Table 3.
Model results: delinquency | ||||||||||
Unconstrained | Constrained | Difference | ||||||||
Chi-square | df | RMSEA | SRMR | Chi-square | df | RMSEA | SRMR | Chi-square | df | p value |
0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 26.70 | 43 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 26.70 | 43 | 0.976 |
Rank | Mean | Wald | p value | |||||||
1 | 4.59 | 1 v 2 | −4.99 | 0.000 | ||||||
2 | 6.08 | 2 v 3 | −4.15 | 0.000 | ||||||
3 | 7.00 | 3 v 4 | −3.01 | 0.003 | ||||||
4 | 7.68 | |||||||||
Model-estimated means: delinquency | ||||||||||
N | Fall 6th | Spring 6th | Fall 7th | Spring 7th | Fall 8th | Spring 8th | ||||
SC females—cohort 3 | 428 | 4.59 | 7.00 | 6.08 | 7.68 | 7.68 | 7.00 | |||
SC males—cohort 3 | 401 | 6.08 | 8.62 | 8.62 | 8.62 | 8.62 | 8.62 | |||
DM females—cohort 3 | 444 | 4.59 | 7.00 | 6.08 | 6.08 | 6.08 | 6.08 | |||
DM males—cohort 3 | 399 | 6.08 | 8.62 | 7.68 | 7.68 | 7.68 | 7.00 | |||
SC females—cohort 4 | 418 | 4.59 | 7.00 | 6.08 | 7.68 | 7.68 | 7.00 | |||
SC males—cohort 4 | 392 | 6.08 | 7.68 | 7.68 | 7.68 | 7.68 | 7.00 | |||
DM females—cohort 4 | 460 | 4.59 | 7.00 | 6.08 | 6.08 | 6.08 | 6.08 | |||
DM males—cohort 4 | 359 | 6.08 | 7.68 | 7.68 | 7.68 | 7.68 | 7.00 |
SC standard condition, DM Dating Matters Comprehensive condition