Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2021 Feb 23;118:106879. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106879

Table 1.

Demographic, COVID-19-related, and psychosocial characteristics according to groups defined by reports of binge drinking

Groups According to Self-Reported Binge Drinking (BD) Level Before and After Campus Closure
Post-Closure Level Differs from Pre-
Post-Closure Level Same as Pre-
Lower BD %(N)/Mean (SD) Higher BD %(N)/Mean (SD) Consistent No BD %(N)/Mean (SD) Consistent BD %(N)/Mean (SD) P-value Total Sample %(N)/Mean (SD)

Demographic Variables
Sex
 Female 64.38% (188) 54.84% (17) 63.59% (234) 66.00% (33) 0.746 63.70% (472)
 Male 35.62% (104) 45.16% (14) 36.41% (134) 34.00% (17) 36.30% (269)
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White 89.04% (269) 80.65% (25) 74.18% (269) 96.00% (48) <0.001 81.78% (607)
 Other 10.96% (32) 19.35% (6) 25.82% (95) 4.00% (2) 18.22% (136)
Living with parents post-closure
 Yes 96.23% (281) 90.32% (28) 92.93% (342) 94.00% (47) 0.247 94.20% (698)
 No 3.77% (11) 9.68% (3) 7.07% (26) 6.00% (3) 5.80% (43)
COVID-19 Variables
Had COVID-19 symptoms 8.45% (25) 16.13% (5) 7.67% (29) 14.81% (8) 0.162 8.83% (67)
Concerned about getting COVID-19 (0 to 3) 0.70 (0.61) 0.74 (0.68) 0.71 (0.62) 0.64 (0.60) 0.863 0.70 (0.61)
Worried about COVID-19 situation (0 to 4) 2.02 (1.00) 1.81 (1.08) 1.96 (1.04) 1.96 (1.14) 0.706 1.98 (1.03)
Feel alone because of COVID-19 (0 to 5) 2.37 (1.17) 2.23 (1.28) 2.10 (1.21) 2.40 (1.05) 0.022a 2.23 (1.19)
Psychosocial Variables
Pledged Greek life 20.20% (60) 25.81% (8) 7.16% (27) 20.37% (11) <0.001 13.77% (102)
Drinking motives (1 to 5)
 Coping 1.83 (0.70) 1.73 (0.71) 1.47 (0.62) 1.83 (0.93) <0.001b 1.71 (0.72)
 Social 3.29 (0.95) 3.43 (0.94) 2.53 (1.06) 3.05 (1.12) <0.001c 3.05 (1.06)
 Conformity 1.40 (0.59) 1.45 (0.58) 1.38 (0.65) 1.41 (0.64) 0.938 1.39 (0.61)
 Enhancement 2.99 (0.98) 2.24 (3.75) 2.14 (0.95) 2.83 (0.95) <0.001d 2.68 (1.34)
Perception of % of other first-year students that currently drink (0 to 100) 38.89 (22.27) 51.03 (22.61) 39.48 (21.57) 43.56 (22.62) 0.018e 40.01 (22.07)
Intervention Groups
 Control 34.93% (102) 25.81% (8) 35.05% (129) 34.00% (17) 0.773 34.55% (256)
 Treatment 65.07% (190) 64.95% (239) 66.00% (33) 74.19% (23) 65.45% (485)

P-values are from chi-square tests for categorical measures and F-tests for continuous measures.

COVID-19 refers to the novel coronavirus.

a

The difference between the consistent no binge drinking group and the group that decreased binge drinking was the only statistically significant pairwise comparison.

b

For coping drinking motive, the consistent no binge drinking group had a statistically significant difference from the consistent binge group and the decrease group; no other pairwise comparisons were statistically significant.

c

For social drinking motive, the consistent no binge drinking group has a statistically significant difference from all other groups; no other pairwise comparison was statistically significant.

d

For enhancement, the consistent no binge drinking group differed significantly from the decrease and consistent binge group, and the difference between the decrease and increase group was statistically significant.

e

The differences for the group that increased binge drinking compared to the groups that decreased and did not binge drink were statistically significant.

N=741; samples for motive drinking variables only included students who did not respond to the option of “I do not drink” in the motive scale.