Table 3.
Model results and model-estimated means for sexual harassment perpetration
| Model results: sexual harassment perpetration | ||||||||||
| Unconstrained | Constrained | Difference | ||||||||
| Chi-square | df | RMSEA | SRMR | Chi-square | df | RMSEA | SRMR | Chi-square | df | p value |
| 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 55.86 | 44 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 55.86 | 44 | 0.108 |
| Rank | Mean | Wald | p value | |||||||
| 1 | 1.34 | 1 v 2 | −6.72 | 0.000 | ||||||
| 2 | 3.05 | 2 v 3 | −5.46 | 0.000 | ||||||
| 3 | 4.02 | 3 v 4 | −5.16 | 0.000 | ||||||
| 4 | 4.96 | |||||||||
| Model-estimated means: sexual harassment perpetration | ||||||||||
| N | Fall 6th | Spring 6th | Fall 7th | Spring 7th | Fall 8th | Spring 8th | ||||
| SC Females—Cohort 3 | 428 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.02 | 3.05 | 4.96 | 4.96 | |||
| SC Males—Cohort 3 | 401 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.02 | 4.96 | 4.96 | |||
| DM Females—Cohort 3 | 444 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.02 | 3.05 | 4.02 | 4.02 | |||
| DM Males—Cohort 3 | 399 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.02 | 4.02 | 4.02 | |||
| SC Females—Cohort 4 | 418 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.02 | 3.05 | 4.02 | 4.02 | |||
| SC Males—Cohort 4 | 392 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 3.05 | 4.96 | 4.96 | |||
| DM Females—Cohort 4 | 460 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.02 | 3.05 | 4.02 | 4.02 | |||
| DM Males—Cohort 4 | 359 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 3.05 | 4.96 | 4.96 | |||
Note. SC standard-of-care condition, DM Dating Matters condition