
Biplane EF, % 2.8 (−3.2, 8.8) p=0.364 2.8 (−1.4, 7.0) p=0.194 4.8 (1.5, 8.1) p=0.006 4.6 (1.6, 7.6) p=0.004 12.4 (9.8, 15.0) p<0.001 3.7 (1.3, 6.1) p=0.003 3.5 (0.5, 6.4) p=0.023
Mitral S’ TDI, m/sec −0.005 (−0.025, 0.015) p=0.602 0.003 (−0.013, 0.019) p=0.700 0.007 (−0.007, 0.021) p=0.316 0.007 (−0.004, 0.018) p=0.193 0.027 (0.017, 0.038) p<0.001 0.003 (−0.005, 0.011) p=0.469 0.002 (−0.009, 0.012) p=0.745
Septal S’ TDI, m/sec −0.005 (−0.014, 0.003) p=0.234 0.003 (−0.004, 0.010) p=0.406 0.003 (−0.004, 0.009) p=0.421 −0.003 (−0.008, 0.003) p=0.366 0.012 (0.007, 0.017) p<0.001 −0.001 (−0.004, 0.003) p=0.778 0.000 (−0.004, 0.005) p=0.952
LV Diastolic Function
Mitral PW E/A ratio 0.59 (0.21, 0.96) p=0.002 0.07 (−0.27, 0.40) p=0.699 0.45 (0.16, 0.74) p=0.002 0.24 (−0.02, 0.50) p=0.069 0.56 (0.32, 0.80) p<0.001 0.34 (0.16, 0.51) p<0.001 0.37 (0.16, 0.58) p<0.001
Mitral E’ (m/sec) 0.014 (−0.018, 0.046); p=0.405 0.004 (−0.022, 0.029) p=0.784 0.013 (−0.010, 0.036) p=0.268 −0.001 (−0.017, 0.016) p=0.930 0.045 (0.029, 0.061) p<0.001 0.007 (−0.007, 0.021) p=0.307 0.010 (−0.007, 0.027) p=0.257
Mitral E/E’ ratio 0.10 (−1.62, 1.81) p=0.913 −0.38 (−1.69, 0.93) p=0.567 0.06 (−1.23, 1.35) p=0.927 −0.26 (−1.15, 0.62) p=0.560 −0.77 (−1.63, 0.08) p=0.078 −0.12 (−0.92, 0.67) p=0.762 −0.08 (−1.04, 0.89) p=0.878
Septal E’ TDI, m/sec −0.018 (−0.035, −0.002) p=0.032 0.010 (−0.004, 0.023) p=0.150 0.008 (−0.004, 0.021) p=0.192 −0.002 (−0.013−0.009) p=0.751 0.018 (0.009, 0.028) p<0.001 0.000 (−0.008, 0.007) p=0.918 0.000 (−0.009, 0.009) p=0.991
Septal E/E’ ratio 1.74 (0.33, 3.16) p=0.016 −0.46 (−1.61, 0.69) p=0.431 −0.26 (−1.35, 0.83) p=0.639 −0.16 (−1.09, 0.76) p=0.729 −0.07 (−0.90, 0.76) p=0.867 0.21 (−0.46, 0.89) p=0.533 0.34 (−0.47, 1.15) p=0.413
LV Combined Systolic/Diastolic Function
PW Doppler−derived MPI 0.006 (−0.036, 0.048) p=0.788 −0.030 (−0.065, 0.004) p=0.088 −0.032 (−0.064, 0.001) p=0.055 −0.026 (−0.055, 0.003) p=0.084 −0.061 (−0.088, −0.034) p<0.001 −0.021 (−0.039, −0.003) p=0.026 −0.019 (−0.041, 0.003) p=0.093
>6 years prior to index 4 to <6 years Prior to index 2 to <4 years prior to index <2 years prior to index Index timepoint All times prior to index >2 years prior to index
TDI−derived MPI 0.020 (−0.043, 0.084) p=0.536 −0.042 (−0.091, 0.008) p=0.100 −0.032 (−0.075, 0.011) p=0.144 0.001 (−0.041, 0.043) p=0.962 −0.063 (−0.101, −0.026) p=0.001 −0.013 (−0.042, 0.016) p=0.374 −0.018 (−0.053, 0.017) p=0.314
LV Size and Geometry
Posterior wall thickness, z-score −0.26 (−0.81, 0.30) p=0.364 −0.11 (−0.58, 0.35) p=0.628 −0.16 (−0.57, 0.25) p=0.437 −0.03 (−0.39, 0.33) p=0.867 0.10 (−0.21,0.41) p=0.532 −0.14 (−0.42, 0.14) p=0.330 −0.18 (−0.52, 0.16) p=0.305
End diastolic dimension, z-score −0.28 (−1.04, 0.47) p=0.462 −0.87 (−1.49, −0.25) p=0.006 −1.09 (−1.64, −0.55) p<0.001 −0.81 (−1.31, −0.32) p=0.001 −1.18 (−1.62, −0.74) p<0.001 −0.77 (−1.19, −0.34) p<0.001 −0.75 (−1.24, − 0.26) p=0.003
Thickness to dimension ratio −0.001 (−0.016, 0.014) p=0.864 0.005 (−0.008, 0.018) p=0.439 0.005 (−0.005, 0.016) p=0.321 0.006 (−0.004, 0.016) p=0.231 0.013 (0.004, 0.022) p=0.004 0.004 (−0.004, 0.011) p=0.323 0.003 (−0.006, 0.012) p=0.507

Abbreviations: 2D, two dimensional; EF, ejection fraction; FS, fractional shortening; LV, left ventricular; MPI, myocardial performance index; PW, pulsed wave Doppler derived; TDI, tissue Doppler imaging

*

Differences were based on comparisons of LSMs from longitudinal mixed models for each measure, including an interaction between case status and time period, using an autoregressive correlation structure between echocardiograms for the same patient. For example, at the index time point, the estimated FS is 8.5% greater in controls, as compared to cases; at the <2 year time point, the estimated FS is 3.0% greater in controls as compared to cases.